Thank you so much. I can stay up all night listening to Prof Susskind.

No matter how complex even just the description is It’s learning something. Thx

Spooky will remain spooky

Great vid but it is cut off. I would like to see the rest of the lecture. Is it available somewhere?

Love this lecture, but would like to hear more.....

Our minds are probably subconsciously entangled with the whole universe, maybe even projecting the material world collectively. At that level we are the universe, What appears as meny individual islands in a body of water, will be revealed as an illusion of separateness, each island appearing to have it's own location and properties. When the water is drained, the illusion disappears and we can see that the islands are all an expression of the same ongoing process . "Particles" in the same way appear to us as separate and discreet islands , when actually they are bulging up and down from a common ground, (quantum field), that underlies our material world. Individual people behave like particles existing in multiple states of potential, popping in and out of existance, but we really are all just the same stuff doing different things. We are good at picking out differences, but seeing the underlying unity may require draining the lake or clarifying the water to see our common ground of being behind the illusion. The advancement of quantum exploration is a clearing up of the water, which may turn out to simply be our own confusion not letting us see all the connections yet. Our minds are part of the equation. The Hindus see the material world as a subset of the universal mind deep in sleep, dreaming up the universe. They started looking at things through the consciousness end of the telescope, and concluded that it's all one, and physicists are looking at the same thing through the physics end, and coming to the same conclusions. Quantum theorists should start looking into these wisdom traditions for clues to decipher and translate into theoretical physics. There are no "things", only process. Every "thing" is everything. Our minds are not naturally tuned to that reality yet, but discovering our true nature through quantum theory and experiments is looking like a valuable path towards wiping away a lot of mankind's feelings of unnaturalness and alienation from nature. To me the notion that calling some things "natural", and others "man made" as if that makes any damn sense at all. A computer is just as natural as a beaver dam, or a birds nest. It might be on a higher scale of complexity, but is the dividing line in that fact somewhere? How utterly ridiculous anybody sounds who tries to explain where and how unnaturalness comes into play, except in our imaginations or arbitrary "facts". These stupid notions are part of the reason the water around the islands is still cloudy. We are still clinging to false notions that don't apply on the quantum level. Anyway, just spitballin' here.

My cerebrum just got entangled with my cerebellum.

love it

Great find, Professor Leonard Susskind gives some of the best lectures!

❤Thank you very much

Susskind has the gift of rendering everything perfectly confusing while seemingy being crystal-clear 🤔

I truly enjoyed this gentleman explanation. He was very clear every single point what he was saying, yes it is true entanglement is true and it happens every single second in our environment. Due to entanglement molecules are forming, and lightnings are sticking, due to entanglement noise is traveling through the atmosphere, that’s all the work of entanglement. In some directions noise travels farther away some directions you won’t hear a thing , what it tells you that? It tells me atoms are functioning exactly identical, just way you see in magnetism when you stuck magnets together you can take that away round our solar system. Entanglement will continue as long as atoms are within close proximity. One single hydrogen atom has ability to influence about little over half inch. Can you imagine microscopic hydrogen atom has influence of that much distance. When atoms absorb heat they expand to maximum distance to release the heat that’s when they get locked within other atoms to create molecules.

Entanglement doesn’t have to imply faster than light communication between two entangled particles (spooky action). Entanglement can be a process of synchronizing the two particles’ underlying quantum fluctuations. Although still random, once separated the particles are now fluxing in harmony and when measured at the same instant they thus yield correlated properties with no communication needed. Analogous to a random number generator with the same seed on independent computers, yielding a pattern of identical random values- if one computer is measured at time T you will know the value generated at T on the 2nd.

Wonderful lecture! (I wish somebody had had the good sense to clip his mic to his lapel to avoid the loud mic pops when he reads while looking down.)

The last comment about entanglement with regions in space ... 💥🧠💥

Woah. Heavy I've read other stuff about entanglement before, but this is the first time I've realised that conponents of spin in 3D /have/ to be +-1, with no sinning and cossing, even though the spin can be in any direction

Wow holy cow. That gave me one of the deepest insights into quantum mechanics I've ever had. I literally felt it the moment it hit me.

In this day (and age), it would be wonderful if the lecturers could have microphones properly positioned by the "techs" anticipating their movements. The subject matter is difficult enough without the lousy audio.

that was just getting interesting... where is the next bit? entanglement of regions of space????

Have you tried fully complex random noise generators at each of the two remote detectors, with a single randomized composite state (that gets conjugated in each direction) at the central point? Look at the behavior when you are 1) well above, 2) close to, and 3) below the noise floor and detection threshold. You will see something interesting, and revealing if you can understand it.

Thank you Leonard. 'and if you had gone further mathematically, you would have found a wave function relating the two entangled systems right? You would have discovered Schrodinger's equation. What is the physical meaning of this relationship? I propose there can be only one answer. There has to be two waves, 180 degrees out of phase, such that the value at any point in time of one of the waves is always equal to the negative slope of the curve, (wave) of the other wave at the same point in time. You need one more aspect. You need to imagine the first wave as "real", but the second wave as "imaginary" in some sense. This is the only way you can get the Schrodinger relationship. I know this seems to be a stab at it, a random guess, but I have spent many years investigating the nature of time and have arrived at this "picture" from basic logic and it happens to fit QM exactly. My starting point is that time is wavelike, it is an energy field that powers everything in a wavelike manner. Let's say it is an energy field throughout the cosmos that provides energy in a wavelike manner, such that time, (or events), proceeds into the "future" faster then slower, then faster then slower, then,..... well, you get the picture. How do I know that time is a wave? Because light is a wave. I.e. photons are emitted in waves from any light source at any point in space. I take the emission of a photon as an event and so deduce that the rate of events is wavelike. (Many more photons are emitted during the peaks of the wave than are emitted at the troughs). The rate of time is wavelike. The energy available to power all events is wavelike. See my paper on "academia dot edu", Ken Hughes, "Time is a wave". There are nine more papers following on from this, presenting a theory that explains many things in physics including the conundrums we still face today. In a nut shell, we live in a "Binary Universe", where there is an exact negative duplicate of all positive energy at all times. This immediately answers two important questions. 1. Why the energy of the universe is a net zero, and 2. Why CPT Symmetry is a fundamental law of nature. But there is much more. I'll leave it there.

Yes.

As ever, superb clarity.

I don't understand the logic of the statement at19:30. When Bob measures the spin of one of those "spin things" he can know that Alice's is the opposite... What is opposite? The spin of one of Alice's spin things? The combined spin of all of them? Now if the division is different, so that what was Alice's spin thing that Bob knew to have the opposite of what he measured is now one of Bob's spin things, had he measured it instead, what would be the oppositely spun spin thing?

What is the actual technical process for creating "entanglement" between two systems? And, WHY is the process doing what it does?

Wow, I had no idea Mike was moonlighting as a physicist when he wasn’t working for Gus.

entanglement is a process of bringing two particles at a predefined twin state. Which you later detect.

It is interesting to know that entanglement is important. What it is seems to be much more difficult to explain.

Maybe The particles are linked over different dimension where they are not physically separated.

hey whadda you know, this is the best lecture so far on what Entanglement is in Quantum Physics

This is the question, how would i know if we r both entangled? When the time we started to communicate? But how i know if u communicate already if you communicate by A meta? Or different ways of language? That is the question ryt?

Bring two particles together, entangle them, now pull them miles apart , change the state of one(spin) , it should change the state of the other, right professore?

👌

Deja vu. I took a couple of QM classes about half a century ago. One thing that confused me about two-particle entanglement is how you can "align" the detectors when they're on opposite sides of the universe, with warped gravitational fields between them and maybe multiple spacetime geodesics linking the two local detector frames.

if you change spin one for the first element, does the second change ? If not, isn’t this like a box of shoes, if you pic the left shoe, then you can “predict” the other one is the right one ?

Physicists still do not investigate the quantity Time..., and "why" it does not have more dimensions, who forbade it? Why can't we have a 3+3 dimensional spacetime? So why couldn't the 3+3 dimensions be physical and the other extra dimensions only as mathematical dimensions? And what would it be for? Well, mass would be built by "packaging" dimensions.

❤

as an entire semi literate newby to this subject, hows about if in fact that all electrons are in fact directly connected to their respective quarks in their nucleus, and that electrons are projected force images of their respective quarks, they being of one entity, as a force projected to the speed of light, thereby projecting mass without having any mass, as in a hydrogen atom of four quarks and thereby randomly entangled to the fourth power, resolved and projected by the nucleus itself. A lost electron can be regenerated. Electrons behave as a particle or a wave, depending on your observation and the state of the nucleus, For a further explanation, please consult any dictionary.

Adding wire negates the entanglement experiment .

Are the two halves of our brain entangled?

This seems to be a short fragment of the lecture. Where is the rest? We even did not touch ER and EPR.

background music, take it away please

How to avoid the annoying space music?

I have had noticed one flaw with this theory once I first got acquiainted with it years ago. Making a measurement on one particle and finding out its spin does not affect the other particle. That means that only the observer knows the outcome of the measurement on one partticle. The other particle does not even know that the first is measured. Only the observer knows it. Therefore, it is not particles that are entangled but the observer with the particles.

LoL at the comments, this is the most significant conjecture in physics possibly ever, ER=EPR is hands down the strongest candidate we have for a theory of everything. Juan Maldacena and Lenny Susskind are two of the greatest minds of this generation

I liked it up to halfway. After that his understanding of how the computer would work falls on its face. It comes down to trying to output the correlation of two opposing states, which will never be in agreement.

Could we entangle gravity?

What exactly is a "spin"?

I have yet to see a relatable description of entanglement & I still don’t understand how entanglement is different from blindly separating a pair of gloves in 2 boxes… open Alice’s box & you instantly know which handed glove is in Bob’s box. I’m sure there must be more to it than this or smart people like Professor Susskind wouldn’t invest so much time in it… but it still eludes me.

Lenny! You stopped just at the exciting point!

Entanglement is an invisible bi-directional arteries between two objects

The bizarre descriptions of computer simulators betrays the origins of the bizarre properties postulated in quantum physics.

I was very intrigued, but couldn't stand the constant music unfortunately..

How can one have a lecture on quantum and not mention Werner Heisenberg?

The mystery of a quantum entanglement can be solved easily. Look here.

Not the Jada Smith video I was looking for 😂

Doesn’t entanglement propagate in Chlorophyll in plants? I understand that this is why plants are so efficient in collecting solar radiation.

But what does entanglement mean? Not what are the symptoms of entanglement, but what does it mean to be entangled?

Best lecture, really?

Forget about the quantum, connect with the absolute in the Nature without contrast.

😍

Kyllä tämä toimii

Wow, excellent channel. Great content. Thank-you. And how can we use quantum entanglement to explain observations in the physical realm of measurements? Leonard never explained how photons become entangled, why some are partially entangled while others are fully entangled or how this entangled state is determined. I don't believe this was the best lecture on quantum entanglement. He claimed information can't travel faster than light, that's not true. Quantum entanglement is instant at any distance. Instant is much faster than the speed of light. That's why Einstein called quantum entanglement spooky action at a distance because it happens in an instant, contradicting his look-back time prediction. Quantum entanglement is an effect that occurs to the information pertaining to light, not particles. Particles are not entangled so that when one particle is manipulated the other instantly takes on the opposite spin. Particles have mass. A light particle is not an elementary particle because it doesn't have mass. Even when it's measured it doesn't have mass. That's why this effect occurs when the EM field of a pair of photons are entangled. Light particles do not have mass and travel at c, outside our reference frame of space, distance matter and time (slow-mass-time). Elementary particles have mass so they can't travel at the speed of light. The light is not traveling faster than c. Light information the wave contains, spin, color, temperature, velocity, trajectory, etc is conveyed in an instant when one of the entangled photons are measured. Sure, elementary particles can be contained inside the same EM field and be entangled to other elementary particles but when one particle is measured it doesn't take on the spin of the distant particles. Because if that were true, then each planet in the solar system would take on the spin and orientation of the sun because everything is contained inside it's EM field. But that's not true. Each planet has a different spin and orientation than the sun, It's called obliquity. Thus the EM fields of matter interact, but they are not quantum entangled. Quantum entanglement then DOES NOT happen to particles with mass. It only happens to light because it's the only thing in the universe that can travel at c, outside our slow-mass-time. Light when it travels at c does not do so as a particle of light. It's a wave of potential light information. This information exists outside our reference frame until it strikes an elementary particle, or is measured by a telescope. Then when the light is measured it's information is conveyed instantly regardless of distance to the body radiating the light, instant action at any distance. This is why in the book SECRET UNIVERSE: GRAVITY by Ron Kemp I published 09-27-2021, before the JWST was launched, I wrote "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." Think about it. The only way a telescope can measure the light coming from a distant galaxy is if it's contained inside it's EM field. All the photons in the galaxy's EM field being measured are quantum entangled to each other. Spooky action at any distance then occurs. The creation of new light added to their EM fields is the action that happens at any distance. It happens in an instant upon measuring the distant galaxy's light information. Telescopes then are unable to see into the universe's past per the predictions of look-back time. Einstein, thousands of astronomers and cosmologists were wrong. Telescopes can't see into the past because they're contained inside the EM field being measured. What did the telescope find? Did it find old, massive galaxies further than 13.8 billion light-years away? Yes it did. In fact, the galaxies are so massive at such a distance that astronomers relying on look-back time to make their predictions were wrong about what they would find in the early universe. Astronomers now refer to them as the impossible early galaxy problem. They are confused because Einstein claimed light information takes time to travel. Astronomers didn't take into consideration the photons in the distant galaxy's EM field were entangled. Telescope can't look back in time. The galaxies in the extremely distant universe are seen as they look today in our here and now, not how they looked in the past. Time is a man-made concept used to measure matter in motion. It doesn't apply to the motion of light because it's not made of matter. When light information is added to the EM field it doesn't travel anywhere. It becomes the EM field containing potential light information. All we have to do then is measure the light information and it's measured by the telescope in an instant because it's inherent in the EM field as potential information. Light information in the real world doesn't travel any distance because of time dilation and length contraction occurring to it upon being measured by an observer. In this case the telescope is the observer taking the measurements. So, when it measures the distant galaxy it's light information is conveyed instantly to the telescope regardless of distance. Believing we can use a telescope to look into the past is as silly as believing we can use a microscope to look into the future. Light information happens in a quantum instant when the telescope is contained inside the EM field it's measuring. I was the only theorist relying on quantum field theory who accurately predicted what the JWST would see before it was launched into space. Theorists like Roger Penrose, Michio Kaku, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Rajendra Gupta and others are still confused. Apparently they don't understand quantum field theory.

Jeez, fix the audio from the mic

The entanglement is a phenomenon through which nature tries to send us a profound message. However, the physicists stubbornly have neglected the facts for almost 90 years, instead of modifying their inadequate theories. As a consequence, modern fundamental physics has ended up in the dead-end. The number of inexplicable facts rises unstoppably in both micro and mega scale with almost every new discovery. Paradoxically, the main obstacles to further fundamental development in physics are - two (most-likely misleading) fundamental theories (quantum and relativity). The main problem with both theories is that they contemplate local conditions only. However, it seems that entanglement hints that all the particles and all phenomena in the universe are inter-related, impacting each other simultaneously. Therefore, a theory should be developed that takes all the space and all objects inside it at once. Perhaps using fractional (non-integer) order differential equations, instead of ordinary (integer) differential equations, may be a way to develop such integral theories that could explain not only the entanglement phenomenon, but also the other so far paradoxical observations in both micro- and cosmic- levels.

I think when the particles become entangled there is either a communication of sorts between the two, determining which has which spin without revealing it, or there is something connecting the two particles. That connection could be direct between the two, or the two could connect by a medium. Maybe when two particles become entangled, there is also a third entanglement with spacetime itself, allowing for faster than light travel by not only entanglement but by being part of spacetime itself. Or it could be entangling or exciting a field that permeates the universe or at least a semi closed system that has a finite range. Maybe within our galaxy or a certain proximity to the center black hole or with a gravitational field.

Hurts my tiny brain🙏🙏🙏

This should be standard education. So should measuring students ability to accept the truth when wrong and prove their right when others challenge them. Our society is so close to greatness and destruction, good tv but annoying real life drama.

"Best lecture so far on what Entanglement is in Quantum Physics" - The Arrow of Energy - The One-Way Entanglement Between Isolated Energies; “In any system of energy, Control is what consumes energy the most. No energy store holds enough energy to extract an amount of energy equal to the total energy it stores. No system of energy can deliver sum useful energy in excess of the total energy put into constructing it. This universal truth applies to all systems. Energy, like time, flows from past to future” (2017). Finite fossil fuels are dangerously hypnotic to humans, their consciousness and mental capacity. Humans were not ready morally, ethically and intellectually to start the mass extraction of fossil fuels with the advent of the steam engine 300 years ago. The Magna Carta requires today overhauling - adding to it the right for humans to understand what Energy really is - before any other commandment.

Lenny's one of the best ! Where/when BTW ?

The biggest mistake in this lecture and all of Quantum Physics is the application of 3 dimensional coordinates to a quantum system to describe it. The mathematics of classical systems , aka 3dimensional coordinates do not apply at the quantum scale, as dimensionality is quantum and what the solution needs is a coordinates system to calculate spin etc that is quantised aswell. Dimensionality is a space time property.

Yes I do like the description in the end about entanglement of multiple particle systems. Dr Leonard Susskind I do like the way you think. I for one also have though about such systems and ask myself what is really happening. Gosh I wish I encountered videos with such illustrations. Now you got me thinking again . Very interesting particularly why the half got entangled fully with other half within a short time. It really throws one hint at me. What is it about the nature of this space that aligns them into exact opposite halves. The other hint is it has also to do with the real structure of the electron, it is like to coils getting Attached with a tachyon field.

LEONARD CHANGE THE RNG TO RND IN FUTURE LECTURES :)

13:00 "I'm not sure Bohr understood it"

Is he trying to sell me the brooklyn bridge 😮😮😮😢

Please argue

QM classicalized in 2010. Juliana Mortenson website Forgotten Physics uncovers the hidden variables and constants and the bad math of Wien, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Einstein, Debroglie,Planck, Bohr etc. So,no.

Is there a single cause of entanglement? Do we know what, physically, makes systems entangled?

1:38 "In classical physics, you can (always) know the exact state of a system." No, you can't, because that would require an exact measurement of a system, which is impossible. We don't have access to the initial values of a Laplacean demon. So does classical physics imply that IF we had access to the exact initial conditions, we could calculate the future of a system (which must be closed, another practically unrealizable constraint)? But even that is wrong in general, because there are no infinitely accurate calculators. Classical mechanics cannot solve the 3-body problem, if by "solve" you mean a formula that can be used to calculate all future states from given initial conditions.

That is the mystery of me how I did it

If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature. Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea.

NOTE COMPLETELY RANDOM NUMBER. COMPUTERS HAVE PSEUDO RANDOM GENERATION. NOT SURE OF THE QUANTUM ONES THOUGH :D

gobbledygook.

🤔🧐🤨😯😎👀💪👌There's no such thing as "spooky action at distance" if we consider that other universes, subdimensions or different worlds( whatever they are) that are lack of t and 3ds. As far as I see that at least two more of them are out there beside our physical universe. The relationship of our physical universe and other universes ( or worlds) is just like traveling transverse waves. They pass through each other without interacting. Then everything is fine with me. Let's investigate and study them so that in the future the government can taxe on them.

Why does this entanglement happen ?

Evidently, Susskind badly misunderstands Bohr!

Thanks for this. Just a thought: Some people who are sensitive to sound find the static, droning music to be annoying. What does it add? A sense of contemplation? No. It just feels sad.

I’ve never understood the faster than speed of light information. And I still don’t.

Noin te pilasitte sen

with all me respect - this is not the best lecture on entanglement but only an intro. what is said and presented by Susskind (who is a great mind indeed) can be explained with classical correlations (shared randomness). genuine quantum correlations (entanglement) cannot be introduced without referring to Bell's inequalities.

But why do they spin and can the rate vary?

If you cant explain it simply , then you dont understand it 😮😮

too bad it's cut off before his conclusions.

How can a subtraction of two states work? The subtraction operation can be applied to numbers. But a subtraction of states makes no sense to me. Unfortunately he didn't explain it, so he lost me here. I wish there were physicists good at didactics.

I think a computer cannot model the random spin measurement. Reason is that a computer has a hard time generating a random number. Computers generate pseudo random numbers. In order for a computer to generate a real random number, it has to go to the outside world and find real randomness, thus relying on...the quantum spin it is modeling? Thus your model relies on the thing it is modeling and it is not an independent model.

Now I'm more convinced that entanglement has to do with hidden variables in a deterministic sysyem. The reason it leads to unpredictability has nothing to do with inherent randomness but with our lack of knowledge of the underlying chaotic system. Our quantum view is merely an approximation of a more fundamental deterministic chaotic system. It might not be fully predictable the same way other chaotic systems aren't, but it's NOT random.

So 2 entangled spin states have random but opposite spin.... What happens with 3 spins with 3 measurements 🤔 If A=1 then B=0,.... C=? I noticed in the video he went out of his way to have an Even Number of spin states... But why? Also surely if you can randomly cut the box of spins everything must be entangled with everything else. So what happens if Alice measures the Box of spins split vertically and simultaneously Bob measures the same Box split horizontally..... 1 quarter appear 1 for A&B 1 quarter appear 0 for A&B But 1 quarter would be 1 for A, simultaneously 0 for B And vice versa? So half the spins match while have contradict each other?

9:10: Here he lost me.

It will be lovely if you use the wrong maths. A new theory of prime numbers would make sense of it.

I would disagree. I am none the wiser as to what entanglement is. In fact I am more confused than ever.