Everything is made of atoms because they are atoms

Do black holes spin? 24:21

Sounds like we're just just a lucky result of a random seed generation variable.

@John Rodgers oh, sweetie.

I signed up to Wren to offset my carbon footprint and get on with my life, but they insisted on sending me emails every few days reminding me about my footprint and what they're using my money to do, and trying to push me up to higher subscription levels. That's the opposite of what I wanted from dealing with that voice at the back of my vegan head, not constantly reminding me that I have a carbon footprint. So I cancelled my subscription and reverted to the relative bliss of ignorance

The power of sin takes control of everyone but easy to overwhelm sin with knowledge. I'm not sure what fully is going on with my way of thinking because everything I thought of as a child was created and explained more. I've been talking about all are technology an cars running off clean energy 30 or so years ago; since everyone seen me as a child I was joked from the adults, I been talking about the lords power towards myself an a few random people like yourself. Oh the clean energy, change gasoline tank with a salt water tank, the salt water tank will cook the water into gas and the gas pumped into the gasoline intake spot on the motors we still have. The government will take all your resources away leaving us trash items/homes/medical insurance. I've lived enough to see a majority of criminals no one understands or puts 2 an 2 together to enlighten the knowledge of anything. We started with Republicans turns to sin, democrats healed us again like how Republicans started healing us from president Lincoln, now democrats are sinning an a 8-12 year old can understand what is right an wrong. Trump was a Republican so I ain't getting tricked easily, oh yes a person preventing being arrested being a president from Joe Bidens being president but do you think it's really Joe Bidens fault? You have Obama Hilary an mostly all democrats trying to get a fat chunk of money and take off. Trumps sinful illusion towards the people is one thing but if are rights/laws change during his time or has to be changed in a amount of time of a different president. They see everyone layed back and they are rushing towards America. Knowledge gets removed from schools every 4 or so years making everyone lack knowledge for 60+ years, your knowledge should surpass me in words and sentencing but you have the knowledge to fully understand everything I texted you. Right now we are looking at the power of God, could have the ability to create anything like the lord himself to a limit. Are brains think with imagination, Jesus wants to save the ones who died that won't perish but have everlasting life, also it says Jesus wants his word out to save the world. Now im thinking save the world? But you saved us from sin/death or when we die or not. Knowledging the 1 true God eternal life and praying does what exactly, the power in are brains energy thinking of the lord while Loving God. I see God everywhere the more I learn because I have nothing to do other then read/learn from everything, I don't work, I'm on disability and the more I want to get closer to God the more information is being released onto everyone but the sin prevents us from helping out each other to a limit until people start to talk to people that doesn't seem to matter too much towards their perspective < as in me choosing you out of all the people in the text. Makes me wonder the transformation of a new spacetime dimension being made from blackwholes, sucking resources from are spacetime to another, blackwholes form into each other becoming bigger and stars getting bigger and/or die off. I've had predictions towards my thoughts, The Simpsons is a Sin towards my name that will show illusion towards my name. This is me my life and no one else's, supposedly everyone is a demon sinning towards me but it could be a limited amount total if I search for righteousness as I am now. You or anyone else reading this will question more and more but be layed out with knowledge in are face, mostly everything is MATH knowledge. Lord of all knowledge but a empty space creating life as we see it but he gives Satan his same power. Everything has a choosing to do something negative or positive towards anything but imagine Satan saying "Oops I showed sin/negative" or Satan never left and is controlling America trying to fix something he shouldn't have done.

I know these things because they are interesting and I’ve grown up being told the information but I still end up working at a basic factory job, despite being more enlightened than even the most educated person a few generations ago. Idk man. I’m only 19 but this video feels like it’s just describing the basics. I’ve always heard about these ideas in school or just browsing UKposts and I’m sure everybody knows about them. But I don’t see how knowing the basics of how light works or the universe began will help any regular person. How is knowledge helping

You are stellar.

Blimey, thanks for the support!

@@HistoryoftheUniverse Just taking the time to say that you guys changed my life. I watched one of your videos 2 years ago and now I am going to college to get my major in physics, thank you ❤

Couldn't agree more @Russell Davis

That never works for me lol. Using the @ and then somebodies username to mention/reply to them. Does anyone know why, please? Also to continue my earlier comment and back up my like clicks 👍🏼 This is literally my favourite channel on UKposts!!!! The algorithm knows as well lol 😆 the first suggested video is always this channel without fail. It is all amazing, the content i.e. all the scientific knowledge you gain from the pleasure of viewing, the narration as your guy before just mentioned. Thank you to the creators for consistent quality content, merry Christmas and a happy new year to everyone also! 🎄

Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it. Plenty more on the channel!

Excellent explanation of once you understand you don’t understand and are not capable of understanding, then you understand. Thanks

" Channel Rocks " are also made of Atoms 😊

​@@TheCiaMKultraYOUR MADE OF ATOMS!! AND SO AM I 😂😂😂

​@@daMillenialTruckerme 2 ☝️🧐 don't forget about me !! We are ruminants of the stars 💫

Merry Christmas to you to.

Merry Christmas! ✝️🎄 Thank you!

Merry Christmas 🎄

Merry Christmas.

❤🥰

Yes

​@@adamnsmartguy3574I could not agree more. Professing to be wise, they became fools. I believe that the more we see and understand the universe, the more we can literally observe his "handiwork". Time, space, and matter had to be brought into existence by something outside of time, space, and matter. The uncaused cause, is not a what, but a who. And in an unfathomable amount of grace, allows us to know him personally. I admire the wonder, and awe that many scientists possess when it comes to observing the incredible size of the universe, both large and small. We cannot even comprehend how big the universe is, nor how small matter can be. As science progresses we find smaller and smaller building blocks. I can only imagine, the wonder and awe that these scientists experience would be exponentially increased with the recognition of the creator.

​@@adamnsmartguy3574 The multiverse problem. By Paul Davies, a cosmologist not bound by any tradition. "I usually say two cheers for the multiverse because there are good reasons of physics and cosmology for supposing that what we see may not be all you get. That there may be other regions of space and time that could be different. So it's not an unreasonable speculation. However, it falls far short of being a complete theory of existence, which is often presented as. That as if there's a multiverse, then we can forget about all the mysteries of the universe because it's all explained. Everything is out there somewhere. End of story. Well, it's simply not true, because to get a multiverse, you need a universe-generating mechanism. Something has got to make all those big bangs go bang. So you're going to need some laws of physics to do that. And you can say, well, where do they all come from? So all you've done is shift the problem of existence up from the level of universe to the level of multiverse, but you haven't explained it. I suppose, for me, the main problem is that what we're trying to do is explain why the universe is as it is by appealing to something outside of it. In this case an infinite number of universes outside of it. That, to me, is no better than traditional religion that appeals to an unseen unexplained God that is outside of the universe. I'm prepared to accept that what we see isn't the totality, that there may be regions of space and time, other universes, if you like, that could be rather different from what we observe. But I certainly don't believe that all possible universes are out there, and that the explanation for the universe that we see is because everything imaginable exists, and that this particular one we see, just because it happens to be one that we live in. I think that falls far short of a proper explanation. Indeed, I think it's contradictory and absurd." . . If all is random and our universe is the only universe, the chance existence of human awareness would seem incredible. Because the laws of physics would have to be so carefully calibrated to enable stars and planets to form and life to emerge, it would seem to require some kind of design. But there are other explanations. . Robert J. Spitzer, SJ, is a Jesuit priest, philosopher, physicist, educator, author, speaker, and retired President of Gonzaga University in Spokane, Washington. .

@@ronaldpettifurd5957 It's amazing how you can't see how absurd your position is.

​@@ronaldpettifurd5957Jesus is His name and Jesus is His Son's name ❤

Glad to say I have physics degree and do tutor in similar manner. Learnt a lot from this guy.

John 3:16

It really draws you in.

A good sidekick to this is the brilliantly chosen background music, which I feel raises my level of curiosity, my need for introspection and for philosophical contemplation of what constitutes life, existence, reality. Well done, a hearty round of applause from a humble concoction of knowledge-thirsty atoms all the way in Romania! ❤️

​@@valeriunichitean302​ The multiverse problem. By Paul Davies, a cosmologist not bound by any tradition. "I usually say two cheers for the multiverse because there are good reasons of physics and cosmology for supposing that what we see may not be all you get. That there may be other regions of space and time that could be different. So it's not an unreasonable speculation. However, it falls far short of being a complete theory of existence, which is often presented as. That as if there's a multiverse, then we can forget about all the mysteries of the universe because it's all explained. Everything is out there somewhere. End of story. Well, it's simply not true, because to get a multiverse, you need a universe-generating mechanism. Something has got to make all those big bangs go bang. So you're going to need some laws of physics to do that. And you can say, well, where do they all come from? So all you've done is shift the problem of existence up from the level of universe to the level of multiverse, but you haven't explained it. I suppose, for me, the main problem is that what we're trying to do is explain why the universe is as it is by appealing to something outside of it. In this case an infinite number of universes outside of it. That, to me, is no better than traditional religion that appeals to an unseen unexplained God that is outside of the universe. I'm prepared to accept that what we see isn't the totality, that there may be regions of space and time, other universes, if you like, that could be rather different from what we observe. But I certainly don't believe that all possible universes are out there, and that the explanation for the universe that we see is because everything imaginable exists, and that this particular one we see, just because it happens to be one that we live in. I think that falls far short of a proper explanation. Indeed, I think it's contradictory and absurd." . . If all is random and our universe is the only universe, the chance existence of human awareness would seem incredible. Because the laws of physics would have to be so carefully calibrated to enable stars and planets to form and life to emerge, it would seem to require some kind of design. But there are other explanations. . Robert J. Spitzer, SJ, is a Jesuit priest, philosopher, physicist, educator, author, speaker, and retired President of Gonzaga University in Spokane, Washington. .

Just do what I do and watch it four times

It really never gets old

Go ad watch the 7 episodes called crisis in cosmology by the LPP Fusion channel and he explains why the big bang couldn’t of happened.

@@jamess3241 Go ad watch the 7 episodes called crisis in cosmology by the LPP Fusion channel and he explains why the big bang couldn’t of happened.

Congratulations on not having ADHD🥳

Their rhetoric is strong but if it takes more than five minutes to find fatal flaws in the theory your not looking in the right place. Of the fifteen or so predictions bbt makes, they got one right. Seems like it debunks itself to me. We are witnessing a paradigm shift in slow motion. The academics don’t want to loose their position so they ignore and/or attack any evidence that is contrary to their beliefs. They’ll say it’s not peer reviewed, because they won’t review it. They will give your telescope time to someone who fits with their ideals. They’ll find some reason to attack the person with insults or say their not qualified to speak on the subject. And when confronted with undeniable evidence they will say they just have to adjust the theory. Some parts are unfalsifiable hypotheses. That’s not scientific. Or controversially, change their predictions after the data was collected, as with the CMB (“To quote Physics Essays in summary, Big Bang Theory Under Fire, regarding the CMB (aka the MBR): “History also shows that some Big Bang cosmologists’ ‘predictions’ of MBR [microwave background radiation] temperature have been ‘adjusted’ after-the-fact to agree with observed temperatures.” Mitchell, pp. 370-379”) Every comet we’ve studied has shot holes in their theory. The need for two different theories, one micro and one macro should be enough to show us we’re on the wrong track. Connecting the dots could give us a very distorted picture of our world if we don’t fully understand the circuit it’s using. I wish you the best and hope you take another look “tabula rasa”. (*edit autocorrect sometimes, changed to some)

Yet he leaves out consciousness. This makes the subject so much easier for some. If not for a conscious big bang, we would not be conscious. Light spins precisely in tune because light is consciousness itself.

​@@pureenergy4578 What does this even mean

@@spagussy Lots of authors writing about the consciousness of our reality. How do you think that quarks and atoms know how to spin into anything, as anything?

@@pureenergy4578 "how do you think quarks and atoms know how to spin into anything, as anything?" I repeat, what does this even mean?

What do they say? " BS baffles brains" And then the usual politics = carbon footprint

@@brucewilson2174 actually, no shaming of the average person, at least not like usual. I liked it.

​@@brucewilson2174 its literally just a fucking sponsor you daft git.

Thanks Terry!

Agreed. I often wonder what the world would look like if stuff like this were as popular as TikTok. Or even half as popular. It's sad really. But he's def doing his part.

To the op. There is a $5 icon before your comment. Does that mean you donated that to the channel? If yes, how did you do that? I mean how did you donate?

@@kfawell There's a "Thanks" button just below the video.

@@MisterNohbdy I see it. I had to simply scroll the buttons to the left. Thanks.

John 3:16

​@@vhawk1951klyou should look at the work of Cerne and the Large Hadron Collider. Plenty 9f evidence there. And it could still all be designed by God you know

absolutely agree

TV? 😂

@@JustMe-ne5dw Yes it's this thing people used before the internet, it even had channels and stuff!

@@Greippi10 before streaming services* We still use TVs, just not cable.

@@Good_Hot_Chocolate I used to have an old 70s tv I still used with bunny ears before broadcasting went digital. It had a channel tuning knob with 32 channels, and had a satisfying electrical *KLUNK* sound when you twisted the knob and changed channels. I miss it sometimes, mostly for the novelty.

@@369Sigma I used to have one of those as a kid. But it has been a good while since I've seen it. Or any TV for that matter. But thank you for making me think of it again.

unfortunately you are not aware of an indian philisopher called Kanada who authored a book called vaisheshika sutra even before leucippus wrote about concept of atom!!

@@guruprasadvenkat5728 Fortunately I did. But Kanada's life is not set in stone. Estimated to have lives around the 6th - 2nd century BC. Leucippus and Democritus have clear timelines for their lives. So your statement is debatable.

@iecasper so is it a matter of proving that you apssed the goalpost by telling my people dont have set dates and your have dates!!! Looks like ego boosting!! At least we should learn to respect that many people in past all over the world had developed the concept of atom!! Not only greece!!

@@guruprasadvenkat5728 Just debatable, not disrespectable.

Great, even you can refer to aruni uddalaka even before kanada wrote about 'kana' means smaller particles which made up the matter. Thanks for reply

Thank you man

The narrator from Red Tree Crime has an even more pleasant voice

There’s a really popular science UKpostsr whose name I won’t mention, but their speaking cadence is so unbearable even though I love what they talk about. It makes a huge difference when the person has a nice voice

No possibility, it is certainty that "every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord." Your want for knowledge is like us will who are descendants of those who are from the tree of the knowledge of Good and evil. But we are without excuse as the wages of sin is death. Science is neat but that is all it is. It's a drop in the bucket under the reality of The Creator. Your worship of the Creation is idolatry and God's mercy is giving you time to turn from it. Choose Jesus and you will see more to come. Or just keep choosing evil and you and the rest of the geniuses will burn forever in the particles you love so much with no relief and you WILL know the loss you are under. God help you. John 3:16 is all you need 😊

People

Thank you man, i appreciate it

@@eggheadusa9900 I don’t know who you are

@@369Sigma ohh....- but then Who. Are' you.?

Well your hopes have paid off as this is the first time I've seen this channel suggested, and it's an easy follow. I'm eager to help boost quality content as opposed to pushing large creators that have come to dominate and prioritize the capitalization of this community's platform. It's disappointing to watch once-passionate creators fall obedient to algorithmic pressures and gimmicky promotions, but I have a good feeling about this channel.

@@hoe4_sho

Tick tock

@@WiseOwl_1408 you can’t even spell it right, gtfo

@@WiseOwl_1408 are you making clock noises, or what's "tick tock"?

U think children wouldn’t find this boring? I’ve watched documentaries as an adult when I saw them as a child and found them fascinating. How do you know this info won’t be outdated?

@@TruckieLooks4Aliens what

Well what governs the law to begin with, why does the universe have rules to begin with. Why can’t puddles pool up on bumps instead of holes.

I like to use the anthropic principle to answer this; every possible universe does exist, it's just the only universe in which WE (observers) can exist are those fine tuned for life

God?

@@eggheadusa9900 It really is a matter of perspective. Everything seems so fine tuned for our existence, because we exist to observe it. If things were not fine tuned for us, then we would not be here to observe it.

"Why does this round hole only allow the round things?"

Great explanation of the quality of how he structures his breakdowns of these concepts.

If something is free YOU are the product.

@@TheGamingNutter someone's high Lol. Hny!

@@emanrezu Content creators get paid for providing you, the consumer, to the sponsors of the platform. YT pays cash money for you and your views, but they don't pay you. They pay the content creators for bringing you here. (What just got sold in that transaction?) Then they sell your viewing time to sponsors and make massive money simply by showing their sponsors that you and so many others are watching. (What just got sold in that transaction?) YOU are not the customer. You are the commodity. Content creators are the sellers, YT is the buyer. Then YT is the seller, and sponsors are the buyers. Who do you think you are in these transactions? I'm not saying it's a bad deal. We all think it's a fair deal or we wouldn't watch YT videos, but nobody is doing us any favors by providing us anything for free. Quality content is the price I demand to be paid for spending hours of my time staring at YT. My price is cheap. On top of all that, how much does Google/YT make from the data it gathers about you every time you click on anything, data which it sells on to its customers? (What just got sold in that transaction?) You are the commodity.

It's Fantastic though for people who have this Knowledge !!!!

​@@spaceted3977your knowledge is nothing but incomplete pride in which you will all be together in Hell if you don't stop playing with the mercy of God

God made us all male and female and we have a choice to choose Jesus. That's what we really are. Wake up. John 3:16

@@micahtaylor1397 Well that's good for you, but I don't have any time for all that Religious Rubbish !!!

@@spaceted3977 wake up smart guy! It's NOT religion. Science IS your god so you and your buddies ARE more religious than any of us who just serve THE KiNG of ALL! Your answers to life are easy. Jesus died for your sins and you can be forgiven. I'm sorry people hurt you and that Satan loves to feed your head with lies. The Bible makes it all clear. And you WILL bow one day ...use your head and call on Him now. Later will be too late! It's facts! He IS the LOGOS!

I had similar nightmares as a kid. As a very young child, I attended Catholic school. Anytime I heard about the concept of "eternity," where nothing changed, EVER, I felt inexplicable despair, to the point that I'd have nightmares about a light source that never dimmed and blinded me. I didn't know how to explain my nightmares to other people. Once I was an adolescent, I finally somewhat understood the white-hot terror that I felt when confronted with a concept like "infinity." Doesn't make it any less terrifying, though, even as an adult in my thirties.

Did your parents take you to disco clubs as an infant? That would definitely do it. Light shows as an infant who is already stressed can form effectual memories. You are now healing. You're welcome.

John 3:16.

​@@dancincoolkidCatholicism is NOT Jesus. I'm sorry you hate religion but science is even worse a god. You find answers that make your flesh feel good but in the end Jesus is returning to save us all ultimately who have chosen salvation. It's a choice not a religion. So dont deceive yourself or others in your thinking you have answers because of your hatred of Catholicism. John 3:16 is what you need and you to be baptized in Truth. Don't lie to others to have company in hell

don't have only one source

If they made history of *insert whatever here* I'd watch every episode. Best narrator ever.

Yes. Enough said

These folks got jokes.

Pervert

All matter, is post consciousness. Consciousness doesn't come from matter. Consciousness Makes matter & all matter everywhere, came from consciousness.

What puzzles you is quantum physics. Light is made of photons, which are particle-waves - photons have both properties. But photons can only have certain energies: it must be a multiplier of Planck's constant. Based on the energy, atoms interact differently, or they do not if the energy is too great. Its kinda like a lock and key - if you dont have the proper energy close enough to the "key", nothing happens, the photon doesnt fit in the "lock". More importantly, if you have less energy than the key, the interaction can never happen. So water will interact with infrared light by absorbing the energy of the photon (turns it into kinetic energy, or heat). We use this in a microwave to heat your food for example. Water in our visible range is strong enough that it doesnt fit most locks, and it gets scattered (makes the atom jiggle then gets emitted again, rather than absorbed). Blue light is stronger than red, and on this part of water absorbtion spectrum, more red light gets aborbed and blue light gets more scattered. This is why water is blue in the distance under water. But for very high power x-rays, another phenomenon occurs: the photon will knock off the electron from the water molecule, making it an ion. So for high power x-rays the water is very scatter heavy and opache. Other materials have different properties based on their electron clouds and density. A fun example is infrared through a trash bag - for that infrared the trash bag is seethrough.

What about woman? Especially talented but not attentive

As I mentioned in another comment, what surprises me about the continued consideration (in some circles) of some infinity of universes with different settings as being a viable explanation for the fine tuning problem is that the current paradigm of dark energy accelerating the universe towards an eventual and eternal heat death completely contradicts the infinite cycles of death and rebirth. It woukd really be something, wouldn't it, if the one-in-one-hundred-billion-trillon odds that this particular universe coming about that could lead to the formation of atoms, stars, and minds capable of thinking about this stuff, would also be the very last one because there won't be another resetting of the dials. Pretty silly, it seems obvious to me to be.

We will get there, we are still in the first few moments of the universe. It’ll be a long time until we get to the end during this history lesson of our universe.

Agree!

The multiverse problem. By Paul Davies, a cosmologist not bound by any tradition. "I usually say two cheers for the multiverse because there are good reasons of physics and cosmology for supposing that what we see may not be all you get. That there may be other regions of space and time that could be different. So it's not an unreasonable speculation. However, it falls far short of being a complete theory of existence, which is often presented as. That as if there's a multiverse, then we can forget about all the mysteries of the universe because it's all explained. Everything is out there somewhere. End of story. Well, it's simply not true, because to get a multiverse, you need a universe-generating mechanism. Something has got to make all those big bangs go bang. So you're going to need some laws of physics to do that. And you can say, well, where do they all come from? So all you've done is shift the problem of existence up from the level of universe to the level of multiverse, but you haven't explained it. I suppose, for me, the main problem is that what we're trying to do is explain why the universe is as it is by appealing to something outside of it. In this case an infinite number of universes outside of it. That, to me, is no better than traditional religion that appeals to an unseen unexplained God that is outside of the universe. I'm prepared to accept that what we see isn't the totality, that there may be regions of space and time, other universes, if you like, that could be rather different from what we observe. But I certainly don't believe that all possible universes are out there, and that the explanation for the universe that we see is because everything imaginable exists, and that this particular one we see, just because it happens to be one that we live in. I think that falls far short of a proper explanation. Indeed, I think it's contradictory and absurd." . . If all is random and our universe is the only universe, the chance existence of human awareness would seem incredible. Because the laws of physics would have to be so carefully calibrated to enable stars and planets to form and life to emerge, it would seem to require some kind of design. But there are other explanations. . Robert J. Spitzer, SJ, is a Jesuit priest, philosopher, physicist, educator, author, speaker, and retired President of Gonzaga University in Spokane, Washington. .