What do you think of the new one? I’d give it a solid 7

You sound so young and innocent. Almost a schoolboy. Is this one of the films that drove you to drink?

16 ... seems as though everyone wanted to be Venkman, with it's nonchalant and glib repartee. Kate McKinnon's character's name is even similar. Not for one second believe, that her name, Holtzmann, isn't drawing the comparison between the 2. She's also got a bit of Egon in her. I heard it when I typed it. Not what I meant. The whole were not phased by any of this dialogue and reactions, is nothing but woke signaling. You can't show a female even being slightly concerned about the "power of a particle accelerator" Because someone would bitch n moan, that's it's furthering the patriarchal, and misogynistic view men have, thats women are scared by anything technical, and sciencey.

It's so cute that you think someone will learn anything about this movie's failure :) .

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fHZ5mWZkfIx4wpc.html

Not surprising though since the director, who also co-wrote the script, didn't even want to do it. He had turned it down several times. So it wasn't exactly a passion project.

Well said. :-)

Bill Murray zombie

Good one lol 😂💀💀😭

Nice

Honestly. Not to mention the scene(when testing the packs), imo, was clunky. Every action seemed in a way accented. Like it was trying to show us an emotion/atmosphere was trying to be conveyed, but was so amateurish. An example when the two ladies backed away when the machine was turned on. They did it to show that they were worried for their safety and took a precautionary step back. It felt so forced and looked, like an excessively dramatized movement. In the original it was suttle and seamless. The guy casually moved over as close to the elvator wall as possible. He didn't need to use an entire scene change to convey it, or a zoom in on his face, just a simple move over. Simplicity.

@@Rob.N. Or, in other words, if you tell me how I'm supposed to feel about a scene, instead of the scene actually making me feel that way, you're doing it wrong.

@@0x777 Bingo

@@0x777 @Robert Neal : Yes as I remember the definition of cheesy on Urban Dictionary some years back. _Celine Dion is cheesy because her lyrics, timbre, key changes, and swelling orchestral accompaniment telegraph 'i want you to be moved' instead of moving you._ I think it kind of applies here

respect wahmen!!

That's the difference: writers used to ask themselves if they'd "earned" the emotional payoff of a scene. Now that they're pushing certain social narratives they feel entitled it.

Kind of the way I felt with Hancock as well.

yeah because it's make sense a city in a apocalypses just getting together to cheer the ghostbusters instead of just run

I think that's also why they felt the need to explain that the obviously menacing sound was dangerous: there are no consistent cues from character behavior, nor do things like slamming into concrete seem to matter, so the audience gets hopelessly mixed messages as to whether the thing is dangerous or not. So because they're too dumb to write a scene that where people and things behave coherently, they have explain everything to their confused audience, thus treating the audience like idiots.

It's blown out a parody

That's the point. Bad writing. In the original, comedy is consistent with the purpose of the scene... let's tell the audience why they have that weird high-tech backpack. Which is a dangerous nuclear device. Comedy comes from them being uneasy with it. Which is a totally normal reaction. In the remake, the characters w/o any explation are totally chill about it. I mean in the original it's dangerous just turning the accelerator on. In the sequel two character at first look concerned (it's the writers' nod to the original scene, but w/o understanding it) then are cool when it goes totally out of control. The whole scene makes no sense. Is it dangerous or is it not? Are the characters worried or are they not? 2 minutes + of screentime spent to establish nothing. Or worse, to establish confusion.

@@TheMule71 Yup. This. Egon explains what these things are and even mentions why it's so dangerous to cross the streams. ("try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light"). The remake focuses on the awful physical comedy and any questions about the proton packs themselves remain unanswered. So are these things dangerous or not? Well, we don't know, so we don't care because we don't know what the stakes are.

Also she would have fried herself and her friends flailing around. Plus it was corny slapstick for cheap laughs. Imagine if the original ghostbusters had a scene like that? It would have been terrible.

Who would even want to watch that infected vaginal excretion for free?

I saw it 4 free and I still want a refund.

Hehehe, that sounds like a good episode of South Park.

@@michaelsolis4801 i only saw a couple scenes from Ghostbusters 2016 and i could feel myself getting dumber just from the 10 minutes of footage i saw on TV when scrolling through channels.

dang... 😂

bloodsling gotta day that got me

bloodsling this is genius Im gonna have to use this one day

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

Now that's funny, you should have been writing the script for this woke nonsense.

Now that was a real rodney dangerfield joke 🤣🤣🤣

*5

Same.

And moving to the other side of the cramped elevator when ray got switched on, i feel like the older movie was better at doing physical comedy so it didn't feel too wordy.

That's basically every movie today which is why everything is 2:45 instead of 90-1:50. That and action scenes go on and on and on because CGI jacking off.

2016: EXPOSITION, BABY! YEAH!

Pretty much sums up how women tell stories lol

Look I’ll simplify it when you try and make women sound smart and funny it fails because women are not smart and funny.

I hate it when things try to act smart but are obviously not. Using sophisticated and meaningless jargon is an example of that.

@@thepope2412 There are movies where they also use "technobable" but atleast some words are still recognisable enough (if you listen closely) to be atleast a little bit coherent.

@@wu1ming9shi But what's even the point in those technobable scenes? Is it to show that the characters are smart? All it does is make them look pretentious. Take that stupid jimmy neutron sodium chloride meme for example. That's essentially what it is. But if the jargon was actually accurate and somewhat needed that would be a lot better, but in the case of ghostbusters 2016 they really just throw a lot of science words together as the op was saying.

I guess you must hate Star Trek: TNG, DS9, and Voyager.

Yeah it makes people sound more photosynthesis than they actually are. SMH my head

And women

@@ryanjones7681 the problem is lazy execution, not having a penis or not. focus on the real problems

This is so true..... It's sad. How and why???? Is it a trend?

@@lalaland2107 because it's a mass market product, therefore it needs to be easy to understand by a vast majority of people.

@@MatteoBandera you didn't get it. I think he was talking abt the feminist agenda pushed in the movie.

Yes... Happy they're making it like the 2016 Ghostbusters never even happened!

@8bit NES Cutscene wrong video bud.

8bit NES Cutscene bruh stfu

8bit NES Cutscene you need help

@@niko-im8nl Don't bother lol.

reminds me of the charlies angels remake

No way realy

Can you link it? I looked everywhere and couldn't find anything where he said this, not in video clips or articles. Either you misheard something he said or your memory retroactively inserted his response (to the backlash after the release) as if it was something he said before the premiere. Here's a pre-movie release article that comes the closest to him saying something about the gender wars, but the context reveals his sentiments are excitement for little girls to see the movie: “I wanted for little girls to be able to see themselves up on the screen,” Feig says. “The original one exists, so you can see boys doing it, but how fun for girls to have this experience!” That’s why he pushed so hard for new Ghostbusters action figures. “There was some resistance,” he says, “because there’s a fear that boys wouldn’t buy toys from a movie starring girls. But guys have such great feelings of nostalgia because the original had a lot of gear. I’d like girls to be able to put on a proton pack and run around.” www.vulture.com/2016/07/paul-feig-ghostbusters-reboot-c-v-r.html

@@YourMajesty143 That's one of the issues. You build up an audience, then years later, some moron copies you, and remakes your thing just because yours is no longer "modern", without any genuine idea of how it should be executed. But there's your good old audience, and they at first think there's gonna be more to what you've created. Only to realise it's not even been actually made for them, it's only a trap with the same title luring them in. The only idea here was to modernize it as well, and incorporate the modern norm. Apart from that, little to no original ideas added. Just modern CGI (modern CGI is still sh*t though...) and women instead of men, just because fEmInIsM. Meanwhile they say how feminism is not about raising women's rights ABOVE men's, but to equalize rights for a good reason; so that no one has to suffer their loss of "autonomy", which sounds fine, but then... kid me not, if that's really true, the very advertisers misunderstand what they advertise.

@@formulasg6828 exactly. Wtf was Elizabeth Banks on? There are plenty of female led movies that men love lol. Wonder Woman, Aliens, Terminator, Terminator 2. She was clearly just reaching. Just because men don’t like her movie doesn’t make them misogynistic

They’ve only really made it because they want pussies instead of dicks

Let's remake all of Adam Sandler's Happy Madison-era films

@Cuthbert Bracegirdle But the original wasn't bad... Just mostly campy by today's standards. The ending is still horrifying and holds up today imo.

Blade Runner 2049...

Well Said John huston 😎

Except...there were people saying they will boycott it even before the first trailer was shown.

@@Hirnlego999what does that have to do with this comment? Theres going to be crazy people who attack any new thing lol. Countless fans boycotted the star trek remake but it still did phenomonally. Hell butthurt fans boycotted star wars episode 1, 2 and 3. What does that have to do with gender?

@@yderga8707 Some of the hatred is gender based, that's the point. Go woke, go broke, it means essentially that do not pander to other audiences...just pander to me. Even suggestions that say James Bond turns into Jane Bond makes a lot of people really nervous which can be seen in the number of comments, videos and likes. I'm not saying that all of it is like this, nor do I think companies do it because they care about diversity (it's all about money).. Context is often also lost, lots of manbabies cried about women ruling in later GoT seasons and they don't seem to even understand that two of the women Cersei and Dany are all bad guys.

@@Hirnlego999 I agree that it's stupid to hate something simply because of a gender or race change without giving it a sporting chance. And I'm sure there was a great number of people who didnt go see this film simply because it was a mostly female cast. To me that wasnt the issue, it was partly the issues stated in the video, and some others including the off putting messages from the director. The reason I mentioned that this list didnt include gender was because of the producers that make bad female centric movies and blame it on men, some preemptively make assumptions their movie will do badly because men are sexist, meanwhile we have a plethora of films containing female leading roles that have male support like kill bill, wonder woman, alien. Personally speaking I get more excited to see a GOOD female lead than a good male lead at this point. But when I start hearing the directors talk about how thr movie isnt for men, and how itll probably fail because it's a female cast, it genuinely makes me not want to see the film, like birds of prey, which actually ended up being a decent film. At the end of the day, producers need to stop this moronic way of pandering and simply focus on good storytelling and good writing, regardless of gender, color or race.

@@yderga8707 "we have a plethora of films containing female leading roles that have male support like kill bill, wonder woman, alien. " There are examples of course, but they are all quite few in numbers in comparison. At least the 80s muscle macho man died out and a lot of the newer heroes are more brainiac. Birds of prey I didn't like but it was not a serious movie at all, she starts up early by blowing up a major factory and likely getting a huge number of people killed just there, so she isn't exactly a role model or anything. Then the movie made the mistake of bringing in too much her gang, and many of them don't seem to be remarkable at all in many ways. I mean the girl just accidentally pick pocketed the wrong person. And one can sort of fight, and scream? Meh. Here I'd rather see her in a role like Joker, or have him meet her in Joker 2 at the asylum, and perhaps dr Strange. Keep things slow and perhaps only in the third movie make him escape, perhaps he has learned a lot from other criminals and this could be used further as a societal error shone light upon, the system makes them worse. I don't think the pandering will end generally, this is just companies trying to reach out to larger markets, obviously Disney has wanted to make SW into something big in China but so far they have failed. There's of course this thing about trying too hard, people can call out the bluff so speak. But also in general, I don't mind if things are shook up a bit, they already for instance got rid of some of Bond's bad habits and what he does in one movie is basically a rape by today's definition, that shit needs to change. Otherwise it seems everyone wants to be pandered to which to me is odd as i was told in various ways as a kid that one should try to live in other people's shoes. I had a toy Yoda, it wasn't because he was like me, I didn't speak like he did and certainly didn't look like him, I liked him because he had some form of heart and was...different.

I wonder how long it'll take people to forget Cats.

@@starlet12321 Funny that you mentioned that. I had completely forgotten that that thing existed. If it wasn't for your reply I hadn't even noticed that it has already been released...

Like most of hyped mainstream films

starlet12321 There's a Cats movie?

Lol I don’t watch ghostbusters but I just thought they canceled the movie 🤣🤦‍♂️

Yeah people change and adapt

Lol true

Watching the 2016 version made me want to eat the end of a shotgun

every movie after social media has invented is about adaptation.

@@sawyerclegg7510 It made me want to be the end of a shotgun

This seems more like an SNL skit than a movie

They mainly focused on the fact that the main cast was all female instead of actually showing us a team of ghost hunters catching ghosts

@@LibertyPrimed Yeah, I know. I just wanted to highlight a key thing that's just wrong about this scene in the 2016 Remake.

Evangelion neon genesis:

I like Star Trek. I'm used to listen to a lot of technobabble. The way they use this kind of dialogue here makes them sound like stupid frauds, not intelligent scientists.

@@Straylight4299 To be fair, in Star Trek, when they talk that way, you can at least understand something.

Yeah, old mic too, lol.

And with no cuts to "I definitely smell shite" or "hA-hA-Haa-HA-hAA"

I listened to a lot of his older videos and the shift from analytical intellectual to full blown drunken critic seems to have happened around the Captain Marvel video. Can't imagine why.

@@GearShotgun Yeah, one can only wonder.

...and sober

Yeah whatever some of those words were you said yeah

@ParallelLogic exactly. Three words each, and you get an instant insight into the dynamic of their relationship.

Exactly. Out of context, one would probably assume the character is saying “So do I (I also blame myself)”, but the way Murray plays Venkman, we know he’s actually saying “So do I (I also blame you)”

YES

@@Dominic-Decoco Exactly. I can relate with Egon because of moments like that.

Or yelling.

It reminded me of one long snl skit, and snl is pure garbage.

Original was pretty shit, but this one was definitely funnier and i dont know why old movies are not that rewatchable, the newer movies, you can put them on rewind and keep watching without getting sick of the same movie but thats just me toh.

@@demonwizard2162 I feel like that is literally just you dude.

@@speedycheese790 i feel like hes trolling

@@lapeez2277 I hope dude

you aint seen mega maid, she goes from suck to blow

@@tenryuta But it was a toggle switch, not both at the same time :P

@@Cairannx trust me, it's better that way

I still use that line to this day. Along with "What you don't know can fill a warehouse."

Hit and run?

It's like one of those loud teenager shows Except this one is also feminist

The reboot was just cancer

UltimateSteevil damn straight have a like

You just described the new SW trilogy

@@i_am_well nah mate, i reckon i nailed "describing the star wars SW better on 'thor skywalkers' video about how "jj abrams thinks he can finish the story he started despite the last jedi"............... where i wrote: i STILL don't know the story, aside from: Rebels: "look-out! bad guys!" fans: "who are they?" story: "don't know." rey: "who am i?" story: "don't know." fans: "who's snoke?" ryan: "your theory sucks." fans: "MY theory..?? Aren't YOU the guy who is supposed to......." story: "hey- luke left us a map in case we need him." Luke: "leave me alone, i came here to die." fans: "..........................." everyone who is not ryan johnson: "w........... wait.... what??" ryan: "exactly!!... how subverted do you feel? Clever, right?" fans who care if the story makes sense: "... uh .................. not...... really.......... kinda POINTLESS actually, both figuratively and literally..." disney: "you are sexist." soon to be ex-fans: "...... uh................... WHAT??!?......" what. a. cliffhanger!! :P

Why tf is he so sober?! It doesn't feel right...

He ran out of booze

I was about to say the same

@@pedolover69 It's the depths of depression this movie sent him into.

you think at one point he was just "the critical healthy Joe" and slowly as the movie industry crippled itself and began plummeting into a downwards spiral of death he became the drinker

Well, I've like Melissa Mccarthy's as a comedian and movies such as The Heat and Tammy which I thought were funny. But yeah her yelling almost every sentence in almost every role gets annoying

Well put

It's what people do when they don't have anything to say. They start making comedy via strange noises and making stupid faces. It shows you if someone is actually a comedian or would like to be one but isn't.

Like most youtubers who aim their material at 8 year olds

This is why i hate Will Ferrell nearly all his roles has him shouting his lines

"If no one's talking, then no one's laughing." - Paul Feig, probably

Well, it's a cast of all women, so.......

@@kevincollins6897 Came here to say that, lol.

@@HankBaxter I also came here to say that

Beat me to it lol :D

"There is no racial bigotry here. Here you are all equally worthless."

Alright Christian Fascist

@@joebenzz Love that. Sauce?

@@bloodcottoncandy1514 Full Metal Jacket 👍

Christian Fascist Nice to see there are voices of reason mixed in with the plain old racist Nazi sympathizer in this comment section, maybe our combined efforts is enough to make you realize how idiotic your antics are

Which means even without discussing that, just on the merits of it being a film, that it lacks the same level of charm, quality, and acting by comparison to the original.

Well, he DID say that there is literally never a moment where someone isn't talking. I think we all know the reason for that... 🤣🤣

He doesn't need to because A - It's so obvious thats what's going on nobody even needs to say it, and B - There are so many other failings to pick at you can fill your boots elsewhere.

it'd be completely different (and probably funnier) had it be done today

Even though that was most of the problem 😆

raimesey Thank you!!!!

Pretty much

Totally agree, prime example is Indiana Jones. If they'd rewritten it with a female Indiana it wouldve killed it, so instead we have tombraider, which is equally as great 👍

I've always asked this statement that makes people go into a craze: If you believe in strong characters that differ from straight white men being good, why not use your creativity to make a unique and likeable character instead of simply taking those straight white men and changing them? Isn't that suggesting that the only interesting characters in your eyes ARE straight white men because you're resorting to copycatting them, therefore saying that you cannot think up an original character to fit your mold? I love seeing them go insane because they can't seem to answer it truthfully.

Because theyre not creative or talented enough.

In the immortal words of John Mulaney; "Ah, you should be a good alumnus and donate, and they all have shirts that say 'school'!"

It's feminism , that's why it failed. It sucked . Women are not funny or entertaining.

Don't forget the fat lady. She isn't plus size or healthy. She's fat. No hate or denigration, but the director chose a fat lady so fat people could be "represented"

Fuck hollywood

@@TheAilmam who is Hollywood. Do you mean a specific studio?

@@shitlordflytrap1078 no, it's hollywood. All the movies that are produced in Hollywood LA

This movie was fucking awful. I saw it because my mom rented it while we were over... It's complete trash. I'm a woman and I support women making moves in Hollywood. However this movie makes us look bad. What the fuck were they thinking🤦‍♀️

In a car, riding a bus, waiting at a bus stop. Waiting in line, fishing, watching TV, being at a sporting event, sitting at a bar, sitting on a park bench, watching a performance, looking at an art exhibit. All just off the top of my head lol

Greys anatomy does this all the time... wonder if that's why

@@Rodgerwilco91 but those wouldn't make sense in the context of the movid

Ummm really?? People walking, people looking at something at the same time (like a concert, movie etc etc etc etc etc etc.), people waiting for something etc

@@Rodgerwilco91 no, in a car you see only 2 people as the others are hidden, the same in line.. also they are going to catch ghosts so nonsense art watching, sporting events, watching tv, riding a bus ridiculous, as well as sitting on a bench or watching a performance.. Logic.

As is the case with every black comedy actresses

@@almostalways False

@@deshawndodd7883 Yeah your name is Deshawn.... I don't take biased opinions into account. Good on you for having your sisters' backs though. Truly commendable.

And wth was she doing with her mouth when she was dancing on the street?

*LOVESICKE* we get it dude you don’t like black women

This sums up perfectly why modern cinema is so bad.

You said it sister

True

@@laggeryt7558 “modern cinema is so bad”? okay boomer

@@naveenkrishna407 right actin like a lot of the old movies ESPECIALLY weren't absolute ass, tryin to hard to be different

DEAN

And this is why I liked this movie. It’s like a crack version of Ghostbusters.

Seriously

They were playing real people, not just caricatures, essentially.

The original also played the humor straight: Ray's eager, Egon's serious, and Venkman's sarcastic. The remake has them all as wacky bumblers.

Amen brother. But I do plan to see the next one with Paul Rudd

@@flabio7074 Definitely - here's hoping that it lives up to the trailers.

This is the most of it I've ever seen... and I'm glad! Fingers crossed for Afterlife!

Watched the 1984 GhostBusters last week, the remake, zero times and never will...

I watched the first one several times, the second one dozens of times (as a kid it's the one I had on VHS), and I've seen the 2016 one once... I will say from a straight up Ghost Busting point of view, it DOES have some pretty good scenes of actual ghost busting, especially the climax. That said, the comedy is almost always a complete dud. Chris Hemsworth is the only funny thing about the movie. So I'd say to those who are proud to have not seen the film, give it a go. But only expect actual comedy from Thor, and enjoy the lightshow at the end. It's not great, but it's better than the trailer had shown

I think a good example of this kinda pause that we miss is one of my favorite deadpan jokes from an old TV show called 'Police Squad' Specifically the one about the locksmith.

That can actually work, if done properly: _The Fugitive_ with Harrison Ford, and _Run, Lola, Run_ with Franka Potente never slowed down.

Nowadays we get two extremes.. Either the actors won't shutup for the entire film and make you feel like you're watching a Disney film full of propaganda *OR* You get a weird Netflix-like film where they have a small cast consisting of a malnutritioned looking main character that maybe has like less than 10 lines the entire film. With those movies you have the volume to the highest decibel because it feels like everything is on MUTE.

@@UncleKennysPlace Mad Max Fury Road might be the best movie I've seen that never slows down or breathes.

An excellent example of impactful silence is in the first Star Wars (A New Hope since the whole numbering thing is jank). Luke stares out at the twin suns setting and you see this range of emotions cross his face while the Jedi theme plays behind him for the first time. He's yearning to go, to explore the wider world and galaxy, but he's trapped in a nowhere farm. Ultimately, you see his face drop in resignation as he heads back in. The score is also incredible, especially as the same theme is played in the final act as Vader kills the emperor to save Luke. It's this circle through the films that just ties it all together. Anyways, most modern movies don't or can't do that. They need constant action and in your face impact, like the viewer will lose interest if you let the things slow down for a few moments.

i like the shameless 6 second cameo of Man candy, to insue that if it were a film with Men as the main stars, as the original.. they would have a "token" pretty female character for no reason

Yeah, the moment I saw the new cover scene & it wasn’t men, but women I could tell they were trying to push some propaganda unlike the 1st & 2nd where it’s old enough where they didn’t do it as bad/screaming at you like it is here. I thought about amwatching it, but it just seems like a huge waste of time & $ just for a shitty GB 1remake. I imaging there will be one after the 2016 like the 1st since it almost duplicates it. Sometimes it’s just better to just leave the series strong like they did with the BTF series & stoped after GB2.

"There is literally never a moment where someone isn't talking." Sounds about right 😬

READ THE BIBLE,.. AND PRAISE THE LORD,, . ,,., ,,

@@foosmonkey well, I mean they cast three women... hahaha

They proved that women cant do like men :))

It proved that 80s had better movies and that the 2010s did cringe humor that makes me sick. I could watch old 80s movies all day they are so clean and simle.

I actually liked this movie (I thought it was fun) BUT I've got enough sulfur in my brain to know the 80s one is millons of times better, and that you're not guilty of misoginistic voodoo if you hate it.

@Paul Martin Yeah that's what I said. You're point?

@@kovacthesaggy4014 He was trying to build on the point you are making, agreeing with you

Tintifax ikr their cringe

Aka Radical ultra left marxist feminazis

professor mcgorgeous stop using long complicated words i cant understand. You know what never mind ill just ask my special ed teacher tomorrow

@@jacobsaccount9353 wow dont bring special ed into this. Dont compare them to the twitter snowflakes

Sanchria my apologies

Exactly man. People often forget. The original was a serious movie sprinkled w comedy. The humor is purposefully dry, as to avoid slapstick bullshit that would undercut the tone of the film, ultimately confusing the audience. The humor also fits the characters. In the new one, which I didn't see, the audience seems like they are supposed to buy that the women are geniuses and idiots at the same time. And Kate McKinnon or whatever is constantly trying to upstage everyone no matter the scene. Even if she isn't speaking, she's trying to draw your attention w movement or facial expressions. She is awful. Seems very insecure.

This is an excellent assessment.

So damn true. Ghosts made me feel like I was in a Lady Gaga concert. They where not scary. Now a scene that scared me for life is Zuul on the fridge.

Poppy Kav you couldn't make "the exact same movie but with men" because if it was a male cast it wouldn't have had the 3rd wave feminist agenda in it. A Male cast might have made the same bad jokes and the same stupid cinematography but it could never have had the Anti male bias in it that was evidenced from almost the opening shot. Also, if you thought the movie was "pretty good" your bar for entertainment must be pretty low. Not trying to criticize you but it's kind of understandable. Compared to the utter crap that we've been fed for comedy movies in the last couple of decades it was pretty good. But mediocrity when compared to utter dross doesn't excuse the makers of this pile of burning dog shit!

@@kavanaghfamily105 Actually it would have received harsh criticism. This Hollywood trend of "rebooting" movies does not sit well with a lot of people. A cheap remake of a classic like Ghostbusters would be sure to bomb.

He's ass ugly honestly

Women are into physical looks as much as men are What terms women on is confidence and Bill Murray is a very confident man

Don't you dare insult Bill Murray! :)

So what youre saying is that women take 5 times as long to describe whats happening in a situation....i dig youre videos, But we coulda filed this in the "O" file for Obvious

Heath VanderWall I feel like Hollywood producers self insert their ugly asses into movies

Don't act like sexism didnt happen and the second ghost buster was terrible

Everyone notices that it’s women rather than men running the business this time. But there’s also gender role reversal within the movie: 4 women are infatuated with their male secretary, he’s not that bright, but they keep him on because they’re so attracted to him.

Don C I’m not blaming the fact that they’re women but I am blaming the fact that nearly all of them are honestly incompetent. They are just not funny

Keytron Onit second ghostbusters was better than 2016

Keytron Onit Sexism didn’t happen Sony over exaggerated it and Ghostbusters 2 wasn’t that bad it was okay, but people at the time were expecting the Mona Lisa it would be like if they made E.T. 2 and it was just okay.

The NFL commentator?

He was the only enjoyable part of this film tho :(

True, although he was the only decent and funny character. The 'Mike Hat' piece was literally the only bit I enjoyed

Bf there’s not a lot he does save

@@robster191 hahaha yea Man

I haven't seen the movie, but just by looking at the scenes showed in this video, I don't like the faces and movements Kate McKinnon is doing, like it feels she is trying too hard...

Leslie Jones is the most unfunny person to ever appear on SNL. I’m so glad they got rid of her.

Eh, maybe we are sexist. Maybe I don’t need Hollywood to reframe everything from a woman’s point of view and call me a caveman when I don’t like it. Either way, I’m not paying anyone to try and make me conform with their ideals (Which by the way always seem to benefit them). Make a good original female lead movie and I love it. Try and reframe based on a gender novelty act and I won’t. It’s simple.

People like McCarthy have to blame everyone for her own failures. Because she is infact a sexist cow her target is always men.

@@CK61380 I would like to introduce you to Jim Breuer

Well this is depressing for the mental level of 16 years old then ^^

As a 16 year old this is brain numbing. Perhaps 16 year old girls?

@@No-uc1xs well, you're def a 16 year old.

Nah comedy are targeted towards us

Not even 16. I watched this at age 12 and thought it was good. Definitely changed my mind.

The scene in the 2016 remake version makes me want to turn off the movie.

On my top 10 list of all-time favorite comedy scenes.

Classic elevator scene. Let's not also forget the "successful test" on the housekeeping lady's cart..."What the hell are you guys doin'?!" "Sorry." "Sorry, that was my fault". "We thought you were someone else". CLASSIC!"I think we should split up.""Yeah, we can do more damage that way". I flippin' cry when I watch this scene--clear down into the ballroom..."Whoa, oh, whoa, oh, oh--nice shootin', Tex!"'84 GB is such a perfect movie.

Don't forget the H&S 'No Smoking'above then.... Whole scene is perfect 😂

I've recently seen the original Ghostbusters about 30 years after I've seen it for the first time, and it's still a great movie to me.

1983: 'our audience is clever, they'll understand' 2016: 'our audience is stupid so let's give it to em all at once'

I wonder if part of that might have to do with more discomfort around nuclear power in the culture in general. There have been a number of high-profile incidents around nuclear power in the years since the original Ghostbusters (Chernobyl comes to mind, in 1986) that may have made it harder to stomach the casual use of it in films. Note that Spiderman in all the live action films no longer gets his powers from a radioactive spider, but a genetically-modified one, and how the Indiana Jones 4 fridge scene was so poorly received. So they substitute a techno-babble explanation. Let's see how Afterlife explains the proton packs, because somehow I doubt they're going to let kids use them onscreen if they are associated with nuclear energy.

@@kateorgera5907 there’s been 3 nuclear meltdowns in history, Chernobyl, 3 mile Island, and Fukushima.

@@kateorgera5907 how do you get all that from a movie where a group of people fight 'ghosts', it's fictional, the fact that they mentioned nuclear power at all is just a way of try to let the audience know its dangerous to the 'characters'

Also, if the proton beam shoved Abbey like a cartoon character holding a fire hose, then why didn't Peter, Ray and Egon didn't get shoved in the original after accidentally shooting a maid's cart? You know proton beams are made of plasma, not liquid. If plasma can do that the same way, then flamethrowers should've been banned in the first place due to accidental firing.

100% this - almost the main "gag" of the scene...Compare this with the vast amounts of signage and graffiti and visual chaff in the alleyway in the remake - which serves no real purpose at all.

And the mundaneness of regular life and the city meanwhile there Is a demon on the roof

@@rmc3728 So what does God think of the movie? He speaks to you, yes?

Yeah the original bit had me laugh/chuckle about four times in that many seconds, that's a bit of a laugh every few seconds. The remake scenes have me cringe at about the same ratio. It's just a lot of needless talking, bright colors, making faces, and some slapstick. Was it meant for toddlers?

Visuals. That's what films are about, not "telling."

Lol saying it louder is one of the core tenets taught at the Amy Schumer / Melissa McCarthy school of not funny acting. Also taught in the curriculum is shit timing, joke theft / cryptomnesia, and repeating an already unfunny joke until the audience pity laughs to silence.

@@DaveKatague That is one of the most complete summaries of typical female comedians I have ever read.

@@rawx485 I tried to watch 10 minutes of Amy Schumer to see if there was a reason she keeps getting specials on Netflix. I sat through the entire thing without even o ce smiling. Nothing she said was funny, fart jokes, looking at the audience with a "you're supposed to laugh now face" and weird tonality that goes through the paces but the punchlines were just so weak and average it just sounded like speaking. She's probably a lovely person but dang she's not funny at all.

Which is a page taken from the Chris Rock book of comedy.

@@JDTonkleton nah Rock had social commentary that surpassed the level of L Black, J Seinfeld and J Carland with better packaging ans deliver Dane Cook is a better example of repeat it until it’s funny while getting louder and making noises and faces

Yes I noticed that.. subtle and classy 👌

I ehh.. don't really understand how that connects

@Ryandal Gilmore I don't understand what that Smoking sign has to do to with the scene It's there but I don't understand how that sign makes a difference

@@fabi3790 Smoking kills, the thing on their back is more dangerous than smoking. Something like this maybe..

Absolutely! If it was redone today, we would have a major close up of the no smoking sign and then pan across to the guys. But this scene was such a subtle and overlooked moment especially with the sign. I love how others notice these small details too.

Saving private becky

Chris Bowman 😂😂

Please don't give them any ideas.

tonycns. PLEASE!!! Don't give them any ideas!!!

Chris Bowman Saving Private Benjamin......instead of casting Goldie Hawn, they can cast Amy Poehler!

Right but times were different jokes were allowed to be bad and funny lol

@@Sirmattnapier yeah now everyone is a bunch of snowflakes sadly

In other words, the old movie having a more plausible plot and didn't give a dang about political correctness.

I call it "Marvel acting." I think it's the defining characteristic of films of this time period. I can't stand it.

@@chaddodson1481 Thats a good way to put it. The jokes never arise from interaction. They just have a character say a goofy phrase.

Was that the whole sentence? I think what was meant is that if someone passes a bad judgement of the movie without even watching it, then yeah, that someone is very probably misogynistic.

What nonsense

Explain Don Rickles then IK lol

Honestly, it goes with any kind of persuading. "Vote yes or you're [insert insult/slur here]" is just going to erode your attempts and credibility.

@@RicardoPetinga That's still nonsense. I chose not to see the movie because it didn't look funny. I'm not obligated to watch something to prove I'm not sexist, although some media woketards tried to argue that with the LITTLE WOMEN remake. "If men are truly pro-feminist then they should prove it by seeing this movie!" 😂