It really is. It's one of my favorites for many, many reasons

I had a section of the video very similar to this that I had to scrap to stick with the flow of the video. Thank you so much for bringing this up and bringing this to light.

Thank you for the kind comment. Helps more than people realize

Oh it's one of the most devastating scenes that I can watch and rewatch over and over and still pick out small details in.

He just keeps making movies that have no reason to work

It is actually, it didn't just "didn't perform well at the box office", it litteraly flopped and except for the few fans of the movie that understood what it means to them and as a movie, it is underrated, because it should be appreciated, watched and talked about more (imo)

It's not a good action movie. But what it is, is a brilliant psychological thriller and tradgey. There is a lot of silence in the film, and considering the length of the movie, not that much dialogue. But the silence says so much and is used so brilliantly. I would definitely watch thisnone first, then go back and watch the original blade runner. As with the first film you really have to be in the right headspace to see what the movie is trying to do/say. Enjoy

Much appreciated

I appreciate it. I'm glad I was able to describe it

I'm glad you enjoyed the video. This is a personal one for me and I'm glad it resonated with you.

I'm glad you enjoyed this video. This one was one I had to fight quite a lot to get posted lol

Thank you

Glad you think so

Glad you enjoyed it

Hopefully it sticks around

I think your take is most accurately read as profoundly stupid on top of lazy.

Hm?

@@AFlyingWalrus I mean, I'm not trying to be mean, but why are K's eyes so droopy and unbalanced. I hardly noticed it in the movies, but now it stands out so much.

Huh that's an interesting catch, never noticed that.

@@AFlyingWalrus Also Bladerunner 2049 is my favourite movie of all time so I'm glad you covered it. Great video!

You can use proofs to prove that a equation will come to a logically outcome. Mathematics is simply our couscousness trying to make sense of the way the physical newtonion world works. As well as helping our minds to explain the quantum. Which in its nature is abstract. But you can't prove the base existence of mathematics with itself. So maybe I wasn't being specific enough. Much in the same way that we can't explain the existence of light with light, we have to have a contrasting thing outside of light to prove its existence. Dark and shadow. Hope that clears that up

@@AFlyingWalrus I do understand what your are trying to convey. I believe we are looking at it from different perspectives. I just see it from a physics point of view vs philosopher's point of view. A philosopher would say that nothing can be proven real, yet someone trained in physics would say that it is real until proven otherwise. Every day we are developing methods that can be replicated by anyone and the same conclusions will be reached 100% of the time. for example, Light. If there was no dark, we would still know light. why? Because our detectors would see particles travelling at the speed of light from a source that is identifiable, measurable, and repeatable. if there was no dark then we might not call these particles "light" but still, they are there. Every day we are learning more and more and discovering that the impossible is indeed possible and understandable. Yet a philosopher would say that we can never really understand. My answer to that is..... Give us time, and the mysteries will not be mysterious anymore. I appreciate your reply and your work.