I have deep interest in quantum physics and technology, and this Nobel Prize encourage me to dig deeper in this field... Congrats Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger.

The fact that reality starts as something probabilistic and non-deterministic which evolved into the determinate and predictable is perfectly intuitive.

Thank you for the mini presentation for context. I love when public educators understand that incredibly complex ideas aren't intuitive to grasp for those without the education background in physics/mathematics. Giving a very basic breakdown of the breakthroughs that led to current understanding is vital for those of us who are fascinated and want to learn about complicated areas of knowledge, but would not be able to grasp much without that surface level understanding of how scientists know the things they do. I am grateful to be able to watch content like this and increase my understanding, even slightly, and my enthusiasm greatly. Thank you.

Thank you Dr.Brian Greene. I have been reading your book-'The fabric of the Cosmos'-really interesting. Thanks to you, I can be available to understand about Physics including the Quantum mecahanics too, even though I am not professional this field. Thank you so much.

Kia ora Brian, thank-you very much. I look forward to you unravelling entanglement even further. Your gift of encapsulating and communicating extraordinary difficult physics to laypeople is so helpful. What a wonder of a time for physics this is.

I'll never understand why nobel don't award these prizes posthumously. That was a remarkable piece of work by John Bell, he should be recognised today as a Nobel laureate along with the 3 experimentalists that confirmed his work.

Excellently explained, I always love your explanation!

My feelings for the presentation is perfect, I understood very well why they given the prize to these 3 clever minds.

The best science educator out there. Great Channel!

Although i did not understand most of what u have said but it gave me goosebumps multiple times our world is too great to be a mere coincidence

We expect a long and engaging interview of the laureates here on this channel.💝🙏🙏💝

Thank you Brian Green! I loved your presentation . But I can only wish for more explicit descriptions of your expression "rolled out" at 6:42 : does it mean that Einstein's intuition was proved to be wrong? test establishing to most people's 6:40 satisfaction Einstein's conventional 6:42 view of reality is rolled out that 6:44 quantum entanglement is real and more

Congratulations fellas… wonderful job.. thank you!

but Einstein wasn't wrong when he said our understanding was incomplete. Einstein's theories didn't stop being useful when quantum physics came along, so why would you think that means quantum physics is the final word? because it works? except when it doesn't...just like relativity. there's something more going on that we aren't seeing.

Now more curious about the spooky-behaviour. Hope to see an another video specific to this Nobel-prize achievement.

So terse and elucidating synopsis! Thanks Brian!

There are a couple issues that needs to be corrected here. 1] Despite the fact that it’s constantly repeated in the popular media (as it is here) Einstein’s objection to QM never was based on its probabilistic nature. Instead, it had to do with the inherent non-local nature of the theory (I.e the inescapable “action at a distance”). 2] Likewise, an equally problematic issue is the way in which these objections are depicted (and simplistically dismissed) as if Einstein was just “wrong”; I.e. he was simply too dense or to out of touch to “get it”. But the fact remains that Einstein was, in a fundamental sense, correct here. That is: although it is, of course, true that Bell, Aspect, et al have demonstrated the QM (and the universe) behaves in this non-local way, anyone who isn’t deeply amazed or bewildered by that fact is very much missing the point. (Or as Feynman said: “Anyone who thinks they understand Quantum Mechanics hasn’t had it explained to them properly.”)

John Bell was nominated for the Nobel but unfortunately he died of a stroke in 1990, he really should have been awarded it earlier, but as an Irish man we are still proud of him.

So the more we know, the less we understand and the less we really know. This is fascinating!

None of this would have been possible without J. Bell's work. He should be one of the winners.

Congratulations Everybody!!!

An awesome science related presentation. It is so inspirational. Thank you

I love this channel thanks professor Greene

Omg! this is spooky indeed :D Technology is about to get even crazier. It's exciting to live in this time of history. I'm so grateful for this channel where we can get professional explanation and it's a reliable source of information. Thank you, Professor!

Wow this is huge! Congrats!

Sir three scientist deserve Nobel prize for contribution physics . Quantum mechanics .state .. and ancient DNA human origins 🇺🇸👍🇮🇳

Salute to those who can think beyond thinkable!!

Good to see Anton win Noble Prize...

Excellent presentation.

Great moment for the Physics congratulations

A frequency wave is a multi dimensional structure.that has mass and distance therefore the energy, frequency waves and vibrations change through out the structure

A beautiful presentation!

Thank you Brian Greene!

pure love for sharing this knowledge

Without Einstein's work discovering Quantum Entanglement mathematically , these 3 men would not have proven it experimentally.They still deserve their recognition , but we shouldnt describe their achievement as proving Einstein wrong .

I have measured both the position and velocity of an electron using Quantum Entanglement the answer i got was 10^ -10 meters for position and velocity I got 10^6 meters/second.

there is peculiarity in those particles, they travel at speed of light, what ever is connected between them since the beginning, will remain connected, it's kinda freezes gravity or electromagnetic field that remains constant between them creating one dimension or one piece that collapses when we measure them, because time starts to run again, it switches to our dimension, gravity wouldn't allow them to travel at speed of light in the opposite directions if they are connected by gravity, somehow "gravity" must gain energy as they go apart. It's hard to correlates distance and time, it seems like the particles goes back in time for us as an observer. In other words, if we put two particles in the opposite sides on a balloon, they go apart as the balloon inflates, the act to measure one particle is when we break the balloon, they disconnect immediately, the time is much shorter to take them apart, the energy releases much faster, space time crashes the whole structure, or if we make a hole in the balloon, both particles will stop immediately as the balloon stop inflating, no matter where we make the hole. We can't deny this possibility because planets can get apart faster then speed of light as the universe expands, the problem is the dimension we are, space time can create dimensions to our prospective.

Thank you! ❤

I love when this man teaches. WSF Rocks!

E=mass X x square will be the energy equation , where x tends to infinity , mass tends to zero.

Congratulation...!!!

PicoPhysics: The essential element of the PicoPhysicst Thought process is reality exists irrespective of Observer. Observation is a projection of reality on the Observer. So once an entangled pair is produced - irrespective of the time of measurement on individual particles the result will be the same. The measurements can be performed simultaneously, or with a gap in space and time, it can not affect the result. The observation on "Quantum Entanglement" establishes reality is not affected by observation. The uncertainty principle must be seen in this perspective (Impact of observation on reality).

wow ! As good as an episode of "Cosmos" Congrats !!

Quantum entanglement means everything we see in our inner space is inherently tied to what we see outside all around us as well. This is ironic when you consider how much Einstein valued imagination. He rejected the quantum perspective of his time so much, because he couldn’t reconcile the notion within himself, and thus he found the means to prove himself right as this respects the notion that what he was doing, was affecting what is collectively understood and observed outside of his inner understanding. Fascinating.

This proves that fundamental reality is a digital virtual reality phenomenon, and not a material mechanical based one, space time is therefor out of the question in regards the definitions of fundamental reality! Thank you Anton Zeilinger for your scientific contribution in solving one of the most fundamental existensial questions!!!

Entanglement has it’s faster than light communication in which information changes the state of a physical particle. However the act of observation, which by definition has no physical component also changes its panicle instantaneously. What I’m asking comment on is the lcomparison. Between these 2 acts.

Oh how good it is to live now. It’s kind of simple some thing or things can make little or big changes. This is massive. As we understand and give application to this the world will change. If you think about it cell phones and our various devices can provide us with news that can become our collective consciousness. When we develop better healthier cleaner faster tools as a result of the potential in the technology the desire to be a part of the movement forward might be enough to direct our shared consciousness to let go of the less valuable and perhaps historical damaging aspects of our existence here on the blue dot.

sending data back in time is possible due to quantum entanglement which has been awarded with nobel prize for the proof this year. Einstein was wrong about Bohr's proposition and called it a spooky action but in fact this also fits in his famous equation which is e=mc2/√1-(v2/c2). Because always worked with real numbers which corresponds to particles with positive mass, and only "particles" without mass are light and gluons which are called luxons. But if you use i2=-1 imaginary numbers which corresponds to particles with negative mass, and with the help of lorentz equation backup, then mathematically there proves that there must be particles with negative mass and they must be always faster than light which are called tachyons, in fact those particles can create faster than light zones of space-time which have different laws of physics, and when those zones interact with each other, the quantum entanglement effect appears which is already proved and nobel prized this year. For the causality preservation, they need to build closed systems which cannot directly interact with the known universe, or another option is the parallel universes which is more logical because if you try to break the causality effect of universe, there might be catastrophic results in a single universe theory. So in parallel universes, yes you can send data back in time actually. Einstein himself even feared this possibility and made tachyonic phone taught experiment with his collegues and called this spooky action eventually. But in the year of 2022, now they accept and proved that is real. Whoever has this technology will be the master of this universe and maybe fhe others. Because when you can change the past, you can create a whole new reality and this means basically you become "the god" with the saying of religious people.

Amazing!

I did a presentation on this topic in my undergrad.

Glad they've caught up

Any measurement of a physical quantity involves some interaction between the measuring device and the object under study. In this case, not only the object under study affects the device, changing its state (due to which measurement becomes possible), but the device also acts on the object under study, changing its state to some extent. Thus, in the general case, the observer is an evolving (- when measuring, his state changes), researcher of the spontaneous evolution of the Universe. The complete state function is a plane monochromatic wave that coincides with the de Broglie wave. Of course, such a coincidence comes from the fact that the de Broglie hypothesis was used from the very beginning in the development of quantum mechanics, and then the peculiarity of the wave function is that the normalization condition is not fulfilled for it - when a particle is detected, its probability is one; on the contrary, with the free movement of a particle, there is an equal probability of detecting a particle at any point in space. Physically, this is caused by the fact that absolutely free particles do not exist in nature, and therefore the concept of free movement is some idealization of the real state of affairs. And quantum mechanics admits the possibility of states close to free, which is unsatisfactory. That is, the observer always measures everything permanently (often without even suspecting it), for example, the observer monitors the state of Schrodinger's cat due to the simple phenomenon called interaction, and does not expect any surprise after opening the box with the cat (this applies to experiments with entangled particles and double-slit effects). Interaction is a dimension.Measurement is a measure of awareness of the observer/object interaction. P.S. "The inner perfection of the theory requires its external (experimental) justification." (Einstein). It seems that the external (experimental) "justification" of quantum mechanics has long demanded its internal perfection.

Can we have a seminar with brian greene and all the noble laureates of 2022. That will be the most enriching thing of this year

Professor Brian greene, i watch all your videos.

In a single frequency wave how much information can be put in it?our entire body receives and transmits frequency waves so how much information does our energy structure hold?

Congratulations 👍

REALLY need posthumous Nobels. Bell's work demands one!

With regard to quantum mechanics presentation and interpretations, It so appears as though there are two different approaches are being considered here,one being the correlation in between the states of the two particles taking place due to an entanglement media or element not exactly known to them what it could actualy be,which by my interpretation could only be explained by the all around universal entanglement through the scalarwave mechanism and energies spreading throughout the vastness of all iniverse,also bei g emitted from the surfaces of all electron and atoms at quantum levels of the subatomic motions Of quaks and other particles as also explained by string theory of prof Kaku, ,and the 2nd approach could be based of stat8stics and probabilities by eliminating all the most improbable states Of the particles reaching out to higher level of probabilities,which must take place via multiple questioning and elimination operations to reach for more rel8able outcomes. And as the Einstein's statement calls the later the outcome is indicated active of a spooky unexplainable correlation,which can only be explanained in terms of la2s of probabilities and statistics,and may be once the two particles are initially aquinted with each other and then seperated ,their initial aquintance will cause a reset of initial staes between the two particles,which could be needed to make subsequent calculations of probabilities more feasible by eliminating many calculation operations to begin with.

Congratulations

I'm reasonably certain that photons move instantaneously from the emission, to the absorption/reflection too. It's the wavefunction which propagates at C.

I deserve Nobel prize in physics.

great i hope more pplications of quantum entanglement will follow

The Nobel Prize makes human beings rethink their understanding of the existenc, destiny and consciousness. Are we witnessing a turning point in history, when the natural sciences and the occult reach the same goal by different routes? Perhaps the cosmic truth sought by modern people has long been discovered by the ancients. Who doesn't love the uncertainty of life?

Awesome!

Could we consider entangled particle as one wavefunction, with opposite superposition for each particle 🤔,so that the spin always stays complementary upon measurement,and in superposition state too? 🤔 I mean one in up down up down superposition and the other in down up ,down up superposition? 😬😬

@2:00 When you realize all the scientists he named were from Germany. Just one country. I am always amazed at how advanced Germany was before world war 2 in science, mainly Physics.

Excellent!!!!

Great but what have they done exactly?

Modern Quantum Physics has shown that reality is based on probability: ​ A statistical impossibility is defined as “a probability that is so low as to not be worthy of mentioning. Sometimes it is quoted as 1/10^50 although the cutoff is inherently arbitrary. Although not truly impossible the probability is low enough so as to not bear mention in a Rational, Reasonable argument." The probability of finding one particular atom out of all of the atoms in the universe has been estimated to be 1/10^80. The probability of just one (1) functional 150 amino acid protein chain forming by chance is 1/10^164. It has been calculated that the probability of DNA forming by chance is 1/10^119,000. The probability of random chance protein-protein linkages in a cell is 1/10^79,000,000,000. Based on just these three cellular components, it would be far more Rational and Reasonable to conclude that the cell was not formed by un-directed random natural processes. Note: Abiogenesis Hypothesis posits that un-directed random natural processes, i.e. random chance formation, of molecules led to living organisms. Natural selection has no effect on individual atoms and molecules on the micro scale in a prebiotic environment. (*For reference, peptides/proteins can vary in size from 3 amino acid chains to 34,000 amino acid chains. Some scientists consider 300-400 amino acid protein chains to be the average size. There are 42,000,000 protein molecules in just one (1) simple cell, each protein requiring precise assembly. There are approx. 30,000,000,000,000 cells in the human body.) Of all the physical laws and constants, just the Cosmological Constant alone is tuned to a level of 1/10^120; not to mention the fine-tuning of the Mass-Energy distribution of early universe which is 1/10^10^123. Therefore, in the fine-tuning argument, it would be more Rational and Reasonable to conclude that the multi-verse is not the correct answer. On the other hand, it has been scientifically proven numerous times that Consciousness does indeed collapse the wave function to cause information waves of probability/potentiality to become particle/matter with 1/1 probability. A rational and reasonable person could therefore conclude that the answer is consciousness. A "Miracle" is considered to be an event with a probability of occurrence of 1/10^6. Abiogenesis, RNA World Hypothesis, and Multiverse would all far, far, far exceed any "Miracle". Yet, these extremely irrational and unreasonable hypotheses are what some of the world’s top scientists ‘must’ believe in because of a prior commitment to a strictly arbitrary, subjective, biased, narrow, limiting, materialistic ideology / worldview. Every idea, number, concept, thought, theory, mathematical equation, abstraction, qualia, etc. existing within and expressed by anyone is "Immaterial" or "Non-material". The very idea or concept of "Materialism" is an immaterial entity and by it's own definition does not exist. Modern science seems to be stuck in archaic, subjective, biased, incomplete ideologies that have inadequately attempted to define the "nature of reality" or the "reality of nature" for millennia. A Paradigm Shift in ‘Science’ is needed for humanity to advance. A major part of this Science Paradigm Shift would be the formal acknowledgment by the scientific community of the existence of "Immaterial" or "Non-material" entities as verified and confirmed by observation of the universe and discoveries in Quantum Physics.)

In order for the universe's probability matrix to work there must be entanglement. Read that somewhere, seems to make intuitive sense on some level. Just as time cannot actually be circular or it breaks the probability flow. Read from some sci-fi book or another.

PicoPhysics: Quantum Entanglement experimental proof establishes a deterministic nature in line with the thought process of PicoPhysics. While modern science deals with uncertainties and probabilities, PicoPhysics explains observations on the universe with determinism and Possibilities. PicoPhsics is a deterministic theory based on Unary Law "Space Contains Kenergy".

Hello Mr, Can I copy your videos in order to translate it to Uzbek language? For young physics

we're let hyped by the news, rather than given any actual info how its really done summary of modern science

The quantum entanglement shows us that not only time, but also distance is relative.

So say I am completely alone and facing forward. According to this video there is an infinity of undetermined possibility behind me that remains that way because it is unobserved. Either that or spooky action at a distance is determining every particle of my mind and body's position and I have no free will. It has to be either/or but not both, and there is no other option? Am I correct? Can someone clarify this for me?

Instead of talking about ghosts we could see a real fundamental invention -- Universal Software Model .... the future Nobel Prize!

got goosebumps

First, congratulations to the Prize winners! Job well done, bravo, etc. A round of brandy, or perhaps a nicely aged scotch on the rocks with a beer chaser. Is there an online application? My work also involves Entanglent as well as Superposition. Is there a category for opening a portal to a heretofore undiscovered dimension? I have done an empirical study and have already provided my findings to ABC News Chief Meteorologist Ginger Zee. Thank you.

Amazing

Watched all of it

Thanks for sharing! ;-)

if they show that those entangled subatomic particles exist it would be nice, because mathematically it is very easy to show that they are not different particles but the same thing all the time with different frequencies... (yes: quatum physics makes no sense)

Titled subject is mentioned at 6:27 for 30 seconds. Prize winners are turned into background art for a moment. Nothing is said about them.

Please tell me why Brian Greens thought process was removed from the introduction. Follow we! I’ll find it.

Huge!

Back in 2004 there was a movie released called; What the bleep do we know? Even though I wished it would’ve been more of a documentary it talks about this. Lots of people blew it off and called it BS.

Is homoeopathy medicine can be teleport from a distance through hair??

Green spent 98% of this video giving background we’ve all heard thousands of times and 2% simply naming the recipients of the 2022 prize without telling us anything about them or the work they did. I clicked on because I wanted to learn something new, something current. Didn’t work out that way.

Mind = Blown

This time Quatum mechanics supports Occultic science with quantum force at a distance proves strangely spooky action at a distance proved by Christ Dhakshinamoorthy swamigal,Tho Paa swamigal and Chattambi swamigal of Vadiveeswaram who changed even the basic click chemistry of Nobel prize winners.

The imagery did a lot to help me grasp what these brilliant physicists are talking about. Otherwise, this psychologist would be lost in the quantum sauce.

Super!

Imagine some Einstein of quantum mechanics completely proved Einstein right with some crazy explanation why that we never would've thought of otherwise

This prize is not yet the end of the series of recent years, where the Nobel Prize in physics (!) was awarded to astronomers, mathematicians, climatologists: it looks like astrologers are in line.

I LOVE THISS!!!

video begins at 6:06

The Zen of Science: Everyday Science discovers answers. Good Science discovers questions. Definition discovered by Don Orfeo, 28 May, 2019

Its about time these guys won. Sabine Hossenfelder was been saying then need to win.

The example which came into my mind is not that profound, but if you look at identical twins whose development happened from a dividing of a single cell, they behave exactly the same as the other regardless of the distance. It’s definitely no quantum mechanics, but does this theory apply on identical twins also?

I liked to know whose measure the one at particle that’s far away? This like Monty’s 3 doors !! You get the response you think is correct because you know they are entangled !!! But if some who didn’t know how would he measure the one father away??