Ai ? U meant crystals

I dont know but i thnk humans will always surpass ai cause ai will never be smarter espically if ai can't i m a g i n e

Humans attached to ai and computers will be verry awesomre better then comp stomps

People that believe AI will surpass human intelligence are probably correct, but only in their own case,

@@CosmicAliveness Come on man, you give AI times, and it will help us. Now, it already makes better decision than average people do.

We definitely will outgrow earth in a few hundred years. #yolo

They are not mutually exclusive. In fact, space research has already benefited Earth. Given that our population is increasing, it also makes sense that we colonize other worlds. Material science has also already advanced since production of material in space allows for material properties that cannot be replicated under the gravity of Earth as experiments on the ISS have shown. This will likely benefit medical science as well.

It's even worse than that, but the average person's education in science is genuinely parroting what they see and hear on TV, and taking it all on faith, we are brainwashed into believing we understand things at a common sense level but are patently wrong. *My formal education requires relativistic quantum mechanics, condensed matter physics and classical mechanics, and the grim truth behind the way we're being robbed blind by NASA for 70-million dollars a day is truly sickening, but trying to reason with the average person is a lost cause.* We will never send human beings to Mars. With current technology, we will never send man to the moon. Mankind has been brainwashed into believing the ruling class can actually control nature, but it's all a lost cause. *What we need to focus on is the health of our species and the pollution we're installing directly into our immediately surrounding environment.* The last 2 generations are riddled with misfits due to exposure to these chemicals like atrazine and now, a percentage believe they are the opposite gender they scientifically and factually are. NASA should be privatized, stripped up their budget and that money used to help solve that problem and more.

​@@macbuff81Actually, world populations are heading in the opposite direction. That doesn't mean it is safe to remain on one planet. One major astronomical mishap and it will be as if we never existed. No, we need to stretch out of the womb though it be difficult snd inconvenient.

Politicians don't want to spend the money. It's just that simple. NASA is a joke right now. JFK is rolling over in his grave.

Yes, But if the trip is just 4 light years to Proxima the time dilation cannot exceed 4 years. It will not be hundreds or thousands of years.

A one-year journey to a star 4 light-years away at 80% the speed of light would only take 3.12 years for the crew, while 10 years would have passed on Earth.

Yet at 99.999997% light speed, universe will end in a blink of the travelers eye

lol SPACE lol 😂 😂

One of many theories.

We used a lot before we used nuclear. Energy extraction and use are advancements that come in leaps and bounds. We have ideas for potential methods of acceleration that could get us where we want to be. It’s just a matter of doing pure physics research and putting money into it.

I also agree with you. Space explorations simply isn't a priority for humanity rn tho it should be

@@BurningGhosts we will have to stop spending so much time and money on murdering each other in order to get there

incorrect in everything, modern day spaceships are incalculably more advanced, much faster and more efficient than anything in the 1960s. a modern day rocket travels many times faster than any built in the 1960s or 1970s

Is out of the question. Armageddon is coming and the Earth will be destroyed with wars.

The universe given its size is to all intents and purposes practically empty, the biggest problem would not be hitting something, but given its emptiness having any frame of reference to navigate off of.

Space is empty. Even when two galaxies collide almost no stars get near enough to hit each other.

@@Just.A.T-Rex there are comits, asteroids and other bodies, yes? No?

@@nicholasflynn5376 thanks Nicholas!

@@Just.A.T-Rex also: thanks as well

now all you need is a way to generate all that power needed to fold space! Unless you got a black hole in your back pocket i wouldnt hold your breath! To this day we still dont know what gravity is only its effects.

@@racerx1777Back in the day we didn't know how to generate lots of power until we learned how to harness nuclear energy. I wouldn't hold my breath for a warp drive but all it takes is a major discovery to change everything we know about space travel.

lol we wont make it another 100 years. the Covid-bioweapon didnt open your eyes? Do you know to this day that research is STILL continuing? That future you speak of does not include us peasants that i can promise!

Dark forest

I like the way nothing kills a cartoon character, they explode with charred blackened faces but they laugh it off!!!

Getting to the moon WAS a huge "ask" until we did it!!!

I love great head!

Yes, I have not seen a single video on this problem. Could the human body ever be protected or insulated from this?

Depends who's doing the thinking :)

At those speeds (near light-speed) even hydrogen gas in space becomes a brick wall. Either we create ships that are multi-generational to travel to other worlds or we figure out ways to live hundreds if not thousands of years.

Probably some kind of forcefield.

You can't at least not anywhere in the near future. By the time you would detect an object on a collision course with you at multiple speeds of light, it would be too late and you'd already be dead. Matter instantaneously reconfigured into energy once again! Much faster than light technologies of all types would need to be developed to make this collision avoidance tech possible. Fortunately space is mostly empty and it seems inter-dimensional travel via quantum physics would be more likely. And when we do get to these life supporting planets in other galaxies, then what. We find highly sophisticated beings that could be nasty, ugly, warring in nature (even worse than us), don't want us there, and think we are low life form pests - like viruses. With that level of tech they would exterminate us like we do to bugs and unwanted bacteria and viruses. Certainly makes me want to live in a confined space ship for centuries!! Or not!! All this is a giant pipe dream to keep thousands of university students in piles of grant money living a cushy life of research while many people world wide are starving and need that money to exist and survive - today, not into the future. Any way you shake it, it is still about greed and money, profit, not a sense or wonderment for pure research. No one with a brain believes that or ever will.

In Star Trek they use something call the "Deflector Dish" which produces a navigational shield ahead of the ship and also provides sensor data of the matter ahead of the ship for navigation.

@@krwilesScience fiction gives us many ideas on what technology might become and how it would benefit us in the here and now along with the future. As it is, this type of technology might not ever be seriously possible. On the other-hand, you never know. We have a giant dynamo sitting in the center of our planet made of iron which creates our magnetic field. Keep something in mind that it doesn't keep everything out. several tons of space stuff falls from space every year. Also, the faster you go, the faster you crash into an object even with deflector shields. At those speeds, a pebble would have enough energy to explode a star. I'm sorry but there has to be a better way. We just haven't thought about it yet. So the best way to make it to other Galaxies is by observing them as they were when their light left them to travel to us.

Really? What about s p a g h e t t i f i c a t i o n ?

@@thomaskaminski5611 doesn't that only happen in a black hole

@@terrytwotoes3225 The closer you get, the thinner it gets. Who wants to be a lightyear tall? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaghettification

@@terrytwotoes3225 Sorry, I do not distinguish between those two. In astrophysics, a wormhole is a black hole that can be travelled through. A black hole would be infinitally heavier, as all absorbed matter is retained within. Spaghettification should happen with both, I reckon. However, this is still highly theoretical...