I live in the UK where the untreated sewage and agricultural run off in all rivers and into the sea is a massive scandal.

Honestly the planet does not care that much, we can kill ourselves off by poisonings the water and a few centuries later the earth has cleansed itself.

​@@markrichter2053 that's sad

100% of you is even older than that-as old as the universe itself

More or less 😅

It may be "natural to assume" and easy to "presume" but it's a bit of stretch to then say "problem solved."

What created a problem is the un-realistic question to be begin with. Creation had and has no problem. Asteroids contain between 0 and 13.5 percent water which means there would have been an incredible amount of asteroid mass pounding the earth in order to fill the oceans. Also, considering the oceans cover about two thirds of the earth surface, makes the proposition more implausable. Has any scientist done and presented a proper calculation as to how much asteroid mass it would take. I don't know, haven't seen any, but would it not be the initial obvious fact to check and present with the hypothesis to establish it? Also, if water did come by asteroid, then where did that water come from? So the question about origin of water still remains. A far more probable hypothesis would be that it manifested here on earth as part in the stages of all further manifestations. For example then, where did the first live cell come from? Or should the question moreso be "how", on earth. A philosophical investigation to the hypothesis of manifestation, leads back to the birth of the star, or sun, whereby it can likened in principle, to a seed or egg that germinates or births into the subsequent developments of a far more complex organism, more than the parts of the seed or egg itself to begin with. To the true scientist, the term "synergy" would now come to mind ~ "more than the sum of its parts" ought to ring some bells. Like the bells of Big Ben. With adequate philosophical approach in scientific endeavour, deduction by way of translation or transposing of concepts in nature that are well known, scientists may make greater strides, by virtue of not creating a problem when there isn't one. In other words, the question itself is in need of question, rather than frame the hypothesis without substantiation and then ensue upon a never ending trivial pursuit. The inherent limitation of science is it relies on physical evidence only, because it has to, to begin with, so in regards to the questions of origin, it gets to the point, or realm, that unless you were there at the time, over time, to observe the occurrence, one cannot know. Other than by logical deduction, translated or transposed in concept or principle from what we do know. At least to be in the realm of certainty and not remain in mystery. For example, "infinity" is a logical deduction from mathematical principle, that a number can be continuously divided by half and never get to zero, but can you prove it with evidence, or even comprehend it? We can only put down a definition of infinity as something that goes on forever, or something not finite, what it is not. More about MAN I FESTATION, is a well recognised and established concept about intention, being an aspect of human consciousness. So, is it not more plausible that creation and/or evolution of matter, and matters, be a manifestion of a universal consciousness? Although beyond our current comprehension, this is not a problem, rather is to recognise what pertains, or is relevant, to our particular intents and purposes here on earth. There is way too much "pie in the sky" stuff, typically caused by celebrity science, rather than working from our foundation, learning from the ground up.

@@russell62790 As computer chips are getting more powerful it can contain more information in a given space. Then what is the ultimate destination. One infinitesimal point contains all the information. That is nature of the beginning. Creation of everything.

You are 100 percent correct because inside the earth crust you have more water than we have outside

@@russell62790Very Brilliant sir! Thank you for that!

😂😂

It is the curse layed upon us....mankind...by.....to find answers to the big obvious questions noone can ever explain.

There are allways! many answers/solutions to a problem/question. As there are allways! many origins for problems/questions.

Like a 'sandclock'.

Yet, I wonder...are earth-like conditions really necessary? Or are the energetic creative forces in our universe capable of inventing life-forms from different materials on /in surfaces of other heavenly bodies/gasclouds? In my non-scientific opinion, scientists think too strict within their 'territory'. As with 'language'. The flora and fauna here are stupid, because they do not speak! a language with a voice. That all those lifeforms communicate in a different way, each according to their species/needs/possibilities/surroundings does not count. They do not speak like humans. Excluding (happily not all scientists are misled this way by tradition and pride) all all other probabilities. So newcomers in the scientific world do not have to fear jobloss, no new exciting research, no chance to write their name in history books, no chance for (short-lived) fame, but instead their are numerous fields and topics waiting to be explored. Not to find absolute answers, but to enhance our knowledge. Not to get rich, but to look up in amazement.

Haha thanks man

God is the answer. Mystery solved

@@thelionofjudah77u82 yes, all hail Ometecuhtli and Omecihuatl. theres like tablets and stuff

@@rogerwilco1777 Every knee shall bow and confess that Christ is Lord John 3:14-18 saves.

The correct answer is not "we don't know'... The answer is that we are still unsure as to the exact answer, the proof is still undetermined.

Science doesn’t know how God made the water and brought it to earth. Yet.

Thats why its called a theory! Nobody was there lol.

Scientists don't know anything, ask them what is electricity, or magnetism, watch the get panic attacks.

This is like the bibles explanation for creation “God created the universe” “Great but who created gif?” Same thing “Earths water came from comets” “Great but where did the water in comets come form?” “

But this is how we find out, and we may know someday. That's what counts. Early on, you don't know much of anything.

@@theuneducatedbiologist9637 Then that would be called a hypothesis not theory in science. In philosophy a "theory" is what science calls a hypothesis. "Theory" in science means it has been tried and tested and you can take it home yourself and get the same result. A theory is the highest rank for evidence in science.

And why have they stopped coming 😒

Cuz there's a thing called the atmosphere now mate​@@hernandezparkes7772

Good question, science is working on it. It takes time to find answers especially if you don't fall for easy, oversimplified stories. Better to keep questions open rather than giving invented explanations

That’s exactly why these programs are great 😂

it is also the time to get that espresso

I found it OK. You are just not a nerd.

I found that bit extremely interesting!

@@maynardjohnson3313 🤣🤣

Really? 😮

It's the only one known for a fact to have liquid water.

Titan is a moon of Saturn containing lakes and rivers of methane.

@@kylewilliams2648 Depends on your standard for evidence. Bear with me, it's going to be long. Do you think the Earth is flat? If you do, tell me so and our conversation is done. If you think Earth is a sphere (more or less), why do you think so? Is it not clear from your own observation that Earth is flat? When you look out your window, don't you see a flat landscape? But you think Earth is a sphere, right? Yet that conclusion is contrary to your own experience and you have never seen Earth from space and never seen for yourself that Earth is a sphere. But you accept multiple evidences and logic and think (without your personal experience) that Earth is a sphere. Similarly, the argument for liquid water on Europa and water ice on Titan is extremely strong. Without direct experience of same. So, what constitutes a fact? Do you require direct personal observation to conclude that something is a 'fact'? If that's the case, then you have no confidence in atomic theory, cell phones, and all the things which you use, exploit, and enjoy every day. Cheers.

@@TX_BoomSlang Thanks for correcting me! Not admitting a mistake is worse than making a mistake!

@@richardpark3054 We learn more from failure than success.

no, its more! life can exist without oxygen!

@@Troutcatchahow? If water is H2O, can’t have water without oxygen

Dogs are more important than both. 💚

@@Steveriknows very true

Well said. Great example of how "We don't know" becomes new questions with some now answered, and the process that works to perform that miracle.

Good question. Can i have u to think about this? If in the beginning there was absolutely nothing, then there shouldn't be anything now. The fact that there is something now must mean it had to come from something, and that something must have the power to originate it. It is the creator. Next question, who is that creator, I can help you with that if you wish👍

​@@sunUK20sure ain't God

@@sunUK20 nothing is not nothing, matter comes in and out of existence all the time thhey can even watch it happen in a lab

@@davidivey9257 you might like to believe..

@mvsmvs8428 u cant get matter from nothing. Not in a billion years..

Exactly. My theory… The Sun emits ionized hydrogen solar winds which interacts with our oxygen rich atmosphere thus creating a condensate mixture of hydrogen and oxygen forming H2O or in simple terms… Water.

The water on our planet is older than the planet, itself. It wasn't created on the planet.

Water cannot be reliably dated. It’s merely a theory that heavy water is older than the earth. That being said… There is no definitive age of earth. 4.5 billion years is an educated guess at best

​@@Magistrate17lol....stop it.😂

@@brandonleesanders we all know the Earth is 6,000 years old and there's bottled water in my refrigerator that's older than that so you tell me 😉

combustion

That's capitalism for you.

@@maynardjohnson3313oh shut up. I’ll take annoying ads (that I’m not forced to buy the product for) over starving and working to death in the gulag and “reeducation” camps. Nothing kills and gathers wealth and power in the hands of an elite few quite like socialism!

What a shame. Your inability to tolerate a few seconds of extraneous information caused you to miss a really good show. Sucks 4 u.

Ron I feel you bro

@@natehurst4329what commercials?

Interesting point, i had to look it up. Oxygen is top 3 abundant elements in the universe so its a no brainer that the planet is covered in hydrogen and oxygen

well if the volcanoes spewed hydrogen sulfide, methane and carbon dioxide and the oxygen in the atmosphere didn't form til life came along that needed that water to produce oxygen and hmm, I wonder how abundant of an element oxygen really is out there in the universe?

⁠@@thegoldensnitch6312 oxygen is an abundant element but as a solid or liquid in the form of various oxides. Oxygen gas is extremely uncommon due to its highly reactive nature. Only planets with life can have atmospheric oxygen like Earth.

Oxygen was first created in SUPER GIANT stars that exploded but only formed neutron stars or pulsars. However, oxygen likely first arrived onto the Earth as liquid water then the plants give off oxygen as a byproduct. Thus water arrived on Earth from comets and asteroids over billions of years. Every single element in the periodic tale was created from the inside of a stars end called a SUPERNOVA.

Great question, then the next question would be how hydrogen even got there in the first place.......we ARE the aliens

That's called panspermia :)

The other source is space, full of stars creating heavy elements. The earth had to form, water probably didn't form on earth. So we think it may have come to earth over time.

Interesting! And, how exactly, did Earth form its own water?

It cried ​@@richardpark3054

The reason is that the early Earth would have been too hot to retain it's water. It would have quickly evaporated out to space. It's collision with Theia would have further resulted in the Earth losing it's water (because that collision would have heated the Earth up tremendously, and exposed it's core to space even more). Also consider how different materials 'settle' into different orbits -- closer or further from the sun. The 'rocky' planets are closer to the sun. The 'gaseous' planets further. And the 'icy' planets seem to be all furthest from the sun. Earth is a 'rocky' planet, and water is NOT a rocky substance. And finally, water existed in space, in that dust/gas cloud from which our entire solar system formed. And THAT dust came from a star going supernova, and all the chemical reactions that occurred in space, forming all kinds of basic molecules [edit: including water]. Does that all make sense?

@@djbenje4019 could that earth/thea collision have been very slow and low energy? Enough to tilt the new larger earth into its seasonal axis. A Swirl of silica, aluminium, water etc that gradually coalesced with minimal boiling away into space?

I think the 7th day Adventist came then,, leaving a 6pk of water each trip,,,till,, WALLAAA,,, an ocean sprang forth when the lil baggies or bottles all eroded enough to burst open

There is😂

Pretty sure it’s more than a thought at this point based on spectrum analysis

Yes that's what they said. The only planet with liquid water.

Believing that there is no liquid water on any other planet in the universe is as dumb as beleiving in god.

​@@KingBritishthey clearly said "in our solar system".

@@OvelNick The original comment in which I'm replying to did not state "our solar system" at all.

Girl stop ✋️ 🫸 😆

I agree. It is much more going with this apparently simple molecule. It has a community relationship.

😂😂😂❤

Leviticus 8:3?

And because of that process, you get to sit there on your device and complain about It...We would be in the stone ages still if we ever adopted that way of thinking. space is our future whether you like it or not. The earth won't last forever. Be glad we have specialists thinking outside the box. Your way of thinking will lead us to extinction.

It’s a reasonable hypothesis.

Where did the water on mars come from though? (Or the water that at least used to be on mars?) Or maybe earth’s water was a combo of Thea and comets?

Sure of what?

@@Soacwiththaface To be sure of how earth got its water.

@@travisinthetrunk the maker himself...

@@Soacwiththaface Do you have any evidence to support your claim?

@@travisinthetrunk these fools will probably tell you some fake trickster god like Jesus's dad, Yahweh or whatever.. but we all know it was Ometecuhtli and Omecihuatl that created everything.. trust me, theres like tablets that prove it or somethin

Yeah I was 26 years old at the time Halley was visible - on an island in the middle of the Caribbean Sea. But it didn’t come close to the 1997 comet Hale-Bopp which was so bright you could see it even in the middle of a city! Hale-Bopp Discovered: 23 juli 1995 Age: 4,503×10^9 years Next perihelion: 4380 Orbits: The sun Last perihelium: 1 april 1997

cool story. got time to tell it again. you are beautiful its true

👍😉

They would never follow their own axioms of science.

😂

Water ice is everywhere on the moon poles

At some point I think a large comet or meteor came flying past Mars with enough force to strip away the atmosphere and the water, too. If this object was inbound(going toward the sun) it could have lost momentum and dropped the water on us. That's just my theory.

Yeah and imagine if religion called the shots, we would not have people with curious minds tracking down the truth of reality.

space