To get everything Brilliant has to offer and a 30 day free trial visit www.brilliant.org/jabzy. The first 200 people to sign up will get 20% off an Annual Subscription!

You should highlight the individual locations (cities/towns) that you are describing as you speak about them. Hearing all of these unfamiliar locations becomes confusing. Other than that great video.

Im a korean christion so i have nothing to do with islam but every muslim person ive met were so nice and it seemed like they had confidence in the righteousness of their belief. Its just so unfortunate that extremism is hurting the identity and image of the religon and the innocent people who believe in it

I’ve been watching your videos since your 3 minute history series. I truly love how far you’ve come and how this channel just keeps improving.

Jabzy's timing is impeccable.

This was a good video... so much overlooked details

Hey Jabzy, great fan of your videos, especially on China. Could you add your sources in the descriptions for further reading for history enthusiasts like me? Keep up the good work. Bless you.

another superb video weird how little details are known and how little written sources exist for certain parts of the Arab world throughout the early modern period

Glad to see your video gets better and better ever since I first saw you a few years ago lol

You need better maps. It’s so complicated subject matter that it would really help if the places you mention were more clearly marked or highlighted on the map. It’s fascinating stuff btw

Really interesting video.

Jabzy did a really good job in the research part 🗿

In high school I had a government teacher tell me when I was doing a debate on if Islam is a violent religion, I was arguing that it is not. I brought up Wahhabism and he had the audacity to tell me that I was lying that Wahhabism was a made up word😂

Folks this is the content we should go out of out way to support.

Btw "wahabbism" is an insult used by the Ottomans on the followers of Muhammad Ibin AbdulWahab, The Imam did not create a new sect nor did he call for something new. He only called for a revivalist salafist movement. Wahabbis (real wahabbis) are an Ibadi movement from Morrocco, the followers of AbdulWahab Ibin Rustum, not the followers of Muhammad Ibin AbdulWahab who is a Sunni Hanbali Salafi Revivalist.

My god.. watching your videos i have really come to appreciate what a mess the middle east really is/was... My god.. how you can keep track of all this is incredible!

Great video keep it up you're doing amazing things 😁👍

Within 6h when 9.8k. Just when I heard more about the different idea streams, I get this video. Dude, very cool

I love Jabzy. With respect and admiration from Kerala, India!

Thanks for the video and knowledge

Tribalism and nomadism, just as they expanded in the Middle East also expanded in North Africa at the same time and without the Mongol invasion, the reason is most likely climate change in the so-called Little Ice Age that began in the 14th century AD and the drought it caused that prompted many to leave the sedentary life and return to nomadism. Nomadism made it difficult for the state to settle and extend its control over all the country , so the Little Ice Age also contributed to the spread of nomadism in the Middle East in addition to the Mongol invasion The Wahhabi was very extremist, but this does not mean that all of its objections were wrong. The Sufism that dominated the Islamic world at that time spread many superstitions, sorcery, and polytheism but the extremism of the Wahhabis and their violence against the other muslims is what made many Muslims reject them from the time they appeared until today, even if some Wahhabi reformed their ideas and toned down their extremism , ad to that that now the largest part of Wahhabism has become a tool in the hands of the House of Saud, and their religious views have become consistent with what the House of Saud wants

Fantastic work as always!

wonderful video❤

After 5 minutes I said hold up, after 9 minutes I had no idea what to even think about, great narration though

Interesting information

Great timing.

.. الدولة السعودية الأولى والثانية والثالثة كانت قادرة على إبادة كل الأقليات المخالفة لها آيديولوجيا.. مثل الموجودة بالقطيف والأحساء أو في نجران وجيزان أو في جدة والمدينة.. كل هذي الأقليات (باستثناء نجران) ما كانت تملك قوة العسكرية تنافس القوة الموجودة عند الدولة السعودية. هذا يعني إن إبادتهم عن بكرة أبيهم ما يتطلب مجهود عسكري أو تخطيط، والأسباب اللي تبرر إبادتهم موجودة، وهي إقامة الشرع حسب فهم محمد بن عبدالوهاب.. والمنفعة السياسية من إبادتهم أيضا موجودة وهي السيطرة المطلقة على ميناء العقير وعلى المناطق المطلة على الخليج اللي كان بوابتهم للعالم، بالإضافة إلى السيطرة على الحرمين وعلى ميناء جدة.. بكذا تكون اجتمعت عندك ثلاث نقاط: (المقدرة والتبرير والمنفعة)، لكن اللي منعك من هذا كله هو وازعك الأخلاقي اللي من الصعب جدا تجد له نظير لا بالتاريخ الحديث ولا بالتاريخ القديم.. لكن كلنا نعرف ان المسلمين في غالبهم من الاعاجم و مستعربين من احفاد الاعاجم عدائهم لنا كعرب وجودي لا علاقة له بالدين او التطرف او الكلام الفاضي ذا كله . اعداء قولا واحدا ونقطة اخر السطر .

Can you share your sources? I want to read more on the subject

wow timed this well

For the idiots who defends Wahhabism and other salafi movements: Calling themselves "true believers/Muslims" and accusing others as being infidels and claiming "real Islam" wasn't practiced since the time of the Prophet and Salaf al-Salihun is simply extreme stupidity, ignorance and kufr.

Exactly the video I wanted

Thank you very much👍🏼

Talk about timely upload

Thank you for your great work ❤

Al-Fahd's argument centres on proving that the Ottoman state was not a caliphate. The title of his pamphlet invokes the term al-dawla al-othmaniyya (Ottoman state). Later on al-Fahd uses al-dawla al-turkiyya (the Turkish state) in order to anchor the polity in a nationalistic framework, thus limit ing its authenticity among Muslims at least the Arabs among them. His main objection to the Ottoman/Turkish polity is its deliberate attempt to corrupt the creed of Muslims, thus turning them into mushrik, association ists who do not strictly adhere to the principle of tauhid (monotheism). In his assessment of the nature of this state, two important objections are raised: first, the state spread blasphemy; second, it fought monotheism. The main manifestation of blasphemy is the spread of Sufism in the ter ritories of the Ottoman caliphate. Citing those who lament the fall of the Ottoman caliphate, for example the contemporary Egyptian thinker 'Abd al-'Aziz al-Shinawi, al-Fahd lists sources that confirm the spread of Sufism among Muslims. While Sufism was present in early Islamic caliphates, it was the Ottoman caliphate that made it the 'religion of the people', accord ing to al-Fahd. In his view the Sufi traditions that flourished among Mus lims under the rule of the Ottomans were closer to Shi'ism than to the Sunni tradition. Both Sufism and Shi'ism are denounced by Wahhabis. Al-Fahd argues that without Ottoman encouragement and financial sup port Sufism would not have penetrated Muslim societies as far as Albania, Central Asia, and the Arab world.

Fitting video for what’s happening

Very very interesting

You say alwahab, which is incorrect. His name was Mohammed ibn abdulwahab altamimi. And there was no packet between Mohammed ibn saud and ibn abdulwahab, he only allowed him to preach his teachings and he prevented ibn abdulwahab to exit diryiah

Wahab destroying religious artifacts (martyr history) is kinda fishy

I think it will be more devastating once majority of middle east citizens starts to question everything and study history from different perspectives. but people not liking change alone prevents it. none of the system we're born in are perfect , in fact corruption runs from the bottom to top anywhere you go. that reason alone should be the fuel for us to work together.

Great work as always! Might catch alot of heat from salafis but it's worth it. Another great resource for this is The Kingdom by Robert Lacey

Wow.... impeccable timing.

Can u please do a history of Al-Andalus, from the Muslim conquest to the fall of Granada.

27:40 it's kinda shocking when you hear you great great grandfather's name in a video accidentally 😅😅

I Love watching History- _any_ history. But this video struck me as too much too fast. Maybe I'm just too tired, but I can usually follow.

1:15 I think it is Enderunlu Fazıl/Fazil. Enderun was a school in Ottoman Empire. Just wanted to fix the typo. Loving your work.

'Al-Wahhab' - name of God "Ibn Abdilwahhab" - Son of the Worshipper of al-Wahhab (God)

Great timing lol

The kingdom of Algiers situation was special as it became a sultanate before joining the Ottomans as a nominal vessel recognizing their Caliphate status in exchange for aid in their wars againat the Spanish,Saadis and Hafsids. Which was the reason they were given the title of Byler baylek "kingdom of kingdoms" and were given authority to appoint governors in Tunis and Tripoli for being the one to conquer them into Ottoman states. However Algiers after facing unrest and instability in the early 17th century due to Ottoman interference in politics was appointed with agahs whic Algerians weren't happy with as they looked for Ottoman interest rather than that of Algerians which caused Algerians to rebel and establish the Republic of Algiers in 1671 with the Sultans given the title "Dey" meaning uncle of Algerians (A title still used today for algerian presidents though in Arabic) this newly regime would go to war with Europeans and force many to pay tribute for passage in the Mediterranean sea against Ottoman interests which also remarks their independence from the Ottomans and ties kept to military support between the two sides in wars.After this, the republic would go to secure its borders with Morocco and force all its neighbors to submit and pay tribute as well (With tunis becoming a vessel of Algiers instead of the Ottomans) as Algiers viewed it as its right to subjugate its neighbors for it was for her who conquered them the first time and lost its influence due to Ottoman meddling in politics. In the other hand. Tunis viewed itself as equals to Algiers in authority and shouldn't be subjugated which led them to ally with Morocco (Who faced defeat prior and had ambitions in Algerian territory) and Attack Algeria from two fronts starting the Maghrebi war with tripoli joining on behalf of the ottomans in an attempt to supdue the revolting republic of Algiers. This war although ended with the defeat of the alliance and military victory of Algiers by defending itself, it had caused unrest in the region with revolts occuring in the 4 states for the years that follow which you've mentioned in the video. Algiers however would completely this time end the dual leadreship that existed from 1671-1710 and the diwan (Synonym to parliament) would elect a single ruling authority no matter his race as long as he's muslim and proves his worth working for the intrests of the nation (Rulers of Algerian decent were still elected). Also its unfair to say this states main income was piracy when they exported grain and coral to european nations. Mainly the republic of algiers and France who held close ties that went as far as Algiers supporting French revolution and lending them money and grain through the state-jew owned company during the blockade France faced in the Napoleonic wars. As those pirates were free lancers who had to pay taxes for the state to use their ports and trade and raid nations which are at war with one of the Barbary states.

So this Al wahab bloke has done more damage to humanity than Karl marx. Thanks. Deick.

Well the timing on this one was pretty excellent, or poor depending on your view

20:49 "Ayyy!"

I generally thought about this aspect. Despite not being an occupation form, the Ottoman Empire's successes in destroying the Salafi movement, at least for a while, and their partial colonisation there in the Arabian peninsula (save for Oman) did curtail the Salafis and isolated their realm.

I don't know everything about wahabi that's if it's even a real thing but i do know that going back to the source material is best, so salafism is great in theory but those who form groups that give it a bad rep is the problem, you don't have to be extreme if you wanna be authentic

8:27 Thank God for the Anglo-Zanzibar war that broke the slavers and led to many African slaves being freed. The British don't get nearly enough credit for this and many more acrions against Arab slavers.

Fantastic level of detail, but by the end of the video it was hard to follow exactly what the changes in North Africa had to do with the rise of extremism.

the miscut duplicated audio makes me think I’m going crazy

5:18 Take a shot everytime Iran looses a war to small neighbours

Dad: is the on of the documentary sites like Magellan? Me: it’s just Jabzy Dad: what did you just call me

24:14 America casually showing up in the most unexpected time and place 😂

I thikl you forget when a Shia Ismailiyah remnants attack Dari'iyyah with the Former ruler of Riyadh Daham ibn Dawaas, you also missed some detail like battle between Dar'iyyah and Uyaynah under al Muammar or Al Ma'mar family, the ones who expelled Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab because of Bani Khalid Pressure and Sulaiman bin Abdul Wahab, Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab's older brother

Will this series end at 1800 or go beyond it a little?

رحمة الله الإمام محمد بن سعود و الشيخ محمد بن عبدالوهاب ❤

3/10??? I knew these sounded and felt like they cut off in the middle of a thought or explanation but 10 parts?! By the Gods!

do a vid on the dhofar rebellion

It was always a threat to other cultures. A quick glance at its history will tell you so.

I hate this so much and everyone knows this and yet these countries are never held accountable everyone knows Qatar has long sponsored terrorists yet they are free 😢😢

Although Ottomans were not perfect they kept the peace in middle east. It's a pity extremists opened a new front against already struggling empire only to make them get colonized and suffer to this day.

The map of Morocco during the sherifian empire is wrong, Morocco go further in the Sahara, they gave allegeance to the sultan until the Senegal river in the south, to tumbuctou in the west.

Footnote: The portuguese that left Mazagão mentioned in 23:55 resettled in northern Brazil, then again a few kilometers to the north Edit: and they named the new colonies as Mazagão too (the first one is now Mazagão Velho - Old Mazagão - ignoring that the oldest city with this name is the moroccan one)

I think that extremism has always, since the very start, been a great part of the religion. Many practitioners maybe peaceful and loving in their demeanor, the officials writings can only lead towards extremism.

If theyre so against idolatry and idols, then they should tear down that black stone they all are forced to go to if they are able and walk around it

Did I miss it? Was there any mention of the Jewish origins of the Saud and Wahab?

7:37 is that an Arabic Vsauce?

Biased (unknowingly perhaps): ibn Abdul wahab preached against the scammers who ran shrines in Arabia and ‘for a fee’ would ‘guide’ visitors to a way out of their problems. Couples unable to conceive, people with business and debt problems, diseases, etc - it was the standard scam: come the shrine pay money and the ‘dead saint’ buried here (died 200 years ago) will ‘help give your prayers a boost!’. The other tribal clan leaders who would sometimes get a cut from these ‘fees’ or a least saw the economy in their area boosted by ‘shrine pilgrims’ didn’t like the preaching obviously and so pushed for his imprisonment or expulsion. There is no doubt whatsoever that these were UN-Islamic practices as the Quran commands people to ask God and God alone for their supplications and the practice of asking dead saints came about centuries later as muslims conquered Egypt, Iran, Turkey etc and ideas of these types slowly got imported with a ‘local flavour’. When ibn saud gave him refuge the surrounding clans besieged diriyah and threatened all out war. So it wasn’t ibn saud or ibn wahhab who were looking for an armed conflict , rather the other tribes who were ‘pro calling out to dead human saints’ (something medieval Christianity was more than familiar with!) thought it would be simple to beat the Al saud clan and ibn Abdul wahab. Interestingly Sufis, Shiites, also preferred the ‘call out to dead men’ system as both Sufis and Shiites had shrines in their day-to-day rituals. But once the sword was unseathed the saud clan surprisingly won victory after victory not least because many ordinary Arabian were also questioning the whole bizzare, scheme of ‘pay money to shrine manager and then a dead ‘saint’ from under his grave will give your prayers a boost!’ . Regarding the ottomans they had by the mid-1700s degenrated - example ottoman sultans would not marry but rather stick to the harems as they saw offspring from marriage kill easchother for succession etc! So ibn Abdul wahhab said all this type of ‘European monarchy machinations’ happening in Istanbul amd going against the important core social fabric of marriage in Islam made the ottomans unfit to rule. Anyway you get the picture: the pro-sufi and pro-shia shrine lovers wanted a military conflict as they miscalculate. After initial stunning victories both ibn saud and ibn A.H realized that these guys just tried to kill them all so the miltary campaigns must niw continue till the scourge of non-Islamic practices (and financial exploitation) is gone from Arabia.

when u are doing the "When did the american extremism become a threat?" video?

Sounds peaceful

As a Muslim born and raised in America I’ve always looked as Muslims not from here as different until I went and traveled through the Middle East from Palestine to Saudi Arabia to Pakistan and my views changed as i met some of the nicest people I’ve ever met plus I felt safer there than I ever did here which is odd since I was actually sort of scared to go travel moral of the story don’t belive anything you see on the media and form opinions on things by experiences and not from hearsay

Safavid and Afsharid not persia (Turkic)

From the very start.

the timing on this one, algorithm gonna take it to the moon

When the governments became arms of the oppressive colonial powers.. Same problem

The Wahhabis have become kind of a catch-all for hardline traditionalism. Proper Salafis were executing Daesh in the 2010s

Somewhere around 610 AD..

the thumb nail looks like a chade meme tamplate

Wahhabis in Central Arabia that ended the first Sa'udi-Wahhabi state in 1818. In his historical recollection of the destruction of Deriyya, the first capital of the Wahhabis, al-Fahd reminds his audience of the atrocities committed against Wahhabi muwahidun (monotheists). In this destruction, al-Fahd argues, the Ottomans sought the help of the Christian infidels, more particularly Napoleon. In their exchanges they discussed the Wahhabi movement and what should be done to eliminate it. According to al-Fahd correspondence between the Ottoman Sultan and Napoleon indicates that the former resorted to help from infi dels against true Muslims, an act that is not permissible and cannot be justi fied. Al-Fahd lists violent acts committed by Ottoman soldiers against Wahhabis whose cars were cut and sent to Istanbul. Soldiers were given special rewards for killing Wahhabis. Women and children were taken as sabaya, women war booty, then sold as slaves. When Wahhabi imams were captured in 1818, they were carried to Istanbul where their heads were cut off and thrown in the sea. Special prayers were held at the time to thank God. This, says al-Fahd, is not a caliphate, it is dawlat al-kufr al-turkiyya, a blasphemous Turkish state. Wahhabis, therefore, did not rebel against an Islamic authority because the Ottoman caliphate was dar al-harb, the land of war, where the rebellion of the Wahhabis was justified. If the caliphate committed atrocities, sought help from infidels, and spread blasphemy, then fighting it was not simply justified but required from the true believer, according to al-Fahd.

1:23 This is false sodomy was forbidden by ottoman law even in 1840 even though ''being homosexual'' was legalised it was still forbidden to engage in sodomy

Since day 1

14:11 Make cartographers hate you with these few simple tricks!

20:08 arabia jumpscare

there’s no such thing as wahhabism. sheikh ibn abdulwahab didn’t invent something out of his mind he just brought back our old values and authentic teachings of Islam which is referred to as salafiya not wahhabism. because the ottoman empire changed islam a lot and in a terrible way. it got to the point where people worshipped shrines and dead saints.

I would argue islamic extemism rooted from wertern colonilisation/imperialism and oppression on muslim. Indonesia was far from wahabi influences, but islamic extemism was wild during our independence gaining process back then. and whomever european colonizer called as terrorists, are now called national heroes. the thing is, fighting for your freedom, identity, culture, land, pride etc was rather a foreign concept by indonesian. people were so discouraged to fight due to realisation of our shortcomings, european was so superior so why bother fight while obeying and befriending them gave tenfold adavantages then fighting? but when religious authorities declared "european are infidels and you're commanded by God to fight them, cowards will be punished severely in hell", you've given peasant a warrior spirit.

“History” yall get it “HIS STORY”

History has shown that Frankish law of succession is the best, even though it fractures the state lol

please do a Kurdish history video

Why is everyone talking about "timing"? What happened?

Spicy Japanese horse radish that looks like ice cream.

REAL ANSWER: Since the birth of Islam in the 7th century.

The real answer is when Oil was discovered in Islamic countries.

In 2022 - Versace Bedouins