Fia bans anything smart.

or just a normal engineer. They ban everything instead of making it the meta because they're so corrupt

Jesus loves you ::

@@bennette.7033 i LOVE moaner boobies

Y😂eah man tottaly

Technically banning it drives innovation But also it’s probably just because of cost

Would you rather them get even more dominant? You blame the FIA for everything instead of using your brain to think why they would.

They only ban it if rb dont dev it

someone innovatives, Ferrari cries and threatens to pull out then FIA bans it.

Fia too chill about the rb19

And was, and still is, illegal. The rules state that nothing could be altered on the set up after qualifying, unless unforseen circumstances. Being able to change toe during the race is breaking those rules. The "reason" why Mercedes was allowed to use it the whole season was because "it would cost too much time and money to alter the steering." Behind the scenes whining wolff did his usual blackmail by threatening to pull out everything Mercedes, decimating the field.

@@1972LittleC That’s just dumb as fuck…. By that logic, steering would also qualify as altering the vehicle after qualification

@@arwo1143 Do You Know What Set Up Means? Christ, the DTS crowd bitches again.

@@arwo1143yeah that other guy is just yapping

@@1972LittleCyour a yapper why don’t they Just not have rules whoever has the best car wins

More than likely did, just didn't use it!

@@nunogloop3386ah the company that makes 0 sense. Can’t modify a new Ferreira cause of them

@@nunogloop3386he didnt say innovation, he said aerodynamics

Remember what ferrari said? Aerodynamics is for people who cant make good cars and i think it applies here. Yeah fuck me i dont even know what im saying

cool! but why they keep macking ugly and trash vehicles

fia should ban pedal shifter

@@bossmen6665 back to manual shift with screaming v10s with refuelling and no restrictions on how many tyres you use. Driving at 100% all race non of this fuel and tyre management bs

@@luciddreams3493 yes sirr

​@@luciddreams3493 are you stupid? Fuel and tire saving happens because it's faster to do a slow 1 stop then to push fast and do 2 stop. It's just basic logic. If you remove all the limits the teams will still do 1 stops with lots of fuel saving and the saving

They’ve always done that. Remember the fan car? Or the 6-wheel Tyrell? Yeah, those didn’t last very long on the track now, did they?

It was banned to keep cost down.

That what caused NASCAR to die. All the cars were the exact same because they kept banning cars that were too good

They did it for Merc but not for Rab now

@@plang42aww the poor car companies can’t spend they’re billions of dollars that they’ve been sitting on for forever

Not only innovation but also an added skill. Anytime you increase the skill gap it benefits competition

yeah and DAS had no role in being so dominant, they would have won without it anyway. IT just helped a little with quali pace and for flying restarts.

It was to adjust the camber and for of front tyres

​@@edwardharris9810caster

@@edwardharris9810 Toe, not camber

@@kojowiredu ?

Check out group b. Badass but a lot of people always end up dying haha

Yeah.

​@@chillyfingers123 don't want to see people dying, haha.

The one with the most money would win. It would be fun to watch at all

Remember the V10 era, those Teams with the most cash.

yeah thats the reason why so many people dont like F1 anymore. Its a show of adverts and laws to forbid any new progress. Like Walther Röhrl recently said in an interview "modern F1 is a kindergarden"

Why not unban in after a year or two to allow everyone else to develop their own system and implement it?

Cost is the biggest reason. Teams didn't budget to have to develop that.

How it would be any more or less interesting, banning it or not, the whole field is even anyways.

*German engineering

​@@Christoph-sd3ziBritish engineering*

They are always innovating tho... It's almost a yearly cycle of, innovate -> ban -> innovate -> ban

Can someone give an example of a fair advantage???

​@@sandasturner9529Seemingly, to be fair is to give time penalties to the guys you don't like.

FIA is all about money, not engineering, innovation or driving skills, it manipulates a situation that would work best for its own image instead of the sport or fans

And who drives on wrong side of the "road"

That's impossible bro

@@EbxPlayzOG nahhh Nothing is: let a big company with funding organise a tournament and every company is allowed to participate except the wet racoon aka Ferrari

then all cars would be porshe 919 EVOs

@@aint_noway69 much love for the evo, its a masterpiece, but around most tracks the w11 is still faster

Look into Pikes Peak

To be honest, yeah. But they are more on "skills" instead of innovation. I agree with you anyways

true, but just because it was banned doesnt mean theyll stop developing it. it was a clearly proven technolgy in just one season. perhaps a less aggressive version will be on their AMG line somewhere in the future.

Tbh, I kinda wish they made cheap cars again. I don't need another peice of universally adopted but unnecessary technology skyrocketing the price of cars in 10 years.

Ah yes, I also wish my Honda civic could adjust its toe angle to keep my tires warm. Darn you FIA.

@@chazbenningfield3743agreed. Technology is nice, but it’s ruining cars. Last thing I need is to pay for a mechanic with a PhD in computer science 😂

The reduce the cost of the car.

Was RB... ferrari where in deep water problems with FIA due to their 2019 engine cheat

It was Horner, in particular..

Horner and rb did most of the protesting, but all the other teams probably weren't to happy about Das either

DAS would've either been banned or next year every team would've had it. It is not mechanically complex and mostly just filled a loophole about actibe suspension.

​@@brinkipinkiand why does that justify banning it? If everyone has it the next year or two, someone will come up with something even better to win. Its called competitive innovation and its what racing should be about.

Understandable

The only reason it didn't dominate even more then before was because they already dominated.

@@AAb-xy6et mate. No. It didnt help Them THAT much. Only on qualy laps and right after a safetycar. Or few hundreds on a straight

@@matiashager5840 Wow, there were piles of races where Mercedes became P1 as well as P2 in both the qualifications as well as the races. This while Bottas rarely ever did anything decent outside of a Mercedes and even the Mercedes crew was shocked about the lack of F1 knowledge from him.

@@AAb-xy6et yeah they where dominant? But it werent cause of DAS

@@matiashager5840 as far as i know, they never used it in the races, only on warm up laps or behind the safteycar. It probably would have been super annoying to pull that for every straight and they probably feared that other teams would cry more about it than they already did.

Sounds safer than weaving. Also Ackerman angle does the exact thing the video describes already🤔🤦🏼‍♂️

Thanks for speak the truth. Narrator had no idea about Physics…

You obviously aren't listening to the video in question, nor doing your research before you comment

@@MikeConner.akaRadioWell said

Why do you say tyre its tire

Blud being able to change ur toe angle is actually hacks. You can optimize for BOTH corner entry, exit, and straights, all on the same setup at the same time. It's 100% all its made out to be, and it didn't get banned because it helped tire Temps, it got banned because the development train for it would have been so long it would take other teams until the next season at the minimum to develop it for their cars, so the other teams protested it.

It was just a feature to warm up the front tires quicker, it wasn’t even used during the race. Just during safety car or qualifying warm up. The Mercedes engine is what allowed them to dominate, remember the whole oil burning phase? The ‘party mode’?

You clearly didn't watch F1 in the Mercedes domination era. FIA favoured Lewis and Merc EVERY SINGLE TIME, up until the 2021 Abu-Dhabi Grand Prix end. You can say that FIA favours RB now, but back then, they were always on Mercedes side.

@@azegyetlenczibi Where were you 2014-2016 and 2016-2017 you can’t discredit Nico and Sebastian. The only season Lewis was far a head was 2020 and guess what they banged Hamilton penalty after penalty, banning every innovation Merc came up. Everyone one was enjoying Hamilton getting penalized.

Hi, someone put salt in your tea this morning ?

cry louder

@@mb16249 100% BS, Lewis got away with pretty much anything outside of his own stupidity.

One week later: Why did my front wheels just fall off the van???

" The FIA clarified steering system rules to ensure they only control the direction of the wheels, aiming to maintain fairness, limit the competitive advantage, and control development costs across teams." - or, in short, to reduce the fun from F1 just like they did by changing from V8 to V6 engines...

When they finally did something interesting and unique, the FIA decided that it was time to punish innovation. FIA is a joke, F1 is focused on maximising performance and endurance, this feature is absolute performance and endurance driven, it could have steered the sport to heights it never could've been imagined.

F1 could've taken it to the sky, but the FIA cut its wings and said drink red bull instead.

to stop innovation and slow mercedes down is why, they wanted to create fake competition by slowing down faster teams

@@vadwvea7153 It's the exact opposite. It was against the spirit of F1. They let mercedes use it that year and banned it from next year. Resulting that no other team was able to do it, because it would be a huge time and money waste. So mercedes had an advantage that year. Everybody else could reasearch it for the next year if they wouldn't ban it. So in the end they helped mercedes with that and "slowed" down others.

hahahahaha.. and they fucked up already!

Except it didn't make mercs dominant... and it was banned on cost grounds, especially cause the smaller teams definitely could not have afforded to implement it

Why the f*** would you need to adjust the tow on the fly in a production car? In fact if your car has a tow-in or tow-out, your cars needs an alignment because all road-driven cars should have a neutral tow or else you will experience excessive tyre wear. Also DAS is not something game-changing, it isn't particularly hard to implement either. If it wasn't banned, every team on the grid would have it by the next year. It's just that Mercedes were the first to find a loophole in the definition of active suspension which had been banned. Hence they designed a system which can vary suspension geometry on the go without technically breaking the rules.

@@tanmayta9131 you missed the entire point of my post…which was defending technological advancement in F1 (never said this system specifically) so those same advancements could be potentially used in production cars down the line…WHICH IS THE PURPOSE OF F1…is not like F1 is there for fun like monster trucks or something aimed at the public…as I said we wouldn’t understand the concept of downforce or aerodynamics in cars if FIA shut down every nook and cranny and slight adjustments to those systems because it gave a slight edge to the one making that discovery…that’s why teams have a whole department dedicated to research and development..so they can discover new things and put out potentially the fastest car on the track…and that same tech be used down the line potentially in production cars…is why we have lambo’s , Bugatti, McLaren, Ferrari,etc super/hyper cars on the roads today

To be fair, we do have 4 wheel steering in production cars today.

Why would it get banned from the start if it didn’t breach any regulations? Clearly you’re sore about Mercedes whooping ass for 7 years. Even when the car only had this for 1 season…🤦🏽‍♂️.

are you stupid it was fully legal

Ok so the FIA didn’t show favoritism to Red Bull in Vettel’s era when RB had the double-blown diffuser ?

Oh, I'm sure he was very well compensated.

For racing development right? I mean it would be a cool Idea on a road car but useless no

Everything in that car was top tier, they barely lost anything when FIA banned the engine mode changes

It changed the toe not camber

@@ThijsSH Changing the toe slightly alters camber as well due to tyre form and surface contact.

@@LongTimeAgoNL yes but the primary function was for toe angle and not camber.

@@ThijsSH Hence why it broke 3 specific rules but all were considered a "grey area". Hence why it was only allowed for a year.

Remarkable driving, too. With so much going on at high speed, to adjust the suspension continually.

@@davidm5707 Seriously tho… Seems so overwhelming! I’d straight up forget to use it and fling that thing into a wall in all the chaos! lol I wonder if having to put pressure on the wheel affected their ability to steer or made it anymore difficult at all. Guess it’s clearly nothing you can’t get used to!