Thank you saying that for all us inquisitive types!

You sound like a paid advertisement

@@waterdog1853 I wasn't paid a thing, I was just conveying my honest opinion and feelings on that video and I still feel as an amazingly blessed fellow to be living in a time, and in a society where I can access that information for free. In societies in millenia past that type of information was only for a select few with arbitrary credentials

1x

@@ramseydaugherty5515 so I don't have the freedom to think you sound like a paid advertisement? You don't have the freedom to think I'm joking?

I hoped he was going to say the theoretical description of black holes is "Recycle Bin"

Recycling bin?😏 😀😂 That's another way to put it .🧐

I am now 70 years of age and find a lot of affinity in your story. I think we could have been good friends back in those days, sharing similar political views!!

Sure u can. Ur not giving yourself enough credit. The fact that u know he's very smart is a good sign.

Frank is smart but he and his colleagues seem to be at a dead-end for now "it's hard to see where things are going to lead" Quote

@@alpineprime9373 6th of 6

It helped me a lot. People in the frontiers of knowledge keep me in contact with reality. You don't have to be smart while sharing your views to others. I can appreciate people whether they are smart or not.

true but they remain puzzled about what the universe fundamentals

@@silent00planet is there anyone who isnt?

Thank u I needed to hear this today u’ve genuinely made my day today internet ❤️

The same here and it puzzles me. Why is that. Some peolpe say that there is beauty in science. Is this what they mean? Do we enjoy a kind of beauty not available for everyone?

I think science has answered some if not majority of deep questions and the beauty arises. Nowadays with help of technology, complex ideas can be understood more easily. Indeed even today, not everyone has been so lucky like us having access to the internet.

Same

Truth Is so simple more than one can imagines or mind can grasps.

Very well said is lucky to have the ability to hear it from original sources.

Darn Diggity... I Seem to have missed the memo. Does it count if I used a wire hanger? It was all I had that kept my glasses on while I swim, run, or do the do.

We prefer the term "Normies". Thanks lol

lol funny

@Dalit Shiv it was a pun

Better check "Cosmology solved from Einstein to James Webb, to Bob Lazar cases"

Nice to hear this .. Even i am into Master Graduation in Physics after MBA.... The reason was Brian... ❤️

If you have a true passion you don't need Brian to stroke your head.

@@JerryMlinarevic You are right, but if I’m not mistaken, no one said I needed him to. So, fuck off. Respectfully :)

There are many people like you however in my own personal case I was discouraged and became very disinterested in the themes Brian Greene was expousing on social media platforms such as UKposts. I didn’t quite connect with Brian’s neurotic approach to physics and often conservative and bland analysis. I did learn or reinforce a few aspects of Physics and cosmology which was one positive but overall it’s been a negative and degrading experience for me.

@@PetraKann Well I truly am sorry you feel that way, like I said he inspired me and I truly think of him as brilliant in his own domain. Out of curiosity, who is it that inspires you? Or if not someone, what is it?

The theory of everything according to humans that believe their intellect evolved from a monkey's brain. If the light waves from the sun were 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of Einstein's space-time then people on Earth are just imagining the infrared warmth of the sun coming up on the horizon. The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. According to Einstein's relativity-time dilation's, photos taken of the Earth from the Discovery Space station traveled from the past to the future violating the laws of physics, conservation of energy and common sense. According to Einstein's projectile light particle proton light has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime, but if light has a (constant speed) then moving clocks cannot run slow through spacetime! :-) The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring. Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. Using optical clocks, lasers and GPS to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. If the speed of light is constant then past and future dimensions of spacetime and an expanding universe would not be possible, obviously destroying the twins paradox as each twin cannot move faster or slower than the other. Einstein would have made a great used car salesman :-) Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot. Unlike a TV or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of frames that create the appearance of a moving image. There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just video recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. Neither time, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch Time, energy, and matter like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. Monkey see monkey do, the science of monkeys have brainwashed you. Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future :-). Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image :-). The speed of electromagnetic wave is 186,282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186,000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light could not travel across the universe, high speed particles traveling at 186,000 miles per second would break the Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories. Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13.8 billion years ago :-). It's truly amazing how the science and politics of the left are able to keep people denying reality, there are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously). “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” a state of superposition where time and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end. "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End" Revelation 22:13. Disciples, remember thy 1st commandment, thou shalt not question thy lawgiver of relativity for blasphemers are the devil's pawn. Let thee not dwell in dissension of our Lord Albert, shun them, drive them back to their jungle lair amen. Albert Einstein, an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix- Magnetron

QCD?

@@extremeuzer3 Quantum ChromoDymamics

Pro tip: Learn how to use apostrophes and commas before telling everyone how smart you are. Also, your comment was edited before I saw it.... 😆😆😆

Very good indeed, you just made a very important point and saddly this is not taken fully seriously because people understand poorly how diverse ecosystems work.

Did you consider the whole process of the scientific method and academic review that goes on during sharing research or are you talking about the need for communication that WSF is fulfilling because they untie interdisciplinary experts and promote conversation?

Fuck yeah this is awesome

@@mildmanneredimpala1956 Both of those and so much more!

I agree that mathematics, albeit a valuable tool, can sometimes get in the way of inventive thinking. The problem with ' Quantum Physics ', is nearly all of the equations include the ' Schrodinger ' wave function, which is based on probability. I believe that all physics must in the first instance, be explained logically, then mathematically.

How they work is there has to be an awareness of them "first," without that, they don't exist. Just mere concepts!

Really interesting concept