You can’t call click bait if you weren’t baited

I don't believe china's works...

Someone who has Brain's

I was going to comment click bait also...for the fact that they used Shanghai Tower in their Image.

It isnt clickbait It's just sheer stupidity

Looks like tofu project.

Godzilla and king Kong would feel the same

Me too. Now we need an 85 story bottle of Old Peculier

Same case in North America and Europe. It's a global phenomenon after COVID.

One hand washing another

😷☕🇺🇲

Challenge accepted.

@@aaabbb-py5xd Fools claim

@@aaabbb-py5xdaccepting that challenge might put you on the FBI’s most wanted list 😵‍💫

@@amandab3946 Lol, then challenge accepted to get on a more robust number of lists

...looks unsinkable for at least a while.

....and workers risk their lives to build it.

@@Chris-ut6eq Well they do if they don't latch their harnesses on

And as a structural ironworker, I see these sweating engineers like I see 2 headed unicorns flying around the job sites.

@@bradleywalsh4103 I was a project manager in the UK They attended every site meeting

@keithadams1538 and so they should my friend. As a crew foreman I'm regularly in contact with Site Supers and Project Managers and very seldomnly see engineers whether its for GCs or a trade employer's in-house engineers, and thats generally hierarchy setup but that being said, in my experience, most engineers unless called to site, "sweat" the job from the office. I'm not saying their workload is minimal in any way, I'm sure they spend a ton of hours and work hard on a project. There's a classic construction meme out there regarding engineers "I don't know anything about building but my book says you're doing it wrong". I would argue engineers sweat far less than you as a Project Manager or Site Superintendent ensuring compliance, or than any of the construction trades actually realizing their portion of the vision. If I am wrong, you have my apologies, this is just my opinion. Construction is generally a tough job accross the board.

Yup, it’s not gona be safe from controlled demolition.

@seansurfn2 Here come the whacky truffers from their parents basements

​@@JackSmith-kp2vs you probably also believe Lee Harvey and not the Government killed JFK Russia Colluded with Trump to win 2016. Epstein killed himself Gender is fluid Seriously, you conspiracy theorists refuse to believe factual science even when it's proven to be true.

10 years ago today

@@user-ys3xw6tj5t thanks! 🙂

2007. at time 50:21, i paused it, and it shows the copyright year MMVII

Not sure ,but I like how they used it to make the buildings reflect light 🤓

@@andyberry-zx2lt THANKS!👍 Good eye!

@huwzebediahthomas9193 What’s that got to do with anything here?

Just like public housing in the US and UK?

@@ianhomerpura8937 No, in the US and UK, you can't get away with using fake concrete and fake rebar.

@@MakerInMotion have you seen how bad construction is in the US nowadays? Five-over-ones using tons of LVL and flammable foam insulations? That's even more dangerous.

😂😂😂 ok...

Yes but many buildings are sitting empty

Grow up. Nothing can with stand a nuclear attack.

Underpaid by US standards. At least they can finish projects on time. Meanwhile in the US basically every single public works project is delayed.

Did a Chinese man take your wife? Or did a Chinese woman you liked reject you? Your insecurities against the Chinese is evident. China has some of the world’s largest bridges and towers and dams. None of them are “literally falling into pieces,” like how you are saying.

I like the way you think & I love it when an American is still stuck on that idea until now. You think the way your government wants you to think.

Sadly our infrastructure in the US is way behind and look at all the crumbling buildings in NYC and Miami and bridges across the states we are no better. And our construction labor unions are just as corrupt you have guys listed on the job sites that aren’t even ever at work collecting paychecks

Wind hole that is very unprofessional sounding

And what if create intelligent system for regulate temperature first of all for health, sanitation, food production, pleasure, business and other important things through intelligent regulation through buildings around planet. Counted for best conditions in real time though sensors, detectors, messages and calculations. And to make it highly stable and safe regulation.

Detailed for each city and village in real time. And I have seen that quantity of fish is changes with time, control underwater world with detectors and sensors could also help to keep attention on population different alive creations(include coral riffs) and regulate them :)

Did anyone say it was?? Please look at the title again and then give it some thought.

@@dougholliday467I can’t think of a good reason to use a completely different building in the thumbnail and I’ve read the title again, don’t see your point.

controlled demo lition

He probably wasn't even invloved/aware of the Inside Job.. Lol ..

Gravity is a downwards force. Did you expect some cartoon instead?

@@FEMADEATHCAMPCONTROL You completely failed to understand my comment. I'm not going to waste time on you.

It's true. The plane also could never bring down that building on it's own. The most damage it could do is maybe 3-5 floors.

Derp.

Dont forget 1984 math 2+2=5

​@@davepowell7168 It is the Conservation of Momentum m1v1 + m2v2 = (m1 + m2)v3

@@psikeyhackr6914 yes l agree this isn't rocket surgery Can you provide me with a link to data of WTC core column dimensions, their bracing, manufacture and installation ? I'm not adversarial just curious if redundancy standards were effected in construction

@@davepowell7168 ROLF This is one of the ridiculous issues. The core was 85 by 135 ft with 47 columns. There were horizontal beams in the core bracing the columns. I have NEVER seen a layout of those beams. I do not know if they varied in thickness down the buildings. Years ago I communicated with Lon Waters PhD in applied mathematics. He told me that he could not find any data on the horizontal beams. In May of 2008 Richard Gage of AE911Truth gave one of his dog and pony shows at Chicago Circle Campus. I drove into town to talk to him. I got in line after the show and asked him about the distribution of steel down the towers. He looked at me like I had grown a 2nd head. He finally said that the NIST was not giving out accurate blueprints. There are 100+ skyscrapers around the world over 300 meters. Gravity works the same way everywhere. At least that is what I have heard. There are people who know how to figure this stuff out. This silence varies from hilarious to scary. I downloaded the entire NCSTAR1 report by the NIST in 2007. They do not even specify the total amount of concrete in the towers. How weird is that?

I saw it quite often.