The Incredible Evolution of Formula 1 Horsepower | Track Evolution
Переглядів 515,613
День томуCheck this out. This is a graph of how much power Formula 1 engines have produced from the very first championship race - all the way up to today.
And the build-up has been far from steady, with massive breakthroughs and tight restrictions. So let me take you through it, explain why these changes have happened as well as the engineering behind it.
➤ Subscribe for more incredible motorsport: goo.gl/AbD2f9
➤Follow us on:
➤ Instagram- @official_driver61 - bit.ly/D61Insta
➤TikTok - @official_driver61 - bit.ly/D61TikTok
➤ Follow Callum on Instagram and Twitter
➤ Instagram- @mcintyre.jpg - / mcintyre.jpg
➤ Twitter - @callum_mcintyre - / callum_mcintyre
⌨️ We're HIRING a Brilliant Writer, apply here bit.ly/2Yumdib
But before we run through this, I’d better explain how we have got to this graph - because it’s been tricky. As you will all know, F1 teams very rarely share horsepower figures for their engines - and for good reason.
For example, Mercedes wouldn’t want Honda knowing how much power or torque the engine produces as it may expose secrets about how the engines are tuned, or designed.
It would also allow them to match the performance figures and then elect to work on reliability, or efficiency - or something else like that.
So they’re kept secret. Well, except for when they can boast about things. For example, Renault, back in 2014, announced that their engine had 1000 horsepower. And, if you can remember, they were far from the front of the pack at this point.
Whilst the rest of the grid stated their suspicion about the accuracy of this, it worked as a PR booster - and well, that’s why these manufacturers are in F1, to begin with.
So sometimes they announce numbers. Another way is from testing historical cars. For example, many cars are sold off after they are retired from Formula1, Scott has driven several Formula 1 cars that are in private ownership because of this. So if you can put one on a dyno, it’s relatively easy to get a good idea of the power they are producing.
➤ iPad Drawing sponsored by Concepts, you can get an exclusive free trial here! - concepts.app/driver61
📺 F1 Driver’s Technique Explained
➤ Senna’s bizarre technique: bit.ly/3lORK59
➤ How Schumacher’s style won 7 championships: bit.ly/3527cVz
➤ Alonso’s strange steering: bit.ly/2Z7a93v
➤ How Verstappen will be F1 champion: bit.ly/3jK6L6n
➤ How Verstappen is so fast in the wet: bit.ly/32WMVhr
📺 F1 Engineering
➤ How F1 brakes work: bit.ly/3h0Whh0
➤ How an F1 clutch works: bit.ly/3i0oDJM
➤ What’s inside an F1 gearbox: bit.ly/2DzMqRW
➤ How F1 teams change four tyres in two seconds: bit.ly/2QVpkIl
🏎️ Track & Racing Driver!
➤ Get a free report on your track driving: bit.ly/2LmYNBA
➤ Get faster on track with our FREE 25-part tutorial series:bit.ly/2PypIMK
➤ Our real-world training programmes: bit.ly/2ktjtgV
🏁 Sim Racers!
➤ My sim wheel: bit.ly/354BBlY
➤ My sim pedals: bit.ly/3eJckQo
➤ Our sim racing course: bit.ly/34WuV7p
➤ Get a free report on your track driving: bit.ly/2LmYNBA
➤ Driver61 Sim Racing Channel: bit.ly/2BMdk4B
#Formula1 #Power #TrackEvolution
@AbdulAhad-oq6lz 2 роки тому
somehow scott always manages to put in a line about him driving formula 1 cars
@franzlemar2250 2 роки тому
Deserved flex imo
@elvincitore1512 2 роки тому
You would be flexing too if you drove an F1 car .
@Rentta 2 роки тому
@@elvincitore1512 That's something anyone can do here in Finland as long as you have driving license and 1800€ burning a hole in your pocket.
@elvincitore1512 2 роки тому
@@Rentta Well , Finland is fucking awesome , in my country , there isn't even a national karting championship .
@james-om8le 2 роки тому
Anyone can do it you can pay to drive and old Jordan in the uk
@devtrivedi4766 2 роки тому
* can only use 3 engines * Bottas : Hold my engines
@anhuman7022 2 роки тому
Merc: here you go bottas, we want you to finish behind Norris so here is another engine
@EyesOfByes 2 роки тому
Imagine a qualifying lap with unrestricted engine/fuel setup with todays F1 cars 😳 2000bhp?
@gunsandcommissions 2 роки тому
Probably pretty easily 2k.
@FRONTI3R_yt 2 роки тому
It might launch the driver to the air if the brakes are too hard…
@AnIdiotAboard_ 2 роки тому
These engine will explode in UNRESTRICTED mode, they wouldn't even make it to T1, as soon as the driver jumped on the gas it would rip itself apart. There designed to produce the roughly 1250 bhp no more and no less. A simple 100 Bhp upgrade would destroy the gearbox, the diffs, the shafts, probably break a crank shaft or 2. People obsession with unrestricted is beyond me, there not designed to un-restricted regulations, there designed to do there 6 races and be done. Please stop with this imagine that or imagine this, you'll never see it.
@Donnerwamp 2 роки тому
@@AnIdiotAboard_ My guess is that having unrestricted qualifying means they design the car for qualifying and just tune the engine down to race spec, similar to how they did it in the 80s. Or some teams will keep running like they do now and try to win in the race as they might squeeze some weight out that helps them in the race. It'd be interesting for sure, but I doubt it'll be possible with the current safety dogma.
@AnIdiotAboard_ 2 роки тому
@@Donnerwamp You cant just shove more fuel and air thru these engines, they will simply break. In QUALLY mode, its maximum power and maximum deployment, the engines couldn't even handle unrestricted hybrid systems, let the harvest and use energy as they see fit they still explode, break gearbox;s etc, they ain't designed for it
@Driver61 2 роки тому
We love a good graph, here at Driver61! What should we plot next? Don't forget to subscribe! We'd love to hit that big 700k before the end of the year!
@drnerd 2 роки тому
How about a graph of average race overtakes throughout the years? 🤔🏎️
@derTommy 2 роки тому
I would be very interested in a detailed explanation what engineers can read from telemetry data and how they can you use it to improve during a weekend. A lot of plot potential I think.
@drnerd 2 роки тому
@@importanttingwei7747 2021 formula 1 technical regs article 5.1.9 defines the valve spec, but there is no definition for the valve closure mechanism so teams are free to use pneumatic valve springs.
@ruan13o 2 роки тому
Cornering speeds would be really interesting. Either compare over time like this video or against other race series.
@dani02_mmd 2 роки тому
Fastest series (lap times) outside of F1 over the years
@LatinoGamer96 2 роки тому
Nice to finally see the man behind the voice, nice one Callum !
@nepicness 2 роки тому
I like how they’re making the F1 cars more fuel efficient when it takes 5 team semi trucks, planes, and 20+ full time on track staff to keep it running, but all that matters is that the race car uses a lil less fuel.
@enyaliosares4301 2 роки тому
I hope you realise how dumb this statement is. Because F1 is a sport yes. Entertainment yes. But above all that it’s the largest fast testing ground for everything car related and beyond (see covid19 respirator thing) so yes, the cars are going the be more efficient and that eventually translates to real life.
@nepicness 2 роки тому
@@enyaliosares4301 I do see that. I've heard that about many things including magnetic suspension that was introduced in F1 which didn't go mainstream, though there were plenty of other things that did. It doesn't seem right that they are limiting it to only V6TH vehicles. Why not V10, v12, v8, I4, I6 with turbo or not and hybrid or not on any one of those configurations. They could all have the same fuel or air restrictions. I would rather see the F1 be the fastest cars in the world than the fastest green cars in the world. If hybrid is faster than by all means use it, but if it's not, then they shouldn't be forced to use it. But right now they aren't given a choice.
@Donterrific 2 роки тому
@@enyaliosares4301 Bro its racing who the fuck cares about fuel efficiency
@thatcher9690 2 роки тому
@@Donterrific you are not allowed to fill up during the race so they need to have the engines fuel efficient enough to last the whole race
@NazriB Рік тому
Lies again? Gamble Bet
@ryanjayi.villorente4642 2 роки тому
Niki Lauda to his mechanic : "Are you using magnesium parts?".... The rest is history.
@wahyudyatmika5119 2 роки тому
@Scom Tott Thirty years ago, Niki Lauda told us ‘take a monkey, place him into the cockpit and he is able to drive the car.’
@gokhansenaolivia 2 роки тому
yeah Magnesium just like 1955 Le Mans
@Phenom98 2 роки тому
I love how the excess of the 80s extends to almost all aspects of culture. 1400hp in 1984? Damn! No wonder my dad says back in those days the year 2000 seemed like so far away, futuristic and exciting. Who knew what was gonna happen if things were progressing at that rate?
@crusherbmx Рік тому
Your dad's description is bang on! We aren't actually in awe of current technology, we're disappointed in it.
@geminiamocassanelli6425 Рік тому
Che cazeda
@eoinoconnell185 Рік тому
The hp was so extreme that taking a corner at high speed could result in the driver going unconscious (extreme downforce aerodynamics were also being experimented with). It was an era where drivers were getting killed every race. Great TV, but not something we need to return to.
@BigBird629 Рік тому
im not nostradamus but i know, a LOT more drivers wouldve died
@drnerd 2 роки тому
425bhp in a 50s car must have been terrifying!
@Jejking 2 роки тому
It must have been indeed! Also don't forget about the surroundings and at times the terrible state the tracks were in, including haystacks as barriers. Absolutely mental.
@drnerd 2 роки тому
@@Jejking totally mad... love it! 😊
@callmeshaggy5166 2 роки тому
The chassis was basically a bathtub in both weight and safety
@bapr3887 2 роки тому
@@drnerd 30s racing cars from Audi and Mercedes have almost 650bhp, so 450bhp 20 years later is mediocre. Audi has supercharged V16 engine in their mid engined grand prix car. This must have been terrifying.
@hmdwgf Рік тому
At Reims-Gueux in France, a circuit made up of straights the Alfas were doing 200 mph on closed-off public roads only 7 m (22 feet) wide. And on top of that- there were no seatbelts, the drivers didn’t wear helmets, and there was no protective bodywork on either side of where the driver sat, who had the driveshaft spinning between their legs, with a manual gearbox that had a selector that was backwards and upside down from a normal one! (Manual gearboxes today are like this: 1 3 5 2 4 6 And the Alfa’s was like this: 4 2 3 1 Yeah. And the gas pedal was on the left ahe clutch on the right.)
@t3h51d3w1nd3r 2 роки тому
The H16 isn't essentially two V8s its two flat 8s. I love the way the English media has digs at Ferrari for getting round the fuel flow limit but never say anything about Mercedes burning oil or having dimpled wheels that act as an aerodynamic device.
@Matty.Hill_87 2 роки тому
2 v8s would have been closer to a radial engine
@DonLee1980 Рік тому
the thing is, very few people understand that engines are rated at max power, but say little about the power curve band. Current F1 engines are programmed to get maximum power given a certain fuel flow, inspite of whether the engine is reving at 12k, or 9k. meanwhile an old traditional turbo engine could get 1400hp, but only a small proportion of the time when it's rowing thru its gears.
@alexjenner1108 2 роки тому
3:50 "For the rest of the '50s the teams settled on either inline 4s and 6s". This ignores significant race winners like the Mercedes-Benz W196 (straight-8), the Lancia/Ferrari D50 (v8) and later in the decade, the Ferrari 246 F1 with the first championship winning V6 engine in formula one (1958 drivers championship for Mike Hawthorn).
@josedacunhafilho 2 роки тому
I had the good fortune to see the Brabham BT 52 and 53 racing in 5 races between 1983 and 1984, and on qualifier mode the BMW engine was a monster. It blew thundrous balls of fire through its pipe, and everyone was in awe after it drove by on a hot lap. It was incredible to consider all that power came from a stock 4 cylinder block with 1,500 cc.
@astroch 2 роки тому
Wait, i always thought it was only Scott. So this was never your voice? For a full minute i thought it was Scott dub over this guy's image
@unthenner5519 2 роки тому
Yeah what the fuck. I thought he'd had a stroke or something.
@unthenner5519 2 роки тому
So there's been two people with the exact same voice all along? And they're not even related? How…? What!?
@Joe-wj7ku 2 роки тому
@@unthenner5519 brothers?
@unthenner5519 2 роки тому
@@Joe-wj7ku Not even related. Nope they're not brothers, their surnames are different.
@olliebonugli8881 2 роки тому
Un Thenner They don’t sound alike though?
@ShionShinigami 2 роки тому
Renault claimed those numbers last year, not 2014. Edit: the engines used from 1966 onwards had 3 liters, not 3.5 liters. Edit 2: the rev limit of the 2.4 liter engines was introduced in 2007. In 2006 there was no rev limit. Mercedes claimed to have the highest reving engine in 2006 with 20232 revs per minute.
@thegregdavieschannel 2 роки тому
Was it Merc or cosworth who claimed the highest rpm? From memory I thought it was cosworth although I could be wrong. If your looking for a real blast from the past, Honda were building 50cc race engines that could reach 22k rpm with conventional valve springs.
@pauloaz496 2 роки тому
9:00 a wild GIGARENAULT appears
@Harry-rj6kh Рік тому
The racing in F 1 in the early 60s was just as exciting when Cosworth was only pumping out around 200 HP as it was in the 80s when the engines were producing 900 or more. The days of the Lotus and the sharknose and the Vanwalls were numero uno.
@kruzihbv 2 роки тому
7:55 pneumatic valve springs still use cams, just instead of a metal spring they use air pressure to reseat the valves, that's why rpm went so nuts so quickly - something to do with resonant frequencies being set up inside the spring and breaking it, dropping the valve :)
@Eden-NoEye 2 роки тому
Thank you I was looking for that, that part of the video is extremely misleading.
@zipsuma6971 2 роки тому
Not the first time he says misleading and wrong things
@alexjenner1108 2 роки тому
Thank you. People don't seem to get that one of the big limitations back then, was closing the valves in a high revving engine. Cams worked fine for opening them, but closing valves was the problem. Perhaps you can use smaller lighter valves, but that means less power unless you have more valves. There is a reason why the teams went from v12 to v10. With pneumatic systems closing valves at high rpm, maybe you don't need the extra size and weight of the v12 any more and a v10 with slightly larger valves (but less of them) becomes a better option.
@petarkostesic8570 2 роки тому
well the first few seconds were a proper WHAAAT? moment, bit by the end of the video you were natural to me in this role as Scott. good job!!
@hetspookjee 2 роки тому
Great video and love to see more videos done by you. Very happy to see the growth of the channel into a wider format. If I could coin a topic I'd be curious to see how brakes have developed over time. There are so many variations, and for some reason the latest cars - despite their weight - are able to reach truly astonishing figures in decelleration. In any case, I'll stay tuned for more. Thank you Callum.
@ATLfletch 2 роки тому
Well, I was wondering for a while who the hell I was watching but I'm glad you finally introduced yourself at the end. Nevertheless, a very good informative and enjoyable breakdown of the topic. This has become one of my favorite race channels and I think your analysis and explanations of the science and racecraft are top-notch.
@diggernator 2 роки тому
Great video - my understanding (from an old Shell engineer that I worked with) was that Shell/BMW collaborated with the use of an old German aviation fuel recipe from WWII that boosted the M12's HP from around the 1,000 hp mark to over 1,400 with the real figure never disclosed
@jeffreytam7684 2 роки тому
Announcing power figures also would allow other teams to compare aero packages. A lot of the back and forth with Merc and Redbull this season seems to be based off of comparatively different wing levels and downforce setups. If either engine manufacturer published credible power numbers it would allow the other team to get a better idea of drag amounts on the other car, given its power and top speed.
@rickcrane6123 2 роки тому
The engine spec for 1966 was raised to 3.0 liters and I think later (1980's) was raised to 3.5 for non turbo engines.
@Gizfreek 2 роки тому
I simply love this format, your videos with all the details and technical knowledge are absolutely fantastic!
@Peasmouldia 2 роки тому
We now need a video on the evolution of the fuel that went along with all this. Those turbos were running on thinned down hairspray! You had to be there for the smell of those motors. Best sounding motor of all was the Renault V10. Back in the 90s teams would test for the 'Hock near my home at Keevil airfield. As soon as they fired up a motor, people who recognized that distinctive wail would be drawn there from literally miles around. Happy days.. Nice video, Ta.
@tomnewham1269 2 роки тому
My favourite F1 engine from the 60’s would have to be the Repco V8. It was designed and built in Australia at the request of Jack Brabham and he won a World Championship using that engine.
@mirrorblue100 2 роки тому
Black Jack!
@colehartel7206 Рік тому
It was a modified Oldsmobile engine from the US, so only partly designed in Australia. Still, it was impressive how they managed to get the jump on all their competitors when the sport went back to 3.0L engines, and won two championships with it before the Ford-Cosworth DFV came along and changed everything.
@jzxtrd337 2 роки тому
Coolest, most amazing and interesting engine F1 ever produced was the BRM V16, 1.5L - 400-600hp, thing sound phenomenal and still has a impressive power figure even for today's standards.
@y_fam_goeglyd 2 роки тому
Lovely to meet you, Callum! A fascinating look into the power of these beasts. It has always amazed me that with such "small" engines, so much HP is generated. Today's engines' figures are mind blowing!
@BobSaint 2 роки тому
80s are the last crazy years of motorsport. 1500+ HP in F1, and that off-road lunacy called the Group B.
@jerryj.2346 2 роки тому
Love the analysis and story telling. What a journey through time
@funkyuk1 2 роки тому
Nice to see you Callum. You present superbly. Top work fella 👍🏼
@dfekety 2 роки тому
Hey Callum! Good to see you in a video, and hope you keep up the good work dude!
@owensaucyn5237 2 роки тому
I believe 1966 was the advent of 3 liter engines, not 3.5l.
@nicholasweiss4662 2 роки тому
One Question came to mind when you told about the turbine powered car. How exactly do you calculate the displacement of a Motor that has no Piszons? Were they limited to a 3.5L burn chamber instead, or did they just simply get around the displacement rule because technically the Engine had zero displacement in the traditional sense and was thus below 3.5L?
@BAndersen-ee1xy 2 роки тому
I would really like to see the evolution of car weight and of power to weight ratio. Also, how did the power of the 3.0 Cosworth V8 evolve. I would love to hear from someone who may have been involved in the development.
@lucylovitt9583 2 роки тому
Keith!
@bloqk16 Рік тому
Having lived in that era when the Cosworth DFV debuted, and this is only based on what the print media back in the 1960s reported on, the Cosworth 3 liter DFV came from the development of the 1.5 liter, four-cylinder, race engine Cosworth designed and made for F2 cars in 1966. One of the features that made the DFV prominent with its power was from the angle of the engine's intake and exhaust valves, as it elevated the performance of the combustion chamber to a higher level than other engines of similar size, which equated to high horsepower; or in international circles, high kW for a 3 liter V8 engine. I also read that the DFV engine's fuel injection system was mechanically timed, as opposed to free-flowing, which may have contributed to the engine's robust performance. Again, the above was from recollections of the print media of the era. I say that because of the revelations I've read and heard about, in the past decade on the behind-the-scenes goings-on in motorsports in the 1960s, has brought to light many things that were kept quiet back then.
@jamesbarisitz4794 2 роки тому
Terrific video man! Some of those engines deserve a standalone story. 👍
@runescapebanker 2 роки тому
These timeline vids are perfect, I will watch more,, thanks!
@geniegb 2 роки тому
Good start there. Keep up, mate!
@RomanShopa 2 роки тому
The graph should start from 1946, not 1950. That was the year the first F1 race was held.
@jk844100 2 роки тому
Yes but 1950 was the first world championship. For most that’s where F1 started on it’s road to what it is now.
@NLBassist 2 роки тому
Great vid and a great job, Callum!
@chillikoala 2 роки тому
Thanks for the video - it was very interesting. A critical piece of information missing that led to the ban of turbos in 1989, was political influence from the ever growing concerns of competitors in the mid-80s - particularly from Ferrari - that they couldn't compete with Honda's engines. Honda demonstrated that theirs was the engine to have across many teams. This influenced restrictions to be put in-place for turbo-charged engines, including reduced boost pressure (as you mention) and the reduced size of fuel tanks. After Honda produced an even more powerful engine in the FW11, despite these restrictions, the FIA imposed further boost and fuel tank size restrictions for 1988 to further disadvantage the use of turbo engines. Not only did Honda produce a more powerful and reliable engine than its competitors, but crucially, it was more fuel efficient and this was key to the dominance of the McLaren Honda MP4/4. This was the final nail in the coffin and turbos were banned for 1989, as we all know.
@jchamber73 2 роки тому
Excellent video. And thanks for turning me on to the huge Rhodia dot grid notebook.
@GrandPrixYannick 2 роки тому
Really interesting subject, great video. Love to see something like this but in terms of recorded top speed each year.
@kipsned Рік тому
Brilliant set of videos! Thank you
@hexgraphica 2 роки тому
Power alone doesn't mean that much, as in the 70s they almost had 1 hp for every kilo (530\600). You'd need to calculate the power to weight ratio, but instead of power you put sort of a work done by the engine throughout the usable power band, so that a car that comes alive 2000rpm before it dies will result slower than a car with same peak power but a broader power band.
@anggabudi5619 2 роки тому
i play in basic simulator rfactor, 1980 car great in acceleration and top speed, but bad at overall cornering speed/stability compared than 2005 F1 for example. maybe tires and brake is different technology , but if we put same tech in brake and tires, 1980 car is beast. Or 2021 car just run it in low fuel tank, you will get same equivalent result. what bad in current gen car f1 is fuel weight (because no refueling), the car bigger and lazy because power to weight ratio(just like you mention)
@The52car 2 роки тому
Weight by year would be an interesting graph as well. I suppose we could also deduce by looking at the 'lap time by year' chart they did in another video.
@antonioakiki3716 2 роки тому
Nothing a cvt cant fix
@jackiecs8190 2 роки тому
Power to weight is important for acceleration, powering out of a corner and early on straights. Later on the straight, however, as the car reaches closer to its top speed, weight plays less of a factor and it’s the ratio of power to drag that dominates.
@manueldelbrouck1462 2 роки тому
I think there is a small error in your description of the engine from the '60 and '70s, the maximum displacement was 3.0L, and not 3.5L as mentioned. The 3.5L came later...
@Tymonello 2 роки тому
thank you for bringing us so much of F1 history!
@scarkillerful 2 роки тому
Good job Callum! Nice video.
@drnerd 2 роки тому
Great vid BTW, it's fascinating to see each era's progression!
@patrickcannady2066 2 роки тому
That Brabham BT52 has to be one of my favorite F1 cars ever
@speeder-scout4541 2 роки тому
Good job, Callum, well done. 👍
@danielbermingrud3655 2 роки тому
Hey! Great voice, great video, hope to see more "from you" :)
@alexjenner1108 2 роки тому
3:15 "this was because turbos were banned". no one was using turbos in formula one or any other form of road racing back in the early 1950's and it would have been superchargers in the Tipo 158/159 Alfa Romeo and similar cars. The regulations might have used the words "forced induction" which covers both.
@johnjones928 Рік тому
1966 saw a 3.0 L max normally aspirated, (not 3.5) 1.5 max supercharged. and the H16 was two FLAT 8's stacked one on the other.
@absolutdani 2 роки тому
Wtf I thought I clicked on another creator! Great video! See you around here Callum!
@micahkiyimba8641 2 роки тому
More amazing content. Thanks
@bobbygray2566 2 роки тому
Great video Callum. :)
@robertpsotka3525 2 роки тому
Very informative. Go Max
@toddb930 2 роки тому
Nice description on the power progression in F1. I'm glad I listened to the end to learn that this wasn't Scott. 🤔 Had me fooled.
@olliebonugli8881 2 роки тому
But he doesn’t look or sound like Scott though?
@toddb930 2 роки тому
@@olliebonugli8881 I thought he sounded like Scott. 🤪
@sultanabran1 2 роки тому
for the turbo era, mercedes also had the pre ignition chamber in the ICE which all the other teams didn't have. hence their significant advantage in 2014 and following years. i heard from another f1 fan that bernie was behind that tech getting to the other teams so they can catch up.
@jaydawson7305 2 роки тому
Love your work mate. High quality and informative content
@amaccama3267 2 роки тому
G'day nice video dude.
@kallehanhela782 Рік тому
Great job, Callum.
@walmartevample6438 2 роки тому
Great vid
@TheColinChapman Рік тому
8:02 „....than they could do with a traditional cam system.“ All formula one cars with piston engines had and have cam systems, only the valve springs were and are pneumatic.
@lucylovitt9583 2 роки тому
I'm so old I recall being at Silverstone on the first Thursday session with that Renault tea pot.
@yerrrrray 2 роки тому
can you make a video explaining how f1 manual transmissions would work? I'm curious as to how the had to set them up seeing how the were midengine with the transmission in the back, but i cant find any video or website explaining it.
@davidjosh5640 2 роки тому
Hollister t-shirt really cements the euro vibes. Havent seen someone from california in one of those since ‘06
@dylansmit3883 2 роки тому
The switch in 1966 was from 1.5 to 3.0L, not 3.5. The 3.5L formula wasn't introduced until 1987 and lasted until 1995. Strange how basic stuff like this is overlooked.
@flavioc5389 2 роки тому
That Nelson Piquet’s Brabham BMW is not only super powerful but also the most beautiful F1 car of all times.
@luiscarlosvieira3966 2 роки тому
...transition from 3.0 V10 to 2.4 V8 was in start of 2005 season (not 2006 or 2007) ... Alonso was champion in 2005 with a 2.4 V8... V10's kept running but with some restrictions.... Another issue... with time the BMW 4L is gaining power... back in the 80's, the max power was +1200HP (some would guess 1250) ... years later, some start saying 1300... and .... now is +1400... one day it will get 2000HP.... if cars had +1400HP, they would achieve +400 kM/H in qualification... and that never happened...not even close...
@mitchrich6 2 роки тому
Nice idea on the split turbo.
@realkilju 2 роки тому
Nothing in the universe will ever beat the v10's sound
@Dimpet-xw9gg 2 роки тому
FACTS
@andrewrichardson4715 2 роки тому
The BMW engine pictured at 7:00 is in the BMW Museum in München, while not disputing the commentary as the guidance is roughly accurate, the associated plaque that is at the bottom right hand side of the picture reads that when introduced in 1981 it was capable of 630-790 BHP @ 11,000 RPM. From intensive development in the following years culminating in the 1985 performance of: 1100 BHP at 4,4 Bar boost strictly for short periods of time only.
@jozefsk7456 2 роки тому
would be interesting to see power to weight ratio chart and while you are at it, throw in a downforce figures if those are available
@wapartist 6 місяців тому
The videos of that BMW Bennetton running literally look twitchy it is such a violent power delivery. Almost looks like an RC car
@toomanyuserids 10 місяців тому
As I recall the BMW turbo fours used junkyard iron production blocks that were left outdoors to season (rust)
@alfredlukasek8644 2 роки тому
Great work.
@bloqk16 Рік тому
Wait a minute!! At @4:34 in this video, in 1966 the engine displacement was *3 LITERS,* not 3.5. One of the reasons for the raise of engine displacement was that the sports cars of that era, such as the FIA Group 6 sports cars of Ferrari and Fords, were getting faster than the F1 open wheel racers with the 1.5 liter displacement engines; where up to that time, F1 prided itself with being the top-tiered international race series . . . but to have those cars lapping slower than sports cars? Unthinkable!
@1010thechamp 7 місяців тому
If only they still used the dimensions of 1998-2008 with 520kg cars quite narrow and kept the V10s and continued developing it for the past 20 years, we would see 1300hp, scary.
@Frostfly Рік тому
I would LOVE to see a series using 750cc engines with superchargers.
@ivanjulian2532 2 роки тому
Some factually incorrect statements in this video unfortunately. Eg; at 4:30 the engine capacity introduced in 1966 was 3.0 litres, not 3.5 litres. The year 1989 is when the 3.5 litre formula was introduced. Also, the massive horsepower wars of 1986 did NOT coincide with the dangers of ground effects. Cars with ground effect bottoms were banned at the end of 1982. In 1983 the only way to get downforce was to use massive wings and THAT is why the massive horsepower war came into play. More horsepower meant bigger wings.
@ivanjulian2532 2 роки тому
Also, the pneumatic valve return system was innovated by Renault not in 1991 onwards.... it was first introduced by Renault in the Senna Lotus Renault of 1986 when the engines were still 1.5L turbos. And they're not actuated pneumatically, they still use cam shafts and cam lobes. They use pneumatic pressure instead of springs to return the valves, which in turn eliminates valve bounce. Renault sat out 1987-1988 and then they introduced their famous normally aspirated V10 in 1989.
@RallyNavigatorOnline 2 роки тому
Good job new guy!
@brianswelding 2 роки тому
I majored in mechanical engineering waaaaay back in the day but my brain still interprets everything as a graph. 🤓
@kevinhawthorne5257 2 роки тому
Good Video!
@c10wiremantawwallace13 2 роки тому
F1 in the 1980 was the very best time to be watching the sport evolve as drivers struggled to cope with the power of qualifying engine tune with max power settings. It hooked me in a big way but today its just boring to watch the homologation rules they have now. All the cars look the same except pain jobs.
@kallo182 2 роки тому
F1 Racing Magazin is the best Source when it goes about F1 Facts. They have personal Contact to the whole F1 Grid since more than 40 years. In one Magazin they wrote about the Turbo Aera, and they wrote also the the strongest F1 Engine ever was a Honda Engine with 1260Hp. The TAG Engines at the Time had about 1050Hp. Those ""1400HP"" is just a Myth. Needless to say that 1200HP in a 500Kg Car is already Insane.
@parkypark22 2 роки тому
Shoutout not scott for the great video. I though i was on the wrong channel at first
@twilightsuzuka6252 2 роки тому
What about the BRM engine from the late 40s/early 50s that made 600 hp ?
@boncheung4315 2 роки тому
Anyone remembers the brm v16? 600hp from 1.5 liters
@RSA169 2 роки тому
9:49 the other limit you should mention is the fuel flow rate limit, even though the ICE is allowed to reach 15k rpm, we never see it go above 12k due to the fuel flow rate limit.
@that.guy11 2 роки тому
That and with the power/torque curves of the 1.6L hybrids, revving to 15k rpm would be pointless anyway
@nightcrawleroriginal 2 роки тому
Weird off the wall thought here, I saw a video (Mythbusters-Golf-Ball-Car) of a comparison gas mileage test done between a smooth surfaced skin on vehicles as to the Golf-Ball-Dimpled surface on a vehicle and the Dimpled won and it had less drag than the smooth surfaced vehicle did. Any possibilities of incorporating some or all of that application to F1 Bodies? It's a stretch I realize, but a 14% savings in gas mileage is pretty significant in F1 racing when your trying to "squeeze" every once of performance out of it. (as well as less drag (to my understanding)). :) NC
@bloqk16 Рік тому
The Lotus F1 turbine car spoken about @5:07, according to AUTOCAR magazine says otherwise, as that car made its F1 debut in 1971, yet, this YT video says 1967? I followed F1 racing in 1967, Lotus was nowhere near dabbling with a F1 turbine car, as they were busy with melding the Lotus 49 with the Cosworth DFV V8. Lotus did design and build the model 56 for Indy racing in 1968, but engine restrictions ruled it non-competitive for 1969 in Indy Car racing. A couple of years later Lotus came up with the model 56B for F1. Check it out for yourself online. I consider AUTOCAR magazine a credible source.
@Traah221 2 роки тому
Wait, a LIMIT of 4 Bar (58 PSI) of boost? LIMIT?! In 1987? Sweet mother of mercy those engines were run on the ragged edge of failure.
@marcusfranconium3392 2 роки тому
Its kind of scary that the early cars had actualy quite some horse power for their day but the cars where fire bombs on wheels with in the center a driver .
@dy7296 Рік тому
7:57 Uhm... actually pneumatic valves still use cams and camshafts the only difference is that "normal" valvetrain systems use springs to close the valves. Using springs for closing valves are cheap and reliable, but they suffer a problem called valve floating, where the springs cannot close the valve fast enough under very high revs. Pneumatic valves simply used gas-filled pressurized cylinders to close the valves instead.
@fracturedlife1393 2 роки тому
H16 engine was a thing too. Thats just Mental.
@kenmay1572 2 роки тому
Road car evolution. My Mk 1 Triumph Spitfire had a massive 63 HP my current XK is tad higher at 296 HP
@adriancox-thesantjordigolf3646 2 роки тому
Good Callum.
Радіо Свобода
Переглядів 331 тис.
Осторожно: Собчак
Переглядів 6 млн
РЕАЛЬНА ІСТОРІЯ
Переглядів 196 тис.
РИХТОВКА313
Переглядів 2,2 млн
Mrr Hong Jem
Переглядів 16 млн
Леонід Бобошко
Переглядів 111 тис.