Sad we even have to say that

very brave of them

So this guy will be the first emperor of the world? lol, j/k! Great debate, and I love how he is putting our own sentience into context!

You cannot either globalize everything nor nationalize everything. It seems very right to have globalized ecology and globalized economy but you can't have a globalized political system due to the fact that you have many countries with many different people. You cannot rule the world like a huge company and format everyone. In so doing you will kill differences, creativity, art, lifestyle etc. Weare not robots!

Climate change is a huge hoax and your ignorance about the facts is dangerous. China is working hard on fixing its environment and the problems of foreign companies consciously polluting their conutry. Job loss is a big issue. The Wall on the US southern border is a must in the face of huge exoduses which means that South America is completely unable to manage its own citizens. What do you think if China were to do the same and send thousands of Chinese to the US without restrain... Wouldn't this be crazy??

They will own nothing and we will be happy lol

Reminded of Michael Parenti, an excerpt from his piece Mystery: How Wealth Creates Poverty, which highlights this very same dynamic under the auspices of global US empire and its continued "full spectrum domination" via currency hegemony and implicit omnipresent military threat: _"In their perpetual confusion, some liberal critics conclude that foreign aid and IMF and World Bank structural adjustments “do not work”; the end result is less self-sufficiency and more poverty for the recipient nations, they point out. Why then do the rich member states continue to fund the IMF and World Bank? Are their leaders just less intelligent than the critics who keep pointing out to them that their policies are having the opposite effect?_ _No, it is the critics who are stupid not the western leaders and investors who own so much of the world and enjoy such immense wealth and success. They pursue their aid and foreign loan programs because such programs do work. The question is, work for whom? Cui bono?_ _The purpose behind their investments, loans, and aid programs is not to uplift the masses in other countries. That is certainly not the business they are in. The purpose is to serve the interests of global capital accumulation, to take over the lands and local economies of Third World peoples, monopolize their markets, depress their wages, indenture their labor with enormous debts, privatize their public service sector, and prevent these nations from emerging as trade competitors by not allowing them a normal development._ _In these respects, investments, foreign loans, and structural adjustments work very well indeed._ _The real mystery is: why do some people find such an analysis to be so improbable, a “conspiratorial” imagining? Why are they skeptical that U.S. rulers knowingly and deliberately pursue such ruthless policies (suppress wages, rollback environmental protections, eliminate the public sector, cut human services) in the Third World? These rulers are pursuing much the same policies right here in our own country!_ _Isn’t it time that liberal critics stop thinking that the people who own so much of the world---and want to own it all---are “incompetent” or “misguided” or “failing to see the unintended consequences of their policies”? You are not being very smart when you think your enemies are not as smart as you. They know where their interests lie, and so should we."_

@@debclarke1746 _"The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society. Conservation of the old modes of production in unaltered form, was, on the contrary, the first condition of existence for all earlier industrial classes. Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed, fast-frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify. All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his real conditions of life, and his relations with his kind."_ - some guy (Marx to not be pointlessly facetious), a bit optimistic at the end we wouldn't just choose individual delusion while the planet literally burns around us... And on that point, some Nietzsche to offer an explanation of how resentment both creates new moral systems of value but insulates these values subjectively as a passive coping mechanism for class domination, _"The slave revolt in morality begins when 'ressentiment' itself becomes creative and gives birth to values: the ressentiment of natures that are denied the true reaction, that of deeds, and compensate themselves with an imaginary revenge."_ Which is all to say, as that first guy once put it, _"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."_

Never repeat their spell. Sing out our own. Stop saying that. You will get what you say.

The greed of money. This constant pursuit of more money. I think your find in Australia and New Zealand alot of businesses built up from scratch get brought out, it's because most people don't want more and more. They just want to enjoy life.

Harari says nations are fictional... except for Israel.

Definitely silenced as I'm just seeing this video 4 years after being published.

Harari says in his books that when he says nations are a fiction or comunism is a fiction people often get ofended beacuse they can't live with the ideia that the ideologies they believe are a myth. they are used to think the things they believe are true so they cant admit theyre not real

@@cokelennon2517 LOL so he's gaslighting

He also says equality of all humans, human rights and freedom are also imaginary and based on no real or biological truths

Def of consciousness doesnt sound complete.. dont you think..

@@sr2754 it is, feeling is the secret. Tesla once said “these ties cannot be seen, but we can feel them. We are all alone”

Exactly. Intelligence, Consciousness are one of the few dimension/way to perceive this complicated world. Sad part is that we look through only one lens viz mostly intellect.

Intelligence sometimes solve real problems. It solves mostly problems that intelligence created: mathematics, literature, ..

🙏

Yes. I agree 100 percent.

Is it human nature? 😑

@@14sakuya26 Unfortunately, yes...

YES! and I should have read your comment...and stayed silent before chiming in on this conversation.

Well, that's why we have democracy. It's heavily flawed but is effective at fighting this problem.

seeing how there are already shitstorms starting I wouldn't be surprised if they disable it later

Conner Nickerson they didn't block the brexit video months ago. they only block on blm and feminsim

"UKposts's comment system isn't up to the task of maintaining a constructive dialogue." Orwellian doublespeak for "people have opinions about progressive dogma that we disagree with, so we'll silence them." See, easy!

THAT'S WHAT ORWELLIAN MEANS OR WHAT ORWELL WOULD HAVE MEANT. CAN PEOPLE PLEASE STOP USING RIDICULOUS JARGON THAT BASTARDIZES LITERARY WORKS THEY'VE NEVER READ TO IMPLY THAT YOU ARE MORE INTELLIGENT THAN YOU ARE.

Conner Nickerson I'm just as surprised as you. To be fair though, the comments are usually disabled on the "progressive" videos, this is more a political discussion.Still nice to not be silenced!

Thanks for being a rational and calm voice for the conservative position. All the ranting and raving from extremists (on both sides) tends to obscure and obstruct genuine, productive debate and discussion. It's reassuring to know folks like you are still out there, being productively curious. This is, of course, not a full debate and there is no way to tackle the whole world's future in just one hour, with just two people, but I agree that this conversation had to start somewhere like this and it must be continued, regardless of the screeching from wing-nuts on all sides.

I differ in political views but share your agreeableness. Keep on encouraging proper discussion👍

My hope for humanity is restored

amerika and nebraska are a perfect fit for you. please stay put

If people could TRULY sit down and discuss the white elephant in the room without getting offended or trying to be right, only THEN will humanity truly start moving forward. A united humanity will be able to overcome any obstacles thrown in front of them. So humanity's 1st true challenge is to be united in the way we think. Before that, I do not have a lot of hope for a good future.

That was before Global Warming reared its ugly head as a grass roots left concern .

Right! The battle for seattle in '99 was anti-globalization. They did a nonchalant surreptitious switcheroo on us all and now lefties are all about global nwo.

Yep.they supported the unions and were against the global trade deals that hurt our workers now they are all globalists.

Phillip Gregory now both parties are anti union.

Nice one! ;)

Now learn that he wishes to create the New World Order, which will be responsible for reducing the world population by nearly 7 billion people, and enslaving the remaining 500 million people. This guy is evil. Do some research 🤔 instead of blindly listening to those who have planned your very demise.

A friend of mine told me a global government will form sooner or later (probably not in a peaceful way). I start to think he is right, even though we dont know what its gonna be like

Seemingly. Perhaps there are nuances to that.

Nice interpretation....

Globalism is the death of free throught. Read a book.

@@firemunky1980 Look around YOU. free thought died a long time ago with Nationalism and Fascism and Communism and hero worship. I've read more books and my library is more extensive than you could possibly imagine. Most people are incapable of free thought. Their prejudices and superstitions and bigotry and what their "grand old flags and governments" have "allowed" in their curriculum, only indoctrinates.

"We no longer have story, but I have story. In fact, I have two stories. Buy my books now." =P

GDL Expose the nose

Nor should one underestimate the power of human intelligence

That We Humanity! - “You should ever be aware of human Brain “conditioning!” Not Stupidity...stupid, to believe that humans are stupid! The conditioning is stupid? ! RDR

"you should never underestimate the power of human stupidity.". e.g., Atomic fission= The evidence of Clever. Atomic bombs = The evidence of stupid. Clever V's stupid?. Stupid is making a comeback!.

Josef Abu Nijmeh posts 10 minutes after video was uploaded, video 1 hour long. Maybe he pondered his ideas later on the video. Are you being satirical?

This is true. However, judging by the flow of the conversation it was rather one sided. If you watch Joe Rogan's podcast let's say, you can appreciate a host that both let's his interviewee speak and be challenged when the topic is controversial. As the topic of "Nationalism vs. globalism" is inherently controversial this is of utmost importance. I do not need to sit through the whole one hour before I can judge if the conversation will be productive or not which is what my comment reflected upon.

boooooo

The interviewer was too preoccupied with his own fake stories that he still believes and he kept interrupting Yuval and didn't let him finish his answers. Yuval was awesome. His idea of, no universal meaning to life refers to the Existentialism of Sartre.

I´m afraid if you really want to cover that topic correctly, you need not just more people. But also way more time. There are so many factors involved. I guess there should be a whole series of videos to it that cover all the main issues. Including all the problems that we failed to fix so far and all the possible new problems from the fixes we have to provide. It´s not really as simple as comparing the two words Nationalism and Globalism.

its not. you can apreciate cultures and traditions of the past and take whats best to move on to the future but globalism is what leads to world peace.

Hi there, I can tell you that as an Irish woman living in Ireland, globalism is taking us on a path of Civil War, there will be no peace in our country. Also people can appreciate different cultures and traditions without destroying their own countries to do so. Diversity is great as long as diversity is not destroying countries and Continents as it is. Europe is being destroyed, the West is being destroyed. Multiculturalism has some benefits but the down side is not acceptable at all @@Peritye

@@priscillagallagher7325but Imagine if all the world was Like the West in the golden age. That’s the final objective of globalism. Not detroying the West. But make all the world Like the west. You are irish you should now how nationalism is dangerous (English imperialism).

@@Peritye NO Globalism leads to unrest an war, no one but corrupt tyrants want Globalism.

@@Peritye Globalism is Communism, just a new Label. Communism killed more than 100 Million People worldwide since 1850. It is not the path to World Peace but to endless tyranny.

???

1st you need to realize that because of Afghans natural resources the Globalist will never allow for your country to be united under freedom. Think about all the wars fought there for decades, and why? I pray for the people of Afghanistan, and for those who have purposely destroyed it, I pray swift judgement from God comes to them.

I am sure there will be a few cases of homeschooling for girls and Talibans can not stop it, and it will have impact on the future. The taliban culture can not turn back the time completely.

No wonder why he's a Globalist

Really? I thought he looked out of his depth. Mind you, if a Leftie woman had been sat there, the guest wouldn't have had a chance to explain anything.

Is his name Ted?

I find him rather distracting. looking away all the time, while mumbling humm, yes, humm..

is this sarcasm?

except he dont understand how cousciousness works

@@saucesriracha3763 nobody does. That's the point, so we can't mechanically replicate it. Without feeling there's no conciousness. We still can't explain from where that "entropy" comes. Not even scientists

@@mikhael.j7 Prove that without feeling there is no cousciousness ? And what do you mean by feeling ? Because the sense of touch is absolutely unneeded for cousciousness to develop. Sure, you need some sensory organs for "your attention to determine" (you get it its not the attention by itself who determine) that you are/exist, but touch is not mandatory. Plus, cousciousness of self is not synonym with cousciousness. I don't get what you meant with entropy, maybe it's a reference to this video? Anyway, cousciousness is just attention.

@@saucesriracha3763 i am not talking about feelings of sensory types. I am talking about emotions, feeling different spectrum of emotions, like anger, sadness, happiness, boredom, ALL SORTS OF WEIRD UNPREDICTABLE EMOTIONS THAT SOMETIMES COME OUT OF NOWHERE, can a AI FEEL THOSE?? YOU CAN SAY THAT MAKES THEM BETTER. I QUESTION "BETTER FOR WHOM?". DO YOU THINK THE UNPREDICTABILITY OF YOURSELF IS A BAD THING. to experience to live to die to feel fear of you own demise, can a AI feel that. Other animals other than humans can feel too. Can a AI FEEL THOSE TOO. An AI CAN CONCENTRATE IT'S ATTENTION WHERE IT IS DIRECTED BY OUTSIDE NUDGE, THEN IT TRIES TO FIND THINGS RELATED TO THAT CONCENTRATED SUBJECT. DO YOU DO THE SAME, OR DO YOU CHOOSE WHERE YOU WANT to PUT YOUR ATTENTION TO. Can you see any pattern in my written comment?

@@saucesriracha3763 neither you do.

Why would corporates pay more if the same job could be done for less money if outsourced? It's capitalism to increase profits and reduce costs and globalisation is the next step to capitalism.

We arent ready for it for at least another 100,000 years. How long have humans been around now? We still have people running nations who sell body parts from political slaves for money. This is simply communism/socialism 2.0 on a much grander scale. Please point me to a nation where ultimate power has EVER been “better for the people.”? WEF is the worlds uber elites just using their wealth and influence to increase their wealth and influence and make sure they keep it.

Globalist will win. They will release a virus . They will do anything . I mean anything. They have control of all the media and write the story. In the US they have control of the Justice Department FBI and CIA. The lobbyist have paid off the politicians/Game over you lose

@@dmlindley They can try.

I think people use the word trauma in this context because they can’t believe that humans are sometimes just evil. Replace the word evil with trauma and this comment makes more sense

He sounds like a Cult leader.

Ten pajac globalny czuje się Bogiem..jego idea jest totalna klapa narodow.

It seems to me that humans over time created communities that become ever larger. The question is, has this been to the betterment of those individuals in the larger communities? I think most people would agree that it has. It appears to me that the EU is a beginning that just might show the way to a better world for the human race.

"Nationalism can solve global issues because it's in the best interest of every nation to survive." Globalism isn't the death of nations, it's about the unity of humankind. "Every nation can see what it needs to do to solve their own problems-" Let me stop you right there, how many nations answer that problem with OTHER nations? Seeking help, or taking resources, or or or "And *I am sure most nations* want to move in the direction of saving the planet." This isn't true. Most politicians are only worried about themselves, their term, their agendas. They don't serve their population, they serve themselves and their minds. In a way, and at a distance, this begins to manifest as serving "their" people, which is right back to red vs blue and left vs right. Nations are short term, they had served a point, but that term is over. I feel like you latched onto his message of how israel wants to build temple as a "retrograde vision", a way to go back to a comforting point and move forward from there, and you instantly saw him as the enemy and a foreigner who just wants in YOUR america. It was never yours. It's land. It belongs to every foot that steps on it for the moment that foot is there and no longer. So go ahead and stomp your foot, you're only proving our point. shill that.

@@bishopvida One World Government won't ever work. The people who propose it are all out of their minds they've been brainwashed by the con men who stole control of our money and are incapable of understanding basic concepts. The only problems that need solved all originate with a man whose head has never been right. He convinced himself he was a different species than the rest of Mankind and has been a liar a thief and a murderer from the beginning. Gee I know let's hack human beings and make them incapable of independent thought what a super genius idea. I don't think so. Human beings have no purpose other than to serve the Chosen People as their slaves. Look at their solution for their scam artist monetary system, blame their victims. They've always blamed everybody but themselves that's why the problem won't go away. Well they've reached the end of the line the jig is up.

If we hav global problems we should communicate to solve those issues, but still hav national sovereignty. We hav a right to freedom and piracy.

@@johnnyguerra5427 I hope you meant privacy, not piracy; pirates want their freedom to.

@@johnnyguerra5427 you have a freedom to work like a dog and pay taxes regardless of whether you are in a national or global government.

The debate isn't more about how much control do we want to give the global government.

@@g.williams2047 is or isn`t? not sure I understand.

Your suggestion is absolutely spot on! Now go and find these "selfless" ones and convince them to take the job.

I would love to be on that level. I would absolutely devote myself to serving humanity by making the practical changes needed for a better world.

I agree with your observation of a massive part of the problem of functioning democracies in the last 5 years.. The tricky bit is how to change the operating systems of democracies so that it makes sense to the smart humble servant competent types to pursue this work. For now, it makes no sense to them and we keep getting very marginal types stepping up. They play a game long enough to get their hands on the power reigns and then make a terrible mess we all have to live with.

"The solution is to put selfless (service to others) people in the major roles of leadership." Don't you get the memo? Politic is the art of making your self interest into the public interest. In other words, "Selfless people" in practice means politicians.

fitting to the channel

I like the libertarian stance on social issues, but that's about it. Authoritarianism seems to be the root of political arguments these days. It would be nice to see people tackle the subject directly.

what?

And focus on the EU authoritarianism in particular

SpaceManDawn More like Authoritarianism is the he root of all evils. Including all forms of collectivism, particularly the vilest version of the religion of statetheism, namely democrazy. And all other politics at large ofc. Without the insane idea that a class of irrational megalomaniacs hallucinating ownership over me, by accident of birth, and gets to dominate and steal from me, there is nothing to have political discussions about. I own myself and the results of my actions. No matter where you are or how many you are, you don't own me, you don't have a say in how I run my life, and you do not get to take a portion of what make.

If you agree with most of what he is saying, you're having difficulty spotting evil when it's directly in front of you. He doesn't believe in God. He is planning the New World Order, wherein nearly 7 billion people will be exterminated, and the remaining 500 million people will be controlled and enslaved by the elite. This man is evil.

Originally it is from vedant India ie Bharat.

everything he said is within the accepted mainstream dogma that somehow the only form of globalisation is this current right wing neoliberal form, making nationalism the only alternative. he even made the ridiculous statement that left and right are no longer relevant. and of course with those assumptions he can't answer the question about inequality. and he can tell you that politicians have a limited ability to do good, but can't say it's largely because of corporate interests. automation is also a left/right issue in many ways. if automating work or making it easier leads to lower living standards for some, the problem is the economic system not the automation.

Amazing that people exist that straight up support Evil.

Don't build the temple, it will end us.

This is shi*t...the only reason I keep listening is because Jonathan Haidy is in audience...not one m nation of China...whose going to make the close their coal plants in the name of a global decision on climate change....whose going to form a global group with gays and Muslims?????

@@jonathanlunn2464 , could you please say that again, in a comprehensible manner. Thanks

Absolutely correct, this is framed all wrong. The people are aware that the globalists elite wanting to control the world are psychopaths intent on world dopmination, nothing to do with nice people wanting what;s best for humanity.

@@alexanderthegreat7213 good point

@@alexanderthegreat7213 Who is the globalist elite? And what are you proposing in stead? Donald Trump and his reactionary movement? Anarcho-capitalism? The status quo?

@@paradxxicalkxrruptixn7296 just because i have identified the problem doesn't automatically mean i have the solution. But, what i do know is that Hillary clinton, barak obama, theresa may, tony blair, angela mwekel, emmanel macron et all DEFINITELY aren't the solution, and the UN should be abolished. The typical globalist elites tha we definitely know about are the Rothchilds, Rockafellas, Soros, along with the Bilderberg and the Freemasons. Jacob Rothchlds has recently come out in an interview and admitted that after decades of planning the NWO is now ready to go and is underway as we speak which is why there is now so much chaos.

The precise problem IS global trade and communication

how so?

How do you now how his “mind processes thoughts”?

@@SchgurmTewehr Good question. I don't. But how he evaluates subjects gives a pretty good insight. Thinking can be really quality process, depending on what level it is done. And he seems to be able to think very efficiently.

I also love the way he admits he does not know a certain area.

@@catem8752 I forgot what part that was, can you give me the min. and sec. please?

There's 87% chance of possibility that you're a sapiosexual. 😉

"Power corrupts". I disagree. Corrupt people ( genetics) seek power too ( narrate with evil voice) take over the world!. I think hitler ( whom must still be serving his time in eternal damnation) was probably emotionally unstable long before he was elected.

@@evolutionrhythm4416 Not everyone ambitious for power has mental issues. Most are personally sane and grow corrupt as they run their course of power.

Sam 88 Not always true either, I have a feeling both of you are right, for some it’s nurture for others it’s nature. Around 1 in 5 CEOs are psychopaths, meaning they really don’t feel much sympathy or empathy. Being a psycho also means you’re generally great at getting what you want out of people, which is most of sales. A psycho is way more likely to work towards one of these positions than say become a serial killer, for obvious reasons. Now that leaves 4 out of 5 who aren’t, who probably go against their own morals quite a bit, which generally I think is best done by dehumanizing people through numbers and generalizations, as well as a bit of selfishness. As Joseph Stalin once put it, “If one man dies it’s a tragedy, if millions die it’s a statistic”. If for example you’re a billionaire CEO, due to negligence and corner cutting, one of your buildings has an accident, killing 500 guys. You don’t know any of these people personally, you didn’t intend to kill them, and ultimately it doesn’t really personally affect you in any way other than the PR nightmare and money to families. You don’t really feel the moral repercussions because you can just place it in your mind as a statistic or generalize it and not feel poorly about it. This isn’t a psychopathic action, everyone has done this at some point or another. It’s the same reason you can watch say a war movie and feel nothing at watching a bunch of characters die on screen, you can’t really feel bad for each individual character. Or you can go to something like the Vietnam memorial and not burst into tears every time you see it. As a leader one of the biggest flaws you can make is judging how well you’re doing by your supporters, not by your critics. This is why Donald Trump is as hated as he is, he’s judging himself based on what his supporters say about him.

If you globalize your freedom will be lost by a government 3000 miles away and you will not be able to take the tyrant out as easily if it was in your own backyard

Power doesn't corrupt. It only shows one's true intentions.

Lol ironically enough this dude believes in nothing spiritually. He pushes evolution through technology, he pushes controlling human impulse and emotion through science. Our existence isn't for the purpose of turning ourselves into govt lab rats.

On balance, I think it is. The amount of convenience it provides me is greater than the control it asserts over me. Now that's not to say that I don't think it doesn't have the potential for rampant authoritarianism (eg China's social credit system), or that we shouldn't fight against moves in that direction. But where we are now, technology (and particularly communications tech) is a net benefit to humanity, and those benefits are pretty equitably distributed within developed nations.

@@alexpotts6520 technology is controlling you and not otherwise, you buy what amazon wants you to buy, you watch what youtube wants you to watch

@@lacasadehonor9408 How could you know? You don't know me. UKposts, that's kind of reasonable, I think most videos are picked through the recommendation algorithm rather than through manual search, because otherwise you wouldn't know what exists on UKposts. But Amazon? Whenever I use it, it's to buy specific products that I know what I'm looking for beforehand. I don't think anyone browses for impulse buys on Amazon, especially compared to the old brick-and-mortar shops where a lot of market research has gone into how to do the store layout to maximise sales.

@@alexpotts6520 but when you type on amazon something， it shows you the results it wants you to show

@@lacasadehonor9408 True, but it is incentivised to show me things that I actually want to buy, at a price I want to buy them, rather than persuade me to buy something I don't want.

very true The past we humans created won’t leave us anytime soon We are bearing the consequences of times since we decided to stay silent about what’s happening around us

Best line: "We should never underestimate human stupidity."

What did he explain in a scientific way? I must have missed that.

@@Exploer8591 hey before concluding anything he was saying the data not in numbers but broadly that's why we are believing

@@famboltfanpage7322 What are you believing?

@@famboltfanpage7322 I don't know what it is that you could possibly be believing in. He didn't say anything scientific.

Go Maxim here here, agreed wholeheartedly.

The appetite for raw power is never satisfied. BI-LATERAL talks may be more cumbersome; but, they're also far safer!

Boom. Simply put there is just about no way to unify the world. The biggest way would be among cultures, and even then there oils be massive superstates battling it out while crushing the weaker ones. Ultimately, we will end up with EUs all over the world, battling for supremacy.

The New World Order 🌎, which is what he's promoting, plans on reducing the world population by nearly 7 billion people and the elite few will control and enslave the remaining 500 million people. There goes all of those said problems you were talking about. This man is evil. Word.

we need less globalism period, we need more decentralization

Global capitalism has given us the standard of living we have now, I don't think anyone would want to lose it.

@@jamestang1227 A species incapable of adaptation is doomed to extinction.

@@jamestang1227 you mean industrial revolutions, lets see if capitalism is so necessary...

Liberation from suffering is a futile and dangerous idea. An eternal solution cannot be to perpetually and selflessly sedate everyone's need to avoid suffering without any responsibility. Suffering is part and parcel of existing in a limited world. Limitations will not disappear with a globalist religion that want's to believe world can be run by solving things in global social structures. When supply runs low supply needs to be regulated and a global "no-borders" world is unable to do it efficiently. Without borders world will implode with global irresponsibility. Only borders can limit resources efficiently enough so that the most responsible will have most resources. If we let people who just breed most, have more resources, there will be no way of stopping irresponsible rise in global population. Borders should be shut completely, those who breed should be responsible for the land they breed upon.

Sounds like a rationalization for eugenics to me...

ban religion could be a solution

"without some overarching authority, REAL AUTHORITY...certainly there is no reason to think that it would look like Denmmark, OR THAT IT WOULD BE A DEMOCRACY. Most likely, it wouldn't; we don't have workable democratic models for a global government. So maybe it would look more like ancient China (an imperial, feudal system)...given the "dangers" we are facing, I think the imperative of having some kind of REAL ABILITY to FORCE through difficult decisions on the global level, is MORE IMPORTANT THAN ALMOST ANYTHING ELSE."

@@Havensand irrelevant much?

So you must hate the halo games

Well said. Look at Switzerland this model works very well. It is called micro management and it works because those in charge actually live in the community they are governing so decisions they make they live under them and face consequences of their decisions.

This man wants to hack human minds. They want to have tracking capsules for medications. They want to monitor your biometrics. They want a social credit system like china. This talk is cheap, the cost is heavy.

this is all propaganda , this is the globalist NWO that wants to soft kill humanity attempt at stopping the destruction of their 300 year long agenda.... MAN MADE CO2 CLIMATE CHANGE IS A MARXIST LIE, just like the MARXIST LIE OF COVID 19 TO GET THE FREE WORLD TO DESTROY ITSELF... you are living in a FAKE REALITY

Looks like Dominic did not complete highschool

@@524dominic the world is going to be destroyed by anti christ. Period😏

I hope Klass is paying you and you~re not just An Idiot

Yeah, the man got the manual of the 20' decade. His a astrologer

Yikes!

You have heard too little of him and you need to get a bigger picture then.

These people want to control your minds with demonic nanoparticles. God owns my soul. God created all things great and small. He will bound these demons who try to destroy his people.

@Ragnar Odinsson Climate change is the use of weather and climate engineering / forcing.

Good job sheep

​@@leeknowe1598 said the lamb

Wow. Low standard.

@marissashantez6051 yes, at the time it was now its not

"One of the best examples on the planet of a man who has done his homework." Huh? He talks as if climate change is settled science. I'm aware that climate change advocacy is a popular opinion but it's not settled science.

Onthe contrary, he is the kind of man whose colourful rhetoric caused many of the conflicts of the past. Globalists are using Orwell's 1984 as a template for how to control people. If we carry on surrendering national powers to global organisations, as Harari suggests, we will end up losing all of our freedoms in the name of protection. We are on a dangerous road towards a single, world government which would have a single, world army. With that amount of power why would they bother remain democratic? It's way too risky, and reversing the situation would be near impossible.

Mikael Holmer The most sensible- and accurate- thing I've read all day. Surely the answer lies in finding a stable, yet flexible enough to continually evolve- balance between the two? The extreme version where every product on earth is made by children in China for slave wages is not palatable to me. The extreme version where every nation performs every function for itself and must therefore have a very rigid, hierarchical society within it is also not palatable to me. There must be something in between where the lowest paid worker rights are protected (and there remains a proportion of each 'type' of worker in each nation despite some economic specialisation taking place nationally) whilst we retain national autonomy over certain crucial aspects.

Mikael Holmer Exactly some things grow to make the world smaller and better but never give the kitchen keys to just one man. Because eventually he and his will eat steak everyday and you will share Ramen noodles with the rest.

I agree. I don't think the answer to governance lies in any single ideology. To me it almost always seems like each side makes both good and bad points, and if one or the other had their way entirely the whole thing would go off the rails. I think good governance is a constant and dynamic process. A possible down side that I see is that it requires competent assessment and honest implementation. I think ideologies miss the mark because they aren't adaptable enough to changing realities. Look how much these days ideologues look to change reality rather than change their beliefs.

Mikael, You need more education as to what Nationalism is and how globalism is a threat to it. The worlds rich and powerful consolidating their power sounds like the makings for a future dystopic society and you don't realize what that would mean for your future children and grand children. It's moronic to think that the two ideals could ever cohabitate like oil and water. Educate yourself before you give your rights up to the collective, make sure you know what you are signing up for.

You are right. The globalisation he is talking about is a non state one e.g. unlike the WTO type one, we can have the ICANN one (the internet is now being managed by an NGO with a global governance structure)

How much did they pay you to comment this? Cause not a chance you're a normal human being.

What if the middle ground means no stories at all?

​@@southoceannthe narrative cannot be a vacuum

I surmise what he pointed out from that notion is that people must not find their identity in this cosmos because it is changing but that people must be aware of what suffering is because it is somehow the reason why people cannot think or decide fully because they are being controlled by their emotions. A good example to this is AI wherein it only has intelligence but no consciousness which means to say that its only focus is to solve problems without the need to be confused by its feelings which he does not possess at all. Whereas for humans, since we have both the mind and consciousness which pertains to our emotions, it is but necessary to understand suffering in order not to be controlled by it but that we, humans can control it because we already know the cause of our suffering or where our suffering is coming from.

@@nurainiever4126 this a very old comment, I had to refresh my memory a bit. I don't even remember writing this. Imo, it's more more important to acknowledge that suffering exists rather than understand it completely. I don't need to completely understand what a black person goes through or what a woman goes through in order to support feminism or the antiracist campaign. No one can ever completely understand someone else's suffering because we all experience things differently. What's important is that we discuss issues & find common ground. That's how we solve problems. Demanding that everyone understand what some suffering population feels has usually resulted in emotional manipulation, leading to suffering simply getting diffused, not solved. That's what's happening with cancel culture rn, with myriads of lists of proper & improper behaviour being circulated & then when someone breaks one rule a rabid horde descends upon them for being some kind of -ist & not understanding how terribly bad their actions could be. That may provide emotional satisfaction of some sort, but it comes at a long term cost of socially alienating people & creating an environment of fear. All we need to do is listen to people when they say they have problems, & find a mutually acceptable way to fix those. Move on. The more we emotionally invest in understanding the concept of suffering, the less easy it gets to solve it.

@@salemsaberhagan I reckon it is about understanding your own suffering and not the suffering of others in a sense that for you to be able to decide on a critical level, don't mix your emotions to it because you might not get a tangible solution. Just like artificial intelligence is working- so to speak.

@@nurainiever4126 aahh yes, that makes more sense. I went for a general interpretation when a specific one was better. Thanks.

Have fun owning nothing!

WoW wake up !!

this guy is already preaching the rise of a "useless class" by 2050. By this he means people who are no use to the elites as either "bullet stoppers" ( soldiers ) or worker drones. that is how the elite sees us. He completely ignores the fact that the majortiy of the world's population is already left behind. The problem is not coming, it is here already for the rest of the world. Now, automation is threatening the jobs of westerners, so he thinks he has got our attention. IMHO, humanity needs to stop killing each other and learn sustainable, healthy farmiong practices. We should be concentrating on feeding everybody, providing shelter for everybody, and cleaning up our planetary messes.

​@@terminaltom1662 - "Sustainibility" and Malthus go hand in hand.

Global power domination never been in they plans, relax pls

The guy is just postulating another communistic fervour, or "anti Trump" rhetoric. What good is that for the sake of philosopical discourse.

Noah is a satanist

You really think so? Funny, he just rehashed the same, tired globalist propaganda that we have all heard. For example, how fascinating is the argument against border security for nations based on the populace in the future losing jobs to technology and not migrants? Do you see that as intellectually dishonest, or mind opening?

Suffering is a reality created by the elite. If you really want to see reality, go through the door after they murder nearly 7 billion people and enslave the remaining 500 million. The New World Order and this is his plan to eliminate suffering. How's that for reality?