没有任何。只有我们黑客才有工作 None. Only us Hackers will have jobs 👌🏼

Artificial intelligence is going to replace every job, people changing career won't help. Maybe AI can't do the jobs now, but In 5 years artificial intelligence will have every job. Artificial intelligence is smarter and better than us. So stop lying.

​@@XianCTFDemol

Thank you for such a well researched video. Extremely helpful. Sorry for any haters - remember: some people will never be happy, and can always find things to complain about. You don't have to appease them, because they work hard not to be appeased.

that beat around the bush intro is one of the greatest intros I have ever seen :D

as long as they control the robots the rest of us don't matter

Vote robot 🤖

​@@samuelmeyer4029 vote anarchy

They’re clinging hard but they know they’ve lost control

As much as I don’t like politicians, I would fear robot politicians even more. Just take the most utilitarian approach even if it means pulling a Thanos 😂😬

Just wait till robotics figures it out

No one will want a robot consoling them while they are dying. The immense outrage that will cause companies who decide to go through with that... Phew. All I gotta say is that they'd be brave to try. Inhumane and immoral, even.@@pravin4266

So are kindergarten and elementary school teachers. What, we’re going to leave kids to their own devices?

@@pravin4266 I will see, how will AI replace boilers 😄

Youd be surprised

Had the exact same thoughts as well. Truly unbelievable.

Especially with the imminent creation of a generalized advanced AI model, most of the jobs on that list will be gone.

Said the Luddites.

You have absolutely NO idea what you are talking about. Please look up why the great depression happened. This is closer to the Industrial Revolution. A lot of jobs will be lost in turn creating new jobs that require more advanced set of skills. It's a double edged sword.

@@lacku2677yes, THANK YOU

Yup, I chose software six years ago for job security. Now I have no job security.

The problem right now is not in AI but in economics crisis, so big guys don' invest in startups as much as in 2021 and 2022. That's why there is a lot less projects than before.

Same experience. No one is hiring software engineers and I see why. I also don't think that AI Experts are safe GPT can program neural nets and even though they are not of great quality and can't see why that souldn't be the case a few years from now

I think nowadays you can make great websites with no code tools

Yeah, this is terrifying to me too. I've been pivoting to game dev from 3D animation (long time graphics programmer, then had a family) and I'm quite nervous. I do agree that integrating AI into what I'm doing is probably the best course. I don't want to make a game, but (get paid to) help others make their own games. And also...educating people who want to make a game.

Won't matter in 5 years if we reach biological immortality timeline, or some other exponential technologies come out rendering them not necessary. (i.e no need for hospitals because everyone has a near agi level robot in their homes with more medical knowledge than any human) and for this it doesn't even take AGI level technology. Just look at all the humanoid companies building them, and tasks they are capable of already. Some can function autonomously. If they are cheaper, better, and can live in your home with you, then they can take care of anyone better than any human can.

@@phen-themoogle7651 What makes you think that is happening any time soon? Lol

@@kevin6447 It's exponential thinking vs linear thinking. Why am I thinking exponentially? Because OpenAI showed a preview of Sora which is a world simulation model capable of not just generating videos but producing simulations of the physics of the real world, and I wasn't expecting that level of (pre-matrix lol) technology for 2-3 years based on the other AI video generation software we have. Some technology shouldn't have been here for a few years. GoogledeepMind used an LLM to solve an impossible math problem with "FunSearch" it used the "hallucinating" that language models have to its advantage finding millions or possible solutions until they found one that actually worked lol then we have GNoME which found 2.2 million new materials. Technology nowadays is helping us discover new things at exponential rates. Then if quantum computers help out it could be even faster. Or even without quantum computers if OpenAI has AGI internally we could see ASI in a much shorter time than you would expect even if the tech is private. Wouldn't be surprised if gpt6 or gpt7 can be prompted to cure diseases. Also we have humanoids that work autonomously and are embodied by those very LLMs, can use humanoids to help with dangerous experiments or there's a plethora of ways to use combined technologies to enhance everything. Also at Harvard they found a way to reverse the age of mice. There's a lot of regenerative therapies that will be accelerated into human trials (some already are) etc

Wouldn't that just perpetuate the population issue?

@@nursejean903there is no population issue

Right, it all comes down to if people even WANT to be surrounded by AI and trust it

AI can never replace nurses. Sick people do not want to interact with robots.

Years ago, I spent 3 weeks in the hospital because of deep burns. I had very good nurses in the day and some terrible ones at night. I can tell you that I would have preferred nurse androids at night. But AI will eliminate many nurse and doctor jobs by eliminating the underlying reasons for being in the hospital in the first place. Robots will do dangerous jobs so many people won't get injured. AGI will find cures, and finally solve nanobot pending technological breakthroughs leading to advanced nanomedicine using swarm nanobots to fix our bodies. I wouldn't be surprised if all this happens next decade.

​@@Nash0303 sadly it will not be about what patients or clients want. If the billionaire owner of a company or the government itself wants to make more money (which they always do) they will replace ad many workers woth machines as possible

exactly !!!

Until those humans leave it to AI to decide, also AI already is used for hiring.

AI has been around for decades now. It's only recently that people care about it. So too late. They should have cried when they had a chance to change it's momentum.

U mean the stakeholders get to decide. Rarely does customer dissatisfaction with automated A.I. systems actually change the decision made at the top, since every other company is also automating. There no choice but to automate.

But as long as our dollars go to that then we can’t complain. It starts with the consumer!

I'm sorry you have to go through this at a young age （ ; ; ） but just remember you won't be alone, and i'm sure you will find something fulfilling in your life even if humans don't need a "job" at some point in the next 2-10 years. When more than 50-60% of jobs are replaced by AI then a new system is definitely implemented so humans can survive. Just remember there will be a way to survive in the future... Just enjoy college and life as much as you can. Things will work out for the best. Hang in there! 🌟

@@phen-themoogle7651 Thank you so much for your kind and reassuring words !

Go into the trades. Until robots can frame a house or build a custom plumbing manifold, then you'll make bank! Once your body gets conditioned, it's smooth sailing

@@NeonmalibuDitto on the plumbing comment. My uncle is a plumber and has had a comfortable lifestyle at least as far back as I can remember. He gets a lot of business and lives in a beautiful house.

​@@Neonmalibu The problrm is millions more will going into the trades as well. Pushing wages down to the floor. Wages are already bad in many places.

Maybe not aircraft (yet) because of their tight performance requirements but cars will likely become increasingly modularised to allow for automated component replacement (probably a fair way off though, so you've got a decade or so ... maybe).

Maintenance jobs require not only versatility of a human body, but also human deduction and problem solving skills for troubleshooting, which are still hard or almost impossible for a machine to do efficiently. For aircraft maintenance you would need dozens or even hundreds of different robots for different maintenance tasks, all of which will have to be certified, tested, maintained, upgraded and ultimately discarded as new aircrafts with different needs emerge, so, a mechanic or engineer will have his job for decades, if for nothing else, then because they will be cheaper then 30 or 50 different machines that you would need for each specific aircraft type.

@@chrisanderson7820what makes you say they will become modularized ?

What I worried it there will be less demand, so while my job probably won’t get taken over, I might still lose my job

@@jordansprojectsNot because its better design, just purely to take advantage of robotics and even more immense production centralisation. We are already seeing the first modular EV batteries that can be swapped out of cars in minutes.

Their reports are useful for certain things but they are biased. You can be sure they are under reporting job loss in fields they are biased towards.

boycott tallow soaps lotions shampoo etc its homonecrobeastiality spending spermm unto a fetus and aborting him is in effect homonecropedophilia oral intercourse after abortion is in effect cannibalism save all microscopicbabies embryothers phitusisters grandadults love God with all heart and soul ♥️

Spot on. As much as I dislike those two organizations because of what they did with developing countries (I come from one, and I know how cold and anti-critic IMF was), and am heavily aware of their biases, I think their reports are worth to read if you supplement them with more genuine research works of academic nature.

analysis or programming?

IMF and WEF are also made up of the people who have the most control over the subject matter, like them or not (I do not, no one voted for them, and they pull mad strings) their analysis is essential to informing one's self

Aww I feel appreciated 🥺

@@TinaHuang1 - Did you ever study at Guangwai?

For the better. Lets not be luddites now. We know what happened to them.

Being alive is a big achievement too, having fingers if you used those to comment is also nice(if you got em), being able to eat food if you are is also convenient, there's a lot of achievements on smaller scales that we take for granted. But it's still a nice achievement to comment fast on new videos. I sometimes feel the same way btw lol

don’t compare just keep living your life, all our lives have different timelines/paces in the first place so it’s best to chill and do your own thing

hm...yeah, right.

Wow big tuna walking by

Being alive isn't big achievement. it's literally a starting baseline to achieve something, which apply to all/most human, if it apply to most humans it isn't big achievement. It's great to be grateful for being alive, but it isn't big achievement by any means especially when you happen to be born in first world country.

It did replace letters… did it not?

You're mixing ideas. Amazon has provided a means for postal services to continue despite letters being largely replaced by email. Postal services pivoted towards parcel delivery.

@@oniseikeji6023 Do you not get letters in your mail anymore? :p

@@DorkaliciousAF Even with low (pre online shopping) package volume most of the PO's revenue is made from 1st 2nd and 3rd class mail (junk mail). Currently I believe package's make up about 35%. Regardless, because it's a government service and not an actual business the Post office will be around to some extent. We know that consumer trends aren't forever and is not enough to warrant closing up an entity that's been around since the founding of the country. At worst they'd go down to 3 days delivery per week and consolidate routes. I also think there's something to be said about real customer service. People don't like dealing with companies where they can't talk to a real person when they have problems. Who enjoy's a phone tree??

@@DorkaliciousAF I don’t think that he’s mixing things up. I guess he meant “He acknowledges that while email has largely replaced traditional postal services, the individuals once involved in those services were able to adapt and find roles in new technological frontiers, like those offered by companies such as Amazon. The idea is that as technology continues to advance and potentially replace current jobs, it may also create new opportunities that we cannot yet envision like postal service workers could not have foreseen a company like Amazon. So as technology grows, so does the potential for new industries and employment possibilities, ensuring that the workforce will adapt and find new ways to contribute.” in a nutshell.

I agree so much with you. It is with this same arrogance that people in the tech industry think they are safe when they are at risk as well because they find flaws in the current technology and its inability to perform certain tasks. It is sad they don't take into account technological advancements.

Yea I agree, like when they said AI is gonna replace 300 mill jobs but somehow replace more jobs. But they don’t mention that because it’s AGI it will soon again be able to do those jobs too, thus replacing those jobs soon after they created them. Like a machine learning engineer

so then i have to ask, if all of these ai advancements are heading toward a place where most jobs will be replaced by ai, what is the point in learning anything, getting a degree, or doing anything?

@@-ASTROMAGIC yes, a lot of laymen people (most of the population) will come to that conclusion soon, probably in about 4-5 years. The whole jobs market will end by about 2035. You’ll notice it’ll get harder and harder every year to get a job, AI will become more of the main reason. Right now sending out 2000 applications is the fate of some, well when it gets that hard, sending out 10-20k applications will actually become the new norm. Then it’ll get so hard, people will realize there’s no point to it, there’s might as well be no job market, then at that point UBI will come in, and AI will run the work based economy.

@@Wanderer2035it feels like a tragedy to have been born into a time that started so well yet plays out so badly

That's because robots have not been developed to be so good as AI. Things start getting really scary when robotics become powerful.

and the combinations of Robotics, automation, and Ai. Impacts are exponential

​@chorko696 We'd probably start seeing that early 2030. With robots doing simple factory work this decade.

​@@MrNote-lz7lh Try this year.

​@@chorko696just for your info google headquarter already uses robots powered by AI to clear their cafeteria, we're already on track for this threat to arrive faster than poeple think

Thanks so much for your kind words - it genuinely makes me feel so appreciated. I’ll keep doing so 😊

Hi Roshan , I am new to AI , I started with Python, finished it. I am doing Andrew Ng beginners basic course on Coursera which I will finish this week . Can you kindly share what to do next

Agreed

Hey folk, i am currently learning js, the concern is by the time i learn full stack with good projects (stuff like nextjs, ShadCN, tailwind, docker, kubernetes, CI/CD), genAI, langchain, deep learning stuff, 2026 or 2027 will come, where the hell will my requirement accomodate in the industry, because all these senior engineers by that time (like you) have already replace junior devs, what value will I provide? Pls help, it's infuriating.....

@ShubhankarSharma-vr6zg 👋 I understand your concern. To be honest, nobody knows what is going to happen, but that being said, I think learning these skills of programming will help you write code and assess what should be done. The tech stack will not be very important in the future. We will become more like a translator from human desires to code. I really don't think a person who does not do anything of programming will ask chatgpt 5/6/7 to make an Uber app, and it will generate everything. The user will still need to know how to interact with AI to generate the code or tweak it based on the needs of the client. People who wrote programs on punch cards moved to using keyboards instead. This is the next shift instead of typing 1000 lines of code you ask for a bunch of requirements and it generates that code, we adapt it or ask it to change based on the final state we want the program or app. Take a deep breath, and don't panic. We will still need programers. In the meantime, continue learning to program it will be very useful.

@@santicomp thanks for your words, but instead since you got the hold of things, can't you predict that what new demands will be raised by AI in the said timeline (2026,27), or which domain will companies need workers on, so i can assure myself of some security, provided i will also learn mern

@ShubhankarSharma-vr6zg maybe the basics javascript a backend language, probably python or go/rust Learn prompting/prompt engineering, and if you want, you can go down the route of AI. But I think the programmers who use AI regularly will be better off than just having languages under your belt. Once you have some experience, you kind of get the hand of most of them, but get deep with a frontend/backend and work with AI as an ally

Sorry, ml and analytics are most suited for replacements by ai. Both of these are structured and thus. Also, anyone can start these overrated jobs with a days or two training. 6 months is overkill. I have seen most stupid people in ml and analytics. Out of millions there are just few good at very top. Rest are just irritants. I would be happy if they get sacrificed by AI

@@z00011001 okaaaaayyy, if you say so!

Truth, I know at least two Data Scientists who got laid off with me two months ago.

@@TheSnergglyData Science is different. They usually don't add any ROI, infact they're renowned for being a net loss with 98% of their research. Data Scientists are hired in the good times when profits are soaring and the first to be fired.

Lmao exactly good luck getting out of your bootcamp and competing with senior software devs with a msc maths

Ai will be doing the predictions.

not only the pace at which it develops but also the fact that the people developing it have an insanely vested interest in pretending that it can do everything

It seems like these reports are only based on what AI can do right now, not what it obviously will be able to to in the next years, which is incredibly stupid.

@@GameDogLeader21 but it can't,that's the point,unless it stops evolving as fast as it is

@@stuartcarter4139 not pretending but they are trying to make AI be able to do everything

Be careful what you wish for...

​@@RepublicOfWesternCanadaNOWfr, I need people to think before they type studd like this out.

lol

No thank you! Human politician is anyday better than an AI politician! It's scary to even think that... :/

At least they’d have some type of intelligence

We're going to live in cyberpunk world

well.. if most people lose their jobs before a UBI is implemented, there is a very, very good chance that there will be revolts happening. Citizens don't want to not be able to live. it'll be bad

yeah right I dont know why people inventing AI and government are not thinking about this except being selfish. Future is just sad.

oh wow hi!

31 not old thou

31 isn’t 51, you’re going to be fine (for now) so long as you’re capable of adapting. My existential fear is a world that transforms into chaos because the only lucrative jobs available will be either medical, caregiving or machine learning related. Not everyone is interested, or mentally capable, of learning advanced programming in Python, becoming a surgeon or possess the emotional aptitude and patience to care for seniors and children. We all have different strengths and talents, but if too many people are suddenly incapable of finding anything they qualify for (or DO qualify for but Ai does it cheaper and better) there’s going to be homelessness and riots.

@@TheRockyCrowequite interesting and insightful thought there!

If you dislike coding and reading code I wouldn’t recommend anything software related - *but* if you just think you’re bad at it, that doesn’t necessarily mean you wouldn’t do well in a software job. I work as a software engineer in the test department , and a handful of people don’t code and don’t need to code because there’s aspects of testing that are not fully automatable . The human aspect is still highly valuable. And this also could buy you time to learn more technical skills if it’s something you wanted to do. You at least wouldn’t be unemployed on your journey. (Not that you’ll be unemployed now- I just mean learning to code better while working in software is a different experience that scraping by as a student )

I think you can rest easy. If the influencers and bloggers were hiring you in the first place it shows that their interest for learning AI tools and blogging is fairly low. Meaning, as long as people are lazy you'll have a job 😊

I suggest you better use AI to "improve" your writing skills.

Then those jobs being forced will not be paid.

Do you think the population will drop a lot?

@@LilyGazou Will the population drop a lot? Absolutely, absent a LOT of immigration. Which is politically anathema on both left & (especially) the right, in America. So it's unlikely to happen soon. Everywhere 'round the globe where living standards & health care have improved enough to ensure people can expect their kids to live to maturity, they've limited the birth rate, poured limited resources into raising fewer kids - typically just one or two. Peter Zeihan has famously argued this is because of urbanization: "on the farm kids are free labor; in the city they're just expensive pets." Peter's very good at popularizing demography & geopolitics, but he's dead wrong on this. This trend isn't new: humans have, throughout recorded history, done just this. In all times & places, wherever a slice of society - call it the middle- & upper-class - has achieved sufficient living standards to enable them to assume their kids would survive to maturity, they've limited their number to well under the rate of replacement (these days, 2.1 kids). So their population has fallen. It happened in Ancient Greece, in Rome; it's happening in India now. Sure, the Indian population is still surging, but the growth rate of the Indian middle-class has already plummeted. So yeah: the population of all developed nations is in steep decline. With two exceptions, at present. - In Canada we're welcoming 500,000 immigrants annually; also ~30,000 refugees. So far, without breaking sweat. Short-term a manageable burden, an investment. Long-term it drives growth. As a percentage of the existing population it's significant but no greater - still not even a match - for the numbers that came in during the late-1900s & early- to mid-20th Century. And so far, people have followed the rule: leave your squabbles & prejudices where you came from, don't bring them here. We all get along. It works, because it's a new country, and because of a healthy social & political attitude. There's hints though not only of an increase in the number of "republican wanna-be" conservatives being influenced by US media (we're swamped in it) but also of increasing numbers of immigrants who won't follow "the rule" to leave foreign wars & squabbles where they left them. There are Palestinian & Islamic demonstrations - nearly all peaceful for now - in support of Palestinians in Gaza (understandable) but also sometimes displaying support for Hamas. And for a few years now there's been a lot of fund-raising in some Sikh communities for independence movements in Indian, to which the Indian government (or rogue elements within it) appear to have responded with assassinations & attempted killings, in Canada. - In the US the social & political attitude is downright toxic. Immigration is feared & stigmatized, even by recent immigrants: how ironic that the Republican Party (which is currently anything but 'republican') counts amongst it's ballot-box motivated interest groups a sizeable chunk of the Hispanic community. But for now, family sizes & birth rates amongst the Hispanic & Black population are such that the US growth rate is static: not growing, but not shrinking either. That doesn't bode well for the US economy - it suggests stagnation, or very very low growth - but it doesn't mean a shrinking economy either. Everywhere else across the developed world, there's trouble coming. Germany, Italy (in fact the whole EU), Japan & Korea: they're all in free fall. China's worse. And no one's yet figured out how to keep an economy growing when it's population is in decline. As Peter Zeihan is famous for saying (correctly this time): "We don't have an economic model for how that can happen." Developing nations from India to Nigeria, Venezuela to Honduras, all have rapidly growing populations still, because they're poor & underdeveloped. But already their middle classes are displaying plummeting growth rates. The EU has experimented with immigration & refugee influx to keep growing. At present this has backfired, caused huge social & political blow-back. Some of that is attributable to their being long-established nations with strong cultural identities: they're not very accepting of people with a different culture, and have ostracized them, ensuring they end up living in poverty where social problems fester. But TBF there's an equally awkward problem: much of the influx of immigrants and refugees in recent years has been of Muslim people from N Africa & the Middle East, people who's own culture & religion are vehemently opposed to integration. Not all, but that's a verifiable trend. And without a commitment to integration there's reduced incentive for established cultures to provide support, acceptance & tolerance. Intolerance on both sides is evident, and violence in places like Sweden, Germany & France has substantially undermined earlier acceptance. Asian countries won't even entertain immigration in the first place. Asian cultures are unashamedly xenophobic, so Japan & Korea, for instance, aren't about to try to bring in people to offset declining birth rates. So immigration may not be the answer for countries with stagnant or declining populations. And immigration/refugee movements aside, there are mass migrations on the horizon. Sizeable areas of India saw temperatures of 50 degrees for days, perhaps weeks: thousands of people died. In Canada global warming is more of an inconvenience or irritant than a threat to survival, but the North is warming faster than anywhere else on the globe. Within 30 years the glaciers feeding all the river systems of W Canada & W USA will have melted, and the entire western US & Canada will become desert: a dust bowl from the Rockies to the Great Lakes/Mississippi. Think about that. The only amusing irony in that is that most of our climate-change deniers live in that area, and they'll be most affected. But I guess they pump lots of oil in the Arabian desert, so Westerners will continue pumping oil regardless. And demand more subsidies for a failing industry from "lib-tards" on both coasts. Worse is coming: most of N Canada from about 300 mi. north of the US border is muskeg: frozen swamp, a thousand feet of frozen peat moss. As that warms & melts it releases methane. Methane is a much more potent warming influence than CO2. And methane burns: lightening strikes will ignite massive province-sized fires that will burn underground forever, massively increasing further methane release. This cascading effect will drive global warming ever faster. If we don't somehow limit & eventually reverse global warming - soon! - we won't stop it. Vast parts of the planet will become uninhabitable. Meanwhile mass migration is coming. And we won't have the populations to stop either problem. Global population is now expected to peak at 8.5-9 billion, then plummet - fall off a cliff. But that's already happening in developed nations. All the remaining growth is in underdeveloped nations, most of them closer to the equator, and therefore more likely to be catastrophically impacted by warming climate effects.

Pharmacists aren't needed? A pharmacy can't legally operate without a pharmacist present. If an AI gave the wrong prescription away and killed an infant, who would be legally responsible? The company who manufactured the AI? They absolutely wouldn't want to be liable for that because they'd be sued, get the worst reputation and eventually go into bankruptcy. But legally, someone has to be responsible if a mistake like that is made. Pharmacists are needed because they have the knowledge and expertise to take on the legal liability. A pharmacist is there to ensure the patient receives the right medicine, the right dosage, and that it won't cause any health issues if it's taken with their other medication. If a medication could injure you or kill you if you overdose on it, honestly I don't believe anyone would trust an AI with that much responsibility if it was their life or their child's life on the line.

@@TruffleSeeker54I think you’re making the same point OP made

???

yep i have had probelms with gpt deleting data

Is it AI proof job

What are you planning to do when AI does your AI job?

And AI cant get a masters in AI? You seem to think you have this all figured out when in fact the original creators of AI had already been 4 steps ahead of you@@user-qd1fd7ei8h

Do you think AI has the potential to replace manual and automation testers?

Have fun, make friends, socialize, learn critical thinking. Find things that are interesting to them and study them think about the biggest issues in the world and aspire to solve them no matter how outrageous.

Forget the idea that you are ever going to retire. Learn trade jobs.

Start therapy asap.

Join clubs, make connections, attend campus events and get an internship. I went to college but I didn’t join any clubs or make any friends at school. That affected my life greatly. You should flirt, date and interact with a lot of girls on campus. Women are taking over the white collar world and they only want to work around social competent men that make them feel comfortable. This may sound weird, but it’s the truth. I spent so much time on my studies when I really should’ve spent more time interacting with the people around me because these are the people I’m going to work with in corporate America.

Traditional engineering, medicine, IB, law, just exclude CS from now on

just testing this message is still here because i get shadow taken down lol

also thinking lots of jobs like real estate agent /doctor ect will still be mandated to be people by law which protects them same with a decent amount of govt jobs but those tend to be not very good jobs

Yes. Like when I was working and everyone was collecting Covid checks.

ubi means you'd be getting it too. its universal

@@dasit6034 good point. Aight. Well if that's how it's dished out I'll take it 😂

yes, thank god Im not a nurse anymore

I'm not surprised. I'll let you in on a secret: as a headhunter I discovered there's one (1) job that everyone hates. And not just a little. Accounting. I think I've met one CPA who actually likes the job; won't rave about it, but they don't hate it. One. The job sucks, and even people ideally suited to it dislike it. If your kid wants to be an accountant, seriously encourage other options.

NO! Come on now, having that kind of knowledge is so vital for a human to have! I want to go into Finance and Accounting!

Senior finance roles - mainly qualified people - are pretty safe, however, entry level accounting and finance jobs will be eliminated by AI for sure.

I don’t know your backstory, but I understand how you feel. What has helped me when things just get too stressful and dark, is to take a mental break for a few days(no news/social media) and write down what really scares me and what really stresses me out. On another piece of paper, I write down the things that bring meaning to my life and what I’m passionate about. Whatever you need to do to bring in money for your preferred lifestyle doesn’t have to be your passion or dream job. Find a skill that is in good/high demand that won’t be as impacted by AI and that your mindset is capable of doing as a profession. The steps to attain that skill haven’t been more available. - School - Online Certification - Self -Study Instead of looking for videos on jobs being lost, research jobs being created/in-demand Find 5-10minutes a day to study/research on a skill that’s profitable and gradually increase the study time. That skill will provide money to sustain your basic needs + your personal hobbies/interests/time spent with family and friends I hope this brings some structure to you. You matter.

​@@NewMarley3thanks man... I needed that.

This is just silly. You have no idea how AI works.

I disagree, because a lot of AI's programming side can be quite bad and if you don't have good skills understanding what it's showing you, you can jeopordise the project in no time. I think really skilled veterans will always be in the demand, but it will be harder to break into industry.

@@svetlanasygiainen5339 just because it isn't good now doesn't mean it won't be good in the future, ai is getting exponentially better it can make videos which is not just a combination of images in sequence it has to make sense using real world physics and images have to tie in together Coding is nothing compared to that and is much easier lmao, have you read about what the ceo of nvidia has said? I agree on your point that veterans will be necessary as coding isn't just programming it's much more than that but similarly videos is not a combination of images so you can't say for sure

Yes. There's still plenty to discover in that branch of the field. Even if you choose to not pursue that career later, the degree subject commands respect and will set you up well in your chosen path.

"any non physical jobs that do not focus on human relationships". It's sorta wild to me that people don't think AI will be better at human relationships than humans. I'd expect an AI therapist to be way better than a human therapist in a few years.

I agree that they would be way better, but some people just want other people for certain types of services. Lets take sales, AI sales would do targeted ads really well, and could explain the product and even manipulate it's customers into buying the product but it would miss a certain trust factor that a human sales rep builds up over several weeks to months. I think depending on what is being sold AI will replace the sales rep or AI will not.

@@2007dinand Ah I see. Fair enough. I would definitely agree with everything you said. While I'd prefer the efficient product I know way more people that wouldn't give up a human barber shop lol.

not only that, but with massive unemployment and salaries plummeting in the remaining jobs people wont have money in their pockets, so small businneses will close in the the whole planet, and all this to make rich a few dudes

I still think most creative fields (especially UX design) are safe because the output is often subjective- with objective elements mixed in. This is why mixing code with art skills is so great.

yep, people have been saying AI will transform everything it has been more than a year since gpt 3.5 and everything is just as shitty as it was back then.

u should watch the new reveal from nvidia