Trucks are an american thing. For example, there are none built in Europe. Viability of non-urban public transport depends on whether autonomous vehicles are going to be a thing by then. Otherwise you'll sadly still need an individual vehicle adapted to your transport needs.

Ha! Luckily, the camera can be added - but it's going to take some extra parts which (sadly) I can't afford right now - Nikki.

She said in the video she had an idea for adding it. If so, I hope it's well documented, because I would seriously consider doing the same!

Strange. Between Nikki and the rest of the tea, we have more than 35 years of EV driving experience, and we'd disagree on that. We've saved far more driving electric.

Two EVs in our household. 3 years on one, 4.5 years on the other. Only expense has been windshield washer fluid and wipers. I just put tires on the Bolt at 42,000 miles. I've saved $7,700 over driving my gas car in three years. If I ever need to replace the battery on the car I'll have MORE than covered the cost of the battery in the amount I've saved over not driving gas.

Do you have any data, be it personal experience or statistics to back up your most improbable claims? Given that EVs are far less complex, than ICE-vehicles, very little maintenance is required.

I don't understand why you troll on channels like this one. It's a waste of your time.

The quality isn’t the same…Besides, we all know that GoPro looks like a smush on a lens ;)

Funny. No major youtuber uses a gopro for quality video. Tell me you don't know how to make videos, without telling me you don't know how to make videos.

@@transportevolved Working with a champagne taste when progressively running on a beer budget just won't work out in the long run. Revenue is dwindling for reasons you don't control. Viewers begged for moar money will most probably not see a substantial benefit in maintaining marginal quality benefits for an excessive premium. There's some serious downsizing coming your way. Fortunately, you have quite a bit of superfluous expense to cut before the coverage of evolved transport will really suffer, and that's a Good Thing.

Your ramblings are nonsensical.

Which member of staff should we fire first? M? Erin? Kate?

This is a whole argument in the computer industry. Yes, decades ago, nerds decided rather than to measure in actual kilo=1000, to just use the nearest power-of-2 number, 1024, because binary is hard. This was generally accepted in the computer industry through at least the late '80s. By and large, any use of "kilo" or "mega" in computers prior to the late '80s means 1024 or 1,048,576. Then scientific pedants started worming their way in, and wanted to redefine "kilobytes" and "megabytes" to mean the pure SI meaning 1000 and 1,000,000. Storage manufacturers *IMMEDIATELY* jumped on it, because suddenly it made storage look bigger. That's why "1 TB of RAM" is 1024*1024*1024*1024 while "1 TB of storage" is 1000*1000*1000*1000. Because if you measured them the same, that "1 TB drive" would only be 930 GB. Their solution? KB/MB/GB would refer only to power-of-10 proper SI prefixes, while inventing a new prefix "Ki/Mi/Gi" - Kibi/Mebi/Gibi - the last two 'bi' short for 'binary' for the power-of-2 prefixes. So a Commodore 64 would have 64Kibibytes of RAM, not Kilobytes. That "1 TB SSD" is a 930GiB SSD. That 64 GB RAM isn't actually GB, it's GiB. I'd say that among "computer enthusiasts", the "binary prefixes" are about 25% adopted. Yes, many OSes now use it, many don't. Those who support the binary prefixes are *VERY VOCAL* about it. To me? Computer measurements aren't SI standards. They don't have to obey SI prefix standards. binary use of SI-like prefixes is well established. I have no problem with the use of 1024 for K. --- When referring to computers. Obviously when referring to actual SI units (grams, meters, seconds,) you should absolutely use the proper K = 1000. BUT! Miles aren't SI. "Kilomiles" aren't an officially defined thing. So Nikki is absolutely free to tongue-in-cheek use "1K miles" for 1024 miles. Especially since everywhere written says the full 1024, not "1K".

​@@AnonymousFreakYTNow I totally need to rethink my 397.678 mile update joke.

@@AnonymousFreakYT well I live in Germany, so instead of 1k miles milestone, I'll have to use the 1k kilometer milestone, admittedly it's a bit shorter but just makes more sense being continental.

Kibimiles

Can't wait for the 65,536 update!

I saw the tagline, and immediately thought of course 1024 that makes sense, then I did a double take, and thought who other than me would do such a thing? And then thought about it for a second and realized that it shouldn't surprise me any on this channel.

Ah yes! Back in the day in the 1970's when I memorized everything up to 2^20. Now with up to 2^64... oh forget it.

You for computers it's 1024 as it's representation of binary

Except ICE vehicles have as much if not more networking in it, making them easier to hack into.

You can choose to not watch. Instead, you choose to attack. Why? What’s your end goal?

@@transportevolved You could choose to improve your content rather than make it a vanity project.

@@transportevolved I have been a long-time supporter of renewable energy and EVs. I have been a long-time subscriber to TE. I have made at least as many complimentary post as critical ones. Journalism (a field in which I worked) is about objectively and concisely presenting information. When a putatively journalistic channel frequently devolves into "personality journalism," in which 20-minute segments consisting of the presenter languidly and sometimes emotionally presenting mostly editorial comment, the channel needs to reexamine its core purpose.

This video was about the supercharger network...

No. Nobody has put nacs on their vehicles and adaptors are taking an age to arrive.

@@transportevolved in 2025 (less than a year) all the manufacturers have said they would put nacs connectors in their vehicles. I'm not sure how you don't know this.

Saying and doing are different

@@transportevolved can you not read? Where did I say that they have installed them in newly manufactured vehicles? I said they've all own adopted NACS as the standard. Maybe concentrate on researching facts instead of arguing in the comments section.

@@TabsT-vy5jy The thing you're missing, and do please keep it civil, is that saying you'll adopt it, and then putting it in the vehicle, is completely different. Our contacts in the industry seem a little more cautious, and we've heard from multiple automaker sources that after Tesla laid off its charging team, there's a reluctance creeping in. Next, let's not forget to keep backward compatibility. If you're going to supply a new standard that's great - but we need to make sure older vehicles are supported too!