In Sylvester Stallonegrad ?

The record for the assembly time of the T34 tank is 31 minutes.

@@Coloss92I bet T-90 is a lot more complex compared to T-34

​@@easternfrontagainSo are all the tools, facilities, etc required to make it

34 t34s in 34 minutes

It's true. They meant refurbishment

No, more like the blind walking into a concrete wall.

Their information source is the Ukrainan Comedians Group in Kiev

Exactly! They probably only managed to observe 1/10th of the actual russian losses.

Usually the ratio is between 1:10-1:20 Russian to Ukrainian losses

Who is the biggest liar? Washington? London? Brussels? Tel Aviv? Let the arguments begin!

UToobe's comment control system protects those paragons of truth.

🐵🐵

When they say losses, they don't say that 80 to 90% of those "losses" are just damaged tanks that will be repaired quickly and easily. The same way many "casualties" are flowing back to the frontline after healing,

In Abvdiivca alone the UCRANIANS have a 1 to 11.5 tank loss advantage against the invading orc army when it comes to tanks. Also. 3 tanks produced a day is nothing when in a single attack Russia loses 2-3 tanks and 2-6 AFVS in each attempted attack on Abvdiivca alone 😂 When Russia produces 3 tanks a day Ukraine produces 1,000 RPG ROUNDS ABD FPVS 😂

And they are turning T-72 into BMP Terminators.

because they're coffins for four alcoholics. RPG7 can obliterate them, FPV drones can obliterate them.... hence they're useful just as artillery, their optics are bad and their fire control systems are from the 80s at best.

they are being used

T-55s are actually more loved than the newer T-62s which had several issues with the engine and inaccurate smooth bore cannon. And they do use their BTRs, MLTBs etc in DA and IDA roles. russian's are willing destroy everything in their path and sacrifice company sized elements just to draw out our artillery so they can counter battery. Our artillery often will not engage platoon sized elements. russians have no regard for life. Not much has changed.

they have started being used but i imagine one reason is the morale hit for the crews driving in on those tanks.

😂😅🤣👏👏👏😁

Accurate AF 😂

where are the facts stating this ?

@@alangunningham5667 have you ever come across such a concept as "sarcasm"?

Ghost of Kiev?

Agree

Just thought the same

UToobe not only trusts British intel but, they block any substantial criticism of them IF it even slightly makes a sideways comment against certain members. They aren't even trying to hide their complicity in the crimes of TPTB.

He just gets this garbage from the Guardian and the BBC.

Putin said he wouldnt invaded Ukraine British intel said he would. which was correct?

Quantity over quality but done the right way.

One little note: Russia have THE RESOURCES! Russia is capable to produce spaceship engines and nuclear plants of the next level! Germany or USA can't!

There is simply no need to produce tanks like the T-72. There are enough of them. The T-14 does not take an active part in Ukraine, due to the fact that it is not necessary there. There is no opponent for him.The problem with Western tanks is solved by another method. This also applies to some other types of equipment.

Usa see it in this war and stop money wasting technologies like defiant, sky raider programs stop immediately and going on ch46,s60 new wars will need quantity not quality.

The T-14 is not far enough along it's development curve to be considered "ready for combat." But, Ukraine is the perfect place to perfect it. Several of them have been seen, but presently they're in very limited numbers.

There will be no negotiations, otherwise they will rearm and again Uncle Sam will drive them to war.

Deal to whome? Old daddy from US? He is hardy understanding, what going on and talks to dead people. To Scholz? To Boris Jonson)? Sorry - to this Indian guy….

@@RikPol Actually, like was well known already, and said by Putin to Tucker in the interview, the Ukros broke good faith in the first 6 months of the war and the Russian people want blood.

Ukraine had 6000+ at SU breakup.

Uncle Sam wird den arsch aufgerissen bekommen sollte er sich in Russland sehen lassen 😂

as demining kamikaze (even perhaps decoy) equipment

gay

@@RobertBalejik For this purpose, there are t-64 and earlier versions. Counting which no one would think of. What is used on landfills as mobile targets.

Why not? China has turned many of its Cold War-era jets into drones.

hahahaha, they lack complety such capabilities. They can not even equip their "new" built tanks with modern sights or produce the T14 armata. I highly doubt they would waste modern cameras and computers on an 70years old tank, filled with cheap Humanmeat.

the usual false Western propaganda. The Western media tell such nonsense about Russia

As an average that’s about right, if not a bit low. Documenting Russian equipment loses based on geolocated footage throughout the conflict does support that claim.

I think it is far more

​@@edthebumblingfoolsays who? If they losing that much why they are advancing?

Yes, this is an overoptimistic propaganda

I'd say about half...

A lot of the ones damaged by drones probably were. That is why it is important to make followup shots to try and destroy the tank.

And those tanks and IFV's that were recycled back to the battlefield were counted as new. Russia is practically not losing that much while Ukraine have no capabilities that's why they want more tanks from NATO. What's destroyed were just left in the battlefield. Anyway the US and NATO will give them more. Do you think NATO have enough stockpile left to last a week if they attack Russia? Just saying.

Those turrets that have flown 100 meters go back on easily 🤣

Any of them that aren't brewed up.

I know right

T-64 can also be used as a MBT it is the expensive version of the T-72.

Yeah right. If this level of discipline and organisation was true Russia would have won the war ages ago !

@@MrAvant123 How do you imagine the victory of the Russians in this conflict? Rapid conquest of territory and then control of that territory? What will they achieve in this way? The Russian strategy is "I don't give a fuck about the territory, I intend to exterminate the Ukrainians (Galicians), so that I never have a problem with those pests again, and the territory will come into its own when those pests are gone"! Notice the difference in strategy!? The West likes the first strategy "I came, I robbed, I left", the Russians are in favor of "I took mine back, I cleaned it of pests, I stayed"!

"according to Shoigu"...you dont see it yourself?

The old tanks are basically cannon-fodders on the frontline

Это не просто много,это сложно представить даже)

​@@qwerty8287 А теперь вдумайся что Т-72 было произведено более 25000

No no no... about 1200 a year, in some cases, more like due to upgrades and refits etc but i believe from end 2022, the production is around 100 a month.

Do they? Evidence please.

@@justinlawrence5453there is proof of a destroyed Challenger and a destroyed Leopord, plus Bradleys and artillery pieces destoryed lol

@@justinlawrence5453 Red Effect covered quite a few of them. Only one not to get lost, yet, is the Abrams. Holy hell though is it sad to see so many Leo 2 A6s burn in fields when T-55S only lost 3-4 so far.

@@RomanianReaver utter hogwash you troll.

@@justinlawrence5453 There is more than enough evidence for most of the Leopard 2 tanks having been destroyed. There are also evidence of at least 2x Challenger tanks having been destroyed. There are also articles in the western media which claims that the UK has asked to Ukrainians to keep the Challengers once they achieved a break through - which obviously did not happened, and is not going to happen. The anti tank weapons on both sides are such that a tank which is seen does not survive for very long. So the Russians are losing tanks as well as the Ukrainians. Russia started with many more, and they can repair and replace tanks at a significantly higher rate than the Ukrainians. The west cannot supply newly built tanks. The capability to manufacture the main gun of the Challenger does not exist in Europe anymore for example. So even if they can manufacture new Challengers, they cannot provide the guns. Most people does not seem to realize how much the West European arms manufacturing industry has been decimated in the last 3 or 4 decades. Mostly because of their "friends" the USA, who puts tremendous pressure to kill off any domestic developments in the EU, so that they can sell their own stuff.

They know but that is all part of the plan to divide and conquer, same in Europe and in the US. Its deliberate whats going on - no one is doing anything about it because its not on your doorstep, yet.

I agree, Russia isn't building brand new, old tanks at all. The T-90 is a good example, it's in use and it's still in it's development cycle and is a monster. Some say better than an Abrams (less weak spots) And it's also just a T-72 which they never stopped upgrading, starting with Ukraine's own tanks which I believe are all Soviet era T-72's. What you get today, won't be the exact same one you get a month from now. A year from now it might even get a new number. LOL They never stop developing and each tank is almost unique in that sense. Hell, they're on the third version of just the Lancet Drone. It was introduced in Syria and perfected in Ukraine. They only cost 8,000 dollars to make. The Lancet 3 can swarm in groups of 8 (pickup truck racks, pickup truck racks?) and has a common AI powered interface. This allows them to pick their own targets autonomously. If it's in their database, it's dead dead. And it ran all the Leopard 2 tanks out of Ukraine; almost single handedly. Germany's sending them all back home. NATO is in shock. The Leopards were a preferred target and got massacred. The Abrams have been hiding, but when they come out; the same thing is going to happen to them. The grinder. The Lancets also stitch together a huge map in real time and shares it with all the other battle interfaces, whether it be ground/ air/ infantry/ artillery, or the Navy. They all talk to each other electronically. And if anyone can use anything on that map, they can react within 5 minutes; before the event is even over. Not wasting half the day lining up the shots. Everything on the map is already GPS marked. (that pesky AI again) It's pretty amazing actually to see it all work. Even their artillery cannons are smart to that effect. They can fire off that map loaded with GPS coordinates with smart ammunition that can hit a nickel at 200 miles. I watched one of those tiny Lancet drones (it looks like a kite) blow an armored patrol boat out of the water. That's why you don't see any aircraft carriers in Ukraine, or Africa. And they're sending 10,000 Lancet 3's to Syria. It's not if you can hit the tank, it's WHERE you can hit the tank. War is not the same game it was 20 years ago and Russia knows exactly how to play it. LOL

the key is 'stocking+strategical' Russia is yet to push on a real broad front. That needs a big stockpile in the rear. Currently, it's a phase of 'eliminate what is thrown at static positions, move forward where is weak'.

@@mast_g Actually both sides are just burning their old equipment in Ukraine. The main difference is Russia is using its own population to do that while western powers are using ukrainians for the job. Also Putin is clearly prepearing for something major. He is literally held back the modern equipments, aircrafts, tanks, manpower, et cetera from the battlefield. He is probably prepearing for an agressive NATO move.....however, i dont believe western leaders are so stupid, that they are attacking a nuclear power. That could spiral out of control very easily. Well i hope they are not on such level of stupidity.

+ captured

@@dannysdailys Lol - lol... there is footage of tanks on rail, lots and has been since the end of 2022 - that is why its estimated around 100 a month, due to the footage. Doesn't matter, pointless commenting.

And what of your Ukrainian Orthodox Brothers in Ukraine? My understanding is that has its service undertaken in Russian the other in Ukrainian. That it. You must hate those who have their service in Latin, Spanish, English, etc. but clearly you never really understood the concept of Christianity have you.

@@andyglastonbury6032the difference is the Russians didn’t give up on orthodoxy - from a Muslim with great respect for Christianity

Thank you ❤

@@andyglastonbury6032 Look up the stunts Ukranians have been pulling on their fellow orthodox people and you'll quickly learn to stop drinking from that septic tank (eye for an eye is in the bible)

Your Orthodox Christianity in Russian is blinded by corrupted power and supremacy. Your patriarch Kirill is doing devils work by giving blessing for Putin, war and genocide.

t-90m is good looking. Oryx is a reliable source to my knowledge, they even compare unit markings and use geolocation to ensure that tank losses are not counted twice or fabricated by Ukrainians

@@jackvogenitz4284 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@jackvogenitz4284 Oryx was founded and funded by the CIA, and now that site is closed because no one believes their lies anymore! Now we can expect the opening of a new "independent and neutral source of information about catastrophic Russian losses"!

and then it gets whacked by Bradley IFV

BTW, if you find any more credible way of counting how many tanks were destroyed than collecting photographs of destroyed tanks and geolocalization of said photographs then you are welcome to share.

Yeah, mate, this is said in the video exactly

Until (like Saddam Husseins tanks) the barrels are just 'shot-out' and useless....

@@MrAvant123 About twenty thousand T-55s with probably as many spare barrels and maybe even a million shells... and it is inevitable that in the near future they will all be melted down... so why not use them up now, and wear them out!?

Old tanks are targets.

@@lewcrowley3710 every tank is

Lol - i takr you have not seen the new artillery systems, more and more due this year and the drones, speculated to be doing a lot damage - and all you have to do is see the train loads of tanks from 2022 from the production facility, i take it you know where it is - can't miss it.. doesn't matter. With the intelligence, not just from the MoD, various others too, they can see it and so can you - if you look. Don't forget, YT has been taken down a lot of Russian content - telegram channels are best.

@JosephGibson Russia is a 145 million country, they are against a coalition of around 800 million people + Ukraine. If this war drags off for much longer the conclusion is a forgone one.

New Tanks are mostly T90M, T80BVM and T72B3M are restored and modernized

@@bagamut Actually they have production lines for the T-72 still and the T-80 got one made last year from what I recall. So no, fair chunk of the 72s and 80s are new too.

Yeah its going to be mostly t-80s restarting production if i remember correctly and older tanks being upgrades to be up to standard like t-72b’s and the occasional t-62’s

Where are two main sources of tanks: new production and modernisation. all new tanks are t90. Russia is uncapable of bulding new T80. They annonced the new production line for it but I don't think the production is started yet. Another big sorce of tanks is modernisation of old T72 and T80 and they are still great tanks.

@@user-ol8qv8vo1x "ussia is uncapable of bulding new T80. They annonced the new production line for it but I don't think the production is started yet." A production line being set up means it's being made. Maybe not industrial quantities but still. The T-80's only real difference to the T-90 is the turbine, that was hard to make but guess they figured it out in the end.

Ukraine I guess?

@@edthebumblingfool They are not Orthodox Christians and definitely not brothers of the Serbs. The Nazi SS Galicia division made up of Catholic Ukrainians came from Ukraine to Serbia and committed terrible crimes against Orthodox Serbs, and when they lost the war in 1945, the Vatican organized their rescue by transferring them, mostly to Canada, with the explanation that those bloodthirsty Ukrainian Catholic dogs are "good Catholics and devoted anti-communists"! Guess once again whose side the Serbs are on!

@@edthebumblingfool no

@@edthebumblingfool Serbs are bros with Russians, lol

Не просто хорошие, а лучшие💪🇷🇺

​@@vinsentrso9469? Based on what?

@@NoName-md5zb competitions (pre-war) and video analysis during the war in ukraine. I have seen some interesting, neutral reports on this.

The US currently has no assembly facilities producing new tanks. As things stand now US tank facilities can only repair/refurbish 12 tanks a month.

US has 4 million 155mm cluster shells in stock that it could give to Ukraine. They are never going to use them, so why not?

exactly

We know that from the beginning... that site was funded by the CIA, and it was shut down because the CIA stopped giving money... that site lost its relevance because the lies were exposed very quickly!

Nope wrong. Ukraine got tanks from all its neighbours (basically the old Russian junk) but Russia was the biggest donor with 500+ (captured) Russian tanks now part of the Ukrainian army. Thanks Russia. Russia loses more than it can replace. Ukraine gets stronger, Russia grows weaker.

Drunk Cossacks drink vodka with bears and then play balalaikas

If so inclined? The Russians could be in Berlin in a week.

@@dannysdailys The Russians just came back from conquering Berlin, in 45. Russia is huge, it has no interest in more territory, or any other foreign stuff. All Russia wants is Peace and Reason to endure and secure the lives of all in the world...and that in equal access to Prosperity. Europe, Germany, France, etc.. faces a poor future without Russia..and they all know it.

Your preaching to the choir. BRICS is going to buy the west single handedly.@@rosszografov614

"Russia has no interest in more territory, Russia want Peace and Reason" also Russia: invades and threatens neighbouring countries for decades,annexes foreign land, claims borders from 1000 years ago are somehow relevant today and completely ignored diplomacy and peace since 2008. Get facts straight,Vatnik

​@stantheman276 Russia in Paris? Are you drunk?

Yep, diversity is strength, equal to strength of at least 1000 Russian tanks. 😀😀

Better to have a few different places

Sure and Russia also lost 7 billion men!!

@@starstray4326 No. But almost twice as many as Germany lost at Stalingrad.

You don't quite understand the situation correctly. Russia has an offensive concept. These are her missile weapons. Let's hope it doesn't come to that.

We have integrated air support, way better surveillance tech, better tech generally, better training better attitude. Yes we do build forces in a defensive way but thats just the point, you are admitting Russia is a war-faring nation full stop !

@user-fh9bt7gx8e Russians' biggest flaw is that their offensive capability built upon nuclear tactic weapons, They thought we could take Ukraine threaten Nato with our nukes to stop helping them take with in weeks... But war going on ww1 and ww2 mixed concept, whole Russian black sea fleet withdraw near Georgia, whole Frontline dig in trenches like ww1 waiting winter end and softining Ukraine attacks like Stalingrad defense. In any way, Russia will get what they want, but with a big resource and life loose.

But in the 1990's and 2000's Russian tank production was pathetic. They just could not afford to make them. And a lot of the stock, was sold to other countries.

@@zedeyejoe agreed Oligarks earn huge amounts at these days by selling stock working tanks as a scrap. But today if they can produce 3 tank a day still out perform any country at this production rate.

but russian soldiers are dumb poor alchoholics, they are innefective at basic task, so no matter what they are given they will get it destroyed or captured somehow

I wonder how many Javelins and NLAWs the West can produce per year. 🤔

@@dextercochran4916but those are infantry weapons, and if it gets to the point ukraine only left with those weapons, they gonna relly on meat shields, which means the ukranian casualties will skyrocket due to 8:1 russian artillery firepower advantage. Artillery clears the defenses the little leftover is for the AVs, tanks, infantry

@@balazsszekely2132 You think those are infantry weapons because you lack imagination.

@@dextercochran4916 you lack of brain cells cause you smoked too much copium kiddo, the nato doctrine says it’s infantry weapon category

russia does not see the yet for drastic messurement at the moment... this would also impact it's economy.

@@christian9125abd The military industrial order has really affected the economy. The economy is currently in a phase of active growth. New enterprises are opening, production is increasing. The military-oriented economy inherited by Russia from the USSR lacked just such events.

Herein lies the belief problem ! Russia in WW2 isnt Russia today. Russians were fighting for survival in WW2 and actually would be shot for not working nearly 24h a day or charging the German machine guns. Russia now is a country that likes buying Mercedes and designer handbags and anyone with any sensibility has fled the country. Also, this massive production has to be paid for rather than just demanded !

@@MrAvant123 it doesn't really. Just issue IOU's. Or just pay the military and tell them to occupy factories, farmland, etc. To extract what they need for war by forcing the population to work. Forced requisition is as old as time.

​@@taowroland8697😂Don't work if you have low war support

Well tanks are more likely to be in the ballpark because Russia emphasizes troop conservation over materiel.

Russia lost 180K, another lie from Ukraine 😂 Russia lost only 56K while Ukraine lost allready 550.000 men and 275.000 wounded

​@@worfkillerexactly

They actually lost over 350.000 men because they suck

evidence for this?@@supaja

No its about 3,000 Russian tanks left in storage. Probably get about 1 in 4 of those working again. Russia should have enough tanks left to last until the end of this year. But Russia is losing tanks faster than it can renovate them.

On 22 Feb 2022,russia had 14500 tanks(largest in the world)with on third functional,one third barely usable and the rest junk.

Traditore.

russia is the only non asian country that still has an active tank production....

There aren't tank vs tank battles. It's tanks vs ATGM/artillery. And russia didn't have good communication and night vision equipment in the start of the war.

Russia is always in the offensive. You must be too stupid not understanding the basics

Russia has been on the offensive most of the war, hence the superior losses, it's normal.

Heavy tanks can be used because its not about weight, its about ground pressure. Now for bridges, weight is important.

Where does that saying cone from?

@@erikquint1989 I saw it broadcasted on the BBC a military analyst was discussing the war in Ukraine and said Russia was running out of ammo and did not have enough modern rifles for their troops and was basically attacking with shovels.

Believe in Ukrainian shit😅

You might want to take a look at the massacres perpetuated by Russia in Africa these past few years, for instance the horrors performed by Wagner in Mali. Russia is not your friend.

No, of course Russia lacks anything, Let's continue to sing these songs 😅

The Brits lie as usual. Russia don't lose tanks each day. This is absurd. The Russian tanks are highly hard to kill. They are the best tanks ever.

@@silverfist21 very true dont know why everybody belives the brit like its a message from god lol

russia has the GDP of Italy ffs. :)))) superpower my arse

@@silverfist21 -- Thicko !!!

@@silverfist21 "They are the best tanks ever", lmao I like their esthetics but I'm not crazy enough to get in one, specially because they do a disappearing trick if Mr. mine say hello, but they are cheaper too so to be fair they are good for the Russian army budget but not for the crew 😅.

Hi Ribbentrop!

@@filippopotame3579 Depp.

@@filippopotame3579 Depp!

7

Zero... no need for them to cover either of those ships... transport ships are necessary but not of crucial importance. Other lost ships were in line for decommissioning and scrapping, including the cruiser Moskva which was scheduled to be decommissioned, if I'm not mistaken, in April of this year. The West can only talk about the loss of that cruiser for a few more months, after which it would be removed from the list of active ships anyway... The main strength of the Russian Black Sea Fleet is intact... new ships with VLC cells full of the most modern cruise and anti-ship missiles! P.S. Yes... The Admiral Isakov frigate of project 22350 will join the Black Sea Fleet this year and assume the role of a command ship, and it was planned to replace the Moskva cruiser, which would be decommissioned.

It was decommissioned by a non-existent Ukrainian Navy. The excuses you bots come up with is laughable. Poor little fellas, trying to make sense of being slapped by a small force and a non-existent Navy.

True

Only tanks they get is from other country

They do not have to. They use their land-lease tanks provided by russia.

Well given how easy its been to destroy tanks now, why would you base your strategy on just tanks ? Most military analysts in the modern world (not Russias 1950's world) say main battle tanks are now a niche piece of equipment in overall warfare..

​@MrAvant123 "most military analysts" 😂😂😂 is those who never war? like US, who can war only against shepherds in sandals?😂 Who told that Russia relies only on tanks? They produce now tons of every type of technic. Not like british who can only blabla, can't produce technic for themselves without a lot of help, and can war only against shepherds in sandals. Do you know how Russians call british now? Not Great Britain, but tiny/shallow britain. 😂

actually the T 34 was a quite decent tank.. for sure better than the sherman.

T90M is a most perfect tank in production at this moment, German, British or American tanks are outdated

What you wrote is very ridiculous. Russian tanks are technologically advanced better than Western counterparts given to Ukraine. For many characteristics and armor, including! And in terms of patency, there are no equals in the world. Russia and quantity and quality are higher

The T-34 was equal to the German rival Panzer Pz-IV, it was certainly better than the American Sherman, and compared to the British... British tanks in WW2 were... shit!

@@jerromedrakejr9332 2 corrections: 1) T-34 was shit vs Pzr 4 and Sherman 76 2) T-34-85 gave Panthers, better tank than the above two, the sweats.

2000 Russian t-72 have been sent to Ukraine 2 weeks ago kid.

​@@that_russianя тебе секрет открою если ты не знал мы ещё начали дроны делать из Т-72😊

😂😅😆🤣

Yeah, and running out of all equipment and manpower. 😂

i guess Russia must have an unlimited supply then if Ivan says so.

Russia bought ammunition from North Korea but its rubbish.

⁠@@zedeyejoe It is so rubbish that they are retreating towards kyiv lol

@@Givemeproofkid I don't think anyone is retreating anywhere at the moment. I think the solution is when Russian troops simply refuse to fight. As they did in 1917.

It’s now day 720 + of Putins 3 week invasion and yet Russia still hasn’t taken Avdiinka. In fact it cannot even displace a handful of Ukrainians from Kynky. And you think Ukraine is the failure. 😂🤣😂

Oh, you're not the only one, everyone here laughed in my face

I would say even simpler than that. Russia just gets out of Ukraine, war ends. But since that means the end of Putin, I don't think he would favour that choice.

You live in a alternate reality lol

@@starstray4326 I live in the real world. Time for you to wake up to Russian fantasies. Russia lost on the 3rd day of its invasion when it failed to capture Kyiv. No way that Russia can recover from that. Russia cannot outproduce the 30 countries supporting Ukraine and does not have quality troops left (the VDV suffered 25% losses in the initial invasion).

@@starstray4326 No, you do bot. Especially if you think Russia will come out of this with barely more than a pulse.

Ne diži pogled 😅

people forget russia has other things also in mass numbers not just tanks

Have they got thousands of well trained tank crews to man them?

No its not bro 100 tanks per month

These are 3 brand new tanks per day set aside dosens of repared/refurbished tanks per day provided by small tank reparing stations near front line.

Some times the Russians lose 100 tanks in a day. They call that a bad day.

Putting old tanks into service is not difficult. However, there is a problem where to get so many crews, technicians, fuel for their maintenance

Its true. URALVAGONZAVOD is working in non-stop 3 eight hour shifts per day. Mostly focusing on the T90M

@@thewedge8823 they also started production of T-80 again and T-72 are also still made

From what I've see of russian tank tactics,manoeuvring and formation,,,it reminds me of watching the "benny hill show"

@@scorpiontail2561 It's simple. In a minefield everyone will behave like they are at such a show