😂😂😂

Literally nothing they could do 😢

You'd be surprised how often it happens.

That's how we defeated the nazis. Didn't you hear? 😂

Just throw a molly

I’d try it at home. But like at home in the living room with the cats sneaking.

why don't you have a hydraulic press at home.

I think that armor would disagree

Hydraulic press at home :

everyone that uses a press is impressive to me

Wdym, just finished up picking up the pieces of glass that my shard of metal broke when it hit the neighbors window. I also fucked up my hydraulic press. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

No worries here as mine can't make that much force. It's made for lighter softer stuff.

Yup well they have to better be safe then be sorry and get sued & someone getting injured or worse killed u see how many safety procautions they took around the press just imagine if their was none.

Well, they had to get more careful after that incident with the documentary about the Manhattan Project.

@@Ifyoucanreadthisgooglebroke Did someone tried that at home? What happened? I wanted to try that myself but don't know how. Just think, to be able to teleport to another place and time.

Like Ukraine ❤

​@@Lorem-Ipsum it ended up faster in broken armor in the fabled ukies counter-offensive though... 🙄

@@Lorem-Ipsum Like Cocainelensky 😘

​@@kittytrailStill going strong, vatnik.

@@Vhite still kvetching about the million vaillant ukies counter-offensive of last Summer that ended up being a year late and turned be a one way trip to explosive leg number reduction land or death for them poor ukies while the kievan grifters kept on buying multi-millions luxury properties in Europe, Israel and the UK, sipping Champagne and laughing at how stupid those poor ukies goyim are? yeah, right, still going strong... 🙄

Rifle plates can stop any Small arms bullet except maybe a 50 bmg. They are strong af. I have some armor plates myself.

He took explosions to a whole new level. And there was no bomb. Dam!!!

pay attention to the hydraulic tips, they use different tips..i doubt the results they get.

this pushed back totally ukposts.info/have/v-deo/q552f6GRnYxkooE.html

"push back" .... now ain't that a Newtonian term :)

and a better slowMo camera

Abrupt yield.

@@AncientEvilSaiyan and faster hydraulic press as he was cooling the plate with this ball for 10 seconds...

Good idea

The thing I want to ask

And hearing protection, too!

Nice and interresting video 👍 However, it was a bit ironic that chipboard plates were used as protection when testing state of the art armour to destruction 🤔

Say you don't know how modern armor works without saying it. Modern armor is designed to be reactive and provide a counter concussion to absorb.

@@halvarmc671 Uh, think you responded to the wrong comment. Not sure this has anything to do with the video being an example for the importance of protective safety measures.

@@halvarmc671 he's not talking about the armor, he's talking about the presses "OOO shit" protection. If he where standing nearby this could have killed him, as it is it just cost him a camera.

slide 5

Allergic? More like super power. The ball was AR500 and got harder after the dip in nitrogen.

"ACHOO"

😂😂

I put safety goggles on to watch this. It was never going to end well.

to be honest this is russian channel which named crazy russian experiments

I would love to see that. Especially because it was cold in the first place. Would have been very interesting indeed.

​@@wagu7003 We actually did. Those sparks you saw were molten metal, and they were so much cooler 1 meter away from their inception at around 3000-4000 degrees Celsius.

Not really. It's not a gas dude, it doesn't follow ideal gas laws.

I thought the same! Thought of one of those solidworks stress simulations that get all red

@@greg77389 I bend steel pretty often. bending a piece of 0.25 inch mild steel 90 degrees in a 2 inch die makes it heat several degrees and become noticeably warm to the touch.

Ice-cold ball forced against you until you just can't take it anymore and bust? I wish I had your problems.

You must be a diamond geezer!

Taxes will do that to a man

Yup, crazy too that the result is typically the sum of the choices made a long the years. Picking bad material to go with is a poor choice.

​@TheXnocf Yeah, but the materials tend to lie all the way to the alter, so you never know what you're really going to get. 😂

Ever heard of spall liner? And with modern composite plating it's a non issue in the first place.

yeah, HESH shells is even designed for creating spalling, although spall liners and composite armor have made spalling much less of an issue

@@shajidrahaman Not to mention we wrap armor in C4 to defeat shaped charges. If squash was still viable, using ERA would be suicidal...

The titanium armor is more for aircraft and body armor, used as the outer layer of protection. The inner layers stop any shards and suck up the energy.

​@@demoncore5342 spall liners absolutly on point, but tanks are not covered all over with composite armor, usually just the turret front and sides and the front plate of the chassis

And people working with metal know that ar500 is not a armor material.. as people stated in the comments above..

@@vihreelinja4743And people who do basic research know that ar500 is in fact, used in body armor

What types of armor is it used in? @@ctvaughan6623

Did he use a modern tungsten or uranium sabot equivalent tho? Nope, homogenous rolled toilet paper barely counts as armor since 90's.

Depleted uranium is a Weapon

What he said. Wow

Everybody did.

Same

@@Corsa15DT except those people that know how spheres work. Unlike on any other shape, on a circle/sphere there are no weak points because stresses are distributed equally along the surface. Theres no corners or edges so there cant be a single weak point.

No those balls were too big

Do not forget that the majority of modern tank armor uses higher quality alloys than what was shown here, and also usually is layered with some form of composite (usually advanced ceramics or in the case of the abrams, spent uranium-derived materials) that works in conjunction with the high end alloys to slow, catch, and disperse the energy of, modern super high velocity anti-tank rounds, as well as handle the heat jets from modern shaped charges. A T-90M, Abrams of any model, or a Leopard 2 of any model would simply sneer at any cannon or AP round that WWII could feasibly throw at them.

@@willkenny5687 "A T-90M, Abrams of any model, or a Leopard 2 of any model would simply sneer at any cannon or AP round that WWII could feasibly throw at them." From the front? Most definitely. From the sides? Then I would be a bit concerned. From the back or top? They're a goner. Even ww1 artillery would go though the roof of a modern tank like a hot knife through butter. Also, your tank list is weird, why list the T-90M, which is a top of the line tank, along with any model of Abrams and Leopard 2? An original Abrams or Leopard 2 is no where close to a T-90M, they are more like a T-72B but with a much worse gun in the case of the Abrams who originally only mounted the near obsolete L7 105mm riffled gun. The soviets where way ahead when it comes to guns as they already moved to a 115mm smoothbore gun back in the 60s when they made the T-62. Even the latest version of Abrams would probably be at a disadvantage against the T-90M as the Abrams tank has bigger weakpoint in the upper glacis. In a hull down fight, it's anyone's guess who has the better chance of penning the other since both armor compositions are unknown to the public at this point.

It would be very interesting to see WW2 naval armor

​@@willkenny5687 Тут дело не только в качестве. Похоже сам подход к созданию броневой стали изменился. Раньше считалось, что броня должна обладать высокой вязкостью чтобы снаряд застревал в такой броне примерно как палец в пластилине а сама броня при этом бы не разлеталась на кусочки как во втором случае (чтобы экипаж танка от осколков не пострадал). Сейчас же, похоже, опять пришли к высокой твердости брони дабы броня сама по себе сопротивлялась какому-либо внедрению твердого материала (сердечника снаряда) а осколки в случае разрушения, видимо, должен удерживать противоосколочный подбой или какой-то хитрый слой брони из композитного материала.

@@skitidet4302 The latest version of the abrams at a disadvantage against a T-90M? Don’t make me laugh. The M1a1 abrams handled T72s using the same 2a46m main gun as the t90m in iraq, and was never penetrated. I have strong doubts that that situation has changed dramatically enough to put the M1a2sepv3 at substantial risk. The soviets in the 50’s absolutely were leading the way by a lot when it came to tank technology, and the IS-3 was definitely better than anything the allies or axis had at the time, but materials technology has come a long way since then, I have very strong doubts that even its 122mm gun with WWII era ammo could take out a modern mbt. And the reason as to why I included all of those tanks together is because the original M1, the original leopard 2s, and the T90M, all use technology from the 80’s and 90’s, and are thus roughly contemporary if not equivalent.

That’s what the MiG-29 wanted to do. But it was already a heavy load of crap with its powerful engines NEEDED to even get that thing of the ground.

In other word because steel is heavy as shit

They did, with the MiG-25. It's a piece of shit.

The blackbird made it work, all ironically from the Soviet titanium supply

Heavy

That's kind of the way battleship armor such as Class A face hardened steel is designed, it's also always backed by a softer steel splinter protection layer to catch any spalling

I would like to see some krup steel from ww2

The armor of the T-34 that was used was actually a bit hard and you will see a lot of knocked out T-34s with large cracks in them from getting hit.

omg cute :3 face at the end

the apostrophe after 30 threw me for a second

It looks like they made it to break perpendicular to the normal plane of the installed plate. It cracks perfectly horizontally and vertically. Very impressive.

the point of this video is to see how it does against hydraulic press

​@@nekoharu22 They only compare "yellow" and "warm" at the same time. The structure of steel is clearly different, while 1940 sends a big hello to 2010. Steel production is not drawing in office programs by "effective" managers.

Exactly, a true comparison, like apples to apples, would be a single piece of forged titanium the same size as the steel piece. This is grapes to apples.

Well then it's fucking shit lmao, armor doesn't get attacked once. If it can't handle a volley of bullets then it just isn't good.

The naval dude Drachifell ! has a good episode on shells vs armor.

also its the inside of the AP round that did the job, meaning tungsten carbide and explosive detonation based on tests so that once inside a tank it would exploded killing everyone and also disabling the tank as well?

Yep. Ballistic capped. Just there for the aerodynamics.

@@davidcox3076 spot on champ

I was really expecting that super-cooled ball to shatter way before the armor.... quite the opposite happened. If they could cool a projectiles tip like that, it would penetrate virtually any armor. heh

that's how the people on the titan sub died when the sub imploded that quickly

Part of the reason is because different steels are made for different purposes. The Soviets could have made armor steel similar to AR500 back in the 1940's. in fact, some of their tank armors were even harder, but there's a reason they didn't continue doing this. Tank armor is not supposed to be as hard as possible. Steel is on a spectrum between hardness (ability to resist deformation) and toughness (ability to withstand shock). Too far in either direction would make it bad for the armor. If tank armor was super hard, then it would also be super brittle, and big impacts (like incoming shells) would cause it to shatter super easily. Shards of razor-sharp metal would fly everywhere inside the tank and kill a lot of people.

​@@raven4k998the pressure of the water was more deadly than that carbon fiber vessel. If that's what you meant, you'd be correct

​@@raven4k998With the Titan they used carbon fiber, very strong but when it fails it fails suddenly instead of deforming and bending which could be the difference between getting back to the surface before total failure. I've also seen an example of this in motorcycle racing where a damaged rear wheel made of carbon fiber failed instantly and blew into pieces so they don't use those now haha

I think we have long ways to go not just alloy formulas but more like techniques of structural manipulations

Because Diamond in insanely hard against cutting force (nothing than another diamond can cut a diamond) but also very weak to percussive impacts and crushing

@@vayalond7203 Yeah, diamond is incredibly abrasion resistant, kinda like the AR500 steel brick that exploded in the video, both are used for things like teeth on a bore drill since they just don't wear away quick at all. Diamond is a 98.07 HRC, while AR500 is among the highest steels at 48.3 HRC. 6061-T6 Aluminium is a 60 HRB, and doesn't have an HRC since its just not in the same category of hardness as steel alloys, for comparison an HRB of 82 rates an HRC of 1, or 120 HRB rates 55 HRC, its due to the different weight and from using a different surface, HRB is measured with a 100kg weight on a 1/16" ball while HRC is a 150kg through a diamond brale indenter. There are steels harder than AR500, even up to 68, but much higher than AR500 seems to be going into specialty alloys that are very difficult and expensive to manufacture. There is also CrCoNi, which rates 468 HV hardness, which is about 46 HRC, but it performed excellently from the looks of things at extremely low temperatures, on the order of a yield strength over 500 MPa under 100K, where a material like 2.25Cr-1Mo, or A387 Grade 22, yielded at about 370 MPa at 100K, 380 MPa at around 20K. Shit, I did it again, I rambled but I typed so much I don't want it to go to waste, so lol sorry for the word vomit XD

@@vayalond7203 They routinely cut diamonds with water as well as lasers.

I think you may have misunderstood the 'hold my beer' meme- it's supposed to represent when an overconfident person says 'hold my beer' and then quickly gets humiliated by who-or-whatever they had just underestimated. The first example was an old Yosemite Sam cartoon where some yahoo is challenged by Sam and asks someone to 'Hold my beer.' before getting shot to pieces. But, I agree with your intent re: the strength of steel- most people still think, for example, that titanium is both harder than all steels, and stronger, by mass (which it is not) in addition to by volume (which is may be). And, re: diamond... yeah... (hardness has little to do with tensile/compressive/elastic/plastic/etc strength). Cheers !

@@bholdr----0 Okay, learned something new today

whats diffrence between new and old , aint they all old same ? Is it only about remaking them again

@@hamzagorcevic8443 Yes and no, the "old" armor from 100 yrs. ago is the same material mixture/structure/steel, but back in those days they didn´t have had the steel compound/mixture discovered or researched from today, so that armor from 2010 is "new".

​​@@hamzagorcevic8443not a metallurgist, but there are better alloys, casting techniques and treatment techniques available to improve the resilience. They are usually secret. Even if available, back in WWII the Soviets might simply not have had the time for all these process as they had to churn out lots of tanks to be able to stop the Axis.

It's a fake video, you can see their 2010 armor is rusted and old.

Why did the armor shatter instead of the super cold steel sphere?

Hmmm...very dangerous! Not going to think too much about it: definitely w Top 5!

This video is actually a great example of why tanks shouldn't have too sturdy armor; although this isn't a perfect example, seeing it shatter like that is similar to the phenomenon of 'spalling', which is when armour fractures instead of deforming, causing armour chunks on the inside to break loose, which is _extremely_ hazardous for the crew inside. During WWII the T-34 was notorious for this because they made it overly strong, and therefore brittle.

@@TheEDFLegacy So i guess they need a double layer of armor ? A very strong outer layer and a softer inner layer so that the inner layer stops the fragments of the shattering outer layer. Maybe even an armor plate with gradient hardness where the outside is super hard and it gradually softens to the inside would work ? Oh well since nothing receives better funding than the army and weapons industies, im sure they have thought about that and tried everything :)

@@arjensmit6684 Yep, and this is one of the conventions you see with a lot of modern tanks. The M1 Abrams had depleted uranium as a dense shock absorber. The problem there is that they had to stop using that because of situations where uranium did the uranium thing and irradiated the crew, depleted or not. Other materials are still used, however.

@@TheEDFLegacy the T-34 armor here looked as if it was mild steel. These days tanks will use some lightweight kevlar spall liner.

wrggg

same !!!

Right

​@@JimmyR42v accurate

I believe cooling the steel makes it stronger. Reducing the heat would also reduce the repulsive forces between its atoms, making it denser for a short period of time. It'd also counteract the heat produced during compression, allowing it to retain integrity for longer, since heat causes expansion and that expansion isn't uniform which wof lead to catastrophic failure. I'm not sure what steel it was but I think stainless steel gets stronger at cryogenic Temps. Idk,

The steel acts like a heat sink and start sucking the cold out of the ball bearing vary fast

Right, those armor chunks shot out with force. Bad day to be nearby

Maybe someone can explain why the ball survived after the dunk in liquid nitrogen. I'm willing to guess that the ball actually work-hardened for several millimeters deep, maybe an inch deep? Is this possible? So if the armor was equally work-hardened, it has a shape that was not as strong to withstand the pressure? Internally the armor did not represent an equally tall sphere, for one thing, but has more middle dimension. This has me stumped somewhat.

Think it has to do with the liquid nitrogen allowing energy to be conducted more efficiently through the ball to the metal block.

@@YouKnowTheyExistthere are 2 big reason why this happen. As someone else pointed out the energy was dispersed a lot more with the liquid nitrogen and the shape of the ball will also disperse energy a lot more than a cone, it will stay more on the surface of the ball meaning it wont damage it as much.

Really cool ball bearings.

Or destroy modern tank armor using ball bearings.

@@KnightRadiant-ip9qw You'd need to accelerate them to the sort of velocity that meteorites move at - 5 miles/8km per second or greater. A rail gun could do that but the ball bearings would be prone to getting squeezed in half by the rail gun so they'd need to be very special ball bearings - an apfsds round from a modern tank gun would be much cheaper.

Yeah, frozen to -319°F. You be the crew…

@@vipertwenty249 I know. I realized that as I was writing. But who knows? Maybe railguns will end up being the launcher for such a type of ammunition in the future.

Dont wry he/she can afford

​@@steve00alt70They/them for when you don't know the persons sex. Shorter to write they then "^^".

@@SlimyShadeSlimShady no

@@SlimyShadeSlimShady no

@@SlimyShadeSlimShady no

Oh well, I guess I'll have to return all the hydraulic presses I just got for our family home

Can I have plz plz plz plz plz, I really want to destroy stuff

100% knew this would be a disaster. At best the steel ball would go flying like a canon ball. At worst that slab of AR500 would essentially explode and probably damage the press. I was surprised how well the ball stayed put until realizing it was sitting on the indentation from the previous run. Regardless, that was pretty f'in awesome.

I was expecting the ball to be brittle n explode early on.

@@ralph3333 It's called cryogenic hardening which can greatly improve strength, hardness and wear resistance when used with certain steels. It will be more 'brittle' but a steel ball like that will be extremely strong in good condition. Now if the cryo-treated ball was hardened steel I believe it would have failed exactly as you imagined.

not on the modern armor

Could you say that you were imPRESSed?

Slow, progressive force isn't really like live munition situations though

The modern armour defeated it???

3:24

and body amour

Thats why we back the armor up with a splinter shield made of softer steel. At least the Navy did... can't talk about tanks.

It also work hardens while cutting...

Tank armor does not want armor that is brittle. A single impact could make the armor shatter or weaken to the point of breaking

Yes very brittle, it fractures only at 350 tons.

Same, very interesting.

Actually I was wondering whether his camera ever got broken due to these experiments. And the very next moment 💀✌️

Putting heat treated steel in liquid nitrogen adds even more hardness (even after it has warmed back up again) Applied Science has a good video on this. BBs are already made to be extremely hard, so I'm not surprised it wrecked the AR500 plate. Obviously brittleness comes into play with dynamic loading so you couldn't expect it to survive being used as a bullet, etc.

@@jhonbus ..it wouldnt work as a bullet... perhaps on a very short distance wher it does not experience much friction and heating... would be interesting to see someone test actually..from 10m to 1km or so... ..and yes just because its already heat threathened (has a martensite electron structure) ... the way electrons move in the material makes it extremely much harder when he electron states r being locked at lower temperatures... but it would be hard to keep a bullet below 80 Kelvin (below -193 deg C), of scientiffic curiousity one could possibly use liquid nitrogen for 20 mins and then use liquid Helium pressurized (-4 Kelvins), it probably wouldent be extremely hard to build a pressure cylinder to pressurize a container for this guys... A SHARP WARNING!, LIQUID HELIUM IS VERY DANGEROUS TO PLAY AROUND WITH, IN IT LIQUID STATE IT CAN EXPAND (EXPLODE) WITH A FORCE GREATER THAN TNT!...

Ball bearings are made of 52100 steel. Around 1% carbon. They can be fairly hard. There’s more hardenable steel out there. But ar500 is not very hard at all and only it’s outer surface is hard. The core is soft (compared to martensitic steel like 52100 or ball bearings). Ar500 only has .3-.4% carbon, which is low carbon. It’s the .95% manganese and .75% chromium that gives it the boost. It is a very tough or strong steel. But isn’t very hard. This is of course in terms of actual hard steel. I’m not sure what his cone was made of but it wasn’t medium hard steel or hasn’t been heat treated correctly.

depleted uranium?

@@vincasvosylius6045even just manganese steel fumes can be pretty damn nasty, you can get away without wearing a respirator for most materials, especially with good ventilation but any kind of armor plate is probably going to have chromium, vanadium, manganese, etc that you really don’t want to inhale

​@@vincasvosylius6045thats for ammo not armor

@@affegpus4195 many modern tanks use depleted uranium plates on top of their standard armor. It’s incredibly dense and helps with sabot rounds.

Beryllium

Content???

This person test armor for russian army. You really witsh him long life?

@@user-bw6yp2ll9n Yes, of course. Why wouldn't you?

​@@user-bw6yp2ll9nand how exactly is that a bad thing?

​​@@user-bw6yp2ll9nwar is always madness. The technology looks cool but in the end it always makes people suffer. "Coolness" makes people blind. There must be a better way to be human.

Plenty of rusty tanks still around to get it. Esp the Russian stuff.

@@owlsayssouth true, but only so many that predate 1945...

​@@bryanrosensteel3331nah bro, it's T34, there is more than enough, these things were pumped out from factories extremely fast.

@@killgaet6253 yes, but there is an entire industry around reclaiming this steel...and once it is gone, that's it, we cannot reproduce it. That's all I'm pointing out.

if it was kruppstahl of the Tiger Ausf. B Tiger II or something similar well that would have been painful to see but a simple T-34 thats nothing.

I am a bit skeptical because T34 is known to have way too much hardened armor. Sure the projektile will not penetrate but it was prone to crack. But worst of all on shell impact it absorb all the energy transfer it to the other side creating splatter of hot almost molten sharp shrapnel scattering inside the thank. So even thou it seemingly survived direct impact without visible damage the inside situation may not be so optimistic.

Metallurgy and heat treatment has improved by a lot since 1930, but a t-34 is the worst example to list for WW2, the steel was of a very poor quality even by the standards of the 1940s. Like the other guy said, it was radically treated for hardness, which made spalling common every time it was hit by a larger shell, and it happened a lot because it was only 45mm thick. Because the armour was highly sloped, there was little space inside for 4 grown men, so there was a lot of meat for loose metal to shred into.

Rifle plates can stop any Small arms bullet except maybe a 50 bmg. They are strong af. I have some armor plates myself.

It makes one wonder, how bad ass are the tool used to work that armor?!

​@@portnuefflyerhonestly some of our strongest to be produced from the Industrial age so far They have presses that do many times more than the 350 tons of pressure in the video

Yeah here here, just wow came out of my mouth, well it was "FK" really, but did not expect that.

Three: he needs to rethink his choice of music, because its hot garbage

Not an explosion at all, but still nasty to get hit by one of those fragments.

The difference between strong and hard metals (you'd be surprised how many people think it's the same thing)

Technically it's far more then you think. You maybe heard of the famous formular E=mc², it's for calculating how much energy mass contains. And for example: The mass of a person with a weight of 65kg (~143 pounds) contains the same energy as approx. 100.000 Hiroshima Bombs. No joke. Mass contains extreme amounts of Energy. We are just not yet able to "use" it properly.

@@benfordrin6978 Well, when we do I hope its for something everyone wants. 24/365 Mc Ribs...

How can we not use this to generate power?

@@ryanbayne1033 We allready do with nuclear power plants or fusion power. But you maybe want to know, why we can't just put a box of meat into an oven and turn the theoretical massive energy amount it contains into pure usable energy, right? It's very complex to answer this, but to describe it simply: Because there are 1. Different kinds of energy (kinetic energy, heat energy,.. ) and the big problem is the actual conversion from mass to energy or energy to mass. The Formula E=mc² actually just tells us how much energy mass contains, if we would be able to convert it 1:1 into energy. And that's technically impossible. By convert energy, you always have a loss and often you have to spend some energy first, before getting some. Also how to catch/store the energy? Think of an atomic bomb: By splitting atoms, enormous amounts of energy are released, which spread explosively in fractions of a second through enormous heat and force. If we were able to capture all of this energy without wasting any of it, nuclear fission would be an incredible source of energy. But we can't do that, not yet. We have nuclear power plants that do what an atomic bomb does under controlled conditions on a very small scale. But itself poses enormous risks and dangers. Perhaps at some point in the distant future we will find a way to better capture, use and transmit energy from conversion.

I actually thought the ball would explode as it had been frozen in LN

​@@petenikolic5244yeah I thought freezing would make the ball weaker not stronger

@@TheRealBatabii freezing metal to near 0 will cause it to harden like nothing else. it was literally to hard to break, soo the block of hardened steel broke first and very violently

You only need a single fullstop to separate sentences.* Those multiple fullstops serve no purpose other than making reading more difficult.*

I'm a CNC Mechanic and I looked that steal up with its DIN-Norm and it's composition. Yep I've had to work with similar steals in the past and they've given neither me nor my tools a good time.

@@TENthe10th tough stuff.....

@@SmearCampaignUK nope..... Without proper maintenance, a scary sharp knife will turn into a butter knife.

Also it looks that the pressing cone is not the same.. A shame

Hello ! May Allah protect and guide you to his light and happiness in this life and the hereafter, God bless, Ameen. Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time. Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them). Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI). Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy. Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful. Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI). Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad). Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning! Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures. Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement. It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them. (19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).. Salam (Peace) -----------

Hello ! May Allah protect and guide you to his light and happiness in this life and the hereafter, God bless, Ameen. Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time. Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them). Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI). Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy. Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful. Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI). Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad). Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning! Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures. Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement. It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them. (19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).. Salam (Peace) -----------

To get technical, this was a display of its strength, not toughness. Had it been tougher, it wouldn't have exploded.

Это плака о двух концах, броня должна быть не только прочной но и пластичной, чего не сказать об ar500

Sketchy Russian comment…

I work with abrasion resistant steel (known as "AR steel"). It is quenched and tempered to give it hardness. A common brand name is Bisalloy. I'm not sure if it's the same thing as in the video. We have recently had issues with the steel plates failing violently while being bent. They're not as brittle as harder products such as cast iron or ceramics, but they're a lot less ductile than mild steel. So as in the video, if a 500-hardness steel (usually measured on the Brinell scale) is deformed too much it will fracture and fail catastrophically.

AR500 is Iron, Carbon, Manganese, Phosphorus (!), Sulfur, Silicon (ok this is not toxic), Chromium, Nickel, Molybdenum, Boron (!) I don't think it's very safe for handling, and simple steel should do better if you have a welding torch at hand. The same is with aluminum: nobody like to repair this (cars, ships, ...). Carbon is more nasty to repair.

@@losttownstreet3409 Phosphorous should not be more dangerous than Sulphur. It would likly only emit P2O5, wich is no more dangerous than SO3. In no way should working with a blowtorch create white Phosphorous (that would be toxic).

Thanks for sharing.

Automatic Rifle

Armour Republic

It stands for Assault Rifle!!!

correct and the 500 refers to the ISO standard and is 500 Brinell Hardness , There is also 600 Brinell hardness available , called AR600 or QT600 , QT refers to "Quenched and Tempered"

Yo that thing looked like a thermite explosion, crazy

With that much force? It was well beyond the transition temperature and probably was hot to the touch. All that energy has to go somewhere, so before it breaks it goes to heat. Once it breaks, it rapidly converts to kinetic, creating an explosion of sorts.

So your saying we need to super cool our rounds and make them steel then infantry can shoot through tank armor?

@@jeffbotelho5035 Im not sure what super cooled rounds will do to the firing mechanism and barrel. :F

Not buying it. * The sphere had 20 minutes of total immersion in liquid nitrogen for the ball to fully reach temperature. This whole thing was done in less than 2 minutes. * The AR500 was not submerged in the liquid at all and it had much more mass than the ball. * Because it was a sphere there was a very little surface-to-surface contact area between the AR500 and the sphere. * The AR500 had full surface contact with the base below it making the mass of AR500 even more. * There are ungodly high temperatures being created with that kind of pressure further working against any temperature transfer.

I believe that your analysis is the best explanation. That the difference in temperature of the AR500 is what shattered it. I would have thought the frozen steel ball would have shattered first though.....like a rose dipped in liquid nitrogen.

Must take a lot of electricity to build up that energy too.

Das One Crazy Mo Fo

a reminder of why this is very dangerous

Imagine setting up a wood barrier and thinking it'll be enough...

get a bit of gratitude pal

dude shits moving like 400 mph and weighs like 4 pounds. make a wall that can survive that 20 times

If nobody got hurt it did it's job. The safety shit is for people, you can put the camera wherever you want if the content is good like this you just go buy another lense

He clearly need a new barrier made of AR500

my titanium plate makes for a very nice pillow

don't you?

D-Do you not?

Peasant.

speak for yourself

😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣👍🏿.

Yeah, WWII tank armour no problem, but who tf owns a hydraulic press? 😂

Well, I'm not going to go and buy one.

Apparently in Finland they do. Democracy at it finest...You get a free press...

Фунты на дюйм это дикий бредд. Весь мир перешёл на кг и метры. 40 мпа давление, или 400 атм, это 400 кг на 1см2.

@@vincent_hall Now you have to make a YT short of you going to the bank, getting a loan and buying a press. But dont show the delivery and install till like 3 shorts out!

would also be nice to know if these were good samples or garbage and what type of titanium was used.

Looks like on modern armor steel he used lead press tip, so I would count on accurate and fair results..

Thank you for letting me know I don't need to watch this video. All I was interested in was the numbers

it is the data which makes the video more meaningful

In the video description, it is specified that the press has a capacity of 500 tons, and I believe the creator assumes that when the material being tested withstands the press, there is no need to provide additional data. Personally, I think that more data could make the final result more satisfying.