Ya that worked out sooooooooooooooo well for the states. Genius move right there :/

Yeah we are fucked

Thanks Trump

lmao

@sheldon pereira kinda racist of u ngl

Anyone reminded of Interstellar? What with the agricultural and environmental disaster and Nasa being practically dead and buried...

Hopefully we have a secret underground NASA base like that movie then...

Hi30911 exactly right my friend

You know Bill Clinton cut NASA's budget, so you democrats are just as stupid.

Marcantoni M And yet President 💩 wants us to get to Mars.

Jarid Gaming We should cannibalizes unused or “poorly designed” planes and other wasted military hardware.

@@allasar This guy just put forward a very honest and insightful story about your country's military spending, and you're looking at his grammar? No wonder America is going to shit- people like you can't focus on the main issue.

My things is, if they are gonna pour more money into the military, instead of buying equipment that’s just sitting there, why not pay these soldiers more since they are, ya know, risking their lives for fat rich people in wars they were sent to by said rich fat people. Especially for the LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ soldiers risking their lives for the freedoms of said rich fat people to vote them out of the military.

Yeah I've read about that, that spending isn't really for the millitarys sake but for the towns in which the factories are located. They say its for national security but it's classic pork barell spending. I don't think a bit of cash infusing into a region is a bad thing, but atleast fund something that can potentially carry its own in the long run. There is probably also a lot of state and local rail or other infrastructure dream projects, that could potential tie outlying regions together.

Ueah lets look at the nam war.

They're not from the UK so they wouldn't understand

can you maybe explain? i want to laugh too :-)

grsdgsegesg

​@@morsmordre3 . 1@mll

​@@pennyporta9347 so true bestie

"Security! A little kid managed to sneak into the White House and give a press conference!" *Then it dawned on him*

Donald Trump is 3 little boys on top of each other in a suit. That also explains why he has so small hands.

Carewolf Omg, that actually explains everything! How did we miss it! He's Vincent Adultman!

Don't diss boys on top of each other. that's how Dipper's clones from Gravity Falls spent the rest of their lives, and I would rather trust the country to them than Trump at this point.

It is donald trump understanding the fact that most of his supporters have the intelligence of a five year old("I love the poorly educated") so he has to talk like that.

Same 😊

Search in Google - hdpixels Select 1st Site Go in 1st Popular post on right Disable adblock plugins and refresh page Click Sponsord link Enjoy

Won't accomplish that dream with the dirty mold rag on your head

You are really good at troling

mihrjf So mothers are not allowed to dye their hair and businesses should pay their employees more? And "the establishment" wants to destroy itself because reasons? And white slavers were wonderful people because black people had slaves too? Is that what you are trying to tell us, correct? I'm curious to what are you doing to try to stop this ruination.

He might speak toddler, because he has two young children but psychopathic toddler dont think so.

@@NightridewithNikki the guy was a damn fool, however you wanna slice it. I cant believe anybody still supports the monster

@@rucksoclown7696 B....but hEs nOt a cArEeR PolOtIciAN

UPDATE: 45 bankrupted DC for his Fourth of July dick waving parade. Fucking "stable genius".

Americans have zero control of there politics, anything alluding otherwise is an illusion or someone lying to himself.

@@pumba16b Not really arguing but it seems like the peoples' control of politics all over is slipping somehow. Scary shit man.

Glenn Peterson so true. It feels kinda ominous around anything political.

But he's donating his salary. And - as of Feb 2020 - spent and estimated 300+ years of salary on his half outings, with an unknown amount going to his dick extension golf courses.

No one can bring manufacturing back. It's gone. New factories will be max automated. Service people still required yes, but not sheer numbers. It's capitalism at work. Promising jobs is not compatible with capitalism.

I don't know if you've noticed but capitalism has been dead/dying in the US for a long while. Laissez faire is a myth.

He can if your workers are willing to make 10% their original income. That's what the Chinese worker income are at because they are less developed.

Pure automation is expensive.

Because he demonizes anything that is related to green energy and he knows his people in coal country have no clue how to do those jobs and have no interest in learning. They didn't tell the Repubs "I want to switch industries and get a good paying job." They said "I want my coal mining job back." They look backward, not forward. It's the core of the entire Republican ideology. Backward momentum.

Despite it being humanities best hope for collective immortality.

William Henning I think they brought back the half penny so they could cut NASA's budget even more

How did you reach that interpretation? The OP was obviously referring to oxymoron behind cutting NASA's already pitifully small budget

Kevin Jones 0 to 100 real quick...

They will split it to the atom

Charles Green Probably producing his 900th album or something

Charles Green he's off planet

Buckethead for World President! =D

jamming with brain.

@An Vode actually he's intergalactic

Consistently red states take in way more federal aid than consistently blue states. Hence why these cuts have serious repercussions considering the states that rely more on that aid are the ones who voted for a president that's slashing that aid into oblivion.

Ian, The top 10 states that send more money to the fed than they take out are blue states. 9 of the 10 states that take the most are red states. And about 55% of Obamacare users are republicans as oppose to about 35% democrats. Anyway, back to the topic. The republican politicians have spent the last few decades convincing the poor white republicans (the working poor) that the (legal and illegal) immigrants are stealing their jobs and the blacks are lazy and collecting welfare. When confronted with the fact that they're are on welfare as well, most of them believe that they're the exception few who actually work hard but are victims of circumstance. So they vote for the party that promises to limit immigration deport illegal immigrants. They think once those people are gone, their piece of the pie gets larger. The fact of the matter is, technology is changing faster than we can create replacement jobs. Look at the numbers. Between 2000 and 2016, we lost 22% of our manufacture jobs (went from 23ish mil to 17ish mil). Yet, the manufacture output in America is at an all-time high. You can blame outsourcing all you want, but the fact of the matter is, why would manufacture companies continue to pay hourly wages for human workers when they could pay a 1 time fee for machines. Same thing with the coal sector. A 1 time fee for solar panels will eventually be cheaper than paying per watt to coal plants. Of course, some people need somebody to blame. They need a savior. Enter Trump, the outsider. He's not part of the establishment that has failed them over and over. The conman convinced them that he alone will limit new immigrants, deport illegal immigrants, cut wasteful spending that go to "lazy people." In their desperation, they didn't realize that they're in the same category as those "lazy people."

I relish in that.

+Khalid Hussain I made a video about it, check it out, it debunks what you are saying

michaelatw86 You do know a lot of them are welfare unemployment, disability, social security, Medicare, the ACA and get expanded Medicaid under the ACA don't you? Education cuts don't matter because they like being stupid.

SPACE LAZARS! Sorry, but in all seriousness, many inventions that we use every day were created for space travel originally. It would be foolish to cut it any more then we already have. That was actually one of my major gripes with the Obama administration.

Enderchangling Because they're idiots. Anti-Intellectual greedy bastards. They have no vision.

Cuz NASA doesn't have the fund to lobby properly :P Well unless you are one of those ppl that for some reason thinks the military budget goes to the "military" and not the private sector lol. (protip: if you have the money to invest in some of those companies, this might be a good time to do it they are about to get an influx of money! =D)

When people hear nasa, they think space shit they don't understand. Due to ignorance they can't comprehend the advances made possible due to the challenge of space travel, nor the impact it will have on the future.

Yes, anti-intellectualism, but hey, they are incredibly efficient at it for all their Bible-thumpiness. NASA has _nothing_. NASA, itself, is a fountain of money that the best minds of the world come to drink from. The US produces little gray matter (no offense), most of the tech in the US was invented by people that were imported. Look through the greatest inventions from '50s to '80s and count the truly american names. Exactly. Look though the Nobel Prize winners and cut the people whose parents weren't Americans. Exactly. I'm not saying it's zero, I'm saying the glory days were purchased. Without the money, NASA is going away. EU now has good support for science, they have proven with the LHC and the new satellite launch suite and the new tech that they can and will fund science, and that has curbed export of gray matter _severely_. Even more, the EU has had the foresight to bring tech and research to each and every country, so no matter how poor a country is they won't have to export their very best. After US's SpaceX managed to launch at a smaller cost than Ariane 5 (ESA), EU has taken it to heart and are designing Ariane 6, due to enter service 2020, with a design budget of 3.2 billion Euro. No offense, but this isn't going to be pretty. The changes so far already turned the tide of the market toward ESA. A company can't compete with a continent. It just can't. The only thing that has a chance to compete with the EU is the US. And I mean all of it, government-funding level. China is coming too. Korea, Japan, Taiwan, they are coming too. India, too. It's a race. Everyone is running. De-funding NASA is the worst move you could ever have done. Instead of having the shining beacon of tech, where everybody goes, now the beacon is dim. Instead of recruiting from 2.5 billion people, you now recruit from 300M. Who's going to leave theit home and house and family and move across the planet to work for a regular-ass private space agency when their own home has one? Don't get me started on that self-driving-into-walls shit or that vacuum tube shit they keep trying to build. No offense, but without government oversight shit simply won't be efficient and you can't stop some dude from living out fantasies. De0funding NASA is the worst move, ever, for your future. Or, you know, the best, since I'm not American.

I always like to think it's important not just to defend a country, but to maintain the parts of it that are worth defending. Like, say... health, charity, compassion, culture... oh, and the environment. "The country that destroys its soil, destroys itself", besides which concrete and factories don't replenish oxygen so well... nor do they absorb carbon and turn it into wood that provides shade and can later be used for stuff, if necessary. Trees are neat, seriously. And how many people would want to live in a world where flowers no longer exist? Or fresh fruits and vegetables you could grow in a community plot, or your backyard if you like? Businesses take care of their bottom line, their shareholders and their directors. Everything else is either the state, or random people working for free... which, with all those "beneficial" big businesses holding the reins of a society, people won't be able to afford to do in most cases, even if they want to. Free time is for people who can't be easily replaced if they burn out! Which loops right back to keeping lots of people poor - nice, cheap source of replacements for the cynical fucks at the top to keep shoveling into the grinder.

America right?

Maybe so but 2Pac was convicted of sex assault so I wouldn't exactly trust his word

Joe Blow What the fuck? Yea cause that completely invalidates everything he said and did (not getting into how sketchy that case was an what she says) 2Pac is a legend that’s will never burn out and has made a permanent mark on history, meanwhile you won’t even make a scratch, no wonder no one takes metoo seriously anymore, you use it for stupidity like that

Hazukichan X The corporate Oligarchy is working hard to become global instead of having to operate within different countries...its all the same entitled SOBs on the receiving end of all the money and breaks they can maneuver. Trump is making his play to become accepted into the “old” money club, and they are loving it.🖤🇨🇦

did you mean crabs?

Crabgrass is a thing

you mean *money? yes I know.

Ouch.

I did a quick research on google, these departments :health and human services, department of defense, homeland security, social security administration have 3 to 8 times more budget than the dep of education. I mean better education means better health ,security, defense you name it. I wish the best for the US and all countries.

But we can just get our engineers and doctors from other countries right?

true but isn't it more reliable to produce or have the source instead of renting or buying from others? better education not only gives you better doctors and engineers but also hundreds of other fields and new ones too. Plus it drops the rate of bad things like crimes etc, and increase the quality of life in general drastically.

Same dude! Now I'm going to bed, it is a school night after all...

Dr. Dank Isn't it spring break in America?

+Dr. Dank haha my spring break ends on Tuesday.....

Only stupid Trumptards reject sleep.

For a moment, I thought you said "rejecting SHEEP" and was utterly confused. Then again, I just woke up and only got like, 1 hour of sleep.

JoyfishXO q

Hermann Vöge your life is futile

He might not be a living person.

shawn devol I understand what you’re saying, but that makes it sound like he’s dead lol

6 more seasons and a movie

Democrats who supported Clinton in the primary elections have only themselves to blame

oldmanmike89 Yep. all three of them.

Sheryl Yaseen Elon Musk has already got that covered

That's a way of putting it

Oldmanmike89 - yup, bernie would've destroyed trump in the general

What about a dozen baby puppies piling onto a guy sitting on a couch? Let's be honest here.... one of you is a monster.

Rightfully so.

Ian Jones owned*

Ian, have you ever asked yourself why most successful internet companies (UKposts, Facebook, twitter, Apple, Uber, Amazon etc) are run by the left? That's because liberals innovate. Why don't you join us in creating things instead of conservatives, who just like to copy and/or tear things down.

and less dislikes too with more views.

you're right, i'll just read Breitbart now and go get me some 'alternative facts.' Thanks man!

Ian Jones What here is a lie?

Ian Jones can you explain what part of the federal budget is a lie? The government made the announcement about how they will allocate resources, and this video is to educate Americans about it. It's fact that the government is going to increase budget for defense and take away money from valuable programs for Americans such as education, the arts, and scientific research.

this bias one sided comedy skit?

Ian Jones what's the truth then? That Trump *does* care about education and the well-being of people more than military? Because that's not the case.

Penske Material they don't even need to try to make it comedy. It's not one-sided if they're simply just stating facts.

I agree

chancho bandito because it's funded by the government, aka tax dollars

They need to start funding private companies more like spacex

I actually agree with this cut. We're spending billions of dollars to bring rocks from space when we have thousands of homeless and starving people here on earth.

Michael Montgomery It's about the U.S, not the fucking earth. The US has nothing to do with starving kids in another country

If you got 10 more people with those guns then you're safer but no one to use them then nah. Unless ones a better gun.

Common core is garbage and is a complete waste of money. But we have schools that can't afford things that the students need or that are cutting extra curricular activities just so that they can pay their teachers. The department of education needs to be funded and needs to funnel the money into schools. We don't need their input on the system, we need them to allocate funds where they are necessary. There's no way to look at the country's education statistics and not be concerned.

Strongside When will it be enough because just throwing money at it isn't working.. our schools are terrible

It has been relatively underfunded for years. Throwing money at the shitty organization isn't working because they aren't funding schools, they are blowing it by coming up with stupid shit like common core. It needs to be funded well, but it also needs to be restructured. It needs to be a meanings to distribute money to schools and come up with overarching changes that benefit schools. They treat education like a business and thus it is failing.

I am quoting someone who said, the US military budget is low compared to what? The Death Star!

Jason M no... some bases have mini nuclear reactors or they buy energy from the civilian companies in their areas. The military is a business... they buy all the resources... nothing is given to them...

The military is allotted money by the federal government...they are by no means a business. The Nuclear reactors were developed in part with the DOE !!!!!! The DOE regulates all things nuclear power, including the military. Yes, the military relies heavily on the DOE. Without the DOE, we lose 70% of our functioning Navy. "He who controls the sea, controls everything." - mutha fucking Themistocles.

but Themistocles didn't account for he who controls the air can ram the tip of their jet up those who control the sea

New Violence True

The Department of Energy manages all of our nuclear weapons, so yes.

When he gutted it, he promised that he could put together the best team quickly if an outbreak happened. Too bad he's too stupid to know you have to plan in advance and contain outbreaks before they become pandemics. What a moron. Be safe!

And if we run out of Chris Christies we can just use the same method trump uses to make money: bars of lead colored with gold sharpie.

Or maybe Trump can put the west wing of the whitehouse on airbnb?

Chris Christie is one ButterFinger away from losing a foot.

I believe Chris Christie started as a 6 legged man, he lost 4 legs so far.

We don't have near enough gold.

I am disappointed too

they are a bolivian group that helps control the horrific road traffic conditions in the country. Everithing is better with dancing zebras!

there are videos of the full segment elsewhere on youtube in the last 20 minutes or so they explain and its awesome #Betterwithzebras

me too fam. things still arent looking up and it feels endless

Unfortunately it will be over soon. The world, that is.

Update from 3 years in the future: it's worse.

It will end when Trump does and not before then.

Hey, are you doing okay?

Christian Lamey 10/10 perfect plan IGN

Yep! Boy, I need a drink.

true i never really grasped the concept of wanting more nukes than the other guy. It would only take a few to destroy the planet and us with it and taking into account how many you would need to use against the other countries i can't believe no one has enough and in the end no one wins because nuclear war would kill us all/hurt everyone. When it comes to nuclear warfare after a point the amount the enemy has is irrelevant.

Think about this for a moment. America had enough nukes to create the apocalypse for the USA in WW2, imagine what they could do with increased spending? Destroy the world?

I'm actually collecting caps. If tweeter in chief pisses off the wrong country, I bet fallout GO will be YUUUUGE

So we don't use them, and never will.

Traveel nuclear deterrence my friend... it is what nukes prevent what's important...

The better the nukes, the easier it is for AI to destroy us all...

A_2the_dam Seitz you clearly don't know how the nuclear defense system works.

I know I don't! ;D

I'll take anything that isn't a thong...

Tyler Jenkins My respect for you went through the roof.

yea same with the viewcount

Rumford Chimpenstein 3.6 M views after one day is going down?

+SO O "The amount of views on the videos criticizing trump has been going down every month" Do you really think viewcount for one vid can go down??? how does that even make sense XD how did you think that

Dislikes. Not views.

Rumford - Excellent alternative facts. People are finally starting to wake up the disaster that is President Cheeto-dipshit.

So in essence you're calling for his brutal murder

Nah, we need him alive, Fitzgerald O'Leprechaun!

I have some Jack Daniels if you want some, it may make things easier.

I don't think you'll have a functioning liver by 2020 though at this rate.

Lulakan stuff it down with brown #itsalwayssunnyinphiladephia

You can't even see the sky today

We'll be fine.

Amanda Johnson more jobs

Exactly. That money is better spent on the Department of Transportation

you could even quarter the budget and it’d still he double the budget pt russia.

I really do not know apparently.

Amanda Johnson dude you have 10 times the GDP of russia

exactly. and it will help with their "cradle to cellmate" private prison industry, as well as increase military recruits as jobs dry up for the under-qualified poor and "middle class" that no longer exists.. it almost feels like they read Nineteen Eighty Four, and implementing it all as policy. We even have Newspeak, with their "alternative facts". trumpanzes must think this is Double Plus Good. Sadly, it seems like trumpanzes will gladly vote against their own interests, and do insane mental gymnastics to convince themselves that the con is good

Ehhh, I mean, in Jakarta for the most part, 12 years of public schools are provided by the government, so... Yeah.

I just want to add he cut the budget after some states like Oklahoma cut their education budget twice within 3 months. Highschools had to have paper drives in November!

That and money spent on ordinary citizens is mainly wasteful spending in terms of remaining in power, in said countries. If you want know who a government needs to have the support of, in order to remain in power, just look at their budgets.

Celine Ha, you couldn't be more correct. This is one unfortunate reality that the people need to give a serious reboot.

I don't think they watched for 5 seconds at all. Just instant dislike and then comment bashing.

Ok now tell me why did you dislike this

I agree 100%

People just will keeping rejecting the facts it's going to comeback one day

how do i get my ass IN the clouds?

Oh boy,

Hey I'm from 2021 and HE'S GONE BOISSSS

dollors1 Yes you do and its so fucking unneckessary and dumb to raise its budgets. If I would be an American citizen I would do whatever it takes to end his god damned term.

Literally the only thing American military is unprepared for is a war against Russia IN Russia. US has the most military assets, highest military funding, best technology and a huge number of allies, many very powerful. In addition US has been dragged into so many conflicts over the years that their collective military experience is unbelievably vast. You will have to look really deep to find even a single reason to justify increased military funding. However, US does have a LOT of enemies.

dollors1 Pax Americana

Sadly, that is the problem. We HAD a huge number of allies. At the rate trump is insulting not only actors, the press, union leaders, department stores,....etc., he still for some reason feels the need to attack the countries (via twitter of course) that used to back us up. The man is starting to make me worry even more than I was when he was elected. And I had so hoped that he would grow up. SAD!

Our military budget only pays for a small fraction of actual military hardware. Most of it likely goes to either paying people or paying for development programs which go nowhere, but hey, as long as the CEO of those weapon companies get their due.

We haven't been debt free since Jan. 8, 1835. Get your head out of the clouds and realize what is going on with fiat money and the cabal of big banking (federal reserve).

G Washington it sure isn't a thing for the president

That's not even taking into account the human suffering. Such a cruel, crude budget. What are we even protecting with all that increased military spending?

+G Washington we're all a product of our environment. Pretending 14 year olds have the wherewithal to be successful upstanding citizens without any positive role models or productive hobbies provided for them is absolutely insane.

Tosh Outdoors I know it's so cruel and crude that people will have figure out a way ... If u want a positive role model for these young kids my suggestion is start with the fucking parents

Genesis David Don't worry, NASA obviously has way too much funding. I mean, military spending is a mere, a miniscule, a microscopic trillion dollars.

I like to imagine NASA having the US military budget. Now that would be very badass!

Boogster Su screw mission to mars, NASA is probably going to colonize multiple planets

NASA has such a low budget that they are forced to carpool with Russia just to get to space. We need to better educate people on how beneficial NASA can be with a large budget. Hell they went from having no idea how to get to space, to basically perfecting landing on the moon in like 10 years. Imagine where we could be today had we not given up on it after we beat Russia to the moon.

Genesis David Yeah didn't NASA used to have no-partisan support?

moocowisback focus on your own country because this is like me saying, "man I'm so worried for Libya because there leader could actually destroy that country." no I don't care about the country (sorry Libya) and anyone can destroy anything. At least America isn't going communist.

The only problem is a the US is a global power unlike Libya, so if something is going wrong in the US, a large part of the world can be concerned

nicolas44991 ok than that's like me caring about Russia or China or Germany.

The worst is definitely the fact that trump supporters will refuse to acknowledge anything that's his fault. Anything that goes wrong will be blamed on obama. *Trump is president for 1 hour and a company decides to stay in the USA* = "TRUMP IS ALREADY FIXING EVERYTHING HES AMAZING YES MAKE AMERICA GREAT" *Trump is president for 3 years and world war III begins* = "LOOK AT THE MESS HE HAD TO INHERIT GOD OBAMA WAS SUCH A DISASTER!"

Well you should care about what's happening to Russia and China, China is about to become one of the most powerful country on earth, yet they'er a dictature, who may crumble in a couple of years, and Russia is an Oligarchy at this point run by a tyrant who has massive wealth and kill his politics oponents and journalits

Jasmine la *a joke

I think that's part of the plan, Mars station in 25 years. Meanwhile everyone here can starve, or be poisoned by environmental messes, or die from no medcare, and the rich can all move to Mars. SAD.

Anthony Cupero True. We should focus more on Earth BUT if we continue the way we are WE won't have a planet anymore.

Chris F You watch too many movies lol

*O'Neill cylinders!* _O'Neill cylinders!_ ... *_O'Neill cylinders._* Seriously though, colonies in orbit are way more practical than ones on another planet, make it happen NASA~

I think of NASA as a worst case scenario safety net Say some ego maniac fucks up the environment, causes social unrest and provokes nuclear war Maybe just maybe if it was funded adequately could it save us then...

Gavin Herrera I like this show, but you can't deny that shows like these tend to have biases.

How are shows like these any different than shows like Steven Crowder and Ben Shapiro? Conservatives love those even though they're biased as fuck. It just shows that conservatives doesn't a have problem with bias, just everything that isn't right wing biased.

+King Brick Reality has a bias. And John Oliver criticized Obama on drones, surveillance, mass deportation, not appropriately recognizing the Armenian Genocide, etc.

I have long since stopped trying to convince people with facts. Clearly facts and provable evidence are irrelevant. If you wanna convince Republicans, you gotta just make some shit up. Tell them that Trump is currently fucking their moms on front of them. Maybe then they'll change their minds.

No one bashed Obama this much because Obama didn't do stupid ass things as often.

Abhijato Sensarma A lot of people probably watched it on HBO and then liked the video as soon as it went up. That's how I do it, normally.

Or perhaps many of his subscribers put the artist before the art, and automatically know that they like John Oliver and they hate Donald Trump, and that John Oliver is going to criticize Donald Trump and don't care how good the video is.

Abhijato Sensarma for the most part.

There's nothing stopping anyone from changing their click during or after watching. And the likes stay lit. :)

I came of age in the George W Bush years, and I hate that Trump has made me think nice thoughts about W.

I don't know who you are, but based apon the fact that you managed to spell everything in your comment correctly, I can already tell you are smarter.

Your basic ability to form a sentence proves that you are, love.

Aww 😶😚

I know your smarter because, Donald Trump

The structure of this sentence (and all statistical probability) suggests that you are.

+Ian Jones Except Steve Crowder doesn't show all the facts if anything he's has a tendency to pull things out of his ass and cite unreliable sources. John Oliver on the other hand cites his sources that are generally fairly reliable.

+Ian Jones, how does "not that smart" even apply? Like, what are you looking at to make that judgement?

Oh, this one is easy! Let me handle it, and, since both sides tend to do it, it's the simplest maneuver to identify in the world! ----- This person doesn't agree with me. My positions are well considered and thought out (which I know because they are my positions). Therefore someone who does not agree with me is not thinking through their positions properly. Smart people think through their positions properly. Therefore people who do not agree with me are not smart. ---- Granted, most people don't really bother to realize that that's the thought process they're using, but generally speaking, if someone jumps in and just calls someone "not smart" or "stupid" with the divine art of no evidence and/or just with the presumption that their lack of intelligence is self evident is likely to be using just this great logical progression! It even is internally logically consistent! Of course, points 2 or 3 are likely not to be true, so the entire chain is inapplicable to reality, but has that ever stopped anyone? (Rhetorical question: No it hasn't) And, of course, some groups are worse about it than others, but watch for easy buzzwords like "Sheep," (an easy way to disregard entire groups of people who don't agree with you. Not bothering to understand others has never been so easy!) and other terms suggesting that the person doesn't have enough mental acuity to form their own decisions and therefore are just mindlessly following a leader those individuals find charismatic. And, obviously, since *you* don't find those leaders charismatic, it further demonstrates just how inferior they are to you! And, obviously, not everyone does this. And if you don't, that's great! I love people who try to actually understand other people's thought processes rather than rely on lazy labels so you don't have to. And if anyone finds themselves offended because they totally do these things and I'm insulting them, well, I have something to say about that. *Ahem.* I find your disregard for the potential for you to be mistaken, or the potential of others to have good ideas you haven't realized yet, unhealthy both for society and your personal intellectual growth. Please consider no longer behaving in such a self destructive manner. Thanks!

Oh, as I said, I hardly apply it to everyone, if I insisted it was universal, or even a constant for every single person, I would be doing the exact thing I'm objecting to, and I try to avoid recursive self shaming. And I, further, have no objections, really, to someone saying "I don't like what group X is trying to do/pushing for." Objecting to the actions of a group of people is entirely reasonable. I tend to get testy if, say, one declares that everyone in the group must be, in some way, mentally deficient. I'll admit, I don't understand how other people think a lot of the time, but unless I can really get them to lay out their logic or thought processes for me, it's hard to check for flaws there. Though I will say, Trump is actually an easy target because he's inconsistent in small enough time frames that it's not particularly reasonable to expect he's sincerely changed his mind in that period of time, or, alternatively, if he has, that he actually cares much about the issue if he changes his mind so easily and ambivalently. Does that, strictly, in and of itself make him "stupid?" I don't think so, but it does make me feel he's not the sort of person who should be running a country as that level of ambivalence, or lack of competence, or political shilling, or whatever (I'm not going to state I know what leads to it, but there does seem to be a finite set of options!) does not lead to an effective leader who makes consistently good quality decisions. Or, to make it short: I don't know if he's stupid, but whatever qualities lead to his actions, I certainly agree he shouldn't be running a country, nevermind the US.

+Ian Jones Most his arguments are based of his feelings rather than facts. More often than not he usually make things up and when he does cite his sources they usually very unreliable/biased.

Anubhav Singh HBO budget cut

Wait till april

Now*