First (?) Nobody asked

Well I do and I'm second! Very few comments on such a big channel. But at least no spam Congrats, ThioJoe, on your anti-spam app!

Nah lower speed=better speed

@@TechnologyEverythingJohn there are no spam because he probably put the thing to scan and delete 24/7. its a thing that he can do i think. or spamers are just scared of the app. lmao

"lower speed, better speed"

You mad lad bested me by 2 minutes.

oops

Also range will be pathetic.

haven't watched since he started being useful. thumbs down

@@niggardlyrajigga4992 lame, his videos are pretty good now

A nice transformation from being a jokster to being a informative tech source. That, and to be talked about in a positive manner amongst the broader tech community, is nothing short of a great accomplishment. 👍👍

literally watching Thiojoe unironically rn

Years later and people are still mentioning it in the comments.

WiFi has always been spread spectrum and the change from TDMA (time division multiple access) to CDMA (code division multiple access) occurred before the 802.11b standard was established, when the now called WiFi 1 of 1-2 Mbps to the now called WiFi 2 of 11 Mbps which was what was first became known as WiFi. What we see now are changes in the spectrum channel allocation and collision avoidance so that broader spectrums can be used while reducing the spectrum when needed to avoid collisions with now the concept being collaborative use of the spectrums with WiFi 7. Note that what we now use with our smart phones is GSM which is descended from TDMA not CDMA. CDMA suffered from the Qualcomm delays in producing their chips and people got used to the convenience of Europe's use of SIM chips with their version of TDMA called GSM. Yes technically CDMA would be better but mobile phones is a case where the better mouse trap did not take the market.

What kind of a shitty router do you have that often gives problems when plugged in for a long time. A router might miss a new public IP from your ISP's DHCP when it's load is on 100% Get a router with more than one CPU core. This has nothing to do with the wifi standards used in your LAN

@@UmVtCg Recent Netgear Nighthawk. Evidence is entirely anecdotal. Even devices whose internal IP addresses I have told my DHCP server to use all the time have trouble reconnecting after the router is up for a long time. Rebooting the router seems to make things better. I assume Netgear is using something close to one of the open source router implementations, but I don't know. My load is never anything close to high, so it appears just be memory system clutter or something. Don't want to argue about it though.

I was going to say. When you realize that you've got like a potential Wi-Fi speed of 50Gbps yet most web servers only offer bandwidth of a few hundred Kbps or tens of Mbps, it's pretty pointless.

from what i understand the biggest feature is ethernet level competence there is thunderblot 3 par max speed and ethernet like latency (almost). it has same bands as last gens so it is not getting worse. also yeah router definitely matters the last dlink/netgear routers we had had a crazy long range like across the street . but the shitty cheap one that isp gave us cant even penetrate two rooms lol.

yeah the rush for higher wifi speeds seem completely pointless to me since home users will always be bottleneck by how fast their internet is. less jitter, less latency, less packet loss and more range just seems way more important than anything else.

Me : Should i also buy WiFi 7 device & Router🤣?

@@wildyato3737 no

the numbers is easier to understand for tech newbies, and 802.11 includes standards unrealted to WiFi, you dont know if between ac and be theres other wifi standard like ax, that why they introduce those brandings

@Miguel Guthridge, FOR 50 A MONTH, IT WILL MAKE ME DISSABLED!!!!!!!!!!! WTF??????????

@@SWC44 no it won't. If you don't care about accessibility that's ok but please stay out of the way of everyone who wants to make the world a better place.

@@miguelguthridge AT A CRAZY PRICE, AND YES I AM DISABLED!!!!!!!! AT LEAST KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@@SWC44 what are you on about? You sound like a 12 year old, and I sincerely hope you are, since at least then I can attribute your ableism to ignorance.

I get 70 mbps on 2.4Ghz. The issue with all the newer WiFi standards is the 5Ghz and 6Ghz band are complete trash in the real world, where you don't have direct line of sight 5 feet from the router. I would recommend disabling higher frequencies, and just plug in anything that needs faster speeds, which is pretty much only desktops downloading massive game updates.

@@xeridea 70mbit? Ouch, that's very slow. You must be quite a way from the WAP.

Same here. I wasn't too interested. Until he started talking about acces points coordinating and being able to connect to multiple bands for redundancy. Those have been my biggest issues.

The bandwidth demands increase fast these days and double every few years. So it is good to see WIFI is increasing even faster right now because we were stuck with 11g and 11n for a long time. Those with fiber internet will need gigabit speeds eventually, and WIFI 7 should give fast coverage even with wireless mesh links.

@Bessie Hillum Intel 12th gen

@Bessie Hillum I'm not sure about that. You may need to research it if you are in a need.

True but even 2.4 g has gotten faster with each iteration vs 2.4 g of the past which wasn't even close to modern speeds

I just disable 5Ghz alltogether, it is pretty much useless in most of my house. 5Ghz and 6Ghz won't get any better in future, they will always be trash. It is basic physics, higher frequency radio waves are trash at penetrating anything. If you have direct line of sight, you are better off just plugging in a cable for a much more reliable connection anyway.

Higher frequencies have lower penetration due to physics, so 2.4 Ghz will always have the best signal. WiFi can not be full duplex, due to the fact that the airwaves are shared by all devices. You could have it transmit at the same time on multiple bands, but it would generally be better to just bond the channels anyway. I can't even use 5Ghz band in my house the signal is so bad, so I disable it. And yeah, hardwire everything you can, guaranteed link speed, and no dropped packets.

WAPs designed for mesh often have better coordination, though it is likely done manually, and not due through the wifi directly. WiFi 7 is finally getting coordination built into the standard, but it's about 20 years late, I don't know why it was never a standard feature until now. Seems as if they were more interested in boasting about theoretical speeds than adding better features.

100Gbps fiber ethernet has been a thing for years, physical cables have been and always will be better

Read pinned comment

But do you need it?

Jerking off... ^^ Porn and greed drives all innovation.

All existing systems use proprietary tech to offer the features meaning they're incompatible if you mix and match between different manufacturers. When WiFi 7 is fully standardised, all compatibile routers will be able to work in the same way regardless of brand.

@@miguelguthridge Yes, but he said that they are only dumb switching (so the phone/client chooses), which is not true. But he also said he is not sure completely or so. But something outside the WiFi standard and being part of it, is probably the biggest point.

Most of expensive smartphones are hardly seen 6E.. standard..like iPhone or Samsung.. WiFi 6 are to been seen in Mid-range smartphone... around $300.

Pretty much same, I'm more excited for the features improving reliability and range

same

It is reliable since it was made....but I wonder who needs that kind of speeds..😳

yes but 2.4ghz 802.11ax (wifi 6) is worse than 5ghz 802.11ac (wifi 5)

Because 6E is kind of wierdcase lot of router manufactures will probably just skip to WiFi 7 which 6E client devices will work with at 6GHz

What's funny we always think we have latest version of standards,But development got always one step ahead 🤣