World Science Festival j

World Science Festival )

The dilation of time is both a non-relativistic and a relativistic effect. This is clear from the example I showed in class, before they kicked Special Relativity out of the program. What is interesting is that the same thought experiment can be used to show that the Gemini Paradox is an incorrect claim. Plenty of space could be used in books without inserting that paradox.

Aq

You should checkout the historian and author Christopher J Bjerknes. He has written a series of books on Einstein, exposing him as a fraud, a racist and a pervert.

Wow I agree!

Him and Ed Van Halen

Of course he didn't. He stole every one of them

@@Augalv Like Led Zeppelin? LOL. I Love Zeppelin though. Nah, scientists would have called that out a long time ago.

@@Augalv JUNK SCIENTIST COPY.........GREAT SCIENTIST STEAL........

THAT'S PROBABLY CORRECT.......... GENIUS COMES FROM THE NATURAL POTENTIAL, NOT MERELY PEDESTRIAN PROCESS OF COGNITIVE CORRELATIONS.........WHICH IS SORT OF WHAT I DO AND I'M A GENIUS..........PROBABLY ABOUT THE ONLY ONE ON THIS WHOLE DUMB VIEDO SHARING GOOGLE MAGGOT WEBSITE

He also was kicked out of school preferring to chase chickens and spin a magnet for hours on end. He like hawking had a lot of time to think alone now called tic toc or fishing...

@@katecourt9896 Really? spinning a magnet, hmmm I'm not good at this physics thing, but spinning magnetic fields produces electrical fields, I think, so he was playing with how generators work? Or how to build one, ..or the physics of Maxwell's equations and relativity, or he was just lost and trying to make a compass. He was an accomplished sailor, loved the sport as do I. Sailing opens up a new series of questions when exploring the interface between the two mediums, air and water. A sailboat brings together all the newtonian physics into one package, every F=ma question to solve it seems. E spent a lot of time sailing a small boat alone in Lake Geneva, if I recall correctly.

People always scoff at the patent office thing. Patent lawyers are some of the most qualified professionals out there bar none, often holding masters and phd:s in both law and engineering. It's a ridiculous difficult profession to get into and master. Not that everyone working in a patent office is that senior, but the office itself deals with complicated stuff.

If I said blubbleubbleabbleubble ab. Would that mean anything to you... It should because this is the answer to every question and the spelling is perfectly OK to be ambiguous

@@fredriksvard2603 scoff... That means to eat rapidly

Agreed

Ill back that up

I adore his writing and way of simplifying complexity!

I don’t buy it.

Something is wrong with that logic.

+ Two World Wars!

“Imagination is more important than knowledge.” This is ............Powerful

History has shown that there is controversy about the work of Einstein as far as the relativity and other works in physics …

And the Question is..... Why is “Imagination is more important than knowledge.” ??? One reason is that The Creator has used it in the Creative works that we see all around us

If not Einstein , someone would have eventually reached his pinnacle . It's just nature .stones would cry out

i completely concur. his style of approach reaches every one

The book description put me in touch with God.

The theory of everything according to humans that believe their intellect evolved from a monkey's brain. If the light waves from the sun were 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of Einstein's space-time then people on Earth are just imagining the infrared warmth of the sun coming up on the horizon. The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. According to Einstein's relativity-time dilation's, photos taken of the Earth from the Discovery Space station traveled from the past to the future violating the laws of physics, conservation of energy and common sense. According to Einstein's projectile light particle proton light has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime, but if light has a (constant speed) then moving clocks cannot run slow through spacetime! :-) The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring. Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. Using optical clocks, lasers and GPS to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. If the speed of light is constant then past and future dimensions of spacetime and an expanding universe would not be possible, obviously destroying the twins paradox as each twin cannot move faster or slower than the other. A mirror is a wave reflector that flips the image from left to right, it doesn't transport your face into past and future dimensions of space-time. Einstein's projectile light particle photons do not have the ability to reconverge molecular structures of particles in mirrors Einstein would have made a great used car salesman :-) Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot. Unlike a TV or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of frames that create the appearance of a moving image. There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just video recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. Neither time, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch Time, energy, and matter like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. Monkey see monkey do, the science of monkeys have brainwashed you. Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future :-). Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image :-). The speed of electromagnetic wave is 186,282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186,000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light could not travel across the universe, high speed particles traveling at 186,000 miles per second would break the Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories. Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13.8 billion years ago :-). It's truly amazing how the science and politics of the left are able to keep people denying reality, there are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously). “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” a state of superposition where time and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end. "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End" Revelation 22:13. Disciples, remember thy 1st commandment, thou shalt not question thy lawgiver of relativity for blasphemers are the devil's pawn. Let thee not dwell in dissension of our Lord Albert, shun them, drive them back to their jungle lair amen. Albert Einstein, an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix- Magnetron Refusing to question or debate science is typical of brainwashed Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs as anti-science religous dissenters. When cults are faced with having to question their beliefs, mind control brainwashing tactics are their only refuge to avoid cognitive dissonance-the psychological pain of realizing everything they've ever believed in was a lie. Instead of questioning their beliefs zealots will use ad hominem attacks, character assassinations, demonizing their adversaries as stupid, anti-science enemies, racists, Nazis, white supremacists, deplorables, fighting imaginary demons they believe they are evildoers out to destroy the world, a self-fulfilling prophecy battling the evil forces of bogeyman

Z

Einstein did work himself to death! You obviously know little about Albert Einstein.

Far Out, man! What was the Tchai's end, anyway? Thing is, the mediocre among us just ain't having the smartest of us [problem is we tend towards arrogance anyway, and just cannot stop assuring everyone, ourselves(us) and them alike, just how brilliant we are, it's a built-in, like Tay-Sachs and Jews, rare, yeah, but characteristic as hell, and, as well as high IQ and Jews, NOT Zionists, although is likely, arrogance more attached to Zionists,[since I know many Jews whose arrogance is not as insufferable as Zionist arrogance] forever revealing to the stupid oafs, and of them, (of us, [included as perpetual knee jerk self defense marker]) from asking stupid non-rhetorical, actual real questions from them like: 'Is this going to be on the test?' I have often mused whether these folks were like plants, placed and used for measuring something, no, no, not them but real non-mammal plants, whose lower appendages were in some type of hyponic growing medium. Sorry, went off the beaten path, or created a new one, but lest I forget,I have to mention the train of thought I tend towards is habitual, a charcteristically forced down immovable tracks of which fortunately for the reader, assuming she or he,or they or cis or whomever the reader there is, human, alien or outer space guest, capable of reading English is still there[ and thanks so much] as mine[train of thought,'member?] is but barely sustaining the Engine and its Caboose. Mainly, talent is a given, that simply must exist with or without arrogance, but gott say talentless I am, but arrogance is there, why? I'm dumb as a flea's infecting bacteria.[YES, fleas have their own microbes, but guess they'd be same as we and get infecterd by still smaller ones nanobes? See an infected flea, and tell me its microbe's appearance is to the flea [who appears to the researcher's electron microscope image to be a giant bug, but it's a flea, we barely can see without scope,yet its infection 'bug' making the flea sick looks like the flea we barely see has these 'specks' that is to us seen only via microscope. Wow, thanks for listening but again, no issue exists unless you're talented. Einstein figured out unseen stuff somehow as did Quantum Physicists like Feynman. Far out, I agree with you, how does a brilliant anybody have a life with and or without their talent that likely drives them, or compels them and outsider author Malcolm Gladwell claims a minimum 10,000 hrs at it to succeed, even with best of life, no adverse Chilhood Traumas, and etc. Dummies like me can only entertain our bewilderment at how did they even pose the questiobn? As for possibilities for solutions, I am bewildered, and there forever in awe of those out there. I do love Sean Carroll's representing his topics, I almost understand.

Oh, thank you very much! I heard he joined because of the money, but now you showed me it wasn't the case. You also reminded to check if I can find the book 100 years of relativity online to find out the mathematician who also discovered relativity because my it's been lost by others who borrowed it from my library circuit!

It's all horse shit 🤣

I hadn't read that one. Thanks..

the man could not go far from time related things.

Thats the concern. Powerful discoveries hjacked for nefarious mean by world assumed powers. It does happen.

@@DavetheRaveDinkum Crystal Clear

Hi 'jopp...ni'; I agree and understand "talkers" like B.G. as you say. Hear, hear!

Honestly, there's nothing "self-depreciative" about Brian Greene. He thinks he knows _way_ more than you, up to and including the fact that if you vote for a certain political party, you "are and evil human" (his words, not mine). I love science, which is why I'm here, but Brian doesn't stand for science; he stands for _"Agree with my philosophical opinion or you're a horrible person."_

Seconded

Kenneth Florek the moderator was not the right actress for the role..

inx How so? I never liked reporters, although I have become used to them, and she is just normal. Maybe the guests aren't the right actors? They are tense and artificial. I am sure if they had a playwright write out a script and hired real actors who memorized their lines it would look a lot better. But there is a reason they didn't do that. You are watching a live performance by real people. The producers mean to reach a wider audience than the science buffs who will watch a lecturer or a documentary. I cringe a lot too, being used to seeing 100% professionals, with professional editing. You are aware (right?) that the interviews you see on TV presented as if they are real are the result of hours of talk edited down to a few minutes or seconds. They can make you look like a genius or a jerk by having enough material to edit.

SRV. 123 So? The moderators ask questions, dumb or not, to bring a subject up for an audience that may not know, but who watch in order to be informed. If many people may know what the situation for Jews was at various times, that does not mean a general audience does. Sure, there were a lot of things I would hope everyone already knew, but I also know from personal experience that most people don't, because they never cared to know. This is not a difficult point. Despite these talks having high powered experts on the panel, it is very evident that the presentations, which have been rehearsed, are designed to reach people who know nothing to start.

SRV. 123 You believe something that the producers manifestly do not. You believe that the pro TV journalist which was hired because she did not know the subject should have prepared herself beforehand. The producers do not. The TV reporter looked uncomfortable to me asking the same dumb questions as in the run-through, but she is a pro and did what the directors directed, There is a radio journalist in a wheelchair that comes off as badly in his presentations, except that he jokes about it. He also looks at his written notes constantly, instead of the teleprompter, no doubt because he is used to radio. Alan Alda is about as charming as people get, and a hugely accomplished actor. People who have no interest in science whatever will come to presentations to see him. He also did a science show for PBS for many, many years and did a beautiful job. Besides that, he IS a science buff in his private life. Nevertheless he did ask some bonehead questions at times, and he too looked uncomfortable repeating the same question as in the run-though, but of course he is a superlative pro, which requires doing as directed. Brian Green is a professional physics theorist and has researched and written best-selling books on such for the general audience. He also has done several hour long PBS programs based on the books. I don't think he would know what it would be like to formulate a stupid question. But he doesn't do any presentations unrelated to his expertise, and I don't think he could handle it.

Dumb. Money is greater, than science

@@hosoyalaurence who was the richest person in 1704?

I thought they were experts

@@rickrick5041 the panelists were experts from what we were told. The moderator was a news anchor. If they used a science reporter or someone who may have understood the science more, then the conversation could have been more thought provoking, or more in depth, and we would have probably have benefited more from the time we spent, as would the participants have gotten more benefit from it i believe. when the above person said, "But they could at least get someone who has a real interest in learning about the subject," the above poster would not have meant the panelists, as the panelists were chosen because in their working in their chosen fields they were accomplished at those pursuits and had experience in knowledge or creative work that directly related to some knowledge pertinent to this particular discussion of Einstein's contributions etc. I fear the group putting on the program in trying to appeal to a wider audience may have felt getting an interviewer that might be not very knowledgeable about the subject might dumb down the talk enough to not make people stop watching... just wondering... because it often happens. A word to the wise, you can't raise people's level of awareness and knowledge by limiting their exposure to that knowledge. For a while I was educated in a setting that made the professors make too many classes too easy. there was a general brain drain. The people who did not want to work still dropped out and so did those who wanted to learn more because they were not given the opportunities they needed. You don't want to drive your best students away trying to make people who don't want to be there interested in the subject matter. People who feel forced to attend are not going to be swayed by ease of learning and it is just insulting them as much any the rest of us students, professors included.

@@samanthatomich3160 I thought that’s what he might have meant but he used the word moderators. The moderator actually seemed intelligent and had good prepared questions. Maybe it’s best to choose someone like an average person to ask the questions to match a wide audience. You make a good point though and for me I’d prefer someone with a phd in physics. They’ll always be criticism no matter what is done. The same goes for your classroom example and assumptions. Some that stayed because it was easier might have gone on to enjoy it and take more courses. We don’t know

Lol, I think this moderator learned a tremendous amount doing this. And if she were to do a retake she may appear better to you. Peace Bro. The info got out and most people were pleased with the video

@@samanthatomich3160 I've organized panels similar to this and it's trickier than you think to get the moderator thing right. Typically, pro moderators that aren't experts in the field at hand is the way to go even if the audience consists of experts. It kind of depends on the aim of the discussion too, a conference or summit isn't the same as an academic seminar. Experts that are good at moderating and who also can distance themselves enough are hard to find. I've encountered two or three.

Yes exactly the definition of insanity is trying the same thing and expecting different results

If one knows the ultimate truth, then one is ultimately alone.

@@styroyou nice cup of tea sorts that out!!

There were other physicists that made significant contributions to the field. I think they are giving Einstein all the credit and not acknowledging others such as Niels Bohr

Except almost NONE OF HIS THOUGHTS WERE ORIGINAL. With enough research you'll realize he was an artistic conman and a thief of ideas fueled by outsiders who choose him to become the symbol and also by media.

If you look at his eyes in the youtube photo you can almost see the reflection of the cosmos that fascinated him .Nothing was going to break the focus he had on disciphering explanations for that cosmos ,and as you said, his commitment to bring such explanations to all humanity..his everlasting legacy.

@@kenadams5504Agreed!

Yes, she was a blot on an otherwise good discussion

yeah

ass wholes survive to destroy mother earth

If your passion gives you a strong drive to advance toward a goal you usually need to learn how to accomplish your goal etc so there your brain will change the more you learn. Or you have no passion and you learn because you are made to and something you learn gives you a passion to understand something else and then you have to learn more and more like Einstein had to learn more math to figure out what he was passionately trying to understand. Either way.

Yeah

Ppl] 0p]]]0p0p]]]p ppl ppl] ppl ppppp0pp0p0p]ppp0]p]]]]]p]p]]p]]] ppl pp pl ppp]ppp ⁹o⁹P ⁹⁹o⁹⁹o⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹ and ⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹oo⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹o⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹

⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹o⁹

⁹9 and P P⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹o9⁹or OP o⁹⁹⁹o

⁹⁹⁹⁹ you OP o

⁹⁹⁹⁹o⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹9o⁹P o OP⁹⁹ i ⁹

@@BigPoppieSeed I think you're slight misinformed, if only slightly

love your typo :)

Brain Greene... nice

Yeah, it never ceases to amaze me either...

Daniel TTY Jesus Christ bows to Sarxkyn Ketosis which cures all diseases in the human race. Therefore, all humans bow to Sarxkyn Ketosis.

channel.nationalgeographic.com/genius/

Daniel TTY Jesus Christ loves us all. He is Lord and in his profound Reverence and humility, he is the Highest we strive to realize and at the same time, the least amongst us.

John Campbell b

Religion is literally "make believe" its the "arrogance of ignorance." Fact.

Yes..his persistance and endeavour contributed to his breakthroughs just as much as his intellect...a fact not considered by those who throw around the "genius" term when describing him.

By calculating the shift in Mercury’s orbit his theory was proven beyond reasonable doubt. Think about it, astronomers had determined Mercury orbit shifted by 43 seconds of arc per century, that’s almost nothing ! It’s amazing that astronomers were able to do that in the nineteenth century with the tools of that time. Then Einstein comes along and uses the relativity theory with the guess that forces of acceleration cannot be experimentally distinguished from the force of gravity. The only way for these things to be true is if space and time are warped in the presence of matter. This was similar to special relativity where motion dilates time and compresses apace. Then he calculates Mercury’s orbit and the orbit is close to an ellipse but not quite. The ellipse rotates 45 seconds of arc per century. WTF !!

@@kenadams5504 Yep, this is an irony.

While your thing that,your not following what he's saying.

ｗｈｉｃｈ　ｉｓ?

MauMadRooCon tbh Brian wants to talk all the time so it’s good to have a moderator, otherwise he’d be taking most of the time and interrupting the guests.

They needed a host to be the layperson, aka the ignorant masses

Typically women, once you performed your best and gave them all that you had, they would still keep asking for more of(like) that. She kept dwelling on the aspect that prof.E did not contributed much after moved to America while clearly the 3 men agreed that earlier theories of prof.E are more than enough for scientists/human to study/use for almost a century and still going strong!

😆

It's about her learning also you weirdo

digest*. おともでて!

Yes, very inspiring guy...

yeh he comes across as a genuine nice guy too

brian greene can explain what we don't understsnd physics wish good luckto absorb every he said

So truee

@@elidadia what do you mean please help?

@@elidadia was you in danger?

@@lorriecarrel9962 i was... finally out thanks for noticing but i wanted to formulate that i had a warning out first

@@lorriecarrel9962 domestic disturbance i was being beaten and cops came so late they framed me

@@elidadia Damm bro that sounds shitty,your still alive though and that's a plus

He's not british

please help 4 melaney dr

Hi Harold! What do you think artificial super intelligence might do as far as reaching a unified theory. Maybe we will find out there is no such thing as a unified theory. Just my amateur thought.

Hi Christopher! Just my amateur thought... but didn't Cicero say something based on the premise that if the universe is infinite that renders time as being only a human invention, renders time as inapplicable. I can't remember the quote and sorry if I'm way off. You might be right on with what you are theorizing! Again, I'm only amateur and you're way over my head! This is a lot to ask but... do you think artificial super intelligence might solve the unified theory, or prove there is no such theory?

The next discovery is the answers to the double slit experiment. We live in a virtual reality, and the math behind that theory answers Einstein's general relativity questions. Look up Physicists Tom Campbel's theory of everything.

'Spooky action at a distance' works because there is no distance. All points in space and time are connected. Distance, space and time are all an illusion.

If we were to really get a handle on gravity, to the point where we knew how to control it, like we do electron flow; to focus, or redirect it, it could give us the ability to deflect meteors, or levitate objects; or deflect the flow of solar ejecta when we detect a solar storm. It could give us space travel capabilities that we have dreamt about.

No. Lightyears. Not light years. For each Einstein there are millions of fools. Correct your nonsense, please.

Voor Naam 🤦‍♂️

@@magicpotion8 hellls yes i agree

Waaaaaaaaaaaaay ahead

@@voornaam3191 you are correct sir here have an apple

Michio Kaku is an apologist for belief in gods. I don't listen to him anymore.

@@Vlasko60 I don't even know what that means an apologist but that belief and gods? Does that mean she forgives people you are superstitious or are born agains? Just asking

Sorry for the typos

@@johnjstro A religious apologist is someone who defends a belief in god. He actually once said "you can't prove there isn't a god". That is not an argument and I don't listen to anyone who would use it as such, because there are many, many things that you can't prove don't exist, like an invisible unicorn for example. No one can prove it isn't there, but that doesn't make more likely that it is.

@@Vlasko60 That´s an anti-scientific posture. Carl Sagan said that the best posture for a scientist is the agnosticism. As Kaku said: "you can't prove there isn't a god". It´s a little extremist being a radical-atheist

*Nothing* you're saying in your comment -- I mean literally absolutely NOTHING -- has _any_ fact-based evidence proven via the scientific method. Like, literally....... none of it.

She interrupts because she thinks she is contributing by being funny/cute. She is neither.

I'll reply to this comment by copy/pasting below a comment a made above. It seems very pertinent.... It's really, *really* unfortunate that the American mainstream media has SO smashed their credibility in the last decade that the simple act of bringing an NBC "journalist" into the conversation at 3:33 made me _immediately_ become skeptical of every sentence that's said for the entire remainder of the presentation, whereas before 3:33, I harbored absolutely no skepticism whatsoever and was simply ready to listen and learn. I wish so badly that I didn't have to feel this way. What a bummer.

please help 4 melaney dr

Truth is ....he invented them to commit fraud in an unimaginable vast scale.

@@reclavea How's that?

@@benbaby100 You have no idea? If you are not into science a bit...it will be a bit tough for you grasp.

@@reclavea I googled it. Never heard that before. It kinda makes sense in retrospect. I did hear that other people solved his field equations. Why has this not been corrected? We all heard about Shakespeare being a fraud, and there was much less hard evidence. This is documented and known among his peers. And why would he get the chance to present all this stuff if it was already published. Wasn't he a relative nobody at the time?

@@benbaby100 Here’s the gist ....The masses have no idea that Einstein INVENTED his Relativity Theories....because of a super powerful experiment using light and the aether that proved the Earth isn’t moving. The 1881 & 1887 Michelson/Morley Experiment perplexed scientists for 1/4 century. Einstein was only 7 or 8 years old at the time. Actually ...all previous experiments prior in the early 1800s were all showing a static motionless Earth. This was why a more convincing and more powerful experiment was needed. Michelson asked for help from scientists what the heck was going on. No one could come up any plausible reason till Lorentz and Fitzgerald independently came up with “length contraction” ... In essence the experiment performed to detect the Earth’s motion around the sun ....could not detect the Earth moving ....BECAUSE the EARTH is MOVING! 😳😂👎🏻 . ...so no one seriously took length contraction as a fact. ......till Einstein came up with his magical physics. Both Einstein and Hubble was motivated by their “preferred” cosmology and manipulated science evidence to fit this “preferred” cosmology. Genesis 1:1 was a main motivational factor for sure.

Who did your bodypainting?

please help 4 melaney dr

Fok your Three Letter Words. Very bad habbit. Please take the trouble to write what WSF is. Is it that hard to write three words?!

@@voornaam3191 so right man they still didnt edit ut must be a bot or the genius of Einstein

Just look at the channel name ffs

If the wonder of the Universe gives meaning to who we are ..may I ask what could that meaning be? After all ,AE said he just wanted to understand the thoughts of the Creator through his discoveries, so there may be a meaning .Interestingly, he meant The Creator as Nature /The laws of physics. Through discovering some of our Creators "thoughts" in Relativety Theories , does this hint at what our meaning /purpose is? .Is it about learning and pursuing our passions .?Is it about assuming a greater level of emotion or completion exists and that we must aspire to experience it without any real proof that we're even making progress?

@@kenadams5504 Well, that's a question we can only answer for our selves. Each of us is on his own quest to discover what life means for himself. We are not clones of one another. And as far as "...to understand the thoughts of the Creator" goes, I imagine that to be a task of Herculean proportions, too great even for a mind as penetrating as Einstein's. Perhaps, the closest we'll ever come to understanding the "Mind of the Creator" is best described in William Blake's poem, where he says, "to see the universe in a grain of sand". The question is, what does that 'Universe" look like to you. THX.

That’s a preconceived notion

@@glenkovacs9369 there is no need of evidence for me, just to hear how eloquent he is

Pretty sure Brian Greene is too.... Why do u love that fact.... Oh... U must be black lol

There seems to be a strange pattern of Jewish scientists throughout the history of science. There is even a Wikipedia page of Jewish scientists..Curie, Bohr, Einstein, Feynman, Braine Greene……What could be the reason I wonder? More than 22% of all Nobel laureates!! The chosen people??

The diaspora always emphasized the importance of education, and at this time and place in history (last 400 years) the bias is on european history and the acquisition of knowledge. Had the focus have been the 1000 years before the current era, the show might have been centered on the mathematics and physics discoveries of the greeks the arabs, and the various other ethnic peoples of the levantine. Imagine what we have lost when the library at alexandria was burned, the scrolls of the first chinese dynasties were lost, the clay tablets of the babylonians were destroyed.

@@trebledog thanks for these interesting points. The history of science is indeed a treasure to dive into.

Imagination according to him. And coincidentally he was a Pisces.

@@benbaby100 Wouldn't he himself have hated the idea of astrology, especially given his understanding of the complicated way in which the celestial bodies interacted with each other?

@@vinayseth1114 I didn't feel like qualifying it at the time. But yeah, you're right. I'm just the prototypical Pisces, and I'm looking for confirmation bias lol

@@benbaby100 it’s ok

@@vinayseth1114 🤣🤣🤣🤣