Knowledge is process...you know more than you think! Intuition is an underrated intelligence

Thanks for harvesting our precious oil in spite of the current climate crisis hysteria. Keep up the good work!

Same dude, same

We are here because I convinced the fleet to stop at a planet and we chose this one. Where we are going. Well, we were heading out past Pluto when we stopped to colonize Earth.

@@DeathValleyDazed Dumb comment

Do you know the channel ParallaxNick?

You are deluded on so many levels.

It's all fake baloney.

@@JamesHawkeUKposts the next time you fly in a plane just remember it's physics made that possible not prayers and religious nonsense, the device you use to write your stupid comment is because of science

@@theGoogol ParallaxNick is awesome, great analogies,information and content! Everybody should go check his channel💯😁

Brian Greene is no slouch.

I don't get why the term "underrated“ so often is used in comments to describe people that are very well known and loved world wide? No disrespect, I just can't understand it.

@@bennylloyd-willner9667 Agreed

Underrated?-by whom?

My only beef is with the white background for the guests.

Where is Tesla?

Costas Markou - He was driven off the show in a morgan!

Yeah, this was really refined and super high quality. I was impressed as well. Physicists get it done! I've said it so many times.... if we want our world systems to actually work (for example governments) we to not stop electing lawyers and get some physicists in there. But let's be honest, if you were a physicist, would you drop it to become a politician? Probably not. That would be one hell of downgrade...haha.

Well said, Rob. First class.

You snivelling Scientism worshipper.. As an engineer your type make me sick.. Susskind is a bully pushing bad ideas. I can't stand the guy. Magi-matic waster on a gravy train to nowhere useful. String Theory and The Holographic Universe... What a joke.. Theoretical physics and mega-science projects are total wastes of time, money and resources, including a hell of a lot of electricity... -- Still, when Fake-Green pseudoscience and bad science is pushed for Liberal profiteering and more useless development scams who can we trust... Certainly not the Scientific Dictatorship that these 3 gravy-train Science Luvvies love so much, as they're high up in it.

So true. Ego's... 😔

He's a great explainer.

Leonard’s Stanford lectures on UKposts are excellent.

@@Sprout1200 yes, a joy to watch 👍

But why are you working in a warehouse now? ;-)

@@schmetterling4477 you're mad weird

@@Codduct I take that as a compliment. ;-)

@@schmetterling4477 😲🤣

Don't sound like an idiot. Search universities for couses, not self-teach on youtube . ... And if u r doctor, n like quantum , join Quantum Biology field instead of physics .🙏

Where is Tesla?

Hey Siri

My other favorite source is Dr Becky for astrophysics, astronomy, supermassive black holes, dark matter, dark energy, etc.

@Productganda Tesla first introduced us to quantum field, also known from ancient Greece as ether

@Frank Brown i would also recommend Anton Petrov, Isaac Arthur and Event Horizon

How many genders are there? What is a woman?

Right?

@adrianacarreno1678 Agreed! ❤❤

Sooo unusual. I have never in my life heard of anyone wanting to see Tom Cruise in anything. Most normal people tolerate him in otherwise compelling stories and avoid him in everything else. We do NOT want to support such behaviors by employing those espousing them. Cruise' abusive religion and your comment mentioning the invisible man is curious/unusual for a person awaiting another science forum. Welcome to our group, you are a refreshing change. BUT it might help you to enjoy the world and understand complex relationships by ridding yourself of contradictory ideas. There is no god. If there was it is seriously unlikely that he would be yours, there is virtually no chance that he would change the entire universe (by answering prayers) just for you. Yes, everything has a cause, but the cause is never magic. And Mr. Greene spells his name "Brian". He is a science communicator. His job is to dumb down the content so that barely human apes can understand it. If you are NOT completely annoyed by the never ending repetition of phrases like "spooky action at a distance" then yes this content is intended for you. It is first a commercial advertisement to increase science spending. It is in and of itself entertainment (jibber jabber) for the lowest common denominator.

Oh thank Brian Green for God (since making leaps of faith is how some folk write)

100% Yes, me too.

Agreed. Who the hell is Tom Cruise?

@@communitycollegegenius9684 , you are a punk and there's probably a beat down in your future 🍻💐

Fact.

Sometimes I can't help but.. Think that.. He speaks a little like.. William Shatner but.. I love him all the same 😎😅

Awesome at preaching sci-woo and magi-matical, unrealistic nonsense theories such as string theory and other BS like the Holographic Universe. He is just contributing to the deep, fundamental confusion and cognitive dissonance all theoretical fundy 'physicists' (mathematicians now-a-days) suffer from.

He is attractive too, so that's a thing..... Oh hey Brian 👋👋 Don't' mind me 🥝😂🤠

​@@ZeroOskul .. You people are lost in artificial space... The base field clearly has to be some kind of crystal-like, regular, close-packed matter-energy field as it has to be a WAVE MEDIUM.. -- (Non-big bang) matter creation always involves other matter, ie, protons or neutrons (in a nucleus).. Positronium is what forms just before an entangled electron-positron pair a annihilate, when they are extremely close and getting closer. You can't make new matter out of just light, you have to fire matter or light as matter. -- It is clearly a self-balancing ELECTRO-POSITRONIC base field of +ve cells (balls, quanta, base charge +1) close-packed by free-flowing, displace-able, compress-able -ve 'gas'.. It is NOT a load of 'mass/gravity force balls' kept apart by dark anti-mass/gravity 'gas' which is the other option to form a close-packed base field wave medium.. -- Knock a cell free and it warps the field out while the excess -ve gas hole pulls the field. Each over-balance, so cells get too close and squeeze out their balancing -ve gas, then repel each other, squeezing gas back in.. It is helpful for gravity force and spin force purposes to make electrons and positrons '-ve gas pumps'. sucking in gas straighter and straighter, with curved out-flows.... -- This causes a macro, gravitational charge density gradient and immense acceleration to the centre of particles can be used for the STRONG MASS FORCE field is stretched inwardly with a (relatively) max-packed cells at the core.. This forms proton=hydrogen energy level shells.. Band of +ve cells and -ve gas... -- Protons are 2 positrons with an electron in the middle, bound by the strong mass force.. It is (far) more likely 2 positrons collide with an electron to form a positron than 2 electrons collide at exact;y the right time and angle to form an anti-proton, thus SYMMETRY IS BROKEN, but not broken fundamentally (positrons and electrons are still always formed in pairs). The net result is a HYDROGEN PLASMA SOUP after the Big Bang (MATTER FORMATION event followed by matter formation chain reaction). -- Neutrons, as all experiments show, are Protons with an electron. In a nucleus these electrons are used to bond 1 or more protons (nuclear force). If all this isn't obvious to you. from countless experiments there's no hope for fundy physics. ALL evidence points to this. Black Holes are DARK CRYSTAL.. Probably an electron-positron crystal but possibly like one giant atom - a Nuclear Force Crystal... -- Entangled Electrons and Positrons can connected by a an INSTANT OFF 'Flux Tube' of cells vibrating longitudinally on the spot (AC base current).. When broken all cells stop vibrating by the end of the next tick.

Why both entangled particles measure as heads?Shouldn t other turn into tails the instant other is observed as heads?What happens to conservation??

Wonderfully explained and very clever point. I like to add. It's almost like truth is emerging behind the construct of language. We use words as stepping stones to explain and make meaning of the world around us. Then when you have people from different parts of the world using those stepping stones in different ways, but reaching the same realisation or conclusion - that's when I believe that massive discoveries and new knowledge is shining through. Also like you said; the parrelels emerge. So yes I know exactly what you mean. It makes perfect sense 💯

Suuurrre, you want to see more if ana. I would suggest that you get some fresh air and not be cooped up in your basement for long hours :)

Another way of putting it, is that everything is interconnected? But will leave it to science for giving us the details of how we should understand those connections. I don't have any problems with that - it appears to be an exciting field of science.

@@j_t_p Jesus Christ saved the entire world before the foundation of the world. That includes you. And everything else. Predestination. THINK ABOUT IT ALL. Colossians 1:12-21 “Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light: Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins: Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence. For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell; And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven. And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled.”

Hawking concept is quite interesting if I have understood it properly. When all colours of pain is mixed it turns out black, and that happens when you give a good shake of all colours together. Could it be…many ER creates EPR??? And EPR creates fields of magnetism and the gravity??? What do you think?

@@ZeroOskul 2 Corinthians 5:19. “My Lord and my God.”

Where is Tesla?

Where is Tesla?

@@youcostas he’s around

@@youcostas wYa?👀

This is why I binge all these… I understand enough just to be dangerous

YES!! You said it.... THEORY!!!

yes, I laughed so hard while listening to fools and liars discuss how stupid Einsteins theories are.

@@everythingisalllies2141 But they are stupid. Gravity is a force which is why you use your muscles to stand🤪

@@neildown7231 Yes, I get your point, but Im sure they wont. If curving spacetime makes us imagine that there is a force that keeps us on the ground, and curved spacetime did not require a force to get curved, then we shouldn't need to use a real force to counter it, right? What effort do we use to keep from being sucked onto a wall? none. If curved spacetime is not "forcing" us anywhere, and we are not trying to move anywhere either, then whats countering our muscular forces that we have to use just to stay on our feet? What are we pushing against? Spacetime is a BS concept, an idea invented by an idiot, not a Physicist. Gravity is a FORCE, like Magnetism is a FORCE.

You are making a good case for the abolition of social sciences. ;-)

So, not a scientist at all then...

Yes but you still do not understand it

If this proves to be true, t-shirts will say er=epr in 2,050. Like e= mc2 now.

@@kenadams5504 And it was Einstein that came up with all 3 ideas lol.

Somputers will change the world, others won't...

can you explain it more to me?

@@hunterkudo9832 I am referring to the instances in my personal journey to truth. Meaning that when you seek the truth, the information floods or finds you in a way that is obvious. In my experience I've often set out to find out, and it somehow finds me. Reality is born through our perceptions and our perceptions are what reality provides. If you pay attention reality speaks.

@@333STONE Thank you. I also find that to be true. I will continue to seek truth.

@@hunterkudo9832 thank you, and this may be from far left field. But look to the central courtyard of the Vatican for the ultimate Truth. 👁✝️👁

@@333STONE It looks like a sword, and I see the circle with 8 rays but not sure what it represents tbh.

You sir are one VERY well-read intellectual. Only somebody who reads profusely on the history of physics would know that arcane fact (as I do). Not only did Einstein come up with entanglement before Schordinger, he came up with the semi-classical limit for the Schrodinger Equation - basically offering up the full quantum version of the equation on a plate (which is why Schrodinger, and Max Born, thanked Einstein in their Nobel Prize commentary after they won the award). And here's the thing, Entanglement was staring all those other geniuses right in the fact - bohr, von neumann, born, schrodinger, heisenberg, etc. But Einstein had correctly identified, decades before John Bell's (and Alain Aspect's) experiments testing entanglement, that one of the two had to be falsified if entanglement were true, relativity was violated or the principle of locality was violated (and he realized this decades before any empirical evidence was available). I could go on for pages about the history of quantum mechanics and how CRIMINALLY underrated Einstein's contributions are to the entire field (several ideas are named after other scientists when Einstein was actually the first to discover them - e.g. the Raleigh Jeans Laws, the Boson, for two examples out of many). Einstein is well known for his rejection of quantum mechanics in the form it emerged from the work of Heisenberg, Born and Schrodinger in 1926. Much less appreciated are the many seminal contributions he made to quantum theory prior to his final scientific verdict: that the theory was at best incomplete. Einstein, much more than Planck, introduced the concept of quantization of energy in atomic mechanics. Einstein proposed the photon, the first force-carrying particle discovered for a fundamental interaction, and put forward the notion of wave-particle duality, based on sound statistical arguments 14 years before De Broglie’s work. He was the first to recognize the intrinsic randomness in atomic processes, and introduced the notion of transition probabilities, embodied in the A and B coefficients for atomic emission and absorption. He also preceded Born in suggesting the interpretation of wave fields as probability densities for particles, photons, in the case of the electromagnetic field. Finally, stimulated by Bose, he introduced the notion of indistinguishable particles in the quantum sense and derived the condensed phase of bosons, which is one of the fundamental states of matter at low temperatures. It was Einstein who discovered the the semiclassical limit of the Schrodinger Equation. His work on quantum statistics in turn directly stimulated Schrodinger towards his discovery of the fully quantum wave equation of quantum mechanics. It was only due to his rejection of the final theory that he is not generally recognized as the most central figure in this historic achievement of human civilization. The Boson should have been named after him given that it was him, and not Bose, that created the theory (in condensed matter physics) that led to it's discovery. Einstein is usually revered as the father of special and general relativity (which he is). But he is also the father of Solid State Physics, as well as the broader version known as Condensed Matter Physics (including liquids). His 1907 article on the specific heat of solids introduces, for the first time, the effect of lattice vibrations on the thermodynamic properties of crystals, in particular the specific heat. His 1905 article on the photoelectric effect and photoluminescence opened the fields of photoelectron spectroscopy and photoluminescence spectroscopy. Other important achievements include the aforementioned Bose-Einstein condensation and the Einstein relation between the diffusion coefficient an mobility. It was Einstein that was the first to quantize the radiation field and the first to correctly derive phonons. Between 1902 and 1920, 20 years, Albert Einstein was the only significant physicist of any repute in Europe who believed energy was quantized - it took Bohr many years to believe in quantized energy. He rederived the entire foundations of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics from first principles (he essentially did everything J.W. Gibbs did by the age of 23 - something he isn't even known for, a remarkable feat), he solved the centuries old Tea Leaf Paradox on a whim, he essentially launched Quantum Information Theory with the first paper on the subject now known as the "EPR Paradox" paper. Einstein, with contributions from Otto Stern, was the first to derive the correct value for zero-point energy (also known as zero-point motion), 10 years BEFORE Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle (which, if you understand physics, is a truly remarkable feat). Einstein came up with wormholes (Einstein-Rosen bridges) which could bridge quantum theory and relativity; he also discovered quantum entanglement (EPR Correlations). Absolutely remarkable. And I haven't even address his many, many other contributions to science (e.g. physical chemistry, Gyroscopes, telemetry etc). Sources: Douglas Stone (Head of Applied Physics at Yale University) wrote a book on the early history of quantum mechanics "Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian" - he argues that Einstein should have won 7 to 10 Nobel Prizes. John Stachel - Boston University Physicist and the first editor of the Einstein Papers Project. T.S. Kuhn's book "Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894-1912" --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Einstein is imho the greatest scientist of all time; he essentially launched modern physics as we know it. In many respects, especially in my field (condensed matter) he's criminally underrated. We never discover the Lamb Shift without Einstein. He possessed an absolutely monstrous intellect (beat mathematics giant David Hilbert to the correct field equations of GR, while being sick as a dog, and after TEACHING Hilbert the theory). Monstrous.

The guy is a force of nature. I can’t remember half of what I just saw and look at him. What a gift to the world.

Bingo. He was the one who discovered Entanglement to begin with. It was staring Bohr, Von Neuman, Born etc all in the face, but it took Einstein to flesh out the truly bizarre properties of QM. Einstein is well known for his rejection of quantum mechanics in the form it emerged from the work of Heisenberg, Born and Schrodinger in 1926. Much less appreciated are the many seminal contributions he made to quantum theory prior to his final scientific verdict: that the theory was at best incomplete. Einstein, much more than Planck, introduced the concept of quantization of energy in atomic mechanics. Einstein proposed the photon, the first force-carrying particle discovered for a fundamental interaction, and put forward the notion of wave-particle duality, based on sound statistical arguments 14 years before De Broglie’s work. He was the first to recognize the intrinsic randomness in atomic processes, and introduced the notion of transition probabilities, embodied in the A and B coefficients for atomic emission and absorption. He also preceded Born in suggesting the interpretation of wave fields as probability densities for particles, photons, in the case of the electromagnetic field. Finally, stimulated by Bose, he introduced the notion of indistinguishable particles in the quantum sense and derived the condensed phase of bosons, which is one of the fundamental states of matter at low temperatures. It was Einstein who discovered the the semiclassical limit of the Schrodinger Equation. His work on quantum statistics in turn directly stimulated Schrodinger towards his discovery of the fully quantum wave equation of quantum mechanics. It was only due to his rejection of the final theory that he is not generally recognized as the most central figure in this historic achievement of human civilization. The Boson should have been named after him given that it was him, and not Bose, that created the theory (in condensed matter physics) that led to it's discovery. Einstein is usually revered as the father of special and general relativity (which he is). But he is also the father of Solid State Physics, as well as the broader version known as Condensed Matter Physics (including liquids). His 1907 article on the specific heat of solids introduces, for the first time, the effect of lattice vibrations on the thermodynamic properties of crystals, in particular the specific heat. His 1905 article on the photoelectric effect and photoluminescence opened the fields of photoelectron spectroscopy and photoluminescence spectroscopy. Other important achievements include the aforementioned Bose-Einstein condensation and the Einstein relation between the diffusion coefficient an mobility. It was Einstein that was the first to quantize the radiation field and the first to correctly derive phonons. Between 1902 and 1920, 20 years, Albert Einstein was the only significant physicist of any repute in Europe who believed energy was quantized - it took Bohr many years to believe in quantized energy. He rederived the entire foundations of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics from first principles (he essentially did everything J.W. Gibbs did by the age of 23 - something he isn't even known for, a remarkable feat), he solved the centuries old Tea Leaf Paradox on a whim, he essentially launched Quantum Information Theory with the first paper on the subject now known as the "EPR Paradox" paper. Einstein, with contributions from Otto Stern, was the first to derive the correct value for zero-point energy (also known as zero-point motion), 10 years BEFORE Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle (which, if you understand physics, is a truly remarkable feat). And I haven't even address his many, many other contributions to science (e.g. physical chemistry, Gyroscopes, telemetry etc). Sources: Douglas Stone (Head of Applied Physics at Yale University) wrote a book on the early history of quantum mechanics "Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian" - he argues that Einstein should have won 7 to 10 Nobel Prizes. John Stachel - Boston University Physicist and the first editor of the Einstein Papers Project. T.S. Kuhn's book "Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894-1912" --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Einstein is the greatest scientist of all time, essentially launched modern physics as we know it. In some respects, he's underrated. Absolutely monstrous intellect.

So how's your fast food server/parking lot attendant job search going? ;-)

Your gay dude. Obviously. Look at your thumbnail...

good quotation , I use to watch Carl Sagan

Until he acquires a mysterious aura that oozes, inspires and injects imagination with every word, no. It will be a long time before another Carl Sagan, with the cahonas to infuse every word with drama, appears.

@@Dismythed to me

@@thingsiplay I wouldn't want to take that from you. Cheers. 🙂

Whats new dough?

In addition to Einstein's seminal papers on wormholes and entanglement, he essentially created the field. Einstein is well known for his rejection of quantum mechanics in the form it emerged from the work of Heisenberg, Born and Schrodinger in 1926. Much less appreciated are the many seminal contributions he made to quantum theory prior to his final scientific verdict: that the theory was at best incomplete. Einstein, much more than Planck, introduced the concept of quantization of energy in atomic mechanics. Einstein proposed the photon, the first force-carrying particle discovered for a fundamental interaction, and put forward the notion of wave-particle duality, based on sound statistical arguments 14 years before De Broglie’s work. He was the first to recognize the intrinsic randomness in atomic processes, and introduced the notion of transition probabilities, embodied in the A and B coefficients for atomic emission and absorption. He also preceded Born in suggesting the interpretation of wave fields as probability densities for particles, photons, in the case of the electromagnetic field. Finally, stimulated by Bose, he introduced the notion of indistinguishable particles in the quantum sense and derived the condensed phase of bosons, which is one of the fundamental states of matter at low temperatures. It was Einstein who discovered the the semiclassical limit of the Schrodinger Equation. His work on quantum statistics in turn directly stimulated Schrodinger towards his discovery of the fully quantum wave equation of quantum mechanics. It was only due to his rejection of the final theory that he is not generally recognized as the most central figure in this historic achievement of human civilization. The Boson should have been named after him given that it was him, and not Bose, that created the theory (in condensed matter physics) that led to it's discovery. Einstein is usually revered as the father of special and general relativity (which he is). But he is also the father of Solid State Physics, as well as the broader version known as Condensed Matter Physics (including liquids). His 1907 article on the specific heat of solids introduces, for the first time, the effect of lattice vibrations on the thermodynamic properties of crystals, in particular the specific heat. His 1905 article on the photoelectric effect and photoluminescence opened the fields of photoelectron spectroscopy and photoluminescence spectroscopy. Other important achievements include the aforementioned Bose-Einstein condensation and the Einstein relation between the diffusion coefficient an mobility. It was Einstein that was the first to quantize the radiation field and the first to correctly derive phonons. Between 1902 and 1920, 20 years, Albert Einstein was the only significant physicist of any repute in Europe who believed energy was quantized - it took Bohr many years to believe in quantized energy. He rederived the entire foundations of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics from first principles (he essentially did everything J.W. Gibbs did by the age of 23 - something he isn't even known for, a remarkable feat), he solved the centuries old Tea Leaf Paradox on a whim, he essentially launched Quantum Information Theory with the first paper on the subject now known as the "EPR Paradox" paper. Einstein, with contributions from Otto Stern, was the first to derive the correct value for zero-point energy (also known as zero-point motion), 10 years BEFORE Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle (which, if you understand physics, is a truly remarkable feat). And I haven't even address his many, many other contributions to science (e.g. physical chemistry, Gyroscopes, telemetry etc). Sources: Douglas Stone (Head of Applied Physics at Yale University) wrote a book on the early history of quantum mechanics "Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian" - he argues that Einstein should have won 7 to 10 Nobel Prizes. John Stachel - Boston University Physicist and the first editor of the Einstein Papers Project. T.S. Kuhn's book "Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894-1912" --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Einstein is the greatest scientist of all time, essentially launched modern physics as we know it. In some respects, he's underrated. Absolutely monstrous intellect.

AKA SACRED TWIN FLAMES 🔥

Show your math for that theory!

They're both undeniably real yet difficult to explain.

💫❤️💫

@@users581 haha, in love 1+1=1

How light moves through space? If light is a wave then there must be anything in space due to which light is propagating. Do u have ans

@@umeshshende7540 that idea was abandoned many years ago. It was called "the ether" but it does not exist. No medium required for light.

@@wanderingtravellerAB99 But it doesn't gives sense. How light propagates through space????. It is still bending my mind

@@umeshshende7540 Because photons are massless quantum particles that can travel through anything. It doesnt require a medium to propagate.

@@simonm3951 Massless particles didn't giving any sense. But what are Massless Quantum Particles and how can they travel through anything?

Lol

One could even say, it's gotten your neurons entangled 😏

Your Knots are Entangling with my Brain Neurons

Yes, the separation make no sense. I would go as far as saying that there is no actual mass, it just appears that way because it's an emerging property. E=mc² declares mass and energy equivalent, but I would even say that mass and energy are the same thing, just looked at in a different way. A theory solving the quantum/gravity problem should work without mass, only with energy and geometry. Ignoring the mass we would basically just have this quantum stuff moving around in the world which is intertwined with space. So it can appear that there is gravity, but all we would need to consider on it is just the warping of space. I think what is missing is a real understanding of space. According to quantum mechanics particles can pop in and out of existence. But that requires the presence of space, otherwise there would be nothing to pop into and out of. So space must have certain properties, that we need to detect, aside from just plain geometry. Space in connection with all the quantum stuff should be able to explain all of it. For example a black whole would be an area of high density quantum energy which influences the shape of the surrounding space.

@@jayeff6712 ...Space must have certain properties...you are right ✅️ All the Quantum stuff you also stated I believe are Gravity related operations and their respective effects on Spacetime in Ground State => Vacuum.

@@jayeff6712 I am not a science guy, but to me it would seem that "space" is born from entanglement, maybe gravity too or maybe there the same thing or two parts to the same thing? Again not a sience guy but if you viewed entanglement like you would water, and how water slows light down then maybe the collective entanglment of everything within a closed system creates "space" and this would also to some degree explain why light has a speed limit. Maybe that doesn't make sense mathmatically, not sure again not sciance guy.

My 8yr old son watched this and then asked me "Is there a black hole near Uranus?"

@@stevebrindle1724yep

Oh damn yeah that would be an interesting discussion for sure.

The quality of this production is just astounding and it's free!! Thank you BG and WSF for making such entertaining and educational videos!

James Webb should be able to help us answer some of these questions in a few months.

Yes and we have Structures within the human brain that deal directly with Quantum tunnelling

@@nathangurevitch4506 what is that!?

@@extraterrestrialorganism7940 I think he's trying to say neurosynapses lmaooo

@@Codduct really? Thank you for the answer! I was really wondering what it was :)

Don't worry, nobody does ! 😂

me too BUT WE WILL GET IT ONE DAY BRO TRUST ME

DUUUDE BUT THE EMERGENCE THE FUCKING EMERGENCE IS THE OMGGGGGGG

Jada knows

@@nnenno48 And wht is tht....?

The ultimate question is, how do we as entities/species/AI/bioengineered sentient beings connect directly to it all. Everything is inter-connected from the myths of the Greeks and Egyptians to the tales of the annunaki to the wide constellations and dying stars and nebulas and to the cosmos and also to the science of particles and subatomic particles. In quantum mechanics/physics, energy doesn’t die, and everything has a Place, just like in classical physics…. everything is in a connected somehow …😊So, I’m trying to figure out the “how” and “who’s who” in and of that theories connection. Is it something divine and forth written in our universe or in undiscovered laws or is there a big magic hand or mind that controls it all? I refuse to believe it is all random.

This is a brilliant observation. "Evolution" conscious of itself. It harkens back to theories of pan psychism. The fibonacci sequence is also a neat miracle that gives me goosebumps.

its coming! am an avid amateur theoretical physics ,and given the discovery of thee most distant today! (theBB! it's self?) its never been more exiting.the singularity is! near.:-)

Maureen you are so right as I feel exactly the same, finally now that WSF and Brian has started these chats over the years I actually feel I can understand the basics much more, which then allows me to enjoy the subjects much more because I can follow along, which I couldn't do from books. cheers Kev

Some say deja vu is experienced when you intuit another moment happening at the same time as the present .

Who or what knows? I hope who

@Nicholas Boyko hello Nicolas, I am doing pretty ok thank you for asking. How are you? You enjoy science too?

@Nicholas Boyko Hello Nicholas very happy to be your friend 😊 how are you?

Einstein is well known for his rejection of quantum mechanics in the form it emerged from the work of Heisenberg, Born and Schrodinger in 1926. Much less appreciated are the many seminal contributions he made to quantum theory prior to his final scientific verdict: that the theory was at best incomplete. Einstein, much more than Planck, introduced the concept of quantization of energy in atomic mechanics. Einstein proposed the photon, the first force-carrying particle discovered for a fundamental interaction, and put forward the notion of wave-particle duality, based on sound statistical arguments 14 years before De Broglie’s work. He was the first to recognize the intrinsic randomness in atomic processes, and introduced the notion of transition probabilities, embodied in the A and B coefficients for atomic emission and absorption. He also preceded Born in suggesting the interpretation of wave fields as probability densities for particles, photons, in the case of the electromagnetic field. Finally, stimulated by Bose, he introduced the notion of indistinguishable particles in the quantum sense and derived the condensed phase of bosons, which is one of the fundamental states of matter at low temperatures. It was Einstein who discovered the the semiclassical limit of the Schrodinger Equation. His work on quantum statistics in turn directly stimulated Schrodinger towards his discovery of the fully quantum wave equation of quantum mechanics. It was only due to his rejection of the final theory that he is not generally recognized as the most central figure in this historic achievement of human civilization. The Boson should have been named after him given that it was him, and not Bose, that created the theory (in condensed matter physics) that led to it's discovery. Einstein is usually revered as the father of special and general relativity (which he is). But he is also the father of Solid State Physics, as well as the broader version known as Condensed Matter Physics (including liquids). His 1907 article on the specific heat of solids introduces, for the first time, the effect of lattice vibrations on the thermodynamic properties of crystals, in particular the specific heat. His 1905 article on the photoelectric effect and photoluminescence opened the fields of photoelectron spectroscopy and photoluminescence spectroscopy. Other important achievements include the aforementioned Bose-Einstein condensation and the Einstein relation between the diffusion coefficient an mobility. It was Einstein that was the first to quantize the radiation field and the first to correctly derive phonons. Between 1902 and 1920, 20 years, Albert Einstein was the only significant physicist of any repute in Europe who believed energy was quantized - it took Bohr many years to believe in quantized energy. He rederived the entire foundations of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics from first principles (he essentially did everything J.W. Gibbs did by the age of 23 - something he isn't even known for, a remarkable feat), he solved the centuries old Tea Leaf Paradox on a whim, he essentially launched Quantum Information Theory with the first paper on the subject now known as the "EPR Paradox" paper. Einstein, with contributions from Otto Stern, was the first to derive the correct value for zero-point energy (also known as zero-point motion), 10 years BEFORE Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle (which, if you understand physics, is a truly remarkable feat). And I haven't even address his many, many other contributions to science (e.g. physical chemistry, Gyroscopes, telemetry etc). Sources: Douglas Stone (Head of Applied Physics at Yale University) wrote a book on the early history of quantum mechanics "Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian" - he argues that Einstein should have won 7 to 10 Nobel Prizes. John Stachel - Boston University Physicist and the first editor of the Einstein Papers Project. T.S. Kuhn's book "Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894-1912" --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Einstein is the greatest scientist of all time, essentially launched modern physics as we know it. In some respects, he's underrated. Absolutely monstrous intellect.

@@feynmanschwingere_mc2270 Thank you so much for sharing. I loved reading this and learning more about Einstein. He is and remains to be a the most significant one of a kind in his field and in all other aspects of life. He was also so clever with his words and way of stating things. What you shared was so relevant thank you!! ☀️🌈✨🌏🪫🤍

@@anad2982 You're welcome :) ... He was amazing. Greatest genius of all time.

This is the sharpening of swords off one another we need

Photons have no mass. Dark energy is thought to make up about 70+ percent of the mass in the universe. Light can’t be it.

Dick, Yes totally agree, you said it much better than I did.

So, if ER equals EPR then the structure of our universe must be different. Is this because there are more dimensions than we have currently proven? Or is this more about geometry of space?

@wendyholmes1848 The way I understand it, ER deals more with wormholes and EPR more with entanglement. I think both relate to geometry of spacetime, how other dimensions fit in, I'm not sure. Great question though. 🤔

Its only one superposition with multiple possibilities, so measuring it twice would just see the observed state twice Your body is made up of all of this mysterious stuff, but you dont change shape every day when observed by multiple people at the same or different times, its deeper than that, nobody knows!

Space seems to have a maximum communication speed. Like how fast electric fields can interact with magnetic field. So we can't travel _THROUGH_ space faster than that, but we could possibly travel a shorter distance to the same place if the geometry is changed.

Einstein is well known for his rejection of quantum mechanics in the form it emerged from the work of Heisenberg, Born and Schrodinger in 1926. Much less appreciated are the many seminal contributions he made to quantum theory prior to his final scientific verdict: that the theory was at best incomplete. Einstein, much more than Planck, introduced the concept of quantization of energy in atomic mechanics. Einstein proposed the photon, the first force-carrying particle discovered for a fundamental interaction, and put forward the notion of wave-particle duality, based on sound statistical arguments 14 years before De Broglie’s work. He was the first to recognize the intrinsic randomness in atomic processes, and introduced the notion of transition probabilities, embodied in the A and B coefficients for atomic emission and absorption. He also preceded Born in suggesting the interpretation of wave fields as probability densities for particles, photons, in the case of the electromagnetic field. Finally, stimulated by Bose, he introduced the notion of indistinguishable particles in the quantum sense and derived the condensed phase of bosons, which is one of the fundamental states of matter at low temperatures. It was Einstein who discovered the the semiclassical limit of the Schrodinger Equation. His work on quantum statistics in turn directly stimulated Schrodinger towards his discovery of the fully quantum wave equation of quantum mechanics. It was only due to his rejection of the final theory that he is not generally recognized as the most central figure in this historic achievement of human civilization. The Boson should have been named after him given that it was him, and not Bose, that created the theory (in condensed matter physics) that led to it's discovery. Einstein is usually revered as the father of special and general relativity (which he is). But he is also the father of Solid State Physics, as well as the broader version known as Condensed Matter Physics (including liquids). His 1907 article on the specific heat of solids introduces, for the first time, the effect of lattice vibrations on the thermodynamic properties of crystals, in particular the specific heat. His 1905 article on the photoelectric effect and photoluminescence opened the fields of photoelectron spectroscopy and photoluminescence spectroscopy. Other important achievements include the aforementioned Bose-Einstein condensation and the Einstein relation between the diffusion coefficient an mobility. It was Einstein that was the first to quantize the radiation field and the first to correctly derive phonons. Between 1902 and 1920, 20 years, Albert Einstein was the only significant physicist of any repute in Europe who believed energy was quantized - it took Bohr many years to believe in quantized energy. He rederived the entire foundations of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics from first principles (he essentially did everything J.W. Gibbs did by the age of 23 - something he isn't even known for, a remarkable feat), he solved the centuries old Tea Leaf Paradox on a whim, he essentially launched Quantum Information Theory with the first paper on the subject now known as the "EPR Paradox" paper. Einstein, with contributions from Otto Stern, was the first to derive the correct value for zero-point energy (also known as zero-point motion), 10 years BEFORE Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle (which, if you understand physics, is a truly remarkable feat). And I haven't even address his many, many other contributions to science (e.g. physical chemistry, Gyroscopes, telemetry etc). Sources: Douglas Stone (Head of Applied Physics at Yale University) wrote a book on the early history of quantum mechanics "Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian" - he argues that Einstein should have won 7 to 10 Nobel Prizes. John Stachel - Boston University Physicist and the first editor of the Einstein Papers Project. T.S. Kuhn's book "Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894-1912" --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Einstein is the greatest scientist of all time, essentially launched modern physics as we know it. In some respects, he's underrated. Absolutely monstrous intellect.

@@ZeroOskul at CERN they call the one in a million, face to face, pancake shaped, proton collisions, the higgs particle, I'd like to think it's the fusion reaction of the star that runs out of fuel very quickly.

@@ZeroOskul we all have our right to our opinions, if you can do video presentations as well as Brian Green I salute you go for it.

@@ZeroOskul do you need a hug?

@@ZeroOskul you lost me when you said quantum intangled particals are connected by einstein-rosen Bridges. That my friend tells me volumes about your level of education. I'd be glad to explain why you are wrong, but I can't understand it for you.