No need to code . Just buy Bitcoin now

Off-top, but what do you mean when you say that Christmas is a day of tolerance for Islam, atheists and Catholics? Catholics are Christians. We celebrate Christmas. Protestants are heretics. We invite you to the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church 😊

Need link for the keyboard

awesome deal!

hey im unemployed bro 50 to 60 grand sounds good to me, and if can work remotely work even better, go back to my country and save even more. what type of job could get me in door? not even remotely. Im in boston

I love about coding that you could work in every company on this planet and also remotely.

Tech lead is talking bulshit

​@@walidoulondon8107 nah bro, you didn't understand. TechLead is making such satirical videos. He is actually praising software development jobs. But you'll get it, just watch couple more videos.

Nothing about Eastern Europe is lazy.

Based

Smart to compare it to college. When it’s really all just a pyramid scheme; Go to college to become college professor as there is no need for an Egyptologist 😂

Skillshare have a lot of no-code courses

Tech lead is the king of sarcasm LOL - yep only real folks who knows him well will understand what he is trying to point out, for me, I'll give the folks here a clue, shhhhhhh it's all about the LAW of supply and demand hehe

and selling keyboard for coding xD

And selling a course for nailing tech job interviews

Haha, the only programmers that are left are 'real programmers'. Check who was Ed Nather.

😂😂😅😅😢😢

I know, i know, 🤗

The existential dread, with Costa Rica clips 😢😅

this comment has motivated me

nope

I am telling, this guy who said he haven't code for the pass 10 years, i don't think watching his interview as a programmer is worth it

When someone boasts about traveling every other month, then compares programmers to janitors, who is on-par with slaves, it goes to show the arrogance and how-of-touch with reality. Hey, maybe he only said it for the click and view, which shows the willing to trade ethics for fame and money.

@@felixndifon8511 Totally agree with you. If you need to state you are one of the most qualified people to provide an answer you may not be!

Never was

not any more. AI is already replacing that role. The Tech Lead can do the software design and AI will do the coding

​@@simk42 but who writes the code for a.i

@@rodneynsubuga6275 the AI is trained on all the code that exists, and already AI can create it's own training data and self-improve without us. I recommend watching this to see the future: "OpenAI’s ChatGPT Makes A Game For $1!" - Two Minute Papers

@@simk42 You're claiming that ai seems to know what we expect them to know. Are you confident about this? Proofs?

@@simk42 ha ha ha ha! AI cant do a simple task properly, dont be deluded

I told my friend to learn coding to escape poverty He watched TechLead's videos and never tried opening a text editor

@@jubaaissaoui5496and this is how he overcome poverty 😂😂

😂😂😂😂 absolutely

😂😂😂😂😂😂

hes a grifter as youtube and travelling is all hes doing. Hes trying to cope with his new situation

I mean it makes sense. A rich 30+ guy with no wife and/or child to raise at home will get bored of the monotany of his computer compound after awhile and go on a trip, he just doesn't have to be hypocritical about it.@@Coolboy2755

he is the king of sarcasm LOL

He’s a troll/grifter/wit/genius former Facebook and Google tech lead now UKposts legend. Respect to the Techlead. Preach brother Techlead and merry Christmas 🎄

""Always do the opposite that Tech Lead tells you."

Yeah he’s gatekeeping lol

Yup but in 5 years from now it wont be worth it. AI should be able to code just fine in 5 years.

@@aibrian1 What do you mean? The way we code today will be different in the future? Or will we not code at all?

@@merluzo8269 hence why I said 5 years from now

Agreed

That's different than a slave job

love to see it, great way to modernize your workflow

Very underrated comment right here. I believe you hit the nail on the head. I always loved the idea of coding but was very intimidated with all the coding languages out there (btw i'm 40). But ever since GPT4 came out i actually been building stuff... like real working stuff. My jaw dropped when i suddenly over night "felt" like i was a programmer with the help of AI of course. Anyway, pardon my rambling.... I believe more people will get into programming because of how easy it's becoming. It will attract more attention because building your own custom "Tools" has become a reality to anyone who's able to use natural language to communicate what they want to these AI tools. And they are getting better at a faster pace than it would take the average person to get a degree in computer science. Programming IS in demand now more than ever before. You can still make money from it, you just need to sell it differently. Just my 2 cents.

Can I see the midi generator?

Ty I think teachlead has a bag of chips on his shoulder

yes but thats just another learning curve , the study and learning doesn't stop and its annoying and dull at some point until you get burned out or washed out. you obviously dont get his point

AI will not replace all, but many. I would say in 10 years, 90% of Jobs in this area, will be gone. Just watch what happens in India. I agree that you will still need coders who can put thing together, but as AI raises over 300, there will not even this needed anymore. The human brain just can't properly recognize exponential grow, that's all it is. And now put conscious on it. Experts say, that at this point, we have 72 hours until AI reach 1000 and see us as a threat for earth. Musk, Hawkings and others may be wrong, at least i hope they are, but sadly, this is not a technical anymore, it became more and more philosophical.

Other than maintaining, there are no lucrative problems left to solve with coding.

ok have fun with your button development.

@@danielgx83 Respectfully I disagree. It's like self driving cars. Don't you think UPS, FedEx, and Amazon are writing blank checks for R&D to replace the humans? What about the military? Humans are the costliest asset. - It's just a matter of time before AI coding specialist (or whatever corporate buzzword) is for someone who can think logically and have the AI do the work. I would research the top accounting firms to see what their outlook is to their clients. Coders and IT staffers are probably safe for another decade. Blue collar jobs are looking really well these days. You get paid for what you do. That simple. :) - Have a Happy New Year!

😂 facts

Best take!

For one TechLead, there are dozens of "Hey look how I became a software engineer earning $100,000 with no degree". Every day, I see a new UKposts channel about coding. So, no, your job is going to become more and more difficult. If you believe that TechLead alone is scaring off your competition and making things better for you, then your job is probably difficult already, because it's supposed to be a job that requires logic.

coping mechanism to protect one's self-esteem at its finest. you are right now convincing yourself of a false reality.

Competition for what? He's a multi-millionaire; like he cares? Coding is useless is an age where algorithms are writing 99% of it. The only coding that matter is the creation of NEW and INNOVATIVE software. If you can't bring that to a company or be contracted to do so; you're wasting your time.

Exactly

I mean, he was saying being a coder is more like being a janitor..

what the heck is with this gpt comment

@@goulash31mocking of AI slave mockery by AI

how is this for accuracy? " ChatGPT Ich bin Übersetzer (Deutsch-Englisch). Mir wurde gesagt, dass mein Beruf durch Automatisierung/KI ausgelöscht werden würde, seit diese Schlagworte entstanden sind. Es stellt sich jedoch heraus, dass sich mein Einkommen im Laufe der Jahre nur erhöht hat (als Freiberufler), und die Arbeit ist nur noch komplexer geworden. Obwohl ich keine technische Vorbildung habe, kann ich mit Zuversicht sagen, dass KI/Automatisierung stark überschätzt wird. Ich denke, Programmierung wird immer relevant sein, es ist nur so, dass sich die Art des Berufs im Laufe der Zeit ändern wird. Wie das aussehen wird, bin ich mir nicht sicher. Aber ich glaube, es wird weiterhin ein tiefes Verständnis für die Programmierung erfordern, wird aber eher wie Projektmanagement aussehen.' ---> chatGPT

The spelling is on point. However, it’s a direct translation. For any type of informal text where nuance/sentence structure/word choice (in terms of synonyms) doesn’t matter, this is a perfectly acceptable translation. One substantial mistake I was able to identify perusing the text is that chat GTP spat out the word “Vorbildung”, which shouldn’t translate to the word “background” I used. vorbildung refers to one’s formal education, whereas background in English can refer to both formal and informal training/education. Another mistake which I identified is that Chat GTP adopted the exact same sentence structure used in the English language. That’s actually a huge one as it does not sound like the speech of a native German speaker. Chat GTP also adopted the same short and scrunched together sentence structuring that is common in the English language. This sounds very odd in the German language. Again, it’s a good translation “1-1 direct translation” (and serves its purpose of conveying meaning), but it’s not an “actual translation” that takes the meaning and repackages it into a native-sounding product. This is also the reason why most translators only have a one-way language pair (for example, i ONLY translate from German into English, not vice-versa). Any type of “creative” text that relies heavy on onomatopoeia, literary devices, figures of speech, context and nuance such as marketing, literature, business and legal texts do not fare well with machine translation. Many agencies I work with have policies in place that state that if they suspect the use of machine translation, they will no longer award me assignments. And the most telltale sign that machine translation can create sub-par translations (rather than good ones) is that Google themselves publicly state that Google translate should only be used for reference purposes, and that it should at least be reviewed by a human before being published. This policy is even more important in the legal industry. Legal texts such as judgments, affidavits, contracts have real life consequences. If the lawyers/judges/jury members misinterpret information because machine translation spat out incorrect context/nuance, this can literally alter court cases (for better or worse). Now I will add that the one area where machine translation aids humans the most is technical translations (anything to do with engineering, technology, computers etc.) given the black/white nature of the field, and hence the lack of nuance. In fact, I heard that patent translators are affected the most since machine translation is basically doing the job for them.

@@dallaslooksmaxxer3505 wow! thank you for taking the time to give me such a thorough analysis, much appreciated!

A Slovak-English translator here. I happen to agree with you. And Guten Rutsch by the way!

Ive been saying something similar. I am a software engineer and my work is safety critical. There will always be a human needed to review the code and test the code. Our roles may shift but we will not be eliminated. In fact in my case, there will be more engineers needed, not less, because the number of software products developed will increase with an increase in developer productivity.

facts

Almost Everyone tries some kind of little entrepreneur business at some point in their life. It just takes a lot of luck for it to actually work.

Entrepreneurship isn't high status or guaranteed. I always cringe when I hear people say become an entrepreneur if you want to get rich. I think it is like 80% of businesses fail in the first 2 years. Now imagine starting a business where you have no product and you provide no service but you are suppose to build up millions of followers just to become a late night infomercial host and show them how great a product is. That is infinitely harder than setting up a business and has an even higher fail rate and his advice is "yeah you should try that" because being an "influencer" or "entrepreneur" is "high status". I would say if you hate your job and hate working for people then yeah you should probably start your own business but it is definitely a hard way to make an easy living and that is only if you succeed.

yes, IT is great for developing countries. which is why, now all the rich asian countries are outsourcing to south east asia. while the rich asian countries are now enjoying high unemployment rate. Or artificial "normal" employment rate because the ex-coders are now working as a take-out delivery guy.

​@AAABBB-lh9se 老乡

Why would anyone need mechanical keyboard these days, I have silent one. Let me quote Dr House: People are idiots.

this all for push maximum amount of negativity in many peoples mind this thing really reduce competition if people believe this youtubers nowdays people

@@dukenukem1137Low response time for gaming, precise actuation point, customizable actuation, rapid trigger, thock, you can make your own keycap combo, replace parts easily when broken.

En efecto, no es por idolatrarlo pero dice la verdad jaja

@@joseeduardorodriguezreyes3697 claro, es muy informativo tener el punto de vista de alguien con Tanya experiencia

😂😂

Coding changes all the time. The difference between assembler and high level language was higher, than now and before 20 years. Its now easy to code, however it is not easy to develop large software.

Please share what other skills can I add on top of coding

CSS is the Apex programming language

it's quite surprising how so many designers or web developers don't know basic CSS.

@@sicario55 Only second to HTML

70% of web still running jquery. Sql n jquery are cash vending machines!

Thanks!

nah, coding is dead

@@elliotalderson9517he’s being sarcastic and mocking the ironic nature of the video

@@TOSUnbound it isn't sarcastic, you're denying the reality, coding is dead

@@elliotalderson9517 no im saying Johan is not the video creator silly

Yeeaa 100k is pretty mediocre money to live on. But there is also fact that people make a lot less than that in many other professions, just imagine how bad that is.

@@sercan272727 Less than 15% of US citizens will make more than 100K, and of 2022 the median household income is 75K. Thus, a person earning 100K isn't mediocre at all.

I'm studying Comptia and CCNA certs and thinking of getting my Bachelor degree in I.T. and maybe learning coding after that. But I am 40 years old and not getting any younger. What are your thoughts on this? I am struggling with studying for the Network + and find this stuff pretty boring, for the most part but don't really have much other options.

Agreed but makes you wonder if it wasn’t better for some to just become a certified accountant, a trucker, plumber, etc… many people in the trades (provided they arrive on time and sober) can make way WAY more than $100K after a few of years of working while getting certifications on the side, plus they can start working almost as soon as they finish high school without carrying hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt… so these people start already with a several years of work debt less headstart (+$300K?) compared to someone that spent 5+ years studying and a large loan to pay just starting their career. There’s of course the love for the craft involved, I’m an electronics engineer (out of peer pressure), but never exercised and ended up programming video games (without any CS degrees or formal study on that front), the potential lower pay I deal with by being as minimalist as comfortably possible, since I love doing what I do so much.

@@sercan272727the difference is they never expected to make 100k. A teacher wasn’t sold a 100k starting salary. So they don’t feel like they’re missing it. Like expecting the latest smartphone and being there with replica phone.

He is right, but there are layoffs and hiring freezes for just about every role tech or not. Coding will just morph back to people that actually enjoy doing it instead of people just doing a quick bootcamp to try and make money

jajaja I was about making a comment like this. Since DreamWeaver came out, bunch up people came. alongside with it, and each year passes says the same. It over because this and that, and now we are here, still fixing the shlt chat gpt and bard makes@@user-hm9is5ke9i

Qualcum let go 25% of their employees and replaced them with seasonal migrant workers and asylum seekers.

It seems contradictory that 200,000 tech employees were laid off, considering big companies typically maintain reserves, especially during times like the COVID-19 pandemic when people stayed indoors, and tech firms experienced substantial profits. The tech market is normalized right now. So he’s not that right and also has a profit with making fear and negative news like a lot of his videos lol.

@@weishi5286which one in the USA?

pura vida mae

de Liberia

Lol, he's a millionaire!

@@danielmbazu367 no, he's, 'as a millionaire!'

Or you just know that he is a failure as a human being not just as a tech lead obviously.

@@jeanelkhoury4480 Both can apply

​@@jeanelkhoury4480he has a lot of money

Well Mr. 1985, you're right on a lot of points, though I've come to understand that you are neglecting a strong point. Humans will continuously evolve, technology is ever evolving and humans use this as a method to evolve themselves. That being said, there will always be humans in the equation taking control to some degree, you're right on that. Though, what you're not understanding is that the concern lies with the demand of Software Engineering. SWE will become undoubtedly obsolete to the degree that it at the minimum drastically reduces the majority of the SWE job market; it's simple and logical, it can't be denied. The logistical growth of AI can't be understood, illustrated by the CEO & AI Engineers being surprised or unsure of the breakthroughs that have happened or any that may continue to happen. This being said, there are two possibilities for the very near future (2-7 Years): Possibility 1 - SWE will continue on the path of drastically plummeting on job demand in spite of the market perhaps being the most oversaturated for a high skill job. Possibility 2 - Schools will teach SWE as a fundamental in the future just as we learn 2*2 because there will be some job no-one is aware of currently. So, will AI "Take over SWE?" Well metaphorically and in a great sense, yes; through eliminating an insane demand that employers deem unnecessary. It simply can't be denied, just hope that SWE becomes a fundamental for a more complex job, though we'll see I guess.

"It simply can't be denied" - haha, AI didn't take even 1% of SWE jobs, so it won't take any significant amount in any near future, your 2 years predictions are a joke - here I just denied it.

Although the central thesis of the significance of the (both liberating and dysfunctional) economic opportunity created by broadening participation in media is correct, one of the modulating/countervailing elephant-in-the-living room issues is that the FAANG have monopolized the Internet which is stagnating opportunities for startups software development. The video is overly pessimistic because of the lack of decentralization which he alluded to in the prior video (The Age of Making Money is Over). Correct that people are not going to download new apps (pita!), but they will visit new websites. So apps just need to become websites (the standalone app is nonsensical). And we need to decentralize everything to open up all the opportunities again for programmers and innovation. No disrespect intended because Patrick Shyu is knowledgeable, observant and intelligent, yet he may not be a visionary (after all he took a job at Google and I coded and marketed million user software more than once by myself or in small startups). Afaics, he is analyzing without any vision for how to innovate out of the stagnation of the current monopolization paradigm which incidentally is helping the self-immolation of Western civilization as the scapegoat for the end of the post-WWII (especially post-1970s) globalization, debt bubble.

You cannot operate on patterns, but on facts. And this why AI will fail, at least for now. It is possible that we won't need developers anymore, 1985 is not 2024.

@@yuki2413 I agree 1985 is not 2024. But neither is the technology even remotely close. There are new APIs, libraries, programming paradigms, interaction paradigms, UI/UX designs, operating systems, hardware interfaces, hardware designs, input interfaces, and countless other new developments constantly shaping technology. AI will not "create" these ideas, nor will it be able to implement them in its current state. AI, IMO, will always be AT LEAST one step behind human innovation, and it will depend on humans to develop the blueprints for AI to operate from. It might even get to the point that by the time AI catches up to the newest technology, the tech will have moved on to the next iteration. Eventually, the cost to teach the AI may not justify its usefulness in some fields. It is all speculation for now, and I am a big proponent of AI. It can improve productivity efficiencies in many industries and really help with automation in brand new areas. I just don't think it is going to replace all of our jobs in the foreseeable future. Right now, AI has helped search and information gathering technology take an evolutionary step. I look forward to what comes next.

are you a bot?

@@justin9494 no lol. Just a long time watcher of Techlead

In 10 years from now it will not be controversial. It will be better than human made code. Hate it or not, that's the truth.

​@@ivantheterrible4317End of all jobs

Hey , I’m an aspiring web 3 developer, could you guide me through? I would really appreciate your reply

Stop betting, sell signals or courses instead

@@herikaniugu You're right, all roulette systems fail lol ... all of them !

@@ZotVanBelgie-jn7oz yap all

“We’ve beaten the robots! “

why should he have answers to how you should survive?

everyone knows this guy is the biggest troll

He's usually somewhat right, but his projections are usually around a few years in advance, for this one it seems alot more in advanced. This one time he was talking about the meta verse and how it would fail so he sold his stocks. It came true months laters. This other time I think around 2019-2020, he started talking about how inefficient most tech companies were by the ratio of their employee size and they would most likely lead to mass layoffs in the future. It's been happening more and more after 2020. Following his past ideas on this topic and this idea in this video I wouldn't be surprised again if he is right considering new global talents and that AI technologies increases exponentially. His predictions in the past may seem obvious, but just remember that's all in hindsight and he also gave more reasons as to why than what I typed (I typed the general idea) but when he upload those videos he got alot of flack and many comments disagreeing at the time

He is pretty close.. i would get an advanced degree focusing on building AI

he's both and a grifter too

Don't worry you will be fine. Essentially what he's really trying to get at is, just knowing coding isn't going to suddenly make you some multi-millionaire. It's still more than a fine field to get into, and a great skillset to know. Especially so for computer science. Computer science is a lot more than just coding. If entrepreneurship is what you're trying to get into, it just means there's a lot more you will have to do to achieve that status. Which he gives the answer to in the video. Right now it's about social media marketing and data. Your degree isn't worthless. How you use it is what matters.

I think he's an over 1 million subscribes youtuber which many senior devs want to become if they want to work as solopreneur, and step outside office management. New career these days.

Have not seen a programmer job in years. Thye are all software developer. The jobs AI is going to replace already did not exit anymore.

Somewhat true. These guys always get survivorship biased..

There is a difference between failure and just have a working business (not the super skyrocketing super company). Getting a working business with lots of rationalism, self control and business skills is still 80% possible. But yes entrepreneurs fail to 90% because most are more stupid then my retarded cat.

The only reason Smith was a success for FedEx was because he gambled his last savings in Las Vegas and won enough money ($30,000) to continue pursuing his dream and creation that was "FedEx".

Dont listen to him, he is a joker. I like his videos but dont pay too much attention. Remember he said that PHP is the best language to code with. That should tell you enough, and he has done this for years now.

You are so right. It's a field where you add value deliver results solve a problem. And like you say that's the only way to really make a living

Calling out people as slaves is really toxic entrepreneur mentality. World holds on these small chefs. Even if the market conditions don’t get most favorable.

People underestimate the human brain. The only way computers to reach our level is via quantum computation which we don't know much about. the human brain the most complex object in the known universe still has some limits. We may never be able to solve the quantum puzzle.

What? Why ?

ai will take over the finance industry and a business degree is as useless as gender studies

healthcare will forever be untouched by ai

@@omare5383 First, it's hard if you're not good in math, and the students who are average and good in math still can't master Visual Basic, and they just ended up with non programmer jobs. And it's now useless coz anyone can even learn coding online and as an I.T. graduate myself I think I can say that. While finance, accounting these are the language of business. Business owners hire coders, now they don't need to. Before, you need a programmer if you want a website for your business, now social media does the job, you just need an FB page or Instagram for your business. See what I mean ?

Really? MBAization of America? Different field for different people entirely.

😂😂 what i was thinking

Honestly, this is a problem I've been facing. The only think I was able to get for a new general skill was studying power dynamics and system dynamics

You must be a senior coder to understand his point of view. It is a dead end.

Isn’t that nepotism?

@@Devin7Elevenyeah, but it happens all the time

You have to simplify your preferences, watch the market and adapt. Enjoyment of life doesn’t solely come from getting so financially high, but primarily from doing things. So programming preference = problem solving, logic, introversion, technical knowledge, creativity. That can be transformed. Most importantly knowledge gained in this field won’t just inflate, it shapes thinking.

@@IrrationalDelusion i’m not looking to get financially high, I’m looking for a career to support a family. I don’t want to pursue something if the job itself will not exist in the coming years. A stable job is hard to come by now

Focus on data. Monetize data.

Coding using the advertised keyboard

Not everyone can be a business owner. Not everyone can rely on freelance labor. 9-5 is what the majority have to make do with. If everybody is a business owner, there wouldn’t be any workers for that business.

which language may I ask? python? c?

@@ux4861Learn DSA with one, or it depends on your goal job

As long as HI is so low that they go serverless and think this is more then a stupid marketing concept of Amazon, so long AI will be seen as a competition. Just that it's higher level management/design dosn't mean the people have more brain cells.

On the one hand I see this video is very informative, on the opposite side it's very depressing, I'm just in the process of learning full stack and this is really taking the wind out of me. I'm not expecting to become rich from being a full stock coder (let alone being hired with no experience whatsoever) just making better paying job but if this video is right I have been wasting my time? From your vast experience what should one do?

@@lachopakapura it is not useless. And it will change. But focus on solutions. Find problems, simply by asking, and then work hard on making solutions.

i think that if programming will disappear as a job ( especially in 21th century where we use technology everyday ) , every other job will disappear as well, if economics are depended on people and their jobs , money n salary , who will maintain system of economics?i think that it will fall . so we should learn until we can, even tho simplicity of new platforms and getting money in 2023@@lachopakapura

So what are you shifting your focus into?

🧢 In the next 2-3 years we're gonna look back and be embarrassed that we were acting like crypto bros.

found a react developer

Decade ago, things were different

If entry level devs are not needed, who will replace senior devs then they retire ? There will be break of the circle of growth.

​@@jst8922only a small amount of entry level will get the job. Its already happening. Every single entry level vacancy getting hit on by thousands of candidates. Its like how farming still needs some humans but today we need far less farmers than before.