So this is a great explanation and I love it. But I have a request. I get how entropy works, but I’m having trouble imagining the scenario where all the molecitles end up in a corner of the room. I understand that it’s a one in a huge number probability. I get that. I’m just having trouble even understanding how such a scenario could even happen, I mean the scenario leading up to it. It occurs to me that it would be easier for me to imagine if I saw one of these reverse videos where you ran a simulation where you started all the particles in one corner of the “room” with different velocities and then take a simulation, but then ran it backwards to show how it could conceivably happen. Do you think you would do that please?
@ItsJustAstronomical3 години тому
OK, I made a special animation just for you: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/iKR-o45riX9muI0.html Notice that none of the laws of physics are being broken here (besides the 2nd law). The scenario is possible, just very unlikely.
@mitchjohnson47142 години тому
@@ItsJustAstronomical Thanks. I love how the wall comes down like "Let's just make this permanent."
@joyboy146821 годину тому
Im building a very detailed world for my dnd campaign/book and i cant say enough how much you have helped me. Thank you.
@nicolasclermont893День тому
It's so awesome how you've taught your kids this. Love it.
@skinnyassc92755 днів тому
Yeah earth will spin once a month in 1.47 × 10^16 years later.
@professorfoxtrot5 днів тому
Thanks to capitalism we're not in a frozen wasteland eating snow
@outthere93706 днів тому
A lot of people think ice ages are a common occurrence. They are "not" common at all.
@johnjacobs35027 днів тому
.....
@MyMemphisable7 днів тому
Thanks!
@ItsJustAstronomical7 днів тому
Thanks for your support!
@MyMemphisable7 днів тому
@@ItsJustAstronomical I really love how creative and succinct your videos are. Perfect blend of intuitive visuals and mind boggling physical phenomena!
@commercialbreak82908 днів тому
Video killed the radio star.
@shawns07628 днів тому
Black holes are based on a mathematical misconception. General Relativity predicts dilation, not singularities. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of G.R. predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. There is no singularity at the center of our galaxy. It can be inferred mathematically that dilation is occurring there. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate that we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. In other words that mass is all around us. This is the explanation for galaxy rotation curves/dark matter. The "missing mass" is dilated mass. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has recently been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. There can only be clarity in astronomy if the concept of singularities is discarded. Einstein is known to have repeatedly said that they cannot exist. Nobody believed in them when he was alive including Planck, Bohr, Dirac, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Feynman etc.
@martiant43338 днів тому
What if there's another earth on L3?
@rakshitbhardwaj8478 днів тому
Excellent knowledge
@Primimimimimimimi9 днів тому
this kills the star
@shawnhollahan5909 днів тому
CORRECTION: “How We THINK Stars Die”
@commercialbreak82908 днів тому
Tks 4 the correction !
@kevinrosero972310 днів тому
Kudos
@kevinrosero972310 днів тому
Best animation I've seen explaining the precession
@AkiDreams12 днів тому
When will be the release of the How Stars Die video? My little one is waiting for it. Thank you!
@ItsJustAstronomical12 днів тому
I think I'll finish it within a week. I've been traveling and distracted by other things. I now finally have time to finish it.
@AkiDreams12 днів тому
When will be the release of the How Stars Die video? My little one is waiting for it. Thank you!
@ItsJustAstronomical12 днів тому
I think I'll finish it within a week. I've been traveling and distracted by other things. I now finally have time to finish it.
@AkiDreams10 днів тому
@@ItsJustAstronomical thank you so much! He is excited (he's 6 btw 😆). Love your videos!
@ItsJustAstronomical10 днів тому
@@AkiDreams Oh, that warms my heart! I feel honored to have a young fan, especially considering the difficulty of the subject matter.
@AkiDreams10 днів тому
@@ItsJustAstronomical He loves everything! Especially how you explained the P-P and CNO. He loves the illustration, graphs, everything! :D He has been telling me about it for quite awhile. He loves everything space. :) Thank you so much for your replies! We are so glad we discovered your channel. :)
@kingmasterlord14 днів тому
okay but like, a trailer park of O'Neill cylinders at L5, tho. run asteroids from the belt through the 0g middle for the industrial skyscrapers extending from the otherwise residential, recreational, and agricultural areas inside to process.
@guilbarreto373015 днів тому
We will soon find out that planet 9 is the cause of ice ages. The reason that there isn't an even pattern is because it's depends of where the earth is located when it is closest to the sun.
@yoshbui231215 днів тому
At 2:15, how can you be sure that it’s Capricorn? Obviously you cannot see the constellation behind the sun due to the sun’s light. Wouldn’t it be better to use the cancer sign instead since you can see and verify the cancer constellation at night?
@lesschorlemer515115 днів тому
One quibble, not that you'll actually see this comment since over 9300 people have responded, but at the end of your video you said that the Milankovitch Cycles have been affecting climate here on earth for hundreds of thousands of years... I'm sorry, but they've been affecting climate for billions of years. Otherwise, a great video
@ItsJustAstronomical15 днів тому
You're in luck because I read every comment. I might quibble with your quibble. I said they've been important for hundreds of thousands of years. But remember the cycle depends on ice. It's unusual for the Earth to have polar ice caps. It only happens during ice ages. The Earth has been in an ice age the past few million years, but before that there were no polar ice caps and the Milankovitch cycles had little impact on the climate.
@lesschorlemer515115 днів тому
@@ItsJustAstronomical Oh wow, you *DID* respond. Nice! But I think that even in greenhouse earth mode they play a role in climate. In ice age earth mode, like we're in now, they force climate to cycle from glacial to interglacial, but in greenhouse earth mode they also result in long periods of much warmer summers/much shorter winters to warmer summers/regular length winters.
@mirandamorin605315 днів тому
Scientific bullshit.
@theautoman2215 днів тому
The problem with the theory that humans are causing so much of the earth temperature rise because of their creation of so much more co2 just has one major potential problem, volcanos. Have we away of finding out if volcano's have emitted more CO2 or less during this same time period?
@ItsJustAstronomical15 днів тому
Yes, we have figured that out: www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/which-emits-more-carbon-dioxide-volcanoes-or-human-activities
@theautoman2215 днів тому
@@ItsJustAstronomical thanks for the link.
@guramgudashvili996316 днів тому
Amazing video!!!! Thank you so much for enlightening me about my planet home.
@user-cn2bi4uf2v17 днів тому
I’ll survive 13000years to enjoy summer Christmas
@keithbelcher635218 днів тому
I just had Mexican food and became major green house gas contributor. Sorry
@Paul1_snd.art.s19 днів тому
This is sooo underated, this is one of the best and well explained videos about stars I've ever watched! You've answered questions I had for so long on topics that no other videos I watched talked about so thank you, you've got a new subscriber!
@ItsJustAstronomical18 днів тому
Thank you, I'm so glad!
@paulderoubaix02719 днів тому
But Water is by far the greatest greenhouse gas and when water and carbon dioxide are present together, carbon dioxide only absorbs 5% of the infrared energy. Water vapour is mainly responsible for our climate and the sun is largely responsible for changes in energy. From 1880 to 1950 the temperature rose by 0.45 degrees but the increase in CO2 was only 18ppm. The CO2 increase was not nearly enough to provide this warming.
@nicktheking1234520 днів тому
Why does the sun have a centrifugal force on spacetime? I understand the first gravity well visualized directly around the sun, and then as you leave that well you reach a peak where the sun loses its influence right? Or some sort of peak. But then after that peak another? gravity well? bends spacetime around the sun again. Why are there two wells? I don't understand why the first gravity well doesn't lead to a peak, as it does, and then immediately flatten out back to flat spacetime again
@ItsJustAstronomical20 днів тому
The centrifugal force is a result of us using a rotating coordinate system here. The entire coordinate system is rotating along with the Earth's orbit so that in these coordinates the earth is stationary. This is basically saying that if you were orbital at one revolution per year that would not be fast enough to avoid falling towards the sun if you're close to the sun. If you're far away that would be too fast.
@nicktheking1234520 днів тому
@@ItsJustAstronomical Phenomenal response and now it seriously all makes sense to me. Thank you so much for the wonderfully informative video!
@nicktheking1234520 днів тому
@@ItsJustAstronomical Phenomenal response, it seriously all makes sense to me now. Thanks so much for the great video!
@johnnmn0121 день тому
guys stop chopping onions 😢
@mfr5823 дні тому
You fail to realise that the greenhouse warming effects of C02 have already saturated their ability to trap infrared energy. Any increases in C02 have insignificant effects on global temperature. I wish you YT vloggers would stop pushing false science stories....
@gantongangsta373523 дні тому
Very interesting !
@apichachawarat599324 дні тому
its very clear and dizzy when i try to imagine it. very hate this
@russwellings918425 днів тому
Do your research ! This is rubbish….
@V_ChessGuy27 днів тому
People who watched this for homework >
@aksiwach727228 днів тому
Thank you so much for such a crisp and comprehensive video 😊
@RonHudgens-ck5qe28 днів тому
We ASSUME!!!! MANKIND HAS NO IDEA AS TO REAL WAY IT WORKS PERIOD!!!!
@sreckom9229 днів тому
So, what happens in the future, when we continue adding CO2, but we enter the warm periods according to Milankovitch Cycle?
@smhollanshead29 днів тому
Global warming is either the sun or the barbecue in my back yard. Republicans say it’s the sun. Democrats say it’s my barbecue. I wonder which one is correct?
@chainfrost785129 днів тому
I love this channel!!!!
@FlatEarthMathМісяць тому
This video is fantastic. I love the visuals and how they perfectly illustrate the concept in question. Bravo!
@dploitМісяць тому
🙌👍👍
@paulthomas963Місяць тому
The Earth doesn't wobble on its axis. Go watch what happens to a spinning gyroscope in zero G. If the Earth were wobbling on its axis why is the entire solar system "wobbling" too? how is the Sirus star rising in the same spot? why is the rate *changing*? This explanation is just an old myth that we're taught because Copernicus said so. It doesn't fit the evidence. I don't understand how it really works (no one does) but I know this model is wrong.
@dploitМісяць тому
loco te pasaste ! great job man!. I saw many videos trying to understand different things and yours is just perfect! Im aviator studying for the European pilots license!, thanks a lot
@bugmouthready529Місяць тому
Magnetic pole reversal with mantle decoupling and earths 90° flip. Eyes Open
@robertwallace7213Місяць тому
You mean "our tax dollars" will not stop the Milankovitch Cycle? Said No Politician Ever! Lol...
@quantumcat7673Місяць тому
It's not just astronomical! We have ice ages cycles since the start of the Pleistocene. However Milankovitch cycles have always been there and they did not create ice ages during the Pliocene and before. The important difference is the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Now, we will perhaps not have the next ice age because of man made warming of the climate. Check the NOAA pdf on glaciation cycles.
@ItsJustAstronomicalМісяць тому
I know. I should have said glaciation instead of ice age. I made another video talking about how important greenhouse gases are.
@LongPolipopМісяць тому
Why dont you use the same method for calculating the distance to the moon to calculate that to the sun? Because it is all a lie.😂