Why vote when your honourable dictators do it for you

Lmao. Same here in Easter Europe. We have voting, but every so often they find a truck full of valid voting tickets somewhere in a ditch. Also, people that died decades ago still voting.

I dont care who gets to vote as long as I get to nominate the candidates.

Ah isn't the internet wonderful

this shouldn't be funny, but i laughed nonetheless.

If I remember correctly, someone managed to get Doom working on a Smart Fridge. I don't know how you'd play on a fridge but I'd love to see someone try.

Rule 34b, Ammendment 1: But can it run Crisis?

@@EngineerLume Played on an ATM once, hard af but the best thing to ever run on an ATM.

Calculator was fun

@@EngineerLumesome smart fridges are just android phones. Not too hard to get doom running there!

If I was purchasing merchandise at prices comparable to the stakes of a general election, I'd be exceptionally wary of how the finances are processed. If I was spending a billion dollars on a painting for example, I'd probably only be willing to do so while in the same room as the painting and the people accepting payment for it. If I could, I'd find a means of physical payment such as gold, if not I'd ensure my trust is well-placed in the bank to cover the amount if something goes awry.

Eletronical ballots do not use internet

@@gallectee6032 that would kill anonymity

@@chriswarr641 Not if you make it anonymous.

@@gallectee6032 Genius! Now how do we know if the code is ours? How do we know it's actually tied back to our intended result?

Kkkkkk

@@lnxred3661 kkkkkkk o que irmão?

Vc está descrevendo como o processo deveria ser e não como é. O pedido das forças armadas para acessar o código fonte deu uma polêmica danada e todas as sugestões de melhoria foram atacadas sem argumento algum. E o mais grave é que o código não é aberto como dizem. o TSE só abre PARTE do código, confiando em segurança por obscudidade.

The machines also print several receipts of the votes that were input in them during the election and everyone sees them and takes pictures. So you also have "paper trail" If that IS such a necessary thing

@@PauloPontes até porque eles não tem direito pra fazer isso

Actually not. Tom clearly didn't do any research, this video was based purely on his knowledge about technology, not on actual electronic voting systems.

I was going to say exactly that.

@Danilo The code is not actually open to the general public. Even if it was, there would be the problem of checking if the code is proper on each machine, and also the dubiousness of the code that checks said machines.

@Danilo Para derrubar uma árvore, você corta o tronco, não os galhos. Da mesma forma, a urna é o menos provável de sofrer um ataque, pois é muito difusa. O principal problema é onde se contabiliza todos os votos. Ainda assim, é muito improvável que haja fraude.

@@Rogi1198 improvável 🤨 coff coff

rip and tear

Best election ever.

the demons have the faces of the candidates

@@Greaust who's doom guy?

@@oshkiv4684 the guy from Doom

thnks mark

Surely though, while that would pass a cursory look, if it were actually to be implemented at scale, there would be enough eyeballs that even the subtlest of fuckery would get seen, right?

Before the election the machine should be tested, so this bias would be caught before the election occurred.

@@dominicbeaumont4932 🥴💓

A party? Nah, they wouldn't. Their "friends" in business would, however…

I think it was some malfunction

@@corrupted4726 Ultimately it was a cosmic ray striking one of the transistors. The error was spotted and corrected

@@botigamer9011 there was also another similar event that happened during a super Mario 64 speed run, where a random cosmic ray flipped a bit in the system and caused Mario’s y-coordinate to jump up a bunch. It caused a significantly faster speed run but because it wasn’t intentional I don’t think the run was counted

4096

​@@wren_.I guess you guys are men of culture as well

I can see myself already losing.

Oh boy, I can already imagine the framerate. “Frames per second? I thing you must mean: *seconds per frame.”*

i trust like that

@@Edgeperor That's a good joke

But kahoot always has a right awnser

Nice to see you here

Taran Van Hemert did you use a macro to do so?

Or did you...

Are you sure?

did you forget the whole anonymity part

The machines I voted on in California you voted on the machine, but then it printed out a physical receipt of your choices, and that was the ballot that got counted. You then had the opportunity to examine the printout, and if you changed your mind or there was an error you could reject it and it'd be shredded.

That's probably the best way to do it. The printed ballots can be easily machine readable, and also easily human readable. You can get the results out to the public really fast, even if you spend days verifying the results afterwards. As long as the margin of error between the machine read result and the human read result remains extremely low, there's no problem.

If the machine knows that you are physically impaired it can punch or print different holes that your impaired eyes cannot see . Flipping all the visually impaired votes may only be enough for a closely contested issue, unless combined with other attacks .

It is still computer read and counted. The paper ballot could be correct, the reader program just changes the totals in a convincing way.

​@@johndododoe1411you forgot that touch is a thing

too bad not many canadians vote 😢

"I dont know how to do it. It's impossible" - Some dude after 12 min of being explained how it's possible.

@@AApyrofreakPaper voting. Nothing digital

@@AApyrofreak can u read?

Here in America, it doesn't matter if you get caught, if the party that has the most power favors what you do.

Doom on a TI-84 is nice. Personally have a copy of it.

I've got it on my Samsung smart fridge

seems like skyrim is trying to overtake that achievement

@@somerandomnon9161 I have it on my Ti Nspire, runs great with @234Mhz oc ahah

@@rabywastaken nice dude

Tom Scott shall rule the world ahahahah

@@pixel-hy4jx aHaHa

plot twist: the video changes if you have a malware or outdated OS and tells you

thousandth like

@@System64MC Like a secret ending in a video game? Damn, now I feel like downloading malware to unlock the ending and get that one last achievement

Very similar to the UK, this is the way.

Engraçado, explique o por que dela ser fácil de adulterar, pode usar todos os termos necessários em sua explicação, faço questão de pesquisar para entender seu ponto.

@@fabiosantos1920 acho q vc entendeu errado amigo, ele está defendendo as urnas eletronicas

@@fabiosantos1920 Se você está se referindo a votos em papel, inúmeras maneiras. A urna pode vir já com votos, o mesário pode marcar cédulas e fazer com que sejam consideradas nulas, pessoas contando votos podem anular votos válidos e transformar votos em branco em válidos, etc. Outra fraude usada até a implementação das urnas eletrônicas era feita por coronéis e traficantes. Eles juntavam os eleitores "cativos" deles, o primeiro ia votar, e ao invés de votar fingia colocar o voto na urna e voltava com a cédula em branco. O traficante pegava essa cédula, preenchia como quisesse, e entregava para o segundo eleitor "cativo", que tinha que depositar a cédula já preenchida e voltar com outra cédula em branco. Esse processo seguia até todo o eleitorado "cativo" ter votado. (Diga-se de passagem, a ditadura militar era campeã de fraudes. Eles roubavam tudo o que podiam na cara dura.) Para quem tem a minha idade, não era raro antes das urnas eletrônicas ver algumas dezenas de matérias nos jornais sobre fraudes encontradas nas eleições. Eu tive até aula na escola sobre como identificar fraudes para poder denunciá-las.

@@FabioCapela teve casos de urnas encontradas em lixões, riachos que serviam como esgoto...era como as coisas funcionavam naquela época

KKKKKKKKKKKK tão seguro quanto pular num vulcão

Me every other day: Yes Windows. I absolutely trust that software I just downloaded from a random webpage. Now shut up and run it with elevated privileges.

If someone has the same problem, use malwarebytes, it will save your device from all standard malwares :)

@@matteoalberghini3816 the word is "standard", that means only already discovered malware are being found, and new malware gets made all the time, exploting new security holes.

Any anti-virus software < Tech literacy, Even the most basic of hackers can beat an anti-virus. Anti Virus Programs mostly identify virus from a database of file checksums. If a file has the same checksum as something in the database it's a virus. If not it isn't, even if it is. All you have to do to change the checksums is use a program called an obfuscatetor which adds useless data to the file, which changes the checksum value, then use an existing virus that already exists, and boom you beat pretty much all existing anti-viruses.

@@ThatFadedAsian well, that is how they used to work (Yes, they still do, but not only). Now day they also analys behaivour of programs. Because of what you said. I uses Linux, so I have no problems with viruses. 😜 (of course not, but it still better then Windows, even though Linux isn't proytected from viruses, especially social viruses or viruses attacking web browsers).

you forgot "on" from electronic ;P you can electrically vote by touching the right wires together...

Plato in The Republic: Democracy always leads to oligarchy, plutocracy, and tyranny.

North Korea: What's voting?

@@davidpatel5267 North Korea technically has elections. Kim Jung Un is the only candidate.

@@JohnEusebioToronto It has elections, I stand by it has no votes. Can't vote when you're starving to death🤷🏽‍♂️😂😂

That's what he said... With a move to electronic, the attacks can be easier, more impactful, and harder to trace.

@@quintonwilson8565 its already "hard" to trace when a whole system wont let you audit it. At this point its fairly lateral.

@@nwerd7584 I think we have to abandon secret voting. Either broadcast publicly who you vote for or shut the hell up. Scary, nasty, but probably the only way we can ever be sure the vote hasn't been doctored with.

@@aleksandar5323 I won't even explain why this is a stupid idea...

@@mauricio_ds2322 It probably is but I feel like we don't have a lot of options. Paper ballets are also very much tampered with and I'm starting to loose faith in all voting.

Naah, they are not going to overthrow anything. Biden still being in office is the proof of that.

honestly, I'm amazed they haven't done it already.

Yes because there is insane fraud with mail in ballots and electronic voting.

Mail-in ballots should not be accepted - in-person, verified identification, paper ballots only. No exceptions. On vacation on election day? Too bad. Too sick to leave the hospital? Poll workers can come to you if you demand it.

@@irishmanfromengland25 Don't you remember the incident of the Capitol? It happened PRECISELY due to how unreliable electronic voting was to the point it's reasonable to say we don't truly know who actually won the elections.

xDDDD

Well he’s not getting this ad again 😂

@@xdev_henry I mean, Dashlane had to approve this ad, so...

@@xdev_henry He is legally required to disclose the fact that it's a paid promotion - the only difference is that he did it in an unsusually informal way in this video

He's got me hooked

Photon effect could cause your votes to be redshifted or blueshifted! XD

You can't duplicate thing in quantum state

In 25 years: Tom - "Here is why Skynet voting is the end of the World"

Well actually quantum encryption solves the problem

@@damiankaleomontero496 if you trust the encryptor and counter. Edit: and quantum encryption breaking doesn't get invented.

Lmfao However ironic that is, I trust it more than electronic voting. Not buying it anyway, but still.

@@doughoffman9463 and whats ur point

@@doughoffman9463 oh

Well, a lot of them just got hacked this week. I think you have a point.

@@EulerAlvarenga1 LastPass moment

Which is the problem. Tom is very naiv in saying that trust is the main problem. People are too trusting, especially if they can't change it.

Funny thing about representative democracy is the more that you know and learn, the less you think it can be trusted.

@@richdobbs6595 then you consider the alternatives. Most of them have major downsides (usually 'doesn't scale past small town size without breaking')

@@QuintarFarenor What are you even saying? You think it is a good thing that people can't trust their elections? You think that elections shouldn't strive to be trustable?

@@icedragon769 You're absolutely misunderstanding: I'm saying that people are TOO trusting! sure we need to make votes more trustworthy but we need to make people more sceptical too and I think that's a bit more important even. I'm in and from Germany, we have only paper votes. Even then I think people are too trusting.

Tommunism

10 years down the line: Tulags come into existence

@@d.madureira Communism = Worker control over the means of production. There is no state, money or class. Tommunism = Tom Scott controls the means of production. There is no, unintresting places, american accent or electronic voting.

@@PalkkiTT time zones will be abolished as well

@@randompheidoleminor3011 And Icelandic-Mexican food.

E o tom tava certo kkkkk

pois e, ele tava certo

Ele está certo.... Nenhum dispositivo eletrônico é 100% seguro, assim como nenhum barco é inafragavel, (lembra do Titanic)

@@iVinicius9990 certo por qual razão? Veio chorar aqui também porque teu candidato perdeu?

@@piticolsf4748 HEHEHEHEHEHE

I do believe the 2020 election was not rigged, because they rigged the polling data (rich people only like donating large amounts if it looks like you will win) and if they had rigged the polls it would have matched. But there's no way to check in states with electronic machines.

@@TheGrinningViking but of course when it was obama's election everyone was blaming the russian, but now that it's against trump everyone is saying it wasn't rigged unlike on 2016

@@Alienwareofficial no one said that 2016 was rigged, only that the Russians had a concerted disinformation campaign meant to interfere with the election.

@@sheeplessknight8732 cnn & bbc were all over it back to 2016, just because you missed see the articles doesn't mean no one said it

@@Alienwareofficial the russian disinfo in 2016 has actual data and proof behind it while the 2020 fraud cases have no basis evem after dozens of attempted lawsuits

Respect. 😅

Ironic that you wrote ironic how you write one take in one take in one take

Is it really one take if i erase my message before posting it??

Ironic that you wrote ironic that you wrote ironic how you write one take in one take.

@@DuckboyMcgee The following statement is true. The previous statement is false.

The only problem, you can't confirm that for sure. We call this Faith.

The votes are counted by both parties So if we would vote by the old method, the PT and PL parties would have the right to count the votes

All DISCOVERED frauds you mean. Now they are just not discovered anymore.

@@nescaufrioemtbom1113 Por que tá falando em inglês com uma pessoa que é nativa kkkkkk

@@zyuukki2704 maybe for the gringos understanding us?

😂😂😂😂😂👍💚💚

Then most of the ballots won't even be counted because people will fail the captcha.

@@drabberfrog "people" sure they are

@@nothanks39 the voting machines will be the only ones smart enough to pass the Captcha

and make sure you have to confirm email adress

Democrats: But minority people won't know how pass a Captcha...or know how to get an ID card.

Don't worry, it was his way of saying nicely, "Since you likely won't accept that your machine leaks worse than a colander full of water, imagine how insecure everyone else's stuff is!"

"No windows, come back again tomorrow"

Running a malware test right now, just to be sure...

I'm reasonably sure my devices are malware free because I'm taking care of them and how I use them. Still I can't be complete sure with all the apps in my phone, although any possible security problem would be most likely in small scale. Now imagine all people who are not tech oriented enough to have Linux and know exactly what packages are installing on their system, have checked the checksums or trust the package manager, are following security mailing lists, have real, limited rights sandbox or even virtual machine for internet use (I don't) and so on.

Why would you want immediate results that could be overturned when you already have exit-polls that nobody will be confused by.

@@Quintinohthree So far the immediate results have never been overturned because they have proven accurate every time. But if for some reason the immediate electronic results do not match the paper ballot audit we can still go back and hand count everything. Why would you ever want to wait days or weeks for results when you don't have to???

This makes sense. Spot checking randomly is good enough unless you have suspiciously skewed batches. Then prioritize those batches (e.g. "Why are there two boxes that the machine tally says went 90% to one candidate? Let's look at the paper ballots."

Isn't that just the world's most expensive pencil?

Sure...

kkkkkkkkkkk melhor comentário

Ele é britânico

KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

Ur clearly not a 'Murican, in more ways than one...

Just reupload the same video, but change the intro.

With how uk politics has been lately its more likely to be every 2 yeare

Fixed Tom Parliament Act

I think electronic voting will happen in future, it's kind of inevitable to keep advancing in technology, using more and more automation while relying on ancient and imperfect system of manually counting votes on sometimes rather large sheets of papers with countless possible combinations. Automation will include scanning the ballots, counting the votes, then it will be matter of time before recording the vote itself will go electronic. Depends on voting system used but let me tell you that there are elections with many rules and voting options that not only it does already confuse the voters how they can actually and effectively cast their votes but the election commission (or how it's called) doing the counting doesn't exactly follow the rather thick rule book aka the law, and the volunteers are often retired people who have serious issues with any advanced counting and doing it for hours of undivided attention and not making a mistake, systematic or numerical. We have many reports how preferential votes were miscounted on paper ballots and more often than not the results are either kept as it is because it didn't have enough potential impact on the results or people don't find all the suspicious cases or the complaint isn't even filled. Because then that whole district would have to repeat the voting, less people would come second time and some party might feel they would get even worse result while holding up the final official result.

This guy completely ignores what blockchain technology is. As a computer guy you have to be critical enough to spot when someone is losing track of technology.

Isn't your profile picture from theodd1sout

Meeta Verma I’m not that person, but yes

@@meetaverma8372 ye

Or my capacity for procrastination

@@meetaverma8372 gee I wonder

confia

With no significant concerns until now, cause I don’t see a problem 😅

And also, we use biometry by fingerprint 😊

Confia

@@kevinlimapena5698 crente na net:

*hears super hardcore music* "Must've been the wind"

what

Proof of Concept of an ACE exploit, though, which is why they did it that way.

Tom literally always wears a red shirt.

@@DRDynamyte_ I prefer the old shade of red...

don't forget the punch on the hand to indicate towards the emphasis on regret

I'll always vote freedom 😄

@@sturek me too. This one is too dark imo.

Não é questão de confiar, vc viu o que ele falou, não faz a mínima ideia de como é o voto eletrônico. Quem vota em papel e acha que não é fraudável é iludido. Vc sequer tem garantia de o papel não ter sido extraviado antes de chegar em quem conta. Mas eu não sei como funciona o voto em papel...

@@max1mus963 Nao é questão apenas de ser fraudado. Todo tipo de sistema está sujeito a fraude. Mas sim a transparência. O eleitor não tem a mínima ideal do que está acontecendo dentro daquela máquina e se seu voto foi realmente computado. Diferente do papel que ele sabe 100% que realmente foi computado seu voto. E no caso do sistema em papel é muito complexo que seja feita uma fraude em grande escala. Diferentemente, do software usado para realizar a tarefa de contar os votos. um simples alteração no código, consegue fraudar toda eleição. Comparando as duas maneiras, sem dúvidas o sistema de papel continua sendo mais seguro e principalmente, transparente.

Higor, the paper is for you to validate that your votes were printed correctly. In the case of auditoriums, any citizen can verify that their role is the same as the one they viewed and confirmed.

@@DavidWDRS How a paper printed by the same machine that you don't trust could be a verifying method?

@@max1mus963 in the case proposed at Brazil, the voter could check the paper printed, and once he confirmed the information were accurate, the machine would then store the paper in a sealed box. (The Voter would't take the paper home)

PS. CNN

the funny thing is he's bashing physical mail-in voting and not the far easier to compromise electronic part. as much as a collapsing democracy can be funny

@@thekingoffailure9967 To be fair voting by mail isnt exactly safe either. My solution would be to extend the voting period and have a time booking system for when one can vote.

Please send help

@@pflernak You don't even need a time booking system. Plenty of places have two week or more advance voting periods, no excuse required. What you do need is enough polling places and staff that lines never exceed ten minutes. That breaks the intentional voter suppression that you have in the US.

@Mob nah. Tom's 50m fans mysteriously downvote it and Tom takes it down himself.

@@thePronto underrated comment

Not every problem addressed by him was solved, actually there is a strong one that is really hard to solve, the fact that most people in the country don't even begin to understand how the software inside of the voting machine works. Therefore it makes perfect sense that people don't really trust on it. People never agreed to electronic voting because they can't trust in what they don't know. I mean, it's easy to understand a ballot system not an electronic one. I understand what people claim. Even if there are no verified faults in the system, people will never trust it because they need tecnical knowledge to do so, and that's a problem.

Went right to them after that to check it out

Why Hong Kong get away and we need unleash deadly plague then

China adaptation : 'why voting is a bad idea.' Ancap/A1 adaptation: 'why voting is a bad idea.' China: ? Ancap/A1: ? 😂

US edition just came out

The use the same sort of arguments as people in the US arguing in favour of the electoral college. Basically "people can't be trusted, we need a system to make sure they choose the best option".

Democracy is the worst system of government

Everything can run Doom if you try hard enough

@@blunderbus2695 show me how to run Doom on a single quark

@@monoastro some science person had a theory where all the electrons in the world are the same one after different amounts of time travel, which means every single game of doom ever played was ran on it

@@hecko-yes I asked for a quark

@@monoastro ...frick

People have ran doom on pregnancy tests now.

@@jomialsipi not really. Just on a device put inside the casing of a pregnancy test.

i will not be happy until i see doom running on the apollo command computer

@@nottrevorallen Good luck with that at 2 Mhz. :P

not can, will.

Unless you have the private key to your vote, it would be impossible to verify that your vote is actually yours or that it was counted. We all need Bitcoins for voting so that we can spend our vote with our own keys, not giving the government keys to our votes!

@@raiden72 you need to go outside and touch some grass, even if its artificial

In India I get a link to the Indian election commission. Well done 😊

​​@@raiden72look up vvpat for Indian voting machines. We run the biggest elections on the planet now for over two decades

Well, it's not that far away from reality. It's demonetized .... 😕

Oops!

Why would that be the case? The Dominion votes and this "contested" election weren't done with electronic votes. The votes were done in person, then printed and counted. That's completely different than voting from home electronically. The parallels the people in these comments are drawing are very strange and inaccurate.

Tom is clearly a Nazi /sarc

I think the viruses keep my computer working at this point

linux voids most problems. there's ad-blockers on my browser. hopefully i'm savvy enough that i would get away with visiting some malware-infested sites.

Dawn Praiser Linux users.

It is as malware free as my free software can tell it is.

Gotta remember tell Tom to be more obvious with the sarcasm, next time. ;)

That's just a complicated pencil with the added downside that votes are recorded before they are counted.

How can you prove that it's safe?

@@libertarianalchemist7995 it has many security checks and encrypted codes, it's virtuallt impossible to hack one

@@libertarianalchemist7995 he doesn't need proof. Some people that seem important/smart told him so, and since he is functionally illiterate, he just believes the nonsense discourse.

you realize that other countries validate paper ballots within a similar amount time right? the ballots are a physical receipt that is then counted by a machine at the polling site. using a hybrid system is fast, and has the added benefit of ensuring physical authenticity. purely electronic voting cannot and never will be able to ensure authenticity.

@@embly2319 Those hybrid systems sound interesting. Gotta take a look later.

Under rated comment

trump

hello from poland

Hello from Brazil

@@whobein add stupid and it's Bolsonaro

I saw doom running on cardboard pannels. Is my cereal box the computer or the poor fucker holding the cutouts?

somebody figured out how to run Doom on AO3 (archive of our own, a fanfiction archive in case you didn't know what it was)

Of course a voting machine is able to run doom, but its software should let you do it!

From a practical security standpoint, running Doom on a machine demonstrates that execution of non-trivial arbitrary code is possible.

And if you _can_ run Doom on it, Bethesda will try to release Skyrim for it.

kkkkkkkkkkkkkk

Alexandre de Moraes dá 24h para Bolsonaro explicar pq o gringo falou mal do voto eletrônico

524288?

@@EroShynOObi How can we know that this has been counted accurately?

I was just typing almost the same comment. This video is so critically important.

Who needs to hack electronic voting when the left is already hacking our demographics through mass migration?

If we had electronic voting just imagine we would actually democratically vote on every agenda!! instead of one vote to elect one party and them having absolute total power over the country for years

Tava pensando o mesmo kkkkk.

Mas não podemos negar que o algoritmo do UKposts funcionou que é uma beleza dessa vez.

we are no longer asking, he's going to brazil

He's going to brazil

nonono i dont want to go to brazil ahh ooh god help me ahh

Brazilian electronic voting is totally secure

@@julyanaxel201 No like, every single time there is something very strange, this year a city with 150 people got 150k votes

@@jubscreuto is the earth flat?

@@julyanaxel201 No 💀

@@julyanaxel201 Hahahahahahahahaha! Oh, wait, you're serious? Let me laugh even harder: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

It would be cool to see if someone could mod a voting machine to be secure from those exploits and as a result have their ideas implimented.

@@Merahki3863 It would be cool to see if states would knock it off with this voting machine crap instead of trying to "fix" them.

I feel a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of computer science majors suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

@@octorokpie you can campaign for a different voting system and I can want to see E voting improved. No need to get tribal about it.

"- Root access to a ballot marking machine achieved by connecting a USB keyboard and pressing the windows key." Wait what? So not even a single layer of protection...

i always vote for doom, either literally in the video game sense, or metaphorically in the demise of life as we know it sense.

Before or after they formed a coalition with Gloom?

vote for MF DOOM today! rip DOOM :(

Which Doom? The rapper, the doctor or the slayer?

I got like 666

The same is true the other way around too, computer experts are not experts on current voting systems so they are oblivious to it's o n Fair share of problems.

@@BattousaiHBr Those aren't mutually exclusive areas of expertise.

As an I.T. guy who has seen many things, I couldn’t have said it better myself.

@@BattousaiHBr Some are, some aren't. Any person with a basic interest in the security of a voting system will see flaws in some systems that has been solved by others. And some that hasn't been solved, and some are up for debate whether they're problems at all. Regardless that interest does have some correlation with computer knowledge, particularly with the knowledge of IT-security.

'The people who understand computers the most' are building their linux kernel from source and therefore trust their computer the most

Vote against electronic voting... or you'll regret it

@@rebelfriend1818 vote online against online voting

We've got electronic voting in my state. Plus lawsuits about the machines changing people's votes... So, there's that.

That is very suspicious...

@@yabombo8145 unfortunately we don't just suspect, we know it's been doctored. We even call the 'elected' representatives 'computer chicks' as in they've been hatched by computers 😂

@@hydrolifetech7911very clever, I should keep this in mind if electronic voting becomes more used were I live.

@@yabombo8145 "Suspicious" my ass, in most "democratic" nations of Africa it would be more surprising to find out the elections were fair than it'd be to find out they were faked.

Guy Panzerboss I wouldn’t say Kenya and America are equally as democratic, so... (Not an American btw, just stating the obvious).

In theory it makes sense, but in practice it's impossible for a common citizen to verify all the process and a big number of votes.

@@MarcioNSantos The German Supreme Court does not agree

@@robertojacobbalcells8994 Not gonna lie but the German government or affiliated authorities should not be the ultimate end-all-be-all on matters of digitalization. Germany is terribly outdated in every technological regard.

@@danielwanner281 What the court says has nothing to do with technology, it’s about citizen control and audit

@@robertojacobbalcells8994 that's why they want the voting machines

Imagina contar voto do país todo no papelzinho

@vitor h seria péssimo kkk

Imagina nas áreas de milícia como esses papéis seriam contados…

É muito bom ver os gringos contando papel e gastando dias pra saber o resultado, contra horas que nós gastamos. Uma pena que o brasileiro não sabe votar e continua com o bolsonarismo firme e forte

Tanto acesso à informação, e ainda assim a maioria dos infelizes repetem besteiras infundadas.. A Urna NÃO imprimiria o voto, de forma a que o eleitor levasse para casa. O tal do "Voto Impresso" é apenas o mecanismo de registro de cada voto, para comparação final com o que foi registrado digitalmente na urna eletrônica. Os demais países que utilizam a urna eletrônica, o fazem desta forma. Exceto pelo próprio Brasil, Botão e quiçá mais um país, salvo engano. Tanto inglês, para não conseguirem ler os comentários alheios, e enxergar a farsa nessa narrativa..

Are you still dead?

Well good to know youtube is a thing in afterlife :D

RIP

despite dashlane relies heavily on cryptography, and there's already quantum computer

1k vote

Why?

@@hopin8krzys He's probably referencing the shitshow that was the Iowa caucus.

@@Trinexx42 ye I was

The Iowa caucus is a nice piece of imperial evidence to reinforce Tom's claim

@Orlando Rotundo what?! why, what makes you think a company for collecting caucus data funded by Assigieg would be untrustworthy in the slightest!

In reality, every 2 years. US and Brazil are big democracies of the world and use Electronic polls in their elections.

6 where I live ;)

@@gohanssj48 was gonna comment about it being 2 years but you came faster opora

If it comes up every year everyone should be happy right?

Yes, because America is the only country in the world with election cycles

It just works!

Better launch than fo76

Hodd toward mad lad

Yes, I will by my skyrim that only works on a voting machine.

yo I'm 666th liker

cara, o video soh falou de coisa q n se aplica ao brasil. eu sei q tu quer dizer q foi falsificado quando teu papai bolsonaro perder, mas presta atenção no video antes de comentar

Hmmm...

Well here we are

meio difícil segurar ela, ainda mais se forem os modelos mais antigos que pesam 20 Kg, a atual pesa 9Kg mas ainda é meio pesada

@@eduardofsilva uahehuaehuahe pqp

@@GustavoCesario. Mas é vdd, tenta pegar um bloco de concreto de 9 quilos e ve se tu fica de boas umas 2 horas segurando ele.

Brazil is full of bad ideas :(

@@ricardokenji1 prove that the Electronic voting machine it's a bad idea

I'm not afraid of vulnerabilities. If I know what I am installing, what is running, if it's up to date and I can update it myself from trusted source then I have nothing against it. I do have problem with smart gadgets I have no control over which send data to private company on private server (cloud), can record voice or picture (no thanks, I will not share these with anyone even if I'm not talking about any secrets) and on which I can't change or update the firmware. Of course it's a choice between convenience and security. I can setup smart home with full control and privacy but it will take time and I will have to actively manage it, including running my own server, be it at home or somewhere on VPS. For me that's not worth the effort and I will rather keep my home stupid, there is not that much to control anyway.

@@jan.tichavsky I have a few smart home features, but they are on their separate network with no internet access.

Well, that’s just because you can’t trust most manufacturers. If I make it myself, well, I trust myself, and if it’s open source, at least I and security professionals can inspect it for vulnerabilities, and even if the company goes out of business, you can still use it.

"ALEXA, How much of my conversations do you record and send to Amazon?"

The S in "I.O.T." stands for "Security".

i like big word

I missed most of this video because I was too busy watching it as well.

I remember playing with those with a camera and my old CRT monitor. If you move around juuust right, you could make the scan lines disappear. Then you make your epic halo headshot montage

@@thefrub My dad works at microsoft and i get u bannned because i don't like you.

That intermodulation really is lovely.

I don't know any who refused having someone from any side observe. I've seen lots of cases where they refused having angry rants members of mobs disrupt the process.

@@TsarFrancisDrake when and where did this happen? What news sauced do show it?