Thanks for your support! We will be uploading more videos featuring him in the future so don't forget to like and subscribe 💚

@@docoftheday yeah of course 🙂

Same.

@@BradWatsonMiami so you have to bring in the book that has age of the world as 6000 years into this scientific discussion and try to confuse . It has brought enough misery and provided and continue to provide cover for untold savagery. Nauseaus to put it mildly.

😮 18:46

Hey, thanks for leaving a comment! We're thrilled to hear that you enjoyed Jim Al-Khalili's presentation in our latest video. We definitely agree that he's a great presenter. Stay tuned for more great videos featuring some of the best in the industry!

I totally agree.

He's pretty good. How come he's not in the House of Lords yet? "Sir Jim" has a nice ring to it, doncha think?

@@TheDavidlloydjones I believe "Sir" is a Knighthood, not a Lordship.

As soon as I saw he was presenting, I hit play. He's able to navigate incredibly complex issues with fluid accessibility few others can match.

Lucky for us, not all humans are stupid...

For those of us who can't do the maths.

I totally agree with your statement with such outstanding questions about our very existence is what every human being should aspire to

​@@Mr_Happy_X I want to go on a picnic so I pick mic it's not that funny 😒

He made one called the planets a year ago

I love the clarity of his voice too. He disappeared for a decade but seems to have reappeared having lost quite a bit of weight. Looks overly thin in this video!

He's basically saying there is no God. I'm sorry but that's simply not possible.

I think Jim al-K is great too. I've recently discovered a YT channel called Jeffrey Kaplan who teaches philosophy - he is supremely talented in making difficult topics easy to grasp.

you realize this is one a thousands of ytoutube channels that steal content and post it,,, jimbo aint seeing your msg

Favourite.

"Chaos theory’s order masquerading as randomness, sensitive dependence on initial₇₄ conditions, underlying patterns, self-similarity/fractals, self-organization, feedback, and the butterfly effect." - Introduction to the "7 Seals' revealed as 'Beyond Einstein Theories' on the Title Page to the 74-page "book/scroll", 'There Are No Coincidences'. This satisfies the prophecy of Revelation 5:1; see 7seals.blogspot.com . Only the Returned Christ & Albert Einstein reincarnated could produce that.

Only a Brit would buy they are the only ones involved in this theory. You guys are beyond belief with your superiority complexes

Too many in education think they have the answer already using the clockwork principle, socialism.

Falsehood

Me too, I've watched lots on AI but this made it so much clearer to me.

i studied Complex Systems, Chaos Theory, Thermodynamics, Computational Complexity and a bunch of other sciences for about a decade, to answer a particular, similiar question. In the end, All of it points to Stephan Wolfram's Physics Model as the theory behind it all. Cheers,

well, i think science has been really good at improving predictions and minimizing error weather prediction has been improving with te passing of the years, so i dont see how can you be so sure about your asessment

They don't understand chaos theory. Chaos theory means everything is connected. The starting position is true in very simple systems. But the weather is not a simple system.

@@alejandrogaray4649 Watch the video. Lookup Stephen Wolfram and computational complexity. Lookup and read about the fact that even orbital mechanics (some of the best mathematics we currently have that have amazing predictive capablities about the orbits of planetary bodies) have error margins. These are not errors in measurement which is the most commone misconception, they are 'errors in reality', by which I mean its best to think of the the universe as a computational engine, with particles an energy being computed at the plank length, and this strongly implies that the thing which we are trying to predict (reality itself) hasn't done the computations yet, and its the fastest computer around able to do the job. All other computers we build are like VM's (virtual machines) inside the master bare metal computer (the universe itself), and if know anythiing about computer science you will automatically understand that the VM can never be faster than the Master computer it runs on.

@@NightmareCourtPictures Yes exactly. He was right and then despised for it. He's a brillian albeit somewhat unlikable character since he knows he is a genius and doesn't hide it. I love that about him, but it isn't great for PR since the vast majority of humanity despises intelligence in others. Too threatening.

@duncancollins6722...Although I agree that humans (probably) can't entirely predict changes in nature & therefore cannot control nature, this is true only in the sense that we can't control nature in the more complete way that western society has attempted since at least the advent of the modern era---that is, in the Europe of the early scientific age, when philosophies of science began developing the idea of mankind as the only rational animal, of non-human animals as mechanical forms that might appear alive but which were actually without emotions or intellect. In many ways, early science was merely repeating Christian beliefs: mankind as created in God's image, with all other lifeforms & the earth itself as existing primarily for mankind's use, etc, & the Christian view continued to dominate scientific belief through much of the 20th c Only in recent years has science begun to recognize non-human animals as possibly capable of thought as complex as that of humans. In fact, science has begun to recognize that many forms of life previously classified as inanimate fact not inanimate. This view has not replaced the former animate/inanimate view of life in mainstream/dominant society, although it has gained some popularity worldwide. This newer view in science has developed alongside the growth of movements that include the animal rights movement, the ecological movements, etc. (Perhaps these sociopolitical movements influenced scientific thought, or perhaps these changes occurred simultaneously---that's another subject.) I think these changes in scientific thought were influenced by various movements that arose in the last half of the 20th c., including the spread of popular ideas based upon (Am.) Indian cultures that became more well known among members of the dominant culture (Euro-Am.). With the wider attention given to Native cultures in the '70s, partly prompted by the more vocal parts of the movement by Native peoples to achieve recognition & rights nationally & internationally, the subject of cultural differences between traditional Indians & peoples who were part of the mainstream culture (basically, what is usually called modern culture), some aspects of traditional Indian cultures were adopted by members of the mainstream western society in the U.S. & elsewhere. The point is, science has become more attuned to views previously classed as primitive, backwards, & ignorant. And in recent decades science has come to recognize that the human species is not necessarily superior to all others, that in fact there seem to be many forms of life which are intelligent & emotional in ways both similar to humans & in ways very dissimilar to humans. And the traditional western division of nature into animate & inanimate forms has begun to be seriously questioned by science & by western society. Western society, though, is still dominated by the older traditional views that are based on organized Christian belief. This system of viewing life has led to the extinction of many species & the destruction of entire ecosystems worldwide, destruction which began long before European dominance of the Americas began. In my own lifetime (1948-present) I've seen the destruction of the forests in the southeastern U.S., with firsthand view of the destruction of the forests in southern Ark., where my family & ancestors had lived since just after the US seizure of the Cherokee Nation (1838-) & expulsion of the people from their homeland. My ancestors had escaped capture by US military & the legalized mobs of "white" men who Pres. Jackson awarded with legal rights to any Cherokee property seized by any means chosen by the mobs of settlers, forerunners of organizations such as the Klan. My great great grandparents, along with others who escaped the federal roundups & forced death marches to Indian Territory, made their way to southern Ark, where as yet there were many miles of deep forest unsettled by Americans, where they were able to live independently until toward the end of the 19th c. In the '50s & '60s, I lived among many miles of forest, with about a third of it old forest/"virgin" & quite a bit more of it mature forest. Living 8 miles outside the nearest town (pop. 3,000), our house was one of perhaps 50 houses scattered on dirt or gravel roads within many miles of forest. The only other town (also with abt 3000 people) in the region was 30 miles away, the nearest cities were even farther. (Ark.'s pop. was & still is quite low compared to nearby states.) The southeastern panther (cougar/puma/mtn lion) was supposedly extinct in that region, as in the eastern half of the US, except for a small number of Florida panthers who were almost extinct. But statistics, official statistics, a panther lived along the stream behind our house. Another panther lived in the deep woods that began across the road. Those were the panthers we knew of---the eastern panther is very shy of humans & is very rarely seen. At that time the native wolf species & the native black bear were never seen, having been killed off within the brief period since the area became home to non-native settlers only about half a century before. Although local people had lived by logging in the 20th c, with a logging mill owned locally in the nearest town, in the early 1960s Georgia-Pacific Corp. took over the local mill, modernizing & enlarging it. International Timber had also become active but G-P dominated. By the early '80s, the forests of the region had been almost totally " harvested" of mature trees & in place of those cut trees, G-P planted its own genetically engineered pines. The region had been composed of deciduous forests, but the international timber industry preferred to replace other trees with pines, as they were profitable. Most people have never lived in forests, much less having witnessed the destruction of such forests. Such destruction includes not only the trees but the many life forms who live within the forest. Maybe humans can't predict what plants, animals, , & "Nature"can do, maybe these will be able to survive somehow. Maybe the human species will change & somehow survive. This doesn't excuse the ways we treat the earth & all of "nature." The world dominant in today's world show no respect for life. And while "nature" might morph & survive in other forms, I fear it will survive in much-reduced complexity that we already see in the places like the forests I once knew.

Sucked. Promised the Miracle of Intelligent Life, but delivered drone music to snooze to. Teabag wanker.

Where does mutation come from???? This is the question:)))) Who can prove that in a particular sense it cannot be from God!!! :)

@@sergkapitan2578 God is a mutation of human thinking and unfounded fear.

​@@zipperpillow excellent comment!

​@@sergkapitan2578 Go away

Me too. I've heard the term "chaos theory" thrown around. I think I even Googled it at one point. But I never really got what it was. Only a small piece. Having it all put together kind of knocks you for a philosophical loop.

Yes, Connections was presented by James Burke, another brilliant science presenter, there are episodes available on youtube, well worth rewatching after all this time.

Thank you

This is why they miss label us consumers I got a boomer for their consumer

This document is about the tragic death of Turing. Only in the collective west can such tragedy happen, as they did through out the ages, Archimedes was killed, Galileo was imprisoned, many more were killed trying to further human knowledge. None in the east, China, India etc., ever faced such inhuman culture. is it safe to claim to be civilized (or is it animal logic).

This was produced by the BBC. Any materials presented by Al-Kahlili (physics) Alice Roberts (anthropology), or Waldemar Januszcsak (art) are top notch.

@@sonarbangla8711 Tianeman Square, 1989 10,000 massacred University Students in one night by the orders of the Chinese Communist Party. Stupid ignorant uneducated self hating morons are hard to take.

this documentari is more like science drama oversimplification makes it full of errors done in sake to crate drama

Until the great attractor emerges and makes everything the same.

Chaos by James Gleick is a deep but fascinating book on this subject

Excellent point. Good insight. This seems quite clear once you think about it.

@@BradWatsonMiami "How do you see fractals in evolution?" Wow,, did you even watch the video? I'm sorry it didn't make sense to you but you know, the universe is under no obligation to make you understand. And really, We don't want anything to do with your primitive, superstitious, science-denying, violent, sexist, homophobic, pedophilic, genocidal, slave-owning, goat-humping Hebrew myths. It's time to grow up and give up the bronze-age immoral magic nonsense. It poisons everything.

Yes....and there is a great probablility that similar minds were lost in The Holocaust, slavery in America and elsewhere, in all the millions who were born into primitive cultures and used as stoop labor for their whole lives....a waste ! ..... joe

When I read his biographies and I started crying all the way through the text… Nothing changed since then!

@spiralsun How about this one: Truth is fractal. A higher truth may prove you right, if the historic scientists in this docu are any precursor to the future.

They don't want to consider that there might be more than meets the eye.

They were rejected, nuff said.

Your comments are interesting. You wrote, "...showing what humans actually are". -- Contextually, what are humans?

Yes but it could be argued that it’s an advanced topic and healthy patterns of thinking should be thought first.

@@alfonso8843 Agreed, however, often topics like these serve to spark critical thinking in young students.

@@jerseygurl620 I found it disappointing in that the title promises to explain the link between chaos theory and the emergence of intelligent life, but it completely ignored it.

​​@@eddiecephus1hat's because there is no scientific evidence for linking them (reply to comment about link between chaos and intelligent life)

no you can't use this in school. atleast not yet. people will go insane realizing that everything is just random therefore there's no Creator. billions of people are not ready for that realization. people will become depressed, anxious and lonely as a result of existential crisis that eventually will result into a massive worldwide suicide that will come to unfold before our very eyes! you want that to happen?

Excellent. The idea that the behavior of a cell is determined by its position w.r.t other cells is exactly what came to mind when watching that part of the documentary.

"Evolution allows such "short-sightedness" temporarily but not forever." What? 3.5 Billion years is not long enough for you? Evolution works just fine without you understanding it. Just look around you.

@@benjamindover5676 You completely misunderstood my comment. My fault. I should have said: Evolution allows the "short-sightedness" of our intelligence temporarily but not forever. I mean our short-sighted intelligence has the potential of killing our species.

Thank you. Was thinking just that when I found your comment. I have had similar thoughts about schools of fish. People often talk about a fishes environment as being in the ocean but its environment is in the school (depending on species, I have cod in mind as there has been some good study done on them). So dropping a few fish in the ocean is not necessarily putting them into their environment. And the school as an entity is more than just its individuals and could be older than any of the fish.

Pantheism.

No, science and God are not the same thing. One is real.

What god? Can you please define this God? And what evidence do you have for this God? Please ask this God to make an appearance so we can tell if it's real.

@@benjamindover5676 yes, the fiist source and center of everything. And there have been and still are personifications on earth. The thing is, we get to choose our belief and trust. Nothing is forced on us in the spirit reality. You have chosen to dislike and distrust the evidence. So, for you none of it is real. Your choice.

@@julieisthatart "The thing is, we get to choose our belief and trust." Well,, you didn't answer my question. Probably because your god is not real and you have zero evidence for it. Also,, A wise person can't choose what to believe. I can only believe what the evidence shows. And because you didn't define what god you are talking about,, I can only take a stab in the dark and guess the god of the bible. The bible is very clear that there is not god-given free will. According to the bible god is all-powerful, all-knowing, the creator of the universe who made all the rules and has perfect knowledge of the future. No one comes to Jesus unless the Father draws them first (John 6:44). Makes all the rules, Exodus 24:12>13. Made the flaws in people, Psalm 139:12, Can do anything, Mark 10:27. Knows the future, Isaiah 46:9>10. According to the bible this god knew everything and is 100% responsible for the hurt, pain, and evil in the world. He wants it that way. That is why even if the god of the bible was true, I would not worship him. Would you like some more bible study on free will? I have about 100 verses that will prove my point.

Same here, though the last time I saw them was the late 80's. Good times, Good times.

You don’t need to travel anywhere. The entire universe is embedded in your brain. Anyway, who wants to be stuck in a huge queue waiting to check-in on the intergalactic express, and then get seated next to some obese time-traveller ?

@@jamesdean1143 I can drink 2 cups of ayahuasca and beat the spaceship n get shot up into the universe in a second . I guess that makes me a time traveler. Just got to have a spew due to travel sickness

@@jamesdean1143 Jabba the Hutts misses

@@BradWatsonMiami Have you considered seeking professional help?

How times have changed hey...

That may be true. How have you been made better by it? Holding a grudge against the UK isn't any help to anyone who must live in the UK. You need to forgive and understand the time when this took place. The time you're in now is no different. If you manage to live another 20 or 30 years, you will see that. If you tell yourself the truth then, you will see how you were "complicit" in the injustices we are perpetrating this very day. Life is messy and often not fair.

The god of this world is Lucifer and J.A.K is sent by him to further the Religion of science , so literally speaking you are right

This documentary depicts chaos theory is a very negative light; but when I came across chaos theory, I was absolutely fascinated by it. For start we know that there is infinite possibilities in terms of what can happen, endless fun, strange affects that chaos can have on things, the weirdness of it fascinated me so much. I never realized how negative people were towards it at the time. Maybe because of how it was explained in such a fascinating way, it made me see mostly the positive side to chaos; and I definitely fully understood it.

re: "The fibonnacci sequence proves there is an intelligent design component to the physical aspects of the universe." It doesn't prove anything at all. That's your personal bias because you want it to be so.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Good luck proving your claims. It's alot easier to say I don't know and you don't either.

@@DataWaveTaGo it's already been mathematically proven by people a hell of a lot smarter than you or me. I don't have any bias on the subject,. Id be willing to bet YOU do, however.

@@A-non-theist your bias is what causes you to lead with an ad Hominem and follow with a non-sequitur. See my previous comment.

@@Foundry_made Assertions doesn't prove anything. Just because you believe something doesn't mean it's true. End of conversation. Have a wonderful day or night.

This idea actually came out in popular form in the mid-70s.

lol whatever, genius

it's like the old cliche. "Because we stand on the shoulders of giants."

​@Ali Al-Mahdi Don't worry, your dreams are quite ordinary stuff.

@@GOGO2482 Try cutting back on the magic mushrooms by at least one handful. Otherwise, your dreams make perfect sense. If you're not a shaman, you are in the wrong line of work. And that pee you drank.... was mine. You're welcome. Full-on loaded with Amanita Muscaria. I thought the labeling was funny at the time. Keep on drinking pee and dreaming Dr. Yemen.

there's no shame in humility ❤

@Ali Al-Mahdi Your comment made me laugh. 🙂.

​@Ali Al-Mahdi those are Some dreams you are having

Such a particular reference has absolutely NO business here or in science at all. Interesting? Perhaps. Entertaining? Sure. Objective, scientific truth? No, I'm afraid, on almost ALL accounts. Be wary.

Exactly

Ikr, been trying to get more people to watch this for like ten years. There wasnt any HD upload like this one, surely this will get removed soon 😢