Why are you so SAD? Go outside.

Dude, why are you harshing on him? Have YOU done anything like analyzing the most successful rocket producer in Human history? Sheesh! Get a Life!

So how long have you been working at Blue Origin @mervstash3692?

@@otpyrcralphpierre1742 Trying to help him mate. He's not analysing anything. That actually requires researching time. Don't be dim. Most successful? sure. They've launched a lot of rockets. Are they making any money? Nope. They are torching it. There is no huge demand for private space launches. It's like saying you are the best at taking cargo & people to Antarctica.

@@diogenes64your comment is the best comment I have seen in weeks.

Just using steel is way more practical, they dont have the expertise or equipment for something else and carbon fiber isnt light enouth to not refuel it if they changed the material of the lunar starship they could as well construct something completely new

Great question👍

Yes! A new propulsion system is needed.

@@ludwigvanzappa9548 in opinion elon biggest mistake is ditching hydrogen and use methane instead. I know hydrogen is expensive and hard to keep but hydrogen has 150 megajoule/kg energy compare methane is around 50 megajoule per kg. For low orbital flight , metahe is good cause it is so cheap. But for long trip like moon and mars. Hydrogen is work, apolo 11 prove it.

@@colonbina1 elon is ditching hydrogen with 3 times more energy than methane. I think that is huge mistake!

​@@kusumayogi7956 The point of starship is cheap travel to space so to make hydrogen cheap enough it must be produced from nuclear powered electrolysis plants

How to get a more of comments? Say some nonsense in the video and just wait...

People who are saying it can not be done should not interfere wih people who are actually doni g it. Think positive get a life hate gets us nowhere!!

​@@harrystofberg5794 8-20X refueling in spacr for single trip is BS

True 8-20x refueling in space for single trip is BS

@@harrystofberg5794People can have their own opinion and express them if they want. Having a different opinion doesn't mean hate... And that stupid rocket will prove to be useless very soon. I don't give it two years.

@@kusumayogi7956This is where it will stop for Starship.

What a stupid thing to say.

@@ludwigvanzappa9548 STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES

Can you tell more detail about that?

@@colonbina1 Sure, since Starship isn't staging or refuelling after leaving LEO (at least not for now), its dry mass must be extremely small (below 100 metric tonnes) in order to fly the full HLS mission. That might turn out to be more challenging than the refilling.

@@odril The plan IS for starship to refuel.. complaining they can't do it without refuelling is ridiculous

@@paulslund1 Of course, the dry mass challenge exists WITH refuelling in LEO. Starship has almost NO propellant left without refuelling in LEO, so it is basically a dead brick. After refuelling in LEO, the full HLS mission still needs EXTREMELY low dry masses (<100 metric tonnes) - or refuelling (again) in lunar orbit or on the surface. I can help SpaceX with some consultancy, if they want to make it work. Elon has my number.

@@odril "I can help SpaceX with some consultancy, if they want to make it work. Elon has my number." I'm quite certain his team has this already figured out.

We need to wait further updates to know this

@@colonbina1 Great Episode, Kev.

I don't think so. I think they might opt for an additional smaller fuel tank with higher pressures for refueling and reentry.

I think it's necessary to reach the Moon and Mars

Refueling is very necessary for reaching the moon and beyond, because they want to have a smaller starship that isn't too heavy for lift off and for price, and re-usability Edit: so if the rocket is too heavy they will need stronger boosters which they will need to be able to handle that much heat so they won't explode I believe, which don't quote me on this but I think that's what the heat shield is used for, also increasing overall price

😂😂😂

♥️♥️♥️

Thanks for your great support 🏅. Keep following and discussing our channel

@@colonbina1 okkkk nigga

CAP

Shut up

It doesn't. It slowly lowers with distance from the planet exactly like a light bulb slowly gets dimmer as you walk away from it. Where the international space station is there is still 90% of the gravity that you feel at sea level. If you weight 100 lbs here on Earth and there was a "stationary" platform where the space station is - you would still weigh 90 lbs on that platform. The reason they don't "feel" gravity there is because the ISS isn't stationary, it is in orbit around the Earth. They orbit every 90 minutes so their centrifugal force that wants to fling them outward is EXACTLY the same as the gravity wants to pull them inward. Think of a merry-go-round that wants to fling you out and gravity wants to pull you in. Balance the 2 forces and they cancel and you feel weightless. That is why to get to orbit you have to travel at 17,500 MPH sideways to stay up there. Without that centrifugal force you would fall back down just like you threw a rock up into the air. In fact, that is how they get back down to Earth. The just slow down a little bit and that reduces their centrifugal outward force and gravity pulls them back down. Remember; it is Earths gravity that holds the Moon in place and the Moons gravity that affects the tides and the Sun's gravity that holds the Earth in place - look how far away those 2 objects are and their gravity still works all the way over here.

I guess it’s always a matter of aesthetic preference in the end but I have always thought the SpaceX suit is surprisingly something put together by cash strapped effects designers for a B sci-fi movie from the 60s, ie a poor man’s view of what a future suit might look like a bit like Hardy Amiss’s take on Air Stewardess outfits on the shuttle in 2001, a film otherwise brilliant I might add, but it perhaps deserved better than the Queen’s favourite and rather old hat conservative designer trying to be ‘modern’ which is how the SpaceX suit looks to me, did Musk influence it I wonder? Oh and it seems to make everyone look fat and to my eye far from sleek, esp that weird looking helmet that’s escaped from the Dr Who props Dept though if it works well who cares about the weird look. At first sight the Boeing suit looks far better, efficient, modern practical and fit for function, over the bargain basement put together ‘whatever mis matched bits we could find in the nearest costume store to look different’ approach. But hey I’m judging looks over the possible functionality so in that regard it might indeed be better, though I will take views from non SpaceX fan boy UKposts channels as well on that one so as to try to make a balanced objective judgement.

Exactly others can make a more objective judgement over time.