It's also easier to launch closer to the equator, hence Cape Canaveral being in Florida.
@VegasTigger2 місяці тому
physics for the win.
@K4Cubing2 місяці тому
Cape Canaveral was already in Florida
@Charles-7Місяць тому
french guiana is better, as it's WAY closer to the equator.
@darkfur18Місяць тому
@@Charles-7 you also have to ship the rocket across the Atlantic
@Charles-7Місяць тому
@@darkfur18 and that's what the ESA does often as most of Europe is too far north anyway, and it's too risky to have a launch pad near any populated and/or historical areas.
@SovTheCherub2 місяці тому
Launch rocket from another rocket, too easy
@mileswithau2 місяці тому
Hey! I think I've seen that before
@edbangor91632 місяці тому
I mean, We did figure out how to launch. Anti-satellite missiles from the wing of a fighter jet. It's really not that different
@axlrose3572 місяці тому
Every multi stage rockets doing just that.
@HotelPapa1002 місяці тому
@@axlrose357 r/woosh
@TheBrickSquad11Місяць тому
Even better launch rocket from space
@rhobeans2 місяці тому
Okay hear me out…we hollow out Mt. Everest and turn it into a gigantic VAB and just gradually elevate the rockets up to the top as they’re being built.
@jonathanbuzzard13762 місяці тому
If you can land both stages then you can just fly your rocket to the launch point for the actual missions. No need to drag it up the mountain.
@willoughbykrenzteinburgМісяць тому
@@jonathanbuzzard1376This defeats the entire purpose..... If you're going to launch your rocket just to land it from the "launch site" on top of a mountain.....just keep going and launch it all the way. No need for a wasteful landing on a mountain just to relaunch from there.
@jonathanbuzzard1376Місяць тому
@@willoughbykrenzteinburg You only need to fly it to the top of the mountain *once*. You don't build aeroplanes at airports.
@sanjaynataraj20092 місяці тому
Why not just launch rockets from space instead?
@James-zp5po2 місяці тому
Because nothing has ever been to space
@korakiouranos88192 місяці тому
@@James-zp5po Go back to your basement and put on your tinfoil hat buddy, nothing can hurt you there. As for why we don't launch rockets from space; it's really difficult to get the parts, or the materials to make those parts, once you're already in Earth's orbit. The nearest raw materials are back down the gravity well you just spent so much effort getting out of. Even way in the future it might just be simpler to build rockets on the surface and launch them there, but on different planets or in an asteroid belt it's much easier to find the raw materials you'd need to build something, without having to worry about that pesky gravity.
@FirstLast-vt3ii2 місяці тому
@@James-zp5po * true - for thousands of years, until 1949. Difficult, but we figured it out.
@James-zp5po2 місяці тому
@@FirstLast-vt3ii nukes don't exist and nothing has ever been to space astronauts get their astronaut wings at 50 milles high for a reason because they know they will never go above the 62 mile mark you might want to learn to start thinking instead of just repeating what you heard someone else say
@KerbalOnDresМісяць тому
Mom is calling you for dinner Flat Earther@@James-zp5po
@georgesj.5995Місяць тому
France and Europe (ESA) have the ideal launching base with Kourou Space Center in French Guiana, extremely close to the Equator...
@BigDaddyWes29 днів тому
The most optimal launch platform would be one that's already in orbit.
@Planetery_Dragon2 місяці тому
ROCKET science is too easy with everyday astronaut
@dannop2562Місяць тому
I think, if a major conflict opens up between superpowers, we will find that intercontinental missiles are launched from all sorts of places we never expected…
@Liquid_Mike5 годин тому
I think the Mariana trench cannon in the game Soma makes sense
@ginnybennett47782 місяці тому
Trying to get a rocket up to the mountain doesnt seem like an easy job
@jonathanbuzzard13762 місяці тому
Yes an no. Traditionally yes it's hard. If you can land your rocket, you just fly it to it's launch location and the problem is solved.
@I_dont_want_an_atМісяць тому
Infrastructure is a beautiful thing, if you bother to build it
@PalmBeachFlorida2419 днів тому
Dont drive the rockets up a road. Make the rockets at the peak.
@AlexDiesTrying25 днів тому
Scientific videos from a real person with no fluff whatsoever. That's how youtube should be.
@I_dont_want_an_atМісяць тому
it is a worthy trade off. We just haven't bothered. Some mountains have better weather and obviously you'd build escalators to make the trio up the mountain easy as pie. If we're serious, we'll do it one day
@theyetti-4045Місяць тому
He did get the answer, its cost vs gain, cost of doing a project like this is not worth the gain we would actually get, the gain is so little aswell to the cost of building the rocket that it could take years before doing such a project would pay off due to the tiny bit less required to get it into space so not really worth it, its just more practical to build it on land that is basically 90 percent ready to have a launch system built on it.
@SmedleyButler1Місяць тому
Id watch full length if given a link
@Alasaurus_rexМісяць тому
The equator would be easier but the practicality of getting the rocket, the equipment and the people all to the top of the mountain and set up a base there would be almost impossible
@sussybussyboy3622 місяці тому
Just launch a rocket in space, actually so simple
@primenumberbuster404Місяць тому
Sus
@shijielc9112Місяць тому
haha😂
@Vasy2310Місяць тому
Actually, in the future, when we will build bases on the Moon, we will do that!
@MagnolyiaGraceМісяць тому
If I were to play this in a game, I would build my rocket manufacturing assembly unit on top of the mountain. I'd use as much resources from the mountain as possible and have the rest delivered and then just build the rockets there.
@BorkenovМісяць тому
I mean, a place like Honolulu, Hawaii is a land mass rising out of the ocean higher than Mount Everest. Basically that summit-plateau would be a great place to launch rockets from but... it's an ancient burial site or something.. protected by laws for National landmarks.. that'll fine you big.. So yeah, new plan! Spin launcher baby!!!
@zyxwvutsrqponmlkhМісяць тому
Few places it could be doable for retrograde orbits. Because those are oh so common.
@PinkLemnadeМісяць тому
dig into the mountain at the base and have a mechazilla -like elevator lift it up through the middle of the mountain to the top instead of hauling it up. underground bunker facility + height advantage + every % you dont need to compensate for is distance / weight you can put into space. If you wanted to you could probably even invest in technology that helps make the weather a little better, would probably be best to do this in a location in which the wildlife isnt really special or there isnt much at all. or we could fix all of these problems and just skyhook. Time to go asteroid mining for materials so building giant stuff is cheap!
@Asterra2Місяць тому
I'ma treat this entire hypothetical as an excuse to underscore the country that infamously has no such restrictions on overflying populated areas.
@johnrymszewiczМісяць тому
Build a rocket elevator!
@MyMaster151228 днів тому
The fact that this has to be explained worries me
@PaulDeanBumgarnerМісяць тому
Because getting off the ground is the hard part, Once you lift off, flying through the air to get to space is relatively straightforward, more a function of your longitude than the altitude.
@ellayararwhyaych4711Місяць тому
I think you mean latitude.
@2750casjonМісяць тому
Do an Elon.. By the mountain, and make it into a Rocket factory... 😂😂
@robertlackey7212Місяць тому
Sounds like the argument against reusable rockets , Sounds good until someone does it and it works.
@CourtAboveTheCutМісяць тому
Probably a dumb comment but I have often wondered if they could build a tower on Olympus mons to dock with, meaning they don't need to launch and land through mars thin atmosphere
@EverydayAstronautМісяць тому
The atmosphere is actually super helpful for landing! It bleeds off about 90% of orbital velocity which means you don't need to do a massive retro propulsive burn to slow down and land on mars, like you do the moon. It can actually require less propellant to land on Mars than the Moon because of this, despite Mars having much more gravity.
@FirstLast-vt3ii2 місяці тому
I heard a scientist saying that for “sun synchronous orbit” that launching from around 45° latitude is favourable. Could this be true?
@Jona692 місяці тому
Yes. At the equator you actually get to much speed from the earths rotation for a sun synchronous orbit, so you have to cancel a bit of it out.
@tyranamorМісяць тому
I know all of you are here for the rocket launching explanation. However I'm looking at Pike's peak thinking about how fast of a sprint record I can achieve with parts of a rocket strapped on a celica gt four st025.
@zachmoyer184924 дні тому
you would need sharp vector steering and it needs to be able to turn on and off and have decent throttle range so it would actually be better to use a jet engine plus then you don't need to carry an oxidizer which lightens the vehicle
@user-dv4mo6ee3oМісяць тому
When you going to the moon Dodders? Still confident that you'll survive?
@user-yq7zn4nx9bМісяць тому
Build it on the mountain
@reallyreallypanda8969Місяць тому
Unstable weather conditions and getting everything up thr mt
@jerrylowe7658Місяць тому
Where you going to watch the IFT-3 from?
@mikemcleroy8265Місяць тому
Or, they’d come down on land, instead of falling into the ocean, like they do now. 😂
@twilso12Місяць тому
My question is why don’t we launch from Antarctica
@zachmoyer184924 дні тому
the rotation of the earth actually helps you. The pull of earths gravity would be the same if it were not spinning. So the rotational velocity is velocity you get for free. So the closer you get to the poles the more energy you need to get up to orbital velocity.
@twilso1224 дні тому
@@zachmoyer1849 I suppose I wasn’t specific in referring to launches aiming for outside of orbit - but then again, most of our launches are for exactly that so 🤷♂️
@zachmoyer184924 дні тому
@@twilso12 you still need that energy so if you are trying to go beyond orbit and achieve escape velocity you need less energy to do so at the equator vs the pole.
@twilso1224 дні тому
@@zachmoyer1849 consider the elevation of Antarctica compared to general ground level and the shape of the electromagnetic field around earth And target location - most of all
@twilso1224 дні тому
@@zachmoyer1849 I dunno why UKposts deleted my last comment about the shape of the electromagnetic field and elevation of Antarctica lol
@WatchDogxxМісяць тому
Ok, but why don't we launch rockets from a mountain ... on the equator?
@zachmoyer184924 дні тому
also on the eastern shore as to launch over the ocean. If you search you will find such a mountain is in the middle of some desolate country with terrible infrastructure.
@mumenrider86226 днів тому
thrust in a vacuum... lol
@zachmoyer184924 дні тому
lol im not sure if ur dumb or trolling or making a sexual joke
@FitzChivalry_Chade2 місяці тому
That doesn’t seem like a ‘no brainer’ to me. As soon as you said it, I thought that it really didn’t seem worth it. And for the same reasoning you brought up, just all the hell you’re putting yourself through just assembling the area where the rocket will take off from.
@closedeyesopenmindМісяць тому
Why not off of hot air balloons, is this equally impractical
@user-vy9st4gw9mМісяць тому
Correct
@2148aaМісяць тому
Quito Ecuador
@420SusthingМісяць тому
I have land in meghalaya very hilly can you talk to Elon ? Willing to give him area for space x
@101MadMac13 днів тому
NASA Fanboys are the worst what's your full length video I can barely handle this short. Wake up NASA shouldn't have bloopers.
@Antyss08Місяць тому
Something so obvious didn't needed a video Whats next, why dont they launch rockets from bottom of ocean?
@whirledpeas3477Місяць тому
Why not launch from a giant balloon?
@zachmoyer184924 дні тому
because that giant balloon would be thousands of times bigger than the biggest giant balloon man has ever made lol
@rodriiigotubeМісяць тому
Si te haces esa pregunta es que sabes menos de física y geografía que un niño de secundaria.
@Damos4132 місяці тому
I guess that’s why you’re the only person who had that question. lol, JK
@K4Cubing2 місяці тому
Dont over think it. It’s not rocket science.
@EuclidesClementinoМісяць тому
👍😊✨✨✨🇺🇸🕊️✨. Hello. You ✨
@thetruthspeaker19782 місяці тому
So pretty much it ain't worth the extra effort..problem solved
@muninmatt2 місяці тому
colorado springs is a "major metropolitan area?"
@EverydayAstronaut2 місяці тому
Between that and Denver… uh yes 😅
@mervstash3692Місяць тому
Most pointless video ever
@ophello2 місяці тому
“Seems like a no-brainer.” Yup. You’d have to be brainless to think this was a good idea.
@Dex0z2 місяці тому
Dude shut up they can land them now
@James-zp5po2 місяці тому
Space starts at 62 miles high and nothing has ever been to space because rockets can not produce thrust in a vacuum so the rocket just falls back down at the 62 mile mark
@KerbalOnDresМісяць тому
There is no oxygen in vacuum that's true. That's why rocket fuel is mixed with liquid oxygen to allow combustion.
@James-zp5poМісяць тому
@@KerbalOnDres you have so much to learn you are extremely confused a more accurate term for vacuum is zero air pressure which means no gas liquid or solid a rocket Carries it's own oxygen so it can go higher than a jet but it doesn't mean it can go higher than 62 miles astronauts get their astronaut wings at 50 milles high not 62 because they know they will never go above 62 miles