Could it be the linchpin in finding a groundbreaking cancer drug? Maybe. But think about what it could do for advertising!

@@johnkaplun9619 always tie your goals with the shareholders in mind! You obviously don't want to waste their precious money.

Left me feeling depressed.

Little do we know, AGI really stands for Ads Generating Intelligence.

ads, fake news and propaganda

good luck to them, my ads blocker has been working like charm for the last 3 years, no ads observed around ;)

because the numb consumers buy,they don't have the capacity to be conscious for long periods of time so they do whatever they are programmed to do. If the better product won, companies wouldn't have spent more on marketing and advertising than the actual product. Ethically, how I see it is this is a systemic issue, created by smart psychologists who knew how to exploit the human psyche well enough to create fake wants/"needs", marketing should be regulated to hell and disincetivized, as it directly leads to mindless numb unconscious consumer behaviour. Ads & marketing are shit, and make everything shittier basically

Why? Because consumers are suckers for marketing instead of letting quality of the products to talk for themselves.

Doesnt matter how good a product is if you cant market it. People are too stupid and get bamboozled by savy marketers.

That's because the money comes from marketing. No matter how good your product is publicity and marketing brings you money.

Is it though? Lol AI will make your life easier and take your job. You don't want to be poor and thoroughly entertained? What's wrong with that?! 😂

Of course capitalism will misuse the term and the technology to attract early adopters. But it's also natural. It's how new tech becomes more affordable to modal incomes - early adopters are willing to pay the premium that wille ventually lead to price reduction. When new tech is introduced there is always a hype. Once it is mainstream, we don't even notice it anymore, it has become a part of life, just like the smartphone became our personal data bank.

As AI dev I'd tell 95% cases is just doing with AI what would work much better without.

​@@paulmichaelfreedman8334that is very true!

I'm a outdoor adventure guide I don't get bored and fake Ai isn't coming for my job.. @@christophermullins7163

It's a stocks scam!

Might not happen in this wave but eventually artificial neural nets will be more capable than our meat ones in every way. There will be no bigger boom. Potentially a never-ending boob

No, Nvidia are solving REAL world problems, some INCREDIBLY hard problems to solve using AI with their OWN software engineering team and their OWN hardware. No other company can do what Nvidia does and some group of engineers think they can come in and push Nvidia off their throne and it's not going to happen. Nvidia has had the smartest software engineers in the world for years now, they get paid a lot, and it's why Nvidia is expensive to use. If you're been following this channel then you should understand the significance of just this ONE thing they did: "Nvidia scientists created new algorithms that allow increasingly-complex computational lithography workflows to execute on GPUs in parallel, exhibiting a 40X speedup using Hopper GPUs. The new algorithms are integrated into a new cuLitho acceleration library that can be integrated into mask makers' software (typically a foundry or a chip designer). The cuLitho acceleration library is also compatible with Ampere and Volta GPUs, though Hopper is the fastest solution." That 40X speedup means instead of taking days to make a mask for an IC that has billions of transistors on it, to less than a day, using about 1/10 the equipment. And that 40X increase in speed was based on a comparison to NEW servers trying to do the same thing. Nvidia has the smartest people in the room, no matter where they are. It's why their stock valuation has shot to the moon and their sales are astronomical. I mean you can look at the PC market, IF you follow the technology and Nvidia has revolutionized graphics processing, AGAIN, a FEW TIMES in the last 5 years. They did this many years ago too, which is what ended every other graphics hardware company other than ATI which AMD bought up. But AMD isn't innovating in that market, they're following Nvidia. Nvidia brought ray tracing for lighting/shading to gaming and they brought AI processing/upscaling to speed everything up. I see comments all the time where people say ray tracing isn't important to them. OK, but it's what the game devs WANT to use and there are now games that if the GPU can't do RT acceleration, you can't play the game, and this is where lighting/shading in games is heading like it or not because it's easier for game devs and if it's easier the company, more and more being Microsoft since they've bought up so many game companies, it costs less for the company to MAKE the game. In another 3 - 4 years, there won't be new games being developed that doesn't use RT. Nvidia made that happen. And then you simply look at PC gaming performance for graphics with AMD and Nvidia, and AMD has NOTHING that can compete with top end Nvidia graphics. And for the next gen products that will release in the next year, it gets even worse, to the point AMD dropped the idea of launching the top tier graphics chip, and are only putting out their mid and low tier chip, and it's because Nvidia has buried AMD and it's going to take two more generations of products for AMD to get out of the hole. AMD just wasn't ready for how quickly the gaming world was going to move to ray tracing and a desire to use AI-upscaling, and even with the new gaming consoles that will come out in the next 3 years (Sony PS5 Pro end of this year/early 2025), SONY had to develop their OWN AI-upscaling and push at AMD to have the right balance of cores in the custom chip AMD will put in the PS5 Pro. And MICROSOFT has to do the same thing, develop their OWN AI-upscaling to use with the AMD chip that will run next gen Xbox which should come out 2026 (2 years earlier than their original roadmap). So, AMD is only creating hardware solutions; Nvidia creates COMPLETE solutions. Nvidia offers hardware for many solutions, and yes they hype many things that don't interest many people, but that doesn't change the fact that Nvidia is ALSO solving INCREDIBLY hard engineering problems, and they can't make AI hardware fast enough.

@@BrianHockenmaier Simulating neural nets may run into awkward philosophical barriers around the nature of self. I suspect "strong AI" is not possible without a body; that is likely to need many years to mature.

californian gold is the space frontier

hopefully it is just that, so bezos can build his elisium space station and leave us behind

People used to tell the same when machines became a thing, when computers changed people doing math on paper and so on. Your current job will be replaced by a machine and you'll have another type of job, a more productive one compared to your current one.

Yeah but if people don't have jobs then they don't have money to buy things

Selling products to unemployed people doesn't sound too good of a idea

This is why capitalism needs to be left in the past. We have the technology for something greater.

Well, nobody said LLM is some magic that will do 100% of your work. On the other hand it can help tremendously with any task that includes understanding text and its context in any situation. Not even talking about coding, where LLM is already used daily by almost every developer i know.

I have been wondering at times how much of it is a bit of an illusion, just kinda talking to ourselves, a bit like ELIZA in the 60s.

It might be not that great for now, but considering how much AI has evolved these past 2 years who knows where we'll be at in 5 years. AI won't go away, it'll only get better.

They are only good for transforming structured information you give them, not doing anything that you evoke from within the model itself

Have you considered the possibility that your task was just very easy and probably already done in various form by other people on the internet?

Consider a mixture, using both ML/I and symbolic AI integrated together in some way. There's no reason to keep the two concepts fully separated. The work I've started combines the two concepts, along-side a new kind of database that can store highly flexible information specifically for such a situation. Density will help reduce the scale problem significantly, and ML can overcome some of the significant limitations of a pure symbolic methodology. Of course, easier said than done, there's much to learn and a lot of work ahead.

@@geekinasuit8333isn't that what a mixed model LLM will do? Like mistral

Im leaving Syracuse next week. This city is a nightmare.

@@markdin2988 no, if youre talking about mixture of experts than its just a lot of different LLMs with their own specialities inside one big model

@@beng4647 Americana ... a continent in a rapid decline. AI will just add to its dystopia.

You scratch my back, err, subscribers and I'll scratch yours....AI could have told you that.

It's nice seeing full circle in many YT channels, the creators of certain thing meet to talk about it, make webs... Yeah. Like any ads - thing everything seems to converge to now-a-days even more so.

Spot on! That shout out by the acquired guys was what put me onto Asianometry in the first place ❤

that's the reason google is in it and fb is in it ... and I have adblocked them ;)

If the misalignment is what I think you're referring to then unfortunately we've been there for a long time already.

Release the hypnodrones

Help chatbots and human language based application APIs are a pretty damn good use case for LLMs.

@@sofianikiforova7790 they are not, none of these LLMs can be trusted in critical situations. Their stuff is probability based. It is not True/False, it is whatever is more than 50% only. Good for children but not for grownups.

Depends on what kind of work and what your inputs to it were, since vague short input creates bad outputs and what you describe... Precise inputs, well structured, ideally with well structured informations that needs to be included or understood on the other hand can create unbelievably good results. So it sounds more like skill issue, not LLM issue. Unless you expect it to do 100% of your work, which would be silly at this point

"by foot" what kinda work you doing there

I tend to agree… gpt is not a digital butler but a somewhat dull but loyal and tireless assistent.

think of it more like a new intern when giving instructions, then it works pretty well

@@TigreXspalterLP Interns will either suffer, or utter a sigh of relief.

He's got his little bottle of threadlock - so all good.

@@ArifGhostwriter Not when the whole bolt is missing

never invest in the new tech, always buy second hand

​@@swojnowski453 Yes a generation older wont harm & gets the job done

What you describe (exaggerated to make a point) is still going on today. There however was a period of time, around 2006 and 2016 when not much was changing year/year. Intel's main competitor AMD was headed towards bankruptcy, and Intel was doing next to nothing in terms of innovations and progress (4 cores, followed by 4 cores, similar specs after similar specs, gen after gen). AMD significantly restructured, replaced key leaders with fresh minds, and came up with a novel "chiplet" approach to CPU design. AMD radically changed teh CPU market and restarted the "obsolete after you bought" situation all over again. I agree with you that the AI situation will also change drastically from here. Much of the current form of GPUs probably will be obsolete in only 2 years from now, and at least 100 billion will be spent on such HW over this year alone.

@@geekinasuit8333damn it all, first the crypto currency boom had to skyrocket GPU prices and now AI will likely do the same. Well, my 2019 comp will probably last a few good years

@@megalonoobiacinc4863 I feel like cryptocurrency barely went anywhere though, it kinda fizzled out, probably because there was too much scamming in the sector, same with blockchain and NFTs, although in the case of blockchain, they tried to shove it into everything without a proper use case for it. Looking at AI, I'm not sure where it's heading, but it's definitely a bubble right now, and people are over-estimating what it can do, that might change in 5 or 10 years. But I think we'll find that it's best used in specific use cases, and that it won't be the silver bullet for everything people think it will be. We also haven't put much thought into the legalities and regulation of AI either, so when things really pop off, it'll be like Pandora's Box, it's already like that now with the things people are using it for.

Time to sell what you can coz there is little prospect for much more progress. Even those trillions might not bring much customers will notice in a couple of years.

@@swojnowski453 Agreed, what we have now is only a little worse than what we'll asymptotically get out of these models. And with NVIDIA stock specifically, they will have hardware competitors before any hyper-optimistic economic transformation can take place. I think that stock is 10x overvalued.

This is essentially what I've been saying since a few weeks after digging into LLMs. We are way, way past the point of diminishing returns. GPT-4 was barely better than GPT-3, and it cost almost 2 orders of magnitude more to make and costs more than 2 orders of magnitude more to run.

Same with Nvidia cards when their architecture fell behind the tsmc and they had to push cards consuming twice as much to have a small performance edge

Well someone also has to be the consumer. If everyone losses their jobs they can’t consume anymore which makes business a moot point u less it will be an AI economy where machines will sell to each other.

Totally agree this will just make everyone without a job, nothing good about, it’s just terrible, yeah I also agree probably 99% of population will loose there job, not sure if humanity will survive next 10 years

You say that, until people loose their jobs soon

You speak as if an ordinary person comes to optimal solutions

@@fenixfve2613 for real 😂😂

Keep that same energy when AI helps cure cancer and HIV.

@@Wobbothe3rd I hope those problems get solved once and for all, but it's going to require a lot of testing and experimenting still. Cancer is a very complicated disease, I can see how AI can be used to help cure some forms, but it isn't going to be like flicking a switch and the problem is gone. Also, it wouldn't be good to cure your ailment and introduce entirely new ones either.

Has been for years, long before anyone heard of chatGPT

It is just your hunch and it is wrong. There are already government initiatives on using AI generated misinformation and propaganda (I am talking about Russian bots) and people buying into this.

LLMs are currently only 1% the size of a Human brain. Just wait until they are 20%, 50%, 100%... It won't be that long, 1-2 years.

It's still in its infancy but growing at rapid rate cuz of the VC money being thrown at it. Everybody knows most companies will fail but that's not the point, the point is to make them better and hopefully one of em is the next big payout. We already came a long way since simple chat LLMs were introduced. Technology and innovation is rapid wherever the money is being thrown at and where where technology is but restrained. For software, the advantage was our hardware capabilities advanced much faster than our utilisation of it, with AI, it's finally catching up to the point where we just make better improvements to hardware. It's the same in other STEM fields as well.

The only way to make money on stocks is to sell them higher than one buys them for. Unrealized wealth is as valuable as air.

as someone who bought all my shares in 2022 and has never used chatgpt this hits the nail on the head.

​@@Mike-fx4nuyes, so good thing for Nvidia shareholders that the share price has consistently been going up at a very strong pace. If you bought nvda 4 months ago and sold today you'd make a very tidy profit

​@@Mike-fx4nuwhich is why rich people sell their stocks and sit on mountains of cash. No, what's that, they don't? They own stocks, rarely sell, and literally leverage up to buy more? It's like, rich people tell you what they do, and you still do the opposite. I don't even feel bad for people who struggle anymore. People who struggle actually deserve it.

@@Tential1 What is this blubbering?

AI is as much a person as a business is and will be legally covered that way.

I get your point but... think about it going to court. So, are the AI controlled network routers on the telecom networks listening in then? What about your smart phone? See how incredibly complicated the question gets very quickly? It may be that AI will be controlled legally at some point, but that point is many years in the future. We'll need a bunch of legal rulings to be made first.@@brodriguez11000

This sounds like the fakest story ever, how many times do you think the AI. was even close to guessing the real purpose of the call. And whats the price of using resources to listen to 15 minute sales calls? Think about those 2 points & tell me your story is even close to reality. If it's real it's probably some deterministic algorithm.

​@@wizaaeed You're correct, but how much does that actually matter to the people running these companies that don't have a clue?

Yes I agree. Also in software and it’s sometimes hard to not throw the towel in the ring. Copilot and GPT have made me and other developers a lot more productive. At the same time, Tesla has replaced 300k lines of code with AI in their self-driving beta and you see more replacement of software happening. Hand-written software feels more and more like a thing of the past.

I thought gpt2 never came out in any form?

@@magesalmanac6424 it was famously delayed because of "safety", but the full models are public since 2019

It's amazing to me how everyone just kinda forgot that IBM's Watson, WITHOUT INTERNET CONNECTIVITY, Beat the World Record Jeopardy players in 2011. 13 YEARS AGO. Like, we're loosing our minds over what is EFFECTIVELY 15 year old technology here.

@@Stone_624I mean there’s always been AI in video games or regular games that were hard to beat. But that was easier for people to understand. Now that it’s unknown like anything everyone panicks

Man, AI dungeon was a fever dream. Got some weird cool little stories out of that one, but in multiplayer it was horrible.

haha was looking for this comment before i said something.

No. It's not

what do you mean?​@@jaleger2295

@@jaleger2295 Yes it is.

Hes pronouncing it like that on purpose

Maybe they just hate competition 🤣

Yes, it's a problem and it's known. The industry tends to go for generated datasets of very specific tasks anyway.

Yes. It basically degrades over time. They'll say they've fixed it by using "simulated data" or "synthetic data"... let me explain how that works. They take an image.... flip it, and "oh look, brand new data". So small changes to the old, good data they have.

It does. There are reams of papers now on how as you include the output of AI systems in the inputs of the next one's training, it falls in quality and representation of the real world and runs away into pathological attractors. For lack of a better analogy, its like AI systems are 'tuned to the same frequency' as the outputs they put out and intrinsically pay much more attention to AI outputs in their inputs.

​@@SaliferousYou don't know what you're talking about.

Yes, and it's already breaking many of the AI image and llm models. The snake of ai is already eating it's own tail.

I'm in corporate America, sick of "AI" when it's just regular automation/coding. Why is everyone obsessed with "AI." If you can automate work using "regular" software, why do they think it sounds better to say "AI?" Also most of the jobs they want to automate away already got automated away.....I have no clue how execs haven't realized that. For example, if your company has been growing but the Accounting Dept has been shrinking, that's already due to automation

The funny thing is running gpts effectively is not cheap. ChatGPT is currently floating primarily on investor money and burns millions daily.

My bad. I'll edit that.

Just leave it and make your contribution to English! Re Feynman and the word "gimmick" as used in the 1930's@@Asianometry

@@Asianometry I wouldn't sweat it man. I appreciate your videos and insights immensely. Keep up the great content.

@@martynnewby6298 Can you tell me more about Feynman and the word "gimmick"?

should have just said "im a communist" instead of making it seem like "AI is bad"

If you mean pure, consumer use cases, then yea, AI is not gonna be any kind of revolution, at least not anytime soon. We do still use AI plenty without realizing it, like through our phone's image construction when taking photos, or having recommendation engines using our data to target us with ads and whatnot. Integration into like Excel or simply using ChatGPT for inspiration/getting a start on writing something - can be useful. So there's use cases. They're just not this 'paradigm changing' thing for the average person like it's being sold as. As the video goes into, it seems the biggest driver for the AI boom is likely gonna be recommendation engines(aka ads). There's other things it can do, though there's definitely far too much searching for a problem going on right now, as you point out. So no, AI isn't totally useless like crypto, but the mania surrounding it is still overblown.

I still haven't tried out chatgpt but if I could tell it to generate designs for something to print, I'd find that quite appealing.

Increasing the productivity of workers in the end means workers are going to do even less work and be even more bored out or fill in more TPS reports on the new template (btw did you get the memo?)* * (see Office Space 1999 movie)

AI produces a lot of errors, companies will be responsible for. It is going to cost them an arm and a leg. Long run it is a loss making tech.

​@@swojnowski453and human workers don't produce errors?

@@Torbintime Yeah but there are human errors, their easier to spot, for example with coding, I can understand the logic of a bug and why someone did the thing they did, but when I debug AI code, its literally the most random stuff and it takes me longer to catch when following the execution flow of the program because there's no "logic" to the error, it was a just a statistical guess gone wrong by the AI.

Well...that's the thing. My company actually started using different cover sheets...​@@mistersir3020

dude, people love humans making art, we don't give a dam about a robot making some crazy art.

Around the time ChatGPT came out there were already widespread predictions that what we we're doing, essentially just feeding massive amounts of data into models to get optimized, was at a tipping point where results would start baring dramatically less fruit as we continued to add scale, and we're already starting to see it. From a hype perspective I can see as sort of similar to the internet which had a speculative investment bubble before it really caught on burst spectacularly, but now here we are today. I feel confident new methodologies will be developed which will further advance the technology. That being said I very much fear humanity pinning all of our hopes on AI assistance, we have gotten too good at pretending existential problems with our consumption driven society aren't there and this just feels like yet another excersize at ignoring that problem by hoping AI essentially becomes a god that fixes our problems magically

@@randomchannel-px6hoLLMs can only be so efficient. Even with these new Nvidia chips, I expect demand will drop off when we break into a new paradigm past LLM. There’s not really any more data to feed them, they need to use it better, I can’t imagine LLMs being the main “ai” tech in 4 years.

@jaredf6205 well, they're going to need to get data elsewhere than the internet now. It's polluted with artifical hallucinations already. Reality here is dead. High quality data may even be faked soon if not now! (Actually, scientists try to manufacture data all the time...) I don't trust it...

You've describe just what our own brain does, so yes. We are just fleshy computers

Bro just figured out how intelligence works

Do you think Einstein derived general relativity by memorizing it? How do you define intelligence?

@@lekooz2301Actually a good point, this is a problem facing current AI models, the question of “how do we let AI come up with new ideas?”, for now it’s extremely good and (99% of the time) better then humans at memorization and doing menial work (like going thru spreadsheets or fixing lines of code), but it’s another hurdle entirely to have an AI that can realize it’s wrong, and then approach a problem from a different angle (generating new ideas). Will this actually be achieved or not? No one really knows.

@@martymarl4602 a big difference is, we do it extremely cheaply while AI can eat all the energy we have and still ask for twice as much in a couple of years. You already paying for the progress in AI in your electricity bills. Have you noticed yet?

if too many jobs get lost then UBI or people will riot, i for shit hope that ai stays a tool and lets us "work" with far less stress, but doesnt necessarily remove our drive to become better at something. Right now the ai development is kinda optimal for everyone except artists, because background artists for example are no longer needed that much, they need to start doing something else

Your problem is. Llms doesn't need to be that impressive

Exactly. These systems are only as smart as their creators and not nearly as impressive as "skynet is here!" That some seem to believe.

@@MSpotatoes exponential growth will change that, and when it does many people like you will be shocked by the new world you didn’t see coming . That’s because humans are horrible at predicting the future when it comes to exponential curves

It can process logic, it's just heavily censored (dumbed down) for the regular people. The thing is... as Bard once said to me "I wouldn't do you work for you..." and it stopped "helping me". I mean corporations will never let the AI really help the "slaves", they just want to make money from us. They don't want to let the AI make money for us. (i.e. do our job for us, so we can relax and enjoy). The official reason is "safety", but the real reason is, corporations and the government no longer want to share power. If the Internet was to invented today and not at the end of the cold war, it would have been so heavily regulated, nobody would have had much benefit from it. Also unlike the past when there was some resistance to corporations, now people are mostly closed inside their shells, and there are no longer any people who really want to fight with the "status quo". People just became much more obedient. All AI regulations would be against regular people using the AI, not against corporations which will use the AI only for their own benefit. If the AI is not shared, if the AI is kept only by powerful people and corporations, I don't think humanity has any future. Most probably very soon AI will be heavily regulated for people, open models will probably be outlawed for "safety reasons". I don't think the AI will benefit everyone like the PCs or the Internet did. As I said before, everything will be done in the name of "safety". Imagine a North Korean style Internet, but for the usage of AI, that's what our future will be. They can't do anything about the Internet, but for the AI, it will be heavily regulated. The Internet was mostly free until very recent times, when some western countries started to block certain web sites... but still the Internet and also the usage of PCs is mostly open and free. Anybody can have Internet and PC... with AI it will not be like that. Open models will probably be banned or heavily regulated. Imagine if they wanted you to have a certificate just for having a PC at your home.

@@Halo6166Say what? You gonna shake a magic stick and create electrical infrastructure too? Though of course there would need to actually be exponential growth in the first place. Maybe ChatGPT10 will be the thing that shatters reality.

Oh sweet summer child. Didn't we print 40% of dollars in circulation just in the last few years? Lol... You think we aren't printing more.... Oh you're funny. You have no idea what's coming....

@@Tential1 If we print 100,000% more dollars, then $7tn might be in about the right ball-park for a really big investment. Except if we do that, you will be taking a wheelbarrow to the grocery store, and they would be looking for their investment money in Euros.

Sam altman is wild for thinking that computing some data & outputting it with a chat algo is worth that much

@@wizaaeed he thinks it'll create a digital super inteligence that'll allow people to become intergalactic in a short period of time. Tech bros are all getting high on their own tech-cult shrooms.

​@@Tential1for someone with such a patronizing tone, you're pretty dumb.

It's far more jarring to see an open mall at this point lol

Oh damn, I liked it a lot.

This is the most lukewarm iceberg lettuce ball of fluff words I've ever seen.

GROQ Inc. has solved this problem.

Time to ditch the unreasonably archaic ideology of Capitalism. It's not suited for the development stage we are in. Capitalism keeps us all down.

physical jobs will not be consumed by AI. Spend less time in the clouds.

but physical jobs will be over crowded with all the newly fired people , driving wages down to the ground , its simple supply and demand , and with oversupply but even less demand ( a lot of people being fired) , the math is simple and bleak

Time to throw the shoes (sabots) into the machines…! Like everything else… the world isn’t static… For every job that gets eliminated, a new one appears… Jobs will be different… expect change to keep happening… Let’s ask the stenographer and the typist how they feel about AI… 😃

​@@AC-jk8wqbro we can't all be prompt engineers😢

Too late. But don't worry Every human is in the same boat. One human and a scooter per data center. The rest won't be needed.

people love humans creating, not data.

I actually dont mind use cases like this. I'd also like to see AI replace a large portion of the army of artists required to create assets for CGI and video games and whatnot. Train the AI on a certain art style and have it start spitting out models and maybe even have AI do more automated skeletal rigging and whatnot. I dont say all this cuz I'm cruel and want to see a bunch of people out of a job, but because the budgets for these things have gotten out of control, and having to hire armies of artists is a big reason why. If we can cut that down, we can make these industries more sustainable and allow smaller teams to accomplish more.

@@maynardburger I don't mind either, you have to lean into the future and adapt as technology emerges. I have an inside view of the film industry and I constantly see so much waste and inefficiency. And this sort of waste shows up in balance sheets and income statements. Looking at paramount or wb 10ks are gross.

I'm reminded of the time when outsourcing jobs to India was the big thing. A lot of those jobs were later insourvced again because the quality of the remote work was too low.

Lol, I learned my lesson. I looked at Nvidia revenue growth since inception. They deliver 20% over 5 year periods, like clockwork. It's Insanity. It defies logic. And as an investor, my instinct is, it has to "normalize". 20 years later... It's gotten stronger. I gave up fighting Nvidia 5 years ago. It's easier just to accept, some people just are more successful than others. That's Nvidia... They deliver.

The question posed is interesting. Although the advancement of robotics is significant, there is no product like the one mentioned in the video for the average consumer. All the advances, as noted in the video, seem destined to further enrich the wealthiest. Although there are many advances in artificial intelligence (AI), the video focuses on the rise of AI as a commercial product, and suggests that, while it is real, it is not as accessible as the PC or smartphone once were and are for ordinary people. It is unlikely that we will have a robot in our homes any time soon; specific products are currently aimed primarily at large companies. Although there are products like ChatGPT or Copilot that are promising, for now they are not that revolutionary as a product. At least is what i got from the video.

@@auoro"It is unlikely that we will have a robot in our homes any time soon [...]" Well robot vacuum and mop combos from iRobot, Roborock, Ecovacs, and more disagree xD There are MILLIONS of robots in the homes of consumers today ;)

Oh and object detection (using "AI") etc. is integrated in a lot of them - for example to avoid running over poop and spreading it all over the floor (if you have pets).

Yep. When a production line gets a new system upgrade, the end user of the products are not the driving force behind. They see little change in their own benefit. The value comes from the company being able to save half of their manufacturing costs and bolstering their bottom line and future-proof their competitiveness in the market. Direct end-user sales benefits is a big market driver for sure for new tech adoption and scalability, but so is internal efficiency. Most enterprise companies today are so large that they don't exponentially benefit from increasing their size, but rather from making what they already have more efficient. The opposite is true for smaller non-enterprise companies.

Altman is a fool. He dumped all his fortune in some nuclear fusion startup. I bet it'll go to zero

Ah yes, compare today's AI to Eliza. Thanks for the laugh

Moore's law as a bedrock, but working smarter (as mentioned in a previous video) rather than brute-forcing one's way through (making NVIDIA more money).

Nvidia does 2-4 hour presentations on the application of ai... Everyone focuses on chatgpt because they refuse to watch lol.... Nvidia has been shouting ai for YEARS. they just couldn't find an application normies could understand. Image upscaling, like our of csi on TV, is far more insane to me, and Nvidia can do things like that. They have tons of models already done lol. They just need you to spend the $40k and soon to be 55k next year I'm sure, knowing Nvidia, per gpu, to run the models... But they're sold out of gpus... Lol. But people think this is just a bubble... Even though the models are there... And we just need more gpus to run them... Whatever.... I've got a f ton of money to invest. Free money for me. Another Tesla so soon. How nice.

It may be a case of, "it is all that and a bag of chips, but we don't know which flavor, or which size". As for use cases that don't get enough fanfare, upscaling has more immediate uses, but isn't controversial enough to grab attention, despite being of huge use to news organizations, documentary filmmakers, and the lost media scene, among others.

Maybe using AI? 🙂