Guide to Life, the Universe, and Everything - by Jim Al-Khalili, Part 1

  Переглядів 105,522

SpaceRip

SpaceRip

Місяць тому

In this episode, we explore the first two great pillars of modern physics: Einstein's theory of relativity and the subatomic world of quantum physics.
A MagellanTV original production and exclusive premiere. Join Physicist Jim Al-Khalili as he shows us how science gives us insight into the biggest questions of all. How did the universe come into being? How did life start on Earth, and how does it sustain itself? What is the nature of space and time - and how will it all end?

КОМЕНТАРІ: 146
@snufkinmatt162
@snufkinmatt162 14 днів тому
Jim is my favourite science communicator since Carl Sagan.
@aleonyohan6745
@aleonyohan6745 Місяць тому
This guy's videos are the best.
@seekter-kafa
@seekter-kafa 24 дні тому
there are not his! and do not praise the person but the content!
@parvizmammadov88
@parvizmammadov88 24 дні тому
It is the fisrt time that I see Jim Al-Khalili, I’ve been following his Life Scientific podcast on bbc radio4 since 2018 my IELTS preparation time. I wanna thank mr. Jim Al-Khalili and his podcast guests for that amazing show.
@armitage36
@armitage36 Місяць тому
This is A Stellar Episode 😎👍
@KaraWisdom
@KaraWisdom 3 дні тому
Thank god for the BBC making docs like this, if it wasn't for BBC Horizon docs like this one or Professor Brian Cox and Sir David Attenborough there would be nothing intelligent left on TV
@charlesmartin1121
@charlesmartin1121 Місяць тому
I can't get enough of these kind of programs, even though they sometimes leave my head spinning afterwards.
@cathyzeiler9967
@cathyzeiler9967 Місяць тому
Ditto.
@--BiZ--
@--BiZ-- Місяць тому
that's what she said
@tracymcgeachie7525
@tracymcgeachie7525 Місяць тому
Try history of the universe. Brilliant
@MatthewOfLondon
@MatthewOfLondon Місяць тому
I hear you man. 👍
@JettRink5131947
@JettRink5131947 Місяць тому
It seems to me (judging by the graphic depiction) that when we finally understand why these strange phenomena occur the wavelike illustration used might also describe and/or lead to scientists understanding force fields, magnetism for example. Awkward, I know, but the poorly defined path of the quantum looks like a field, not a lot of individual particles.
@scandalouslando204
@scandalouslando204 Місяць тому
You by far have the absolute best videos, and honestly my knowledge is basic when it comes to physics, but you make it clear and easy to understand everything.
@Pugetwitch
@Pugetwitch Місяць тому
That's not true at all, this person on the channel is stealing videos from old cable TV that works and then posting them
@KaraWisdom
@KaraWisdom 3 дні тому
This was a BBC Horizon documentary not made be the UKpostsr just uploaded
@pittasso
@pittasso Місяць тому
Profoundly beautifull! Thank you all for this amazing documentary! May the force be with you 🙏
@vavilovasvetlana9044
@vavilovasvetlana9044 Місяць тому
Very wonderful lecture like all the others;especially well understood when accompanied by classical music.
@KingBritish
@KingBritish Місяць тому
Seen all these when they were on TV. Jim is superb at these documentaries. This is the kind of content I approve of on UKposts. Leave the short form - non educational content to other apps for those with no attention spans.
@MegaLmae
@MegaLmae 7 днів тому
We don’t care what you approve of. We can’t all live by your own standards or personal attention span.
@KingBritish
@KingBritish 7 днів тому
@@MegaLmae I think you'll find a lot do agree with my statement, just ask anybody with a brain and wasn't born in the 2000's. You cared enough to comment, heyyyyy 👋🏻
@MegaLmae
@MegaLmae 6 днів тому
@@KingBritish You are just an intolerant old git.
@catkeys6911
@catkeys6911 Місяць тому
So, the "fabric" of space itself, in between the galaxies, is what is expanding. And what is this fabric made of? Nothing. "The universe itself, in it's entirety, is getting bigger" -So, its endlessness is getting even more endlessy. You've got to love these "explanations".
@kaoskronostyche9939
@kaoskronostyche9939 2 дні тому
The fabric of space is not "nothing" - this is explained in other Khalili videos. Moreover, these are speculations not explanations. Yes the Universe is expanding and we don't really know how or why but we will invent a place holder - Dark Energy - so we can talk about it. Maybe rewatch the video.
@lilmike2710
@lilmike2710 29 днів тому
This is good stuff. Helps me to stand in awe of creation and its enigmas. And how were endowed with the gift of understanding. Amazing and awesome.
@sikandarmalik8699
@sikandarmalik8699 Місяць тому
Jim, as God says everything is being / is written in a book. There is your 2d storage of info. That is the holographic theory you mention. Food for thought.
@buzzkillington1719
@buzzkillington1719 28 днів тому
I love this great man ❤
@Raiderblack
@Raiderblack 28 днів тому
Love Jim!
@davidcarr7436
@davidcarr7436 Місяць тому
Jim seems the kind of guy you would like to have a beer with and discuss things. Of course, if it was me, it would be very one-sided.
@gregorysavage7527
@gregorysavage7527 18 днів тому
Me too, I also would be a gob smacked listener
@zpydawebb2344
@zpydawebb2344 Місяць тому
Top man Jim!
@walshamite
@walshamite Місяць тому
Agreed, Jim is a top man. He never betrays a shred of personal ego.
@zpydawebb2344
@zpydawebb2344 Місяць тому
@@walshamite yes, a very personable and likeable chap. I've seen other UKposts vids on the same topics as Jim's but they're using quite long-winded and hard to follow. I watch Jim with my sons and he's able to hold their attention (which is tough these days what with children's minds being over-stimulated by tablets/phones/electronics)
@watgaz518
@watgaz518 20 днів тому
Always makes the subject interesting, good on yer JA-K👌🥇👍
@danielpaulson8838
@danielpaulson8838 18 днів тому
Entanglement seems perhaps easy to understand. If a particle is also a wave and you grab a positive or negative part of the wave to manifest it from wave to particle, what’s left of the wave is the opposite side of the cycle. A wave starts at zero the swings off from there in one direction, but to complete the wave, it needs to return to zero then swing the opposite way as the first half. You grab the top or trough of a single wave, what’s left? The other half.
@networksandstuff
@networksandstuff Місяць тому
Jim is excellent amazing video
@Pugetwitch
@Pugetwitch Місяць тому
No no no and I'm pissed that they took away the good documentaries that featured dick rodstein
@colinchambers3433
@colinchambers3433 Місяць тому
Simplicity development, to become information is existence. I will create an imaginary parallel line, I now find it’s equidistant point, here I deform the line into an angular shape. Thus acquired transition of energy for this activation, this will give the line separate components as vectors= polarity or indicated Pole, One N. Two S .+ Direction. = “ information” -magnetic field of plasma?
@remicaron3191
@remicaron3191 Місяць тому
Has anyone done the two skirt experiment over time. What I mean is fire one electron, wait a day, fire another electron, wait another day, and repeat to see if the pattern repeats or if it’s less evident? What if the wave of the particle is in the ether instead of part of the particle and that’s what causes the interference. Maybe I’m nuts but I can’t seems to find anyone who’s tried it and published online. Not the best online discoverer. Let me know if anyone has an answer.
@newforestpixie5297
@newforestpixie5297 Місяць тому
at 19:35 Jim is at Branksome Chine or Westcliff which is a beach on Poole Bay , Bournemouth SW England & one thing within this presentation which I knew without it being explained 😁
@TheEducat0r
@TheEducat0r Місяць тому
Jim Al-Khalili is taking us on a mind-bending journey through the mysteries of life, the universe, and everything! Who else is ready to expand their mind with Part 1?
@nickharrison3748
@nickharrison3748 Місяць тому
Good Nice Video. So, on what basis the Universe still exist and does not go extinct? is it only because of Constsnts? speed of light, gravity constant , Plank's constant?
@atiphwyne5609
@atiphwyne5609 Місяць тому
"If you wind the clock back far enough, there must have been a point of Creation. " That I believe says it all. No further need to look for explanations. Creation by definition indicates that a Creator has been at work.
@dukeon
@dukeon Місяць тому
How was the creator created? You haven’t solved the problem you’ve just inserted a middleman.
@atiphwyne5609
@atiphwyne5609 Місяць тому
@dukeon 'Who created the Creator? I just rephrased your question to highlight the logical fallacy within the question. Anything that is included in the category of creation can be asked this question, but the Creator, by definition, does not fall into the category of created things. When you have exhausted the chain of causal links, you arrive at the Creator and can not proceed any further.
@watgaz518
@watgaz518 20 днів тому
Maybe the visible matter that falls into a black hole, gets 'smashed up', only to sometime later, piece back together to its original form and exit the rear/end of the black hole into another universe?
@ericmartelle9122
@ericmartelle9122 27 днів тому
Information is only lost if the black hole is the only thing with the information. The information still exists if the info is shared. But if the info is only held by the black hole did it really exist in the first place. Once again the proof that connection is important.
@PaulThatcher-iu5in
@PaulThatcher-iu5in 23 дні тому
Every event has 4 coordinates: its location in the 3 space dimensions, and a time coordinate, too: this happened here, at that time. If it's spacetime - emphasis here on time - flowing into a black hole, the event horizon is not (just) a 2D spherical surface in 3D space, but also in time: it's a set of events in spacetime - the last events from which a signal could reach an external observer. So, in the holographic solution to the information paradox, is what we're really talking about not a "flat" "picture" of what "fell in", but a "slice" of its trajectory through spacetime? What happens to this holographic info as the event horizon shrinks as the black hole loses mass-energy, and therefore size, through Hawking Radiation? Keen to hear what people think...
@JamesPilkenton-se5cx
@JamesPilkenton-se5cx Місяць тому
Do you,Jim, study Crop Circles ? Dimensions indeed...
@smokert5555
@smokert5555 Місяць тому
The two slit experiment always gets me. Electrons travel in a straight line. So unless your aim sucks, they will hit where they are aimed. How can you get a wave pattern firing at the same target? When you see a wave pattern with water, it's because you have millions of molecules of water interfering with each other. With the two slit experiment, they are firing single electrons. There's nothing for the electron to interfere with, including other electrons. It just doesn't make sense.
@cathyzeiler9967
@cathyzeiler9967 Місяць тому
Nothing about Quantum Mechanics makes sense. That's why it's so fascinating.
@smokert5555
@smokert5555 Місяць тому
@@cathyzeiler9967 My objection doesn't involve quantum mechanics, as far as i can tell. I'm open to an explanation as to why my objection is irrelevant.
@galeforce69420
@galeforce69420 Місяць тому
All matter has wave particle duality, so even an electron travels like a single wave through both slits, creating the interference pattern from the then two waves coming out of the slits
@smokert5555
@smokert5555 Місяць тому
@@galeforce69420 One electron interferes with itself? Can you explain that?
@dukeon
@dukeon Місяць тому
@@smokert5555 No, it can’t be explained in terms a person can understand. And yet it happens - even individual electrons (or photons, or neutrons…) interfere with themselves. But don’t think of electrons as little billiard balls, they’re just little packets of probability that can exist anywhere theoretically but “tend” to be on a main line. But they exist everywhere at once, just with rapidly diminishing probability as you move away from that line. It’s clear mathematically, but we can’t visualize it because we didn’t evolve brains that needed to, if that makes sense.
@zhavlan1258
@zhavlan1258 Місяць тому
Kazakhstan. The result is a “theory of everything” in a simple device. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, a car - using the Michelson experiment of 1881/2024, and only then the experiment would be 100% completed. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on a 100% completed Michelson experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum.
@rhcpmorley
@rhcpmorley Місяць тому
Why do physicists always fail to see that Space and Time only intersect in the context of relative motion??? Seems so obvious to me. Spacetime, the dimension of (relative) motion. Space literally means the emptiness between. Space is actually a homonym - a word with more than one core meaning. You need to differentiate - you don't. The XYZ-axis is a mathematic model, a three vector dimension for referencing (calibrating and indexing) relative spatial position. You can't curve a mathematical model. Or Space is a vague collective noun as in 'outer space' - like 'sky' is a vague, non-specific collective term - encompassing 'stuff' (matter) and the emptiness between 'stuff'. You can't curve collective nouns. And Time is also a both a dimension (we calibrate change rate and reference change-events using Time), and a vague collective noun - the only evidence of 'time passing' is change (look around you - quintillions of change-events) including the change of spatial position i.e. motion. So merge Space, the dimension of spatial position, with Time, the dimension of change, and you get Spacetime, the dimension of changing spatial position, i.e. the dimension of (relative) motion.
@ericmartelle9122
@ericmartelle9122 27 днів тому
Einstein was wrong about time being the 4th dimension. 1st time can only be measured in one direction. I would argue that the 4th dimension is density( expansion/contraction) as the universe expands it can also contract but time is always this then that.
@danielpaulson8838
@danielpaulson8838 18 днів тому
Time is easily seen as a dimension. Try to meet someone in three dimensional space without it.
@Arrogan28
@Arrogan28 Місяць тому
Wait, hold the phone. I love Jim’s stuff, but i believe he is completely wrong on something here. The ‘fuzzy’ part of the shadow around his hand is not because of the wave of light bending around his hand, it is because of mie scattering causing the light from the sun to bend when it hits large particles in oir atmosphere, causing us to see the sun, not as a very small disk, but as a much larger source of light. Basically the sun photons get deflected on their way almost like someone was holding a fuzzy magnifying lens between us and the sun. The effect is what would otherise be a shadow from a small light source(point light) which would have a very hard shadow edge, instead the sun to everyone on the surface of earth becomes a much larger area light(area light source) and thus like all wide light sources it had a penumbra in addition the umbra part of it’s shadow, and hence the hand he held up has a larger fuzzy region had the sun not had it’s light scattered by Mei scattering. Note Rayleigh scatter is responsible for the blue light and generally shorter wavelengths of sun light hitting the atmosphere being scattered to produce the blue sky we see. This in someway also messes with our shadow as it causes blue light to fill in oir shadows so they are not completely black as say they would be out in space when far away from other bouncing light from say the earth which can also cause the shadows from the sun to be partially lifted, like the shadows on the side of the international spacestation facing the earth, or sometimes the moon’s bounce light can also lift the shadows as well on the ISS when they are aligned correctly. But anyway, the point the shadow of his hand on the bricks was fuzzy not because of light bending around his hand. That does happen but it is very small, compared to the effect that the Mei scattering is having on the sun as an otherwise nearly parallel source of light rays(photons). If he held up his hand in front of a very bright tiny light source in a completely black room, it would not have a fuzzy shadow like it does in a sunny day…. Anyone else pick that up as being Jim mistaken for once?
@markghinn6072
@markghinn6072 24 дні тому
I agree. I like Jim's videos, but it's a shame that he describes the fuzziness of the shadow as being caused by light smearing out rather than the source having a wide area. It is made worse by it being presented as "common sense". Light does to some degree smear out, but would not be detectable on the wall if the source was infinitely narrow. I still really enjoy his videos, he presents very well.
@babusastry
@babusastry Місяць тому
I thought light particles are called photons! And quanta was word coined by Plank for energy. Am I wrong?
@dukeon
@dukeon Місяць тому
Light is a form of energy. It behaves as a quantum particle (photon) and as a wave, depending on how you measure it.
@My_Blindness
@My_Blindness Місяць тому
I can't understand why old video back to back uploaded
@nickharrison3748
@nickharrison3748 Місяць тому
isn't water also "wave" in ocean and "particle" like droplets dropping off Tap water?
@chuckcantillon4764
@chuckcantillon4764 9 днів тому
I see where you're going with this, I've noticed that the energy of a wave is just passing through the water, surfing only happens once you catch the wave of energy, and when it crashes against the shore, you can feel it escaping the water.
@whirledpeas3477
@whirledpeas3477 Місяць тому
Not many people born in Iraq are named Jim 😊
@ABrushwiththeAppalachian-kq9nu
@ABrushwiththeAppalachian-kq9nu Місяць тому
Jameel
@--BiZ--
@--BiZ-- Місяць тому
When did this originally get aired? 2007?
@danielkerr4100
@danielkerr4100 Місяць тому
Late 00s / early 10s use to watch them a lot
@dukeon
@dukeon Місяць тому
It aired in 2022
@aikogiron3449
@aikogiron3449 28 днів тому
This is my new sleeping show.. I listen as I drift to sleep to nothingness..
@MorganSullivan
@MorganSullivan Місяць тому
42
@humanmale4610
@humanmale4610 Місяць тому
I've seen light... I just cannot prove it to you.
@melaniamonicacraciun9900
@melaniamonicacraciun9900 25 днів тому
God gave us FAITH but scientific knowledge as well 😢😢😢if we have to deal with so much stupid people, having no FAITH no belief no trust either scientific knowledge well, it means we need good inspiring skilled teachers to open their minds but their hearts as well 🎉❤🎉
@danielpaulson8838
@danielpaulson8838 18 днів тому
An open mind is not one that believes in supernatural agency. That requires denial of reality and therefore demonstrates a closed mind.
@coreinstincts2659
@coreinstincts2659 Місяць тому
This shit is my jam!!! Hell yeaaa go physics.
@Sharperthanu1
@Sharperthanu1 15 днів тому
Like we're recorded on a CD or a DVD and someone is playing us for their entertainment
@dizzychrist
@dizzychrist Місяць тому
If a black hole evaporates away to nothing, then the is no longer an event horizon, no?
@babusastry
@babusastry Місяць тому
Dear Mr Al Khalili, your background pictures when explaining DO NOT HELP to understand the subject matter but distract. Also, you walking away simply after making a dramatic statement may look impressive, but a big error! That is exactly when you should stay put and explain in various ways!! Note that this 80 year old engineer is a LONG TIME ADMIRER and listener of your presentations. Cheers
@remicaron3191
@remicaron3191 Місяць тому
Why would we be holograms in the holographic theory. All it says is that we are two dimensional at our core and I think we will eventually get to one dimension and discover that the entire universe is just a particle. We are all one.
@hrushikeshvaidya5697
@hrushikeshvaidya5697 25 днів тому
Not sure what you mean Who are you calling stupid ?
@Sharperthanu1
@Sharperthanu1 15 днів тому
However since the universe isn't locally real the black holes are not locally real either
@diegofrederick
@diegofrederick Місяць тому
Love the program and the narrator. Ads every 5 minutes ruined the experience.
@dallingoodrich
@dallingoodrich Місяць тому
What if black hole singularities are the singularities that start new bubble universes and it's just the bridge between the two that evaporates and the information is safe it's it's new bubble of space time, in the new born universe?
@salamander554
@salamander554 24 дні тому
I don't believe the holographic thing. When you watch a video on a 2D screen, it looks 3D, but when an object goes behind another its information is stored back on a chip only. Not stored on the screen. Only storage on the screen is its amount of pixels. The chip has more storage than the screen. Back to where does it go?
@johnlonkert7187
@johnlonkert7187 18 днів тому
I don't think you've grasped what they meant by the holographic thing. Screens and chips have nothing to do with it
@salamander554
@salamander554 17 днів тому
@johnlonkert7187 no I don't. And neither do they
@salamander554
@salamander554 17 днів тому
@johnlonkert7187 so do you understand the math? Because they are the ones that made the comparison. So let them know that they can't do that.
@giuseppeLizzi-rj3er
@giuseppeLizzi-rj3er 20 днів тому
Why do I feel like I’m some kind of mistake
@GPSPYHGPSPYH-ds7gu
@GPSPYHGPSPYH-ds7gu Місяць тому
Almighty Allah increase your intelligence about Scientific Real world. Al PAZA
@babusastry
@babusastry Місяць тому
My point is not the meanings. Plank's quantum is calculated as h to an exact no. I have not come across anyone applying it to a photon, WHICH I THOUGHT was coined be Einstein. Plank used the smallest quantity to explain the anamaly of, I think, color of light vs temperature. I just was confusedthe word quanta used instead of Photon by Mr J Al K
@user-dr5yv8jv9f
@user-dr5yv8jv9f Місяць тому
TO GIVING SUCH TYPE INFO MEN SHOULD BE LIKE ADAM STEPHEN HAWKING. SPECIALLY TO GIVE END AND LIFE START MEN SHOULD BE BUDDHA OR CELIBATE MAN OTHERWISE KNOWLEDGE ULTIMATELY WRONG BY NATURE ORDINARY MEN CANNOT GIVE THESE I GOT ALL FROM BUDDAS STSTEMENT
@WalkinBeauty278
@WalkinBeauty278 Місяць тому
Makes me certain that casinos shut up and calculate how to make money with entanglement
@rookhoatzin
@rookhoatzin Місяць тому
Everything and nothing all over again?! I love Jim Al Khalili’s documentaries but lately it’s been deja vu over and over again... is he even still alive? Or is this AI??
@Pugetwitch
@Pugetwitch Місяць тому
This channel has really gone downhill
@rookhoatzin
@rookhoatzin Місяць тому
Honestly it seems like youtube has fallen off that same hill. So much repetitive/stolen content. So much clickbait deceptive content just out for the bucks.
@rookhoatzin
@rookhoatzin Місяць тому
@@Pugetwitch Repackaging content is so easy with AI that it is becoming a thing to see the same documentary content over and over with different titles. Another great channel that has started doing this is "perspective" Some extremely great content but now they just repackage looking for clicks. I think thats all there will be for documentary content soon as its so much cheaper to suck every penny out of old videos....
@timothysiler5722
@timothysiler5722 Місяць тому
So long and thanks for all the fish. I'll see you all at the restaurant at the end of the universe.
@timothysiler5722
@timothysiler5722 Місяць тому
Oh yeah, I think the answer is 42.
@mrhassell
@mrhassell Місяць тому
Quantum Field Theory provides everything that is needed to explain how the Universe came into being. There was no big bang. The enormous scale of structures in the Universe, makes that quite apparent.
@theGoogol
@theGoogol Місяць тому
This too is a form of religion. Reality is personal... live it and take it in... don't worry about it, else it becomes a discussion between those who disagree.
@nedibrahim9459
@nedibrahim9459 Місяць тому
If there was no Big Bang, then how do you explain the cosmic microwave background radiation that fills the entire visible universe and was not caused by any star formation or super nova explosion?
@jaymanier7286
@jaymanier7286 Місяць тому
@@nedibrahim9459 He doesn't. He ignores it. That's how. lol
@danielkerr4100
@danielkerr4100 Місяць тому
No, it does not provide everything.
@JohelSouza
@JohelSouza Місяць тому
My wife is pretty sure all other women in this world are not holograms, quite contrary!
@68orangecrate26
@68orangecrate26 Місяць тому
Yes… Theories… Never forget that God created ALL of it.
@mahtdickey677
@mahtdickey677 Місяць тому
Absolutely not. Keep that to yourself! Nobody asking for that nonsense. You guys always cry “ don’t push you beliefs.” And here enters your hypocrisy.
@68orangecrate26
@68orangecrate26 Місяць тому
@@mahtdickey677 Ha!
@danielpaulson8838
@danielpaulson8838 18 днів тому
Ironic how science seeks and knocks for truth as Jesus instructed while theists refuse to. You don’t find answers. You have made up ones that someone else had to teach you. Connect a few thoughts together.
@Pugetwitch
@Pugetwitch Місяць тому
Does channel has really gone downhill. This is what Kyle Hill meant when he talks about UKposts becoming oversaturated with crap
@seekter-kafa
@seekter-kafa 24 дні тому
who cares what is your name, hellou, we are here for physics, not your vanity (at least the smarter among us are)
@danielpaulson8838
@danielpaulson8838 18 днів тому
That’s not you.
@seekter-kafa
@seekter-kafa 17 днів тому
@@danielpaulson8838 i never wrote i was, duh... me i have a poster in my room of jim al-khalili and taylor swift... but the important thing is that you are!
@dspmcmirror
@dspmcmirror Місяць тому
Kinda pretentious.
@alangarland8571
@alangarland8571 Місяць тому
Pretensious? Jim Al Khalili is an actual professor of physics and well regarded, or do you think physics itself is pretensious
@magnus6003
@magnus6003 Місяць тому
Sure, the example with the rubber duck was really pretentious. He's actually dumbing it down as much as possible trying to explain advanced physics to regular viewers.
@StrokeMyLovePump
@StrokeMyLovePump Місяць тому
It's not considered pretentious to tell people the basic facts about one's background and education.
@StraightJacket5150
@StraightJacket5150 Місяць тому
I don't get my scientific information from religious fanatics.
@n.y.c.freddy
@n.y.c.freddy Місяць тому
SpaceRip .,. [ CHECK MARK ] .,. (*Got to love it!*) Prof. Jim Al-Khalili .,.,. ! Thank you!
@Pugetwitch
@Pugetwitch Місяць тому
nah
@n.y.c.freddy
@n.y.c.freddy Місяць тому
@@Pugetwitch USURPERS! EVERYWHERE! ($$$) No?
@dopamineaddicts262
@dopamineaddicts262 Місяць тому
if protons act like waves that means that space has some properties which is like a ocean, kind of space with anti water or anti ocean
@user-vv2pf1sy4m
@user-vv2pf1sy4m 13 днів тому
Jim to much too Smart to be Anything But an Atheist
@Privacityuser
@Privacityuser Місяць тому
hir we go again
@dopamineaddicts262
@dopamineaddicts262 Місяць тому
is the camera man japanese
@marlicemorris2022
@marlicemorris2022 7 днів тому
??
Everything and Nothing: Part 1, "Everything" 4k
57:28
SpaceRip
Переглядів 185 тис.
Зомби Апокалипсис  часть 1 🤯#shorts
00:29
INNA SERG
Переглядів 1,6 млн
Сын Расстроился Из-за Новой Стрижки Папы 😂
00:21
Глеб Рандалайнен
Переглядів 2,7 млн
A Brief History of Quantum Mechanics - with Sean Carroll
56:11
The Royal Institution
Переглядів 4 млн
Something Strange Happens When You Follow Einstein's Math
37:03
Veritasium
Переглядів 5 млн
Secrets of Quantum Physics, "Let There Be Life" 4k
59:15
SpaceRip
Переглядів 92 тис.
LIFE BEYOND: Visions of Alien Life. Full Documentary Remastered (4K)
1:48:04
How Does Light Actually Work?
54:58
History of the Universe
Переглядів 3,2 млн
What Is The Biggest Thing In The Universe?
56:12
History of the Universe
Переглядів 569 тис.
I7 2600K тест в играх и сравнение с AMD Ryzen
17:53
Нужен ли робот пылесос?
0:54
Катя и Лайфхаки
Переглядів 849 тис.
Почему сканер ставят так не удобно?
0:47
Не шарю!
Переглядів 674 тис.