MARK !!!!!!

MARK!!!

@@fatehyabali *FATEHYABALI!*

You can likely stream udp over ethermet. 8 different addresses that stream data to the jetson

You can get a cheap usb wireless adapter and call it a day

@@SoussiAfif Thanks for the suggestion .

You like that it was never mentioned?

@@GaryExplains I mean it in the most sarcastic of ways of course.

On the GPU side, I would guess the Jetson is more powerful. On the CPU side I would say the 8cx is better. One interesting thing to note is that Qualcomm is pushing AI via its DSP, not via the GPU, so it would be interesting (but hard at this stage) to see how they compared performance wise for AI.

Yes, of course. I imagine any machine learning AI will take ages to learn with such an underpowered processor. Thankfully there are some pre trained ai you can get to test out on it.

No. I wasn't aware that there were versions for the Jetson Nano.

@Gonçalo Amaro Thank you :)

The module on the development kit doesn't include the 16GB of storage, so you have to use the SD card.

@@GaryExplains thnx

The only way I could get VNC working was to run vino manually. You need to make sure you set encryption to false and prompt to false before you run it. 'gsettings set org.gnome.Vino require-encryption false' and 'gsettings set org.gnome.Vino prompt-enabled false' then run /usr/lib/vino/vino-server

@@GaryExplains where can i find these settings to change encryption to false please? Is it a config file in some directory?

Just type those two commands at the shell prompt and then run vino.

@Gary Explains can u provide a link for that fan u r using please? Is it a 5v 4 pin 40mm fan or is it 12v?

At first I get excited about new products and then I try to figure what I would do with it. The answer is play with it for about 15 minutes and then put it in one of my bags of old and useless tech, that for some reason I just can’t throw out.

ISrael already copied it through its control of microsoft, intel, google and the NSA and sold the tech to China I'd wager.....Why is Taiwan censored? They are more into democracy and independence than the jUSA.

@@melgibson6331 This is the export control list which is about the same as the list of nations of which the nationals require special permit for entering a US overseas base. Israel is a 2nd level ally and not considered by US and Anzac to be as trustworthy as EU,Korea and Japan(example:Israel sold technologies like Lavi and Python missiles to China) Israelis need visa to visit US for travel. As for Taiwan, there have been past defections of fighter pilots to China and chinese infiltration as well as many taiwanese companies relying on china. Taiwanese companies sent over trillion USD to China during their better days. And an attempted cross strati cooperation for semicons was thwarted by US policy. Taiwan makes semiconductors for China(Loongson,Sunway,Ingenics) and Russia(Elbrus) which are not allowed to import semicon manufacturing equipment due to export control. Sunway and Elbrus chips are used for larger computers such as supercomputers which could be used by chinese and russian military which is a very very dangerous thing,.

@@melgibson6331 And Israel has no industry infra to make semiconductors. Even without export controls, Israel's economy is too small for that. Only Korea, a G3 superpower, can do that,

Glad you enjoyed it

I guess that's a generic driver

The Jetson TX1 used a 1024-GFLOP Maxwell GPU with 256 CUDA cores. The TX2 offers 1.3 TFLOPs using a 256-core Pascal GPU, and the top-of-the-range Jetson AGX Xavier breaks 10 TFLOPs with its 512-core Nvidia Volta GPU.

Oh, so they make even the Volta version too? Wow. And the price sir?

I wish it was at least Pascal, that would make it the perfect young brother of the TX2

@@GaryExplains Easy there with the 10 TFLOPs claim! It's actually 1.3 TFLOPs in the 30W configuration. Don't confuse floating point operations with integer operations + Nvidia-marketing "tensor operations".

@@AndreiNeacsu From the AGX FAQ: What's the peak performance of Jetson AGX Xavier? Jetson AGX Xavier is capable of more than 30 TOPS (trillion operations per second) for deep learning and computer vision tasks. The 512-core Volta GPU with support for Tensor Cores and mixed-precision compute is capable of up to 11 TFLOPS FP16 or 22 TOPS INT8 compute. Jetson AGX Xavier's dual NVDLA engines are capable of 5 TOPS INT8 or 2.5 TFLOPS FP16 performance each.

Windows on ARM looks DOA. It was only meant to be a compatibility layer for a transition to ARM, but it looks like developers/hardware companies aren't willing to make the move.

Michael Williams No. it’s just a single Maxwell SMM. No FP16 specialist here, as half precision is done on the CUDA cores.

I hope someone test this Jetson nano for ps4 emulator in Windows

Actually the Nintendo Switch is also based around the Tegra CPU, so maybe you could port Switch games on this device...

Don't you mean here's your first generation Wii that plays GameCube Games and had a really a really sad release on VC. for almost every for ever Nintendo 64 game. "The darkness, the lack of and HDMI port.... Rip the money printer. That red Wii served me well.

@@bradfairbairn2870 No. You should keep up or keep quiet.

Greetings!!! :-)

*BIGBY!*

Yep. That's why I have trouble justifying the purchase of this board, or the Google Coral TPU beta board. I'm sure I could eventually find a use case for the on-board extra horsepower, even if it's just to prettify the user interface with simulated liquids flowing over the GUI window frames. Unfortunately, everything we have in the development pipeline at my job (designing scientific instruments) was designed to allow all the hard work to be done offline. I just don't have a strong use case yet to justify an exploration project.

Training should be done on PC. Otherwise a much more expensive product would be required(the one for self driving cars)

Richard Richard yes it does

Is retropi available for it?

I ordered one to run emulation tests on it. I will be trying all consoles up to and including gamecube...

ihaveanothereye awesome

@@JayRKID unfortunately mine doesn't ship until April 19th. So I won't have results for a bit

i like that question :) now i want to know aswell... all i know is that 2.79 does run on ARMv7 but i'm honestly i'm not too hopeful for eevee to get ported.

Performance is only 1/4 of mobile chips like Kirin 980

Which i7, there are dozens of models and variations.

@@GaryExplains that’s why I said the newest i7 ? Pick one and how would it compare?

@@trialnterror There is a huge difference in performance between the U, Y, K, etc versions of the i7. That is why you can't just pick one.

@@GaryExplains is there a benchmark on these then? That’s where I’m going, Howe does this compare to.....

The Jetson has 4 Cortex-A57 cores. Processors using the A57 were first released in 2014. So 6 years ago. So if you compare it to a 2020 i7, the of course the i7 is faster.

Just start dabbling adn stop asking questions. You WILL learn it by doing it. You'll never learn it by talking about it.

Yeah, that's what I did and now I'm a software dev on the side. If you have a good question, I'm sure anyone on forums will be more than happy to help you out

Don‘t know if you have any programming experience at all. If you have it is quite easy too learn it just by doing it. You can directly start with the ai stuff. For example with some tensorflow keras tutorials. If not maybe do some python tutorials first to grasp the basic concepts of programming before you start with the ai stuff. In general python is one of the easy too learn programming languages and at least as long as you are focused on high level programming and using libraries for the low level stuff it is a really powerful one.

To learn, you must do too. To repeat, do more than two.

@@SimonRichardMasters well said.

yes, the r-pi already could. snes, mega drive, game boy, ms-dos you name it. you could probably add n64, ps1 and dreamcast to this computer. you probably weren't aiming at emulation though, in which case the the answer is: it's an ARM and it doensn't run your vanilla windows most mainstream games are only written for x86, so no, not really in that sense.

I would say it surely can. The Nvidia X1 SoC is the same one used in the Nvidia Shield TV console. However, the Android image needs to be from Nvidia because of the custom SoC drivers/firmware. If anyone has managed to hack/build their own you might try searching XDA developers website.

Haha that’s not Ubuntu 18 lol

@@EstebanAgueroPerez It is, nano runs on 18.04

The successors aren't better. Maxwell my be quite old, but the newer designs won't beat it in this setup; Pascal, Volta, and Turing don't have better performance/watt, so you won't see any improvement from a newer Cuda Core. In fact, almost the exact same Cuda Core was used up until Turing which added float/int pipe-lining. Same for the A57; they can't upgrade because their is no simple upgrade. If they did a full redesign and kept the same power target, you would be lucky to see a 2-3% improvement. The X2 just increased the power consumption, but then they discontinued it because that moved it into competing with the highly competitive 15W laptop processors. TL:DR. The X1 is actually better than the X2 and their is no way to beat the X1 until mass production of 7nm revs up.

@@amirabudubai2279 From wikipedia, X2 is stated to have the similar TDP, as well as Xavier but this one can have TDP up up to twice the lowest configuration. I don't know how better Denver or Carmel cores are compared to A7x series, but I'm sure A57 is really that bad (thermal raises like rocket) because I used to have one (well, nvidia somehow nails the thermal better, but still no better than A7x). A7x is supposed to be backward compatible with A57 anyway, so I don't see any reason why this is no simple upgrade. After all, the smartphone markets have made it smoothly up to current A76. From overall SoC performance side, phoronix once done a comparison between TX1 and TX2, which are powered by respective SoC without T prefix, and TX2 gives 30-100% performance boost (Max-P mode, around half of it in Max-Q) for around 10W power consumption max (the same as TX1), even better the thermals are cooler than TX1. Anyway, I can't find any reference X2 being discontinued, in fact some rumors said new Nintendo Switch should be powered by it. Can you give some pointers? They only don't list it in their Tegra page, but it lists discontinued devices so I think it's the page that's out of date. The only "make sense" reason for me is pricing. This Jetson Nano is priced waaaaay below even TX1 (at launch). For $99, this is the cheapest SBC Nvidia ever released. So, using 2015 SoC sounds like a deal for the given price. After all, its performance is still above many cheap ARM SBC even some x86 ones.

@@leledumbo TDP does not equal power consumption. TDP usually works in a class system to make things easier on system integrators; it is cheaper to put a 15W TDP rated cooler on a 5W SoC than to create 10 different heatsinks. I can't find any any good benchmarks on the X2 since it seems to have only been used in one developer board since it came out 3 years ago, however you seem to have found some misinformation about it. According to Nvidia( www.nvidia.com/en-us/autonomous-machines/embedded-systems/ ) , it still uses the same A57 as the X1. 100% improvement in graphics sounds about right since it has the double the CUDA cores(and the die size to match), but no way it is in the same power class with 2 high power cores(in addition to the same cores in the X1) and twice the CUDA cores.

@@amirabudubai2279 I know TDP doesn't equal power consumption, I just state it to see what thermal performance it's designed for. Check phoronix for the benchmarks, that's the first google result I get. I'll try to find another one, usually notebookcheck also has one. I didn't say that it doesn't use A57, it still uses A57 + additional custom cores (Denver in case of X2). Why I compare to A7x series goes back to my initial question that despite A57 is so bad, why they keep using it knowing that A7x is a lot better? There could be another money playing around, as using newer cores mean that they have to have another deal with ARM.

Granted (for this video at least).

Normally people will cross compile on pc then deploy on the board.

The idea is that in a finished product, you can have an application specific board which will be lighter and cheaper compared to a full-on development board. Development boards are supposed to enable development, they're meant to be universal, giving you full (and preferably convenient) access to the chip in question, not optimized for a concrete application. In an actual drone, you probably wouldn't be using USB cables to connect components or a barrel jack to connect battery. You certainly wouldn't put on connectors that you don't need. And using a module can simplify the design of a board and make it cheaper. The downside is that it's more restrictive; the module is what it is. You have to accommodate it. Not to mention it's probably going to be heavier and use up more space. One of the many engineering decisions to make. This approach can be taken even with custom modules, not just off-the-shelf parts.

Vedant Gawade actually yes but not crisis 3

@@Yetus . Worth it at this price point.

Yup jetson TK1 not the TX1

Why?

@@GaryExplains maybe I can use it, to scan something. If I don't scan something, maybe it will be useful to play some games. Not at max graphics obviously.

@@JOELwindows7 Sir can i output 4k video from this to a monitor pls reply sir

@@codebulletin I haven't yet an idea about this. If it is possible, maybe about 30 Hz or 60 Hz.

Thanks for sharing I'm so happy you enjoyed it! 😂😂😂😂😂

Are you sure it doesn't? I expect it to work, but I guess I will see when I get it.

So far haven't been able to. Drivers won't find it as an available CL platform. Think they prefer you to use CUDA

The game or the weaponised satellite system? 😂

Gary Explains, the satellite weapons system may be doable, if it can do machine learning. ETA prime has his hands on one now, so he will most likely give it a shot!

I think it can some.

klipper is python based could run virtually on any platform

Yes it can but if your idea is to put Android better buy a nvdia shield is the same hardware yes it is 100 us more but come with controller memory an Android is all ready install

This board has about half the GPU core of a Shield, 73% of the CPU frequency, and disabled low power cluster. Unless you are really desperate, the shield with its bundle controller is 100% better than this and with OS preloaded no less.

Just look at the mate 20

Have fun with sending your credit card info to the Chinese government.

Why?

Considering its size, it is bulkier than SD855.

@@mansaha9288 If you are talking GPU performance then yes the GPU in the Jetson Nano is more powerful. But if you are talking CPU then, no.

I mean it's 99 dollars for a new complete computer. Like have you seen how aluggiah the 200 netbooks are? They suck! This is good relatively speaking.

@@ajr993 It's sluggish on Ubuntu, not Windows. Generally running Ubuntu well is not that hard.

Probably I/O limited due to the microSD card

True. But technically the Jetson Nano uses a second generation Maxwell!

@@GaryExplains oh sorry, then you are right 😅

I do raise the gain in post and I don't have a problem hearing the audio, also nobody else has complained. I would suggest the problem is at your end. Sorry.

The worst offenders these days in Linux are the damn browsers and apps themselves not the O.S. itself, and unlike Microsoft and Screwgoole apps, at least in Ubuntu it's trivial to eliminate all telemetry and data gathering from the O.S. and it won't come back every ten minutes with an update. The biggest issue that I hate in Linux these days is the lack of application level firewall support in the O.S. and that is true of pretty much ALL distro releases. There have been independent projects to add this support (such as Douane), but they don't get any support because the kernel developers are arrogant and stupid, and don't see an issue with applications "phoning home" as long as their precious stupid kernel doesn't get hacked by yet another dumbass zeroday root exploit (of which there have been hundreds, thanks to the kernel being written in C, which is pretty much the worst computer language on Earth when it comes to security).

he he because that is the right way to say it he he

A scam at $99 LOL

@@GaryExplains Nvidia makes 60% magin on all their products.

What screen recording software for the Jetson Nano would you recommend? Have you tested it?

Really! Please give me a link to a cheaper and faster RISC-V based board.

@@GaryExplains It will be. Enjoy your nVidia as long as the don't milk you dry

@@browaruspierogus2182 LOL, so your statement isn't true then, it is just based on your wishful thinking... nice! 🙄

@@GaryExplains Sipeed modules are less than $20 and have same or better AI. That board is nothing special except it has goblin stuff in it that makes you so hyped up

@@browaruspierogus2182 So your claim is that a $20 IOT board which is based on Micropython has higher performance than the Jetson Nano? You are claiming that a dual-core 400MHz RISC-V processor which runs FreeRTOS has higher performance than the Jetson Nano. Interesting... Can you point me to a demo where it decodes 8 full HD video streams and applies object tracking to all 8 stream simultaneously? Here is a quote from the Sipeed MAIX-I module description: "It means you can do object recognition 60fps@VGA" Hmmm... Doesn't sound like high performance to me... Would you care to modify your statement?