LG got a baby bump.. Lol.. Lies flat

No bump also means that everytime you put the phone down you risk scratching every single camera on the back

No telephoto, no ultrawide ~ no camera bump.

@@pantelaiosstefanos261 it's nice.

Haha so true

To me the comfort is on it's size and texture. Big, slippery phones are a big no no.

@@oneeyedken6169 it really doesn't bother me because as soon as I buy my phone I slap on a tempered glass screen protector and a case instantly

@@1mezion yeah especially iPhones. They have the thickest protective cases. And almost all of the iPhone users use them! Still they talk about how premium the design is

@@anoopa3547 😆

They have succeeded

I really hope that too especially as a Finn i want Nokia to rise again.

believe me just using AndroidOne in their phones is enough! edited Android is pure agony

@@don.timeless4993 well with few exceptions depending on who you are.

Did you mean 'under' display?

@@shazwanmanjung Well, yeah

True buddy s10 had an issue now after few updates it's getting as good as one on the back nearly there

@@jayamuralijaymos Yeah, I'm sure they will get better every year, but I think no one really minds when it's on the back.

It is better to be on the front and where would nokia even place the fingerprint sensor on the back? The cameras rake up the space.

Don't forget the 3310 :)

Lupo Ch что это за язык?

@@leeeeeee2796 твоя какъв е с нашата азбука

@@leeeeeee2796 булгарский

I still think 5.8 inch is the maximum manageable size.

Fuck no. Phones are getting too big these days. Go 0.2" smaller instead

The phone is nothing related to Nokia. The phone is made by HMD and Hon Hai/Foxconn. Nokia didn't involve in any development and manufacturing. They just sit their and receive money by selling their brand name.

@@Cutieplus I mean HMD is a Finish company started by EX Nokia employs It basically is Nokia and Foxconn only makes the phones the way HMD tells them, they also make Iphones and Samsungs

Yeah..failing to convince the paid reviewers. These guys say good things about Samsungs and apples but will not encourage companies like LG or Nokia if they do something different

But we are seeing some excellent pictures in Twitter and Instagram shot with Nokia 9. How's that possible. Pls don't do biased reviews

@@Cutieplus ikr??

I said the same thing above. I think these GSM arena guys should go and watch Mr.mobile's review about Nokia 9 PureView only after that these stupid guys will realise how good 9's camera is

I agree with you bro. This guy has assumed most of the things. Or else he don't know how to take photos.

@@anoopa3547 he's testing dynamic range in the middle of the day outside

It shoots in raw which is why it you think it's "underexposed" but it's really not

@@tobi-b yes, thats why I said you can recover from the underexpose problem. Its not a big deal.

@@rausyansafwan9720 But it's not "underexposed"

The N8 camera is still a revolution. Sony only started to create a camera sensor with 1.8 micron pixel TEN years later after the N8! Utter madness!

But is Google, they probably analyzed tons of data and images of the users, and they know how to make it work on their OS.

Software based photos are fake like they are Photoshoped, camera based photoes are real, it is same as what your eyes see.

It's all in the software u know it.. Processing is key.. Google is king of this.. Like V40 is king of audio

@@filmaxx3 Lol bruh... This is the dumbest comment I've ever seen on UKposts.

Only sony has it.

yeah

@Walmart Clips they only have 3 and the TOF. It's rumored the next sony has 6. This is getting ridiculous though.

@minecraft guy are you dumb

XD lol, seriously? 🤣

I believe the 9 PureView uses the IMX386 for each of it's cameras, and it is a CMOS sensor. I can see why you would think the 9 PureView has CCD sensors a) because of the high power draw of the camera and b) because the images have some of the subjective qualities associated with CCD sensors (tonal range is reminiscent of a medium format camera for example).

@Darek F wow thanks for quick response PHONE RUINED YOUR FAULT!!!!

Mine was a Sony

There is no next version of it, so do buy one if you are interested with it. Do remember that HMD Nokia only makes 100 million unit of this phone, so it has now become a rare item.

Yes

They're not looking for more cameras with more capabilities, but with more details and dynamic range

You should blame HMD and Hon Hai/Foxconn not Nokia. Nokia didn't involve in any development and manufacturing of the phone. They just sit there and earn money by selling their logo.

at*

shibainu shiro suki all brands have that at this point.

You are the kid of Photography

You should check out the Reddit-Forums there are som completely different reviews with Samples and comparisons. www.reddit.com/r/Nokia

You have no idea what you are saying

@@sbardosi No, I should not. I have seen enough already. It's not that the device is not taking decent photos... It's that a smartphone is not only about taking photos. As it has been presented, it takes an awful amount of time to process the photos. Just imagine that in an everyday situation. I want to make a pic of my friends posing in front of something and if they blinked in the moment I pressed the button, then we're fucked. And the camera tends to crash down. Also, that thing with the biometric locks is pathetic. Face recognition is not safe, the fingerprint scanner is not functioning efficiently. Furthermore, storage cannot be upgraded over 128 GB, while the photo taking process needs a pretty large amount of storage. If there is something that gets me off a smartphone is that it's not being quick enough, especiallly when it's a high-en device. Also, it might be great for some people to photoshop the picture in post edit, but I'm just not one of those and I'd imagine most people aren't either. I realize that it is intended to be a good device for photographers, but in that case let's not advertise it as a flagship device.

@@danielveres4351 "Just imagine that in an everyday situation. I want to make a pic of my friends posing in front of something and if they blinked in the moment I pressed the button, then we're fucked. " That doesnt make any sense, the Phone has no issues taking Pictures quick after each other. Its just slow in the final processing. But hey I totally get it , this phone is not for everyone. Its mainly for Photographer enthusiasts. And I would not call this Phone Flagship anyway. The Price is also not Flagship level.

Same here

Wondered when the first thirsty Indian would appear...

@@jamiel0985 most of the video is about how inadequate this nokia device is , and in that if I praise the good part about the video, what's your problem? You must be sick to wonder like you did...

The brand was sold to HMD which is a company set up by former Nokia employees. They design the phones. It is then made by Foxconn which bought the manufacturing, distribution, and sales arms of Nokia. So, it isn't Nokia but in a way it is I suppose.

@@Xlsy221 that's really cool, but Nokia (or HMD) doesn't own the patents anymore either for things like preview do they? Oh well still really cool to see, I'll definitely try to get my hands on one to play with