Jenny Zhang 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

she was shoplifter? no

@@horst5511 Yes, I never liked her and never will.

that's when she lost support from the crowd. It was disgusting.

Capriati, so cheap, and then realizing Serena is always at the receiving end of trashtalk.

It's ironic because Capriati always threw the biggest fits if she didn't like a call. But she was fine getting a match handed to her because of bad calls.

disgusting

she def cheated everybody in juniors

She is in the cheaters Hall of Fame.

@@kenmore8485 Same with Capriati

She’s a disgusting person. Absolutely no morals

Totally agreed. Same with Cibulkova. I lose so much respect for them when I see these videos.

Right?? Like on so many of them she was super close to the ball she could not miss it, total nonsense

so tru. i lost all respect for her :/

Capriati was a spoilt brat. She had one of the worst on court attitudes of all time

Serena deserves it though

By far they were all in on the screw job.

did u watch the whole video lol

Is it just me or wasn't capriotti a super kunt back in the day?

@@n0ban790 yes...still the worst

That match is what made them get challenges on the tour.

haha, good summary. 😂

I agree 100% on 1 and 2😂

Not for Zhu??

I didn't notice it on this one but when I'm watching matches I can often hear her in the background. Too funny. Her and Kuznetsova.

Yep. I'm surprised McEnroe didn't make much of a stink. It was the other 2 who were calling for the immediate removal of the lines person on that call that was so far in, but it turned out she gave the 'in' sign and the UMPIRE, from 100 feet away at a bad angle, overturned it

@@joycelebaron2582 because McEnroe is a moron

and now that same umpire is a WTA supervisor…

There was a capriati double fault missed as well

@@henrym6758 isn’t she well known for being terrible with overrules

I agree, Cibulkova should never had been awarded that point against Hsieh and the way she just walked off and ignored it was lousy sportsmanship

right? like its just good sportsmanship to do that, the bare minimum lol

Exactly, two perfect cheater in tennis history😄

I think Capriati took the cake with this one. Glad she lost to Dementieva in the semis in the next match.

She should of walked off the court. That would embarass the referees even more

Definitely one of the worst calls in tennis ever. It still angers me when I see it. All Kerber had to do was be honest about the situation. Terrible sportsmanship

So because she had a bad call in 2004 its okay for her to threaten to kill a lines woman some years later + make so many other scandals? 🤦🏼‍♂️😂

@@MikkelJankovic It wasn’t one isolated bad call. It was an entire match of bad calls on crucial points. She actually kept her cool fairly well that night. But it happened many times over the years, it really did. I don’t excuse all or even most of her bad behavior, but your statement that she threatened to kill a lines person shows the bias she experiences. She didn’t threaten to kill anyone. She said “you better be right or I’ll shove this ball down your fucking throat.” Not ok, but not a death threat.

You forget 2003 French Open... 2001 AO... List goes on

​@@badgernation74 You are a Serena apologist. She showed despicable behavior several times over the years. Shame on you.😅

Actually sharma was told that she should have kept track of the score. It such a shame that directors says things like that.

Literally can’t believe he still works as a ref, shameful

Henin was a lying cheater too

You know that hawk eye is not 100% accurate right ? So what will be going on when there will be a clear mark out and the hawk eye will say it's in ? Still a great idea ? Don't think so

@@sweetsouu2402 source?

@@lmaoluke It's just well known since the beginning ..! It's a small margin of error but it's here

@@sweetsouu2402 Hawkeye on clay courts at least will decrease the amount of errors significantly, you loser.

@@sweetsouu2402 It is indeed a very small margin of error, so if there is a "clear mark out and hawk eye says it's in", then the mark is wrong (sometimes a very fast ball hits the ground for a millisecond, then bounces back up and leaves the mark a few centimeters away from the point where it actually first hit the ground).

Thats Fairplay, you can't go against someone saying: "yeah I messed up, it's on me. I lost that one."

The chair should be able to look at the footage and reverse his call.He has the ability to do so, to say we can look afterwards is a joke. This is in regards to Errani's play.

That would seem ideal, and it works for sports like football where the VAR can be consulted on decisions made by the referee. But there the call to challenge isn't made by the players. Getting video replay in tennis would lead to abuse of that option by players.

There is the person that does the digital score that we see on TV, that is waiting to hear the umpire call it. That person is also following the match and should be connected by ear piece to the ump in case they miss the call.

@@jennym2276 so how come these incidents continue to go on where they get the score line wrong?!?!!?!!

@@rgncajun21 it’s not allowed which is wrong in my opinion. They should be connected by earpiece but they aren’t.

Umpires are evaluated during matches. And there is a thing that we learn when we are umpire : Don't change you're original call there is a discussion with a player. Why ? Because his opponent think you're influencable. And after hard matches likes this, there is a video section in office where you watch your match and analyse it

As a black man, good to see learning from their peers

No, Cibulkova lied when she said Hsieh’s ball went into the net. It did not

@@badgernation74 HINDRANCE RULE A hindrance may result from a corrected call by an official or an event on the court that may be ruled involuntary or deliberate. Any continual distraction of regular play, such as grunting, shall be dealt with in accordance with this Section H. 1. Corrected Call a. If a call is corrected from “Good” to “Out,” then the point is ended and there is no hindrance. b. If a call is corrected from “Out” to “Good,” then a let must be called unless the Chair Umpire determines in his/her sole discretion that the ball was a clear ace or a clear winning shot that the player could not have retrieved. If there is any reasonable possibility that the ball could have been played, then the player must be given the benefit of the doubt. c. If a foot fault is called before a serving player hits the ball, then a let must be called. 2. Involuntary Hindrance a. A let should be called the first time a player has created an involuntary hindrance (e.g., ball falling out of pocket, hat falling off, etc.), and the player should be told that any such hindrance thereafter will be ruled deliberate. b. A let should be called if a player is hindered by an event outside of her control (e.g., ball rolling onto the court, paper blowing onto the court, etc.) during play or her service motion. c. Noise, “out” calls, or other similar distractions from spectators are not considered a hindrance and the point should stand as played. 3. Deliberate Hindrance Any hindrance caused by a player that is ruled deliberate will result in the loss of point.

@@badgernation74 The problem here is that the call came before Hsieh returned the ball. It was like this: Hsieh served the ball, then Cibulkova returned it, umpires calls it as out and Hsieh makes final return, then Cibulkova challenged the call and video replay showed that the ball was clearly in. Because an out call came after Cibulkova's return but slightly before Hsieh's return, and Cibulkova was successful in challenging the call, Cibulkova wins the point. Hsieh was clearly wrong. You should realise, that point is over as soon as line umpire makes the line call. In this case Cibulkova's shot was clearly point ending shot and it was a winner as video replay showed. What Hsieh did with it doesn't matter, as it happened after the out call happened and point is stopped after a line call. Chair umpire was correct here.

@@tennispredictionsandreacti130 Wrong. It was not a winner. Cibulkova’s shot was called out, but Hsieh hit it back across the net inside the court anyway. The point should have been replayed. Cibulkova LIED to the chair and said Hseih hit the ball in the net. Bitch move on her part. Consistent with her career though.

@@tennispredictionsandreacti130 100% wrong. Players don't lose a point because of an incorrect out call. The time when ball is called out only matters if they miss the shot on an incorrectly called ball.

A nice exception is Mona Barthel against Radwanska - not immediately but still she admitted that Radwanska was right. Also, notice how no referees were able to do anything. They are completely useless and doing their jobs HORRIBLY just in general. I don't know why they exist