Thank u

Did you know phytoplankton is responsable for most of the oxygen in the world. Their population grows best on paths of whales. So criminalizing with scary fines and enforcing whale fishing will do a lot. It would be interesting if we found a way to make phytoplankton on ships and get them dispersed around the sea. Kind of a catalytic converter for a car, but with the ships leftovers maybe. I wouldn’t doubt that corals also die from whales changing their routes, since I used to have 35 corals on a tank and my house was out of electricity 2 or 3 for up to 18 hours a few times in a few years. My tank was a real small one so temperature changes fast, The water reached the death level temperature several times, but no coral ever died. My tank was also ultra small for what it had in it. My fish died from over salination as a heat wave evaporated a inch or 3 out of the tank because I live in a desert, but my corals actually reproduced, I multiplied my population of corals. Never replenished the fish as I knew they would die, so it was a coral tank with no fish that supposedly make it helthier. I feed them 1/3 of what the reef man told me but 3 times a week instead of once a week, They grew fast. I also read that this also feed most of the lower chain, which feeds what we eat from the sea. Also most medicines now come from corals and they only use a bunch full. Wouldn’t surprise me pharmaceutics killing them, but hopefully its just lack of phytoplankton since it has decreased in population, as the whale population has decreased and evaded human routes. I mean dont get me wrong I love trees, and we have nut trees for a living. Been planting since my grandfather, but I cant help but notice the importance of such a small living thing.

​@@javierbaca5300thanks

That's a great question! I'm not an expert, but my understanding is that the issue deals with scale. Building a lab to perform the photosynthesis of 10,000 trees would cost $$$$$, but just planting 10,000 trees would cost $$.

@@BranchEducation ooh

@@BranchEducation CO2 emissions are the lowest in many thousands of years steadily going down. The optimal level for plants is 1000 PPM The extinction level is 150 PPM. The green new deal is not based in science and your graph [shown [ @ 00:32] is very deceptive. A suggestion: redo this video with accurate research and see Patric Moore''s lectures. I'd like to know where you got the statistics for this video? you should reference your sources as any well done, presentation does !

@@wayneeligur7586 Hardly is that is true. The emissions we say we produce is lower then they actually are. Diesel gate or any number of examples show that companies and people lie about emissions. It is reported false or the emissions happens off site. (electric cars burning coal) Any of the vehicles I interact with are all emission cheating. Tuned to save on fuel and longevity of the machine. Lorries tuned to make more power cheaper at expense of emissions. Since tax on fuel and this forced emissions stuff cost companies and the working people to much money. Big industries that can create clean energy sell it off and buy cheap fossil energy. Really unless the consumers are going to pay more and really demand change from companies to not cheats, lies and the making of money for the 1%. Well, there is no reason to care about any of this. They make stuff up to look good. Government politics and culture need all a reset. All are full of corruption. But for that to happen soon we are talking about killing and hole world cause as on the streets heads rolls and good people is going to die in the cross fire. And the ones in power can shut off our communications and sensor us. :) #TeamTrees is a scam too. Burn wood and the emission collected turn back into the air. You need to stop taking the stuff from the ground. You can not burn fossil fuel and claim planting tress make you neutral. You do not do anything good before removing fossil energy. Agen why claims of emissions are bullshit. We are better now but far from being fucking honest. Scams and lies. Corruption. You need to plant trees and rely on that energy. And not cheat or lie about where you get the energy. Swedish by the way. Love to cheat emissions as they are scams and just corruption. I make sure to not be wasteful and make vehicle last longer and such. I rather think about airports heating there buildings with diesel to keep the big windows towards the run way. And how much diesel go into flying and how they cheat taxing that fuel. Never flying. Never wasting nature more then I need to. The culture of us all need to change and turn back to farm age.

@@Kuumin perhaps, start with patric moore? then find more info? don't rely on just one person, or places like this deceptive channel..

EXACTLY

Yea.

I'm confused of your use of how. The video show that the carbon is stored in the tree as glucose. How is this not explaining how trees extract co2 from the atmosphere? Is the question more specific?

@@xlbbman he kinda haves a point descriptions on what stuff do is not an explication on how stuff kinda works it should kinda tell how exactly the co2 is extracted and how dose the process actually work as in this case in short terms if i remember correctly light kinda smashes the co2 molecule as an fission process like nuclear reactor kinda and then to kinda learn how fission works and then the big picture will be more clear kinda

But he clearly said through photosynthesis 😑

Have you tried a VPN?

I can't get money to any PayPal or any accounts I make, I'm already using a VPN for connecting to youtube

I can still help by actually planting trees my self, giving money is not the only way of helping the planet

slabs 37 it’s alright, you don’t have to donate. It’s understandable that not everyone can.

You can use the webpage.

The tree uses the C02 already harvested to grow. So essentially the C02 once in the air is now wood.

@@bgilgil9487 it becomes food for animals who eat carbon.

The tree either rots, eaten by bacteria or other critters(termites) and the CO2 one way or another goes back into the atmosphere plus heat is generated! Or It goes into (my) fireplace and keeps me warm during winter! So heat plus C02 into atmosphere Or We use it for furniture or building stuff and as long as we keep using the stuff and not trash it the CO2 and the heat are stored!

Who is Alec? Also there are a lot of UKposts videos on this already.

@@BranchEducation Your name is What? There are a lot on this but nobody explains like you do? Give me your contact number please?

@@hui20kumar21 check our about page. details are there.

@@BranchEducation I don't want email.

I'm not too sure but you're asking the same question that I've puzzled by for years. Now this is only my logical answer and not actual fact, But I'm sure fast and tall growing trees help the environment much more than slow and short trees. To further help you understand my view; a whole acre of bamboo will do more for the environment than a whole acre of Bonsai trees. Simply because Bamboo grows about a foot a day, and Bonsai trees grow about a foot a century. But this is just a thought, in my opinion this makes sense

Every forest needs mother trees, meaning large old trees. Sending information via the rootsystem and mycelium fungal connection. Without older trees the forest is weaker and more suseptible to disease and all other types of infestation. The mother trees can actually give other trees nutrience when they need it to survive. Also a forest without any huge trees is plain boring right.

Imagine if you as a human, had a job planting trees (or making an O2 factory), will your existence be harmful or help the Global Warming - since you consume 02.

no why would they? Do people grow taller if they have more food around them?

@@tyfyh622 Yes they will numb nuts. People grow fatter trees will grow fatter FFs

Piece?

That's not true. Trees need water to grow, they net negative in humidity, meaning they take more water than they release. Trees don't make rains, rains makes trees.

@@iskabin it's actually kind of a combination of the two. If it wasn't for trees we would never have rain further along the main land. They're more like a way for rain to extend itself further towards eria that would never see rain if it wasn't for trees. That's why America is becoming more dryer. But a lot of rain clouds can't extend them selves further into the land

@@ragnorockcookie2868 Why is that? How could they extend the rain when they are taking water for themselves?

@@iskabin did you three things absorb store and release water, they also nurish the ground for other fana of plants to grow. When it's dry they release the humidity and create clouds that will travel further in land allowing for plants that are further from the sea to grow absorb and release again the water. That the cycle of rain

Thanks! Yeah, more of my upcoming videos will be on CPUs.

It is not really true, trees also need to respire, do they release Co2 in the morning also, but night there is no photosynthesis going on at night more percentage of CO2 is released into air

Yes but they store more CO2 than they emit! So they are a carbon store!

BAN ELECTRIC CARS NOW....STOP STARVING TREES OF CARBON

To people who own land with trees

@@Roman-qs7md thats me

Through the Stomata look it up FFS!

You dont sound american at all lmao

@@dannyg.4421 what you say

Wait- I don't sound American? What do I sound like then?

@@BranchEducation I don't understand what you say

Sorry I was making a joke to mast ocean because he kinda sounded Soviet or something in comment. I never heard some one say american brother before

shhhh..don't tell anyone about that

haha same

First to the first.

Makanya belajar b inggris Seperti saya

@@mohilhamraflijahja5024 gua pernah belajar bahasa jerman jhahahha Tapi blom juga bisa