It'd be fun if the cars had the same speed and all that so it's not that Lewis and all those people lap everyone so it's more competitive

Like Alonso said before: "Equal engines for everyone."

Nothing. Aside from 2020 and 2016, this has been the best F1 season since 2013.

@@poetseaf1359 “not Honda” - Lewis

Less interference from Stewards. Make it a fair play in terms of regulation, avoid complexities

Kimi could have had so much points with his ability to control oversteer.

Who would’ve thought Psych2Go would be here ?

@@bryan-zp6ty Litteraly so weird to me

@Psych2Go wow, what a surprise!

Its so weird seeing you guys here

Dang man, you commented the same thing 15 min after me and got all the likes. Oh well, great minds think alike.

I would pay extra for that

They don't have the VR but currently you can watch the entire race from each driver's on-board cam. VR would be sick AF though

Having same engine power

It's coming.... At a cost of course

Right? What a time to be alive...

200iq move

What about those 10-20 place points are for the constructors championship only. Encourage reliability but still make the drivers have to break into the top half of the field

At least top 15

You are a f1 fan????? I didn't know that!! Btw huge fan

Top 15 finishers at least. Finishing 11th all season should be worth more than coming dead last in every race except one where they get 10th

I see a lot of people talking about this point and I would definitely love to see a bit wider field of view but it's not going to happen as it would prevent more air time for the sponsors on the car.

You have a valid point

It's because your eyes and brain adjusts to the speed of F1 and makes it feel "normal" for you. After you watch 15 mins of F1, switch over to same track with sports cars. Then comeback to F1. It does not feel slow anymore.

If they done what they did for free practice 1 at jeddah this weekend with the "sound up" period , it was one lap of no commentators talking, with just the sound of the car, but the camera angles changed as the car drove past different sections. It works better for a street circuit as the cameras can get closer

YESSS \

No maximum speed in pitlane. There, I solved the problem for you

@@Peter-fm3wr that is SO dangerous

Yeah there are some tracks where the speed limit line is way too early just to keep the time up (eg silverstone)

I agree to an extent but I think the bigger issue is how hard it is to overtake on many tracks and so track position is so important. Even if you do a 2 stop and are much faster you may struggle to overtake often. I’m hoping the 2022 cars go a long way to solve that but let’s see.

@@Peter-fm3wr Death. There, I solved the problem fo you

WE NEED THIS, And only ex racers are in the box commentating

This is a great idea, Gasly has had an insane year but you don’t really see that much of it

Agree. This year I watched Zandvoort from perpective of one driver. I mean onboard, radio, timing. Official broadcast was in the background. Completely different race, such a grest emotions. I didn't even know what was happening in front and I didn't mind it.

Or at least a dedicated mid-field highlights and a championship battle highlights

Most impact looks brutal, verstappen could've got killed in Azerbaijan if the car didn't spin to the other side, I really don't know why Street circuits are a thing, they're very dangerous. I really hope they put more runoff in Saudi and other street circuits

@@oplisderi3164 Street circuits do not have to be dangerous, you see innovative series like Formula E using them exclusively. Yes, they run cars with drastically less power but the key factor is when you keep the barriers very close and parallel to the circuit, the angle of attack of any collision is shallower which means that you only take a small fraction of the horizontal force that you normally would were the barrier to be further from the track.

That wasn't the same corner, the wall Nico is talking about actually isn't even a wall in real life that's where they have the chicane that cara keep sending big sparks off of

@@exiledrabbit are you sure? im looking at leclercs fp2 crash and that seems to be the same corner nico was talking about. am i missing something?

@@tiny_n1 you're right i was wrong, i thought it was on the first half of the circuit

Max:"hey Lewis, can I have a turn in the merc? " *crashes turn 1* Mwhahahaha

Max got a 50k penalty just for giving a minor tickle to lewis' wing You think teams what other people in their cars? It was a miracle merc allowed even George

You have to earn the right to be in the top 6 cars

Bruh... 😂

Well, didn't age well, did it? FP3 incident between Nikita and Hamilton

There weren't any flags, hamilton didn't know he was coming.

Lol...seems like he's living his best life though.

Agree! I would love to see active aero permitted.

You have to balance the regulations by following the safety and tire innovation rates. I don't think any of the main tire manufacturers would dare to partner up with F1 if it got like that, they would just destroy them. And already at the speed they're going, the crashes get pretty crazy, you don't want to add too much more before you reach the point where the crumple zones are just not enough anymore. And you can't have the drivers passing out from the G-forces mid-corner either. Unless you want to remove the drivers and make the machines drive themselves, I don't think that's either feasible or a good idea in general. I think it's more impressive how much improvements they're able to extract out of very strict regulations. Optimization is the future, innovation for the sake of innovation without practical applications is not sustainable on the long term.

@@charles-antoinemartel-roy I really disagree mate. Think about the amount of RnD that tire manufacturers would gain. Polymers are some of the most understudied materials and the dynamic behavior opens many applications not only in F1. It could even introduce an extra Deg aspect. Just think of how many other routes there are: Braking Performance, Engine efficiency, numeric simulation technology, computational requirements, actuation technologies, etc... You are right safety is always the most important thing, but I'm not saying that we should change every wing for flaps with an 90° range of motion for the next race. It needs to be gradual but still.... And it can be just like changing the brake balance or DRS, it still needs a driver to operate.

@@josepablochew877 Tire manufacturers are already working flat out my friend. Pirelli isn't just sitting there manufacturing, they have permanent research facilities already, and this generation of F1 car is already causing tire failures. And it doesn't matter if your tire is strong enough at race 1, but by the last race the cars are now 3 seconds faster because there was too much room for improvement and the tires can no longer take it. And in-season change of tire construction is bad for multiple reasons, for example how it punishes the teams that had done the best job tuning their car to fit the tire and it introduces risks of corruption, where a tire manufacturer would deliberately introduce a tire favoring a specific team. The Formula One world is already extremely precariously balanced, Mclaren almost ran out of money because Covid delayed the start of the season by 4 months. The risk assessment resulting from this sort of regulations being introduced would scare away investors and the sport would crash. That's without even mentioning how bad the actual racing would be. Don't worry, every engineer dreams to see an insane car built without restrictions, but F1 is not where it should happen. Maybe it could be a standalone project, a modern real life version of the Newey-designed X2011 type of project.

I'm still not so sure about that. Even with the cost cap, big teams such as Merc, Ferrari, Red Bull and McLaren would still hold the best cars, the best drivers, facilities and personel, of course not counting that some of these teams make their own engines, giving them even more freedom with their designs. Something the smaller guys wouldn't have much to their hands to compete if they're allowed to go all out I think that simplifying both the Aero concepts, perhaps with some standarzation between the teams, and of course simpler, more inviting Engine rules to allow new manufacturers/in house departments to be made as well as more varied interpretations should have to take priority before the Teams could go all out on their designs, or else we might see the return of the early 2000s and 2010s Ferrari/Merc Dominance, if not worse

Agreed

Chaos and carnage

Oí that’s a shout

Hahaha you don’t realize that teams have many many people during the race working on which strategy is best. It would be of 0 added value for a team to let their drivers communicate with each other.

@@jopvandam6820 But all those strategists can't actually feel the car physically, only the drivers can. The drivers communicating can allow for better strategies. E.g. I need you to attempt to undercut Max because I'm stuck behind him and have a lot more pace so when he pits, I can overcut him and you can get track position. E.g. Can you give me DRS so I can hold off Lewis?

Absolutely. Nico and you already pointed out turn 22. It looked like the wall absorbed Charles well in FP2 but if someone hits the very end of that barrier and it doesn't work as intended...yikes. Especially since the slightly curved straights lend themselves to drafting going into it. What I am also worried about is turns 4,5,6. While it may not lend itself to overtaking, everyone is going to want to hug the walls and touch kerbs to get the best racing line. Turn 4/5 is too fast to be blind with pretty much 0 runoff. Turn 6 has a similar barrier that you may not want to hit the end of. I just hope Mazespin is at the back.

They have some special barriers which are designed not to bounce the car back. I think they are called Safer and were invented in Nascar. It was mentioned by commentators during free practice. But I agree it's dangerous.

@@tommy4862 Yeah but you dont need this safer barriers becaus the wall is close to the racing line and when you crash you are automatic on the racing line. You got 3-4 runoffs thats it

@@leahx4552 yeah, that can happen too. It depends on the part of the track. But some corners are totally blind and crazy fast so that’s scary for sure.

@@tommy4862 yep. That the danger. You saw in fp2 at turn 10 where lewis was coming and out of nowhere after the corner was a driver slowing down to let him pass.

Yeah, or just more halo cams. Its insane how we dont see more of the actual racing - the lines and corners. Too much far away panning

Alonso and Russel have had some helmet cam stuff this year!

@@Hacktheplanet_ that’s because those extra views are used for race control, if we saw all those views then race control would have a mob on their hands every weekend.

Subscribe to F1 TV and you can see the race from any drivers perspective.

Agreed. They should have around 15 pernament tracks and around 6 rotating

And do a lottery drawing for the rotating tracks.

Monaco could be interchanging as far as I'm concerned.

@@chrisj1612 I would say so too, but you know there would be uproar about that. I guess you have to keep the race for the triple crown in there. The nostalgia does give it benefits but the race itself does not.

@@chrisj1612 I would say so too, but you know there would be uproar about that. I guess you have to keep the race for the triple crown in there. The nostalgia does give it benefits but the race itself does not.

Wow, very stupid!

What about track evolution? Fastest laps usually happen at the end of the session. Whoever goes early would be at a big disadvantage.

@@evilsheep37 do it as a top 5 session only, fastest in previous session goes first.

Nah Simone rarely makes mistakes, especially in qualifying

Just a time trial based weekend would be the go, fastest cars in the world with no inhibitions going for it. Would be nail biting

@@evilsheep37 reverse championship order. The slower cars could go later to level the playing field

I hated the sprint races a lot unfortunately if they made every race that way I would never watch it.

Then fans would not be hyped on them

One of major reasons cars have increased in dimensions is for driver safety. If we want a smaller car size with the current safety standards, reduction in max and average speed is imperative.

I think it's called MarioKart 🤣🤣

I miss the low down & close to the track angles. I think at the moment, Spa has some of the best angles to see what the cars are really doing.

you mean fuel produced from captured carbon techiniques, right? i can definetily get behind that! it's the basic ideia of reforestation forestry centers where you have to plant more trees than you harvest and must only harvest the ones you've planted.

Current f1 cars are too long. The Merc looks like a boat in terms of length.

@@0megalul309 that is a sporting issue, this is a technological issue, both need to be solved at some point, but one doesn't exclude the other

I would love to have v8's back in F1 but sadly I don't think there is any market for it. F1 is nowadays mostly used for technical development for road cars, at least from the engine manufacturers.

Why not v12s while were at it (sound)