it's frightening

Genius?, he's funny, obviously, nothing genius about it, it's called a speed limit lol.

@@mikemorris4548 /woosh

fucking hell nothing gets passed you Mike does it 👍

Actually makes you think how better cars are useless, you can't practically use all you got as it literally is against the law actually. So yes a Prius is as fast as a Bugatti on normal road.

What ant

@@ridhwanramzi4773 That ant!

@@olivercook9663 🤨 *observes jar closely*

@@ridhwanramzi4773 or you can use your common sense and have a labradog

*labradog

An labradog

*igyuana with a silver neckless

What about a dinosaur?....There's another man called Hammond who lives on an island who can get you one of them....Some are a bit bitey but just get a veggiesaurus and you'll be fine.👍🦕🦖

The most ironic part of that episode is that Clarkson was trying to be a middle ground between Hammond's 'budget' Jag F-pace (about 60k) and May's 'expensive' Bentley Bentayga (About 300k). Price of his 'middle ground' Range rover was about 120k.

I don't remember that clip

guy who lived on the equator here, and yes we see a big dotted line everyday in the sky

Who ever wrote that joke should write jokes for female comics

Uuh, yea. We seen the video.

@@disclaimer.imjokin You should probably go outside and touch grass rather than be a misogynist.

@@disclaimer.imjokin Damn ur really not doing well huh

That’s Hollywood logic in a nutshell

​@@ishkabible1028directed by Michael Bay

I lol'd when Hammond said "It'll be a hammer. It's not a hammer!"

Hammond You can’t prune a tree with a Shotgun! 🅲🅻🅰🆁🅺🆂🅾🅽: 🆈🅴🆂 🆈🅾🆄 🅲🅰🅽!

a real American would do it with an AR assault rifle

@@elvis1745 no such gun exists

@@elvis1745assault rifles are illegal in America semi auto rifles are not

Hahah yeah 😂❤️

It’s probably easier to buy the golf, really

The DUP will make it happen

It's legal if you work in an embassy in Saudi Arabia.

"with a hammer"

THE BONE! 😂

"it's nuclear."

it's Clarkson, everything that comes in contact with his genius instantly turns into a hammer

"Come On!!"

It just works

Why didn't he use his shotgun? Much quicker

Man lab is one of those programs that is just infinitely rewatchable. Like the skit of James and Simmy playing Russian roulette with beer cans and end up getting drunk on the fumes.

@@An_Inconvenience Definitely. I watch it a lot!

@@An_Inconvenience Man lab is one of the most manly and entertaining show ever

“Mam, I do my own plumbing!”

Reference: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/f3h1fX-Qhm-SjoE.html

No it was measured in km. 55 miles = 90 km

@@nickcrompton485 they probably measured it in kilometers, but then thought "90 kilometer beach" didn't sound very catchy, so they changed 'kilometer' to 'mile' while keeping the number at 90 because 'ninety' and 'mile' have a similar sound in the beginning and therefore sounds more catchy. I'm probably overthinking this lol but that would kinda make sense to me

@@nickcrompton485 it's 88km long tho lol

@Esh that's an extra 2km of non-existent beach

If that isn't just something you just made up, it probably has more to do with making travel time measurements consistent. If people were used to thinking "okay, 200 mile journey, that is about 4 days" and planned accordingly, and if they used the beach as a highway (which they probably did, and still do in many places), it was more useful to give the distance in the miles it would _normally_ cover in the amount of time it actually took to travel the beach. Although since most people would learn to account for this very quickly anyway, I think it is more likely that they just meant it to mean "Really Long Beach"" and "Ninety Mile Beach" rolls off the tongue the easiest. OR, it was 90 miles from some inland point of importance, or even more likely, it starts 90 miles up the coast from the next most significant point.

"But caravans are made of plywood!"

Yup. Pythonesque

They are EX-weeds!!

Judging by the genius of this mans gardening, im not surprised.

observe the genius of my gardening

Possibly, but I like to think it's more likely that he's questioning the waste of petrol.

General Motors is OVER! 😂

@@themiddleground5263 corgi is the future!

Tesla's are garbage

@@AverageAlien Tell me you haven't driven a Tesla without telling me you haven’t driven a Tesla.

@@TheKorusuk Absolute trash cars

If Clarkson's genius creates gravity, the trio together has enough power to run the entire solar system

It has a presence

Some would even say it's... Almost frightening.

what episode was that from?

Thanks James

Apparently, you have the right to demand a jury trial instead of a magistrate.

@@christopherdean1326 Not for speeding you don’t. Speeding is summary only. You can have trials in the magistrates court believe it or not, but there is no jury, and they use typically a DJ (district judge) or several magistrates. You are confusing jury trials with trials in a magistrates court. Trials in magistrates have no jury, but prosecution, defence counsel, court clerks, any specific witnesses, and either a district judge or several magistrates. Crown courts have trial by jury.

@@thefiestaguy8831 didn't you say "or if you pleaded not guilty"?! Why wouldn't one NOT plead that if they wanted to get a jury? ^^

James: Is that a hammer?

I mean it's still not 90, I do get it though that makes alot more sense, pretty cool a beach is a road tbh

I remember watching this episode when I was growing up and my little brother said that exact same thing. With modern technology that honestly wouldn’t be out of the question, maybe you’re on to something?

@@parkerjanelle7853 I think the amount of energy needed to power the magnet would require a huge battery onboard, but I can't be bothered to do the math rn

A.) Would that actually decrease the decceleration forces at all? You would still be abruptly stopping the car, with all those forces going into the cars structure. If they can't easily built a car that can withstand an actual collision, why would it be any easier to build one that can withstand the same force from a front mounted magnet? Not to mention the enormous 2,000lb magnet itself, as he mentioned. And the enormous power supply it would require, with the additional danger of high voltage cables. B.) What is to stop it from just shunting you off to the side into the traffic beside you or the wall, like happened to the toy car? How is that better? C. ) What do you do when you turn on the magent and it pulls all the traffic beside you into your car, or your car into the traffic beside you instead of the car ahead of you? ANYTHING metal within 20 feet is gong to be pulled into the magnet. D. ) It only works if BOTH cars have magnets activated. Otherwise it is going to just pull you into an even harder crash. AND it only works if your car has a negative magnet facing a negative magnet, or positive-positive. Say you put negatives into the front of all cars. Okay, it might sort of prevent frontal collisions, at the cost of driving around with a huge 2,000 lump on the front of your car, which might slightly effect handling. But it will be useless in rear collisions, which are like 90% of them. Or you go the extra step and make the car automatically select the correct polarity when it detects a crash, how does it know the difference between the rear of a car coming at it at high speed and the front of a car? In any case it is not worth the huge expense and increased complexity for the small potential benefit.

It would rip pacemakers and surgical implants out of people

Why not just add giant springs in front and back of the cars? That way they will push one another apart during the crash without the need for electric magnets.

The Royal Navy did that 200 years ago

Jeremy Clarkson doesn’t speak English, he speaks Clarksonese. Easy mistake.

But some assembly required

It's also basically a Skoda Fabia with a MPV body, similarly to Ford Fusion is just a Fiesta with a hat.

There is a reason why ants, fleas, and so on can fall from a high distance and walk away and a human, dog, elephant and so on cannot. As you increase size by 10, surface increases exponentially, so 100 and volume by ^3 power, so 1000. (and so also weight) If you consider that the toys metal is not much thinner than a real car, imagine having to scale that up *1000. So that small model car that hammond is holding is 1/40. If you also scale up the thickness of the metal hull to have the same effect, the models metal being 1mm thick, it would need to be 40cm thick, from the outside in. So youd be left with little room inside as also the structural components will need the same scaling up. Youd not be able to sit in it. And you wouldnt want to, bc your internal structure isnt suited to deal with the many g's impact and youd still die if it was dropped from the relative same height. But the 'car' would have similar damage as the model. Theres no tank with 40cm thick metal hull, or ship. Not even buildings. And its even worse than this. Edit: The more mass, the more kinetic energy. Since you are trying to make it stronger, as the model, you scale up thickness, but then you also scale up kinetic energy. Its beneficial to be small wrt all this.

@@StofStuiver thank you James, I enjoyed my sleep.

@@VXGaming ;]

That was a very long winded way to say F=M•A But you also say for a car with 1/40 scale with 1mm thick metal would be 40cm thick. That’s 400x’s. It would just be 4cm thick. But the model cars are already scaled down, so scaling back up would just result in the same measurements of the original car. What Jeremey is basically saying is the 1/18 scale model Audi isn’t $3K, so why is the scaled up model $54K?

What does Indesit mean?

@@sukhdevr3489 it's a brand of washing machines... usually white, and not that much smaller than that car. ;-)

WHAT IN THE FUCK

Sir I would like to sponsor that genius

@@chrissosa3723 And I would take that sponsorship, sir!

He'd have to fall head first though. Difficult to maintain that orientation while hurtling through a sea of air.

200 mph crash, but with how much time to slow down? If we are talking about coming to a dead stop instantly like hitting the ground, nobody's surviving that.

Hang on I know this is wrong but I don’t know why. Someone please tell me how this isn’t right?

Me too!!!

You are not familiar with the concept of fuel level float sensors and the behavior of fluids, apparently. It used to be normal for many cars to read higher going up hill than downhill, because the sensor was in the rear of the tank, and all the fuel sloshed to the rear going up hill. It does mean (assuming the pickup is also there) that you won't run out as soon going uphill (which is a good way to engineer it), but it has zero effect on the total amount of fuel. In this case, the float is on one side of the tank. When you corner, all the fuel sloshes to that side, raising the level.

@@justforever96 That's cool, I was 7 when I first saw this so unfamiliar might be a correct term to use. Does make sense though, nice explanation.

@@noahduffin5492 same situation here but I kinda figured it out on my own

I always thought his car was so worn out and rubbish that the needle itself was just sliding around freely with no relation to the sensor.

Load shells with seeds and you can plant with it as well as do the weeding.

All this tells the masses of the youtube comment section is that you’re secretly james may. Waste of text

But even if cars could survive an impact like that, the driver would be liquified anyway. Lol

these nerd enjoying commedy the wrong way

@tomsterBG technically it's written "its scale" :-B