Evolving Genetic Neural Network Optimizes Poly Bridge Problems
Переглядів 987,541
День томуI made a genetic algorithm that can solve and optimize Poly Bridge puzzles with artificial evolution.
This Project's Source Code:
github.com/sam-astro/Genetic-...
Support:
● Patreon: / astrosam
● Ko-fi: ko-fi.com/astrosam
● Monero: 4AAjyAHKnYwCsgJp16v1YeeDPA1Z51QKUfCMWsiCDxkNBFCtbUfDHD7K5sZDrFH2pnGsDAH989XwXdudcoC4iqtVC9QLk8r
--------------------------------------------------
Related Links:
● Streaming Channel: / @astrosamstreams
● Itch.io: astrosam.itch.io/
● Github: github.com/sam-astro
● Discord Server: / discord
--------------------------------------------------
All Music was provided by Epidemic Sound (www.epidemicsound.com)
--------------------------------------------------
Chapters:
0:00 Intro
0:29 Remaking the game
2:06 Making genetic alg.
3:51 Managing agents
5:26 Calculating fitness
6:41 Mass, cost, and strength
7:37 Testing
7:53 Bug fixes
8:05 Real training
8:54 Funny first tries
9:00 Problems with genetic algs.
9:33 Outro
--------------------------------------------------
This video is not sponsored.
#programming
#neuralnetworks
#unity
#polybridge3
@senatordodo4240 9 місяців тому
As Michael reeves put it: "I made a 5 hour long problem into a 2 and a half month long problem, cause I'm a programmer and that's what we do"
@eduardokerber2931 9 місяців тому
but now it can be reused every time you need to solve the 5 hour problem, while taking just 4.5 hours, and it works (almost) every time.
@Angel-kr4qo 9 місяців тому
@@eduardokerber2931you captured the minimal worth value programming thinking
@MortalWombat1988 9 місяців тому
HEY! HEY! Why did the Java programmer wear glasses? Because...he can't C#. Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all week.
@danimgmd3510 9 місяців тому
not funny
@eduardokerber2931 9 місяців тому
@@danimgmd3510 shortest autobiography ever
@packediceisthebestminecraf9007 10 місяців тому
5:48 I can't believe you really just went "assume a spherical car"
@Roset595 13 днів тому
Glad someone else caught that 😂
@AtroxSM 6 днів тому
Google “peel trident”
@Achridian 6 днів тому
Physics problems on tests be like
@kerz5383 9 місяців тому
2:00 As an engineer i can confirm that architects will show you some magical item/building that defies the laws of physics and expect you to build it.
@revwroth3698 9 місяців тому
Lol it's kinda telling that MC Escher wanted to be an architect and actually enrolled in a school for architecture and decorative arts.
@kerz5383 9 місяців тому
@@revwroth3698 I can imagine being told to make an escher design. I would die.
@revwroth3698 9 місяців тому
@@kerz5383 not to mention having to implement building codes, imagine having to design wheelchair ramps for all those staircases. That sounds awful to me and I'm not an engineer.
@benruss4130 9 місяців тому
As an engineer I affirm your statement and would like to add "salesmen" to the list.
@Mike-mu7tk 9 місяців тому
Summoning Real Civil Engineer..
@RealCivilEngineerGaming 9 місяців тому
Respect for the architect dig ❤
@mloxard 9 місяців тому
It had to be done
@BwompProcessing14 9 місяців тому
The man himself!
@ZedakiahBoyer 8 місяців тому
Yo wassup rce love your vids
@hfbdbsijenbd 8 місяців тому
I like that real engineers treat Civil engineers the same way you treat architects.
@craigwhite1202 8 місяців тому
Hi rce love your videos and architects are the worst and honestly my sister wants to be an architect and I want to be an engineer
@hudsonator7259 9 місяців тому
"now one problem we have is it is indestructible. Clearly it was made by engineers. So in order to fix this, we just need some architects" sounds like real civil engineer EDIT: holy shoot 2.1k likes I think that's the most I've gotten before thanks a bunch
@stefanthatcat7143 9 місяців тому
RCE would be proud of him
@bunny6820 9 місяців тому
RCE was an architect all along
@hexturne 9 місяців тому
RCE was the #1 architect hater until he became the #1 architect
@yaroslavpanych2067 9 місяців тому
RCE FTW!
@yaroslavpanych2067 9 місяців тому
We are only missing some strong shapes!
@nightartco 9 місяців тому
"But there is a problem, I am way too busy to be playing this right now" - AstroSam Also AstroSam: recreate the whole game
@justinwhite2725 9 місяців тому
'i didn't have time to play polybridge so I recreated polybridge exactly so am AI can simulate it and solve it for me.'
@maniacone4499 9 місяців тому
@@justinwhite2725 sounds like a normal programmer to me.
@cezarcatalin1406 9 місяців тому
Well, he was technically busy redoing the whole game and training an AI to solve it.
@realtired3670 9 місяців тому
comically overcomplicating a small issue to solve it in unnecessary and often slower ways gotta be my favorite genre of youtube videos
@Terminator85BS 9 місяців тому
have you seen Harder Drive by suckerpinch? my absolute favorite when it comes to this
@matthewwhiteside4619 9 місяців тому
Would also recommend Harder Drive; Tom7 (suckerpinch) commits horrific crimes against maths and computing.
@noahschuler6388 9 місяців тому
This concept applied to Structural Engineering would be amazing.
@oliverwaldock9710 9 місяців тому
Just remember 16 hours of coding can save 20 minutes on planning and/or just actually doing it
@noahschuler6388 9 місяців тому
@@oliverwaldock9710 If this is done for actual bridges, it'd save a lot of time and money due to optimization.
@ojonathan 9 місяців тому
Damn, nice video! About 7:09: Yours didn't performed like Poly Bridge probably because Poly Bridge has its own custom physics engine, this was done because the Unity3D physics engine is not deterministic, which caused a lot of problems on Poly Bridge 1, not only rerunning the simulation will give you a different result, but game speed also affects the outcome. So for Poly Bridge 2 and on, they're using their own physics engine.
@AstroSamDev 9 місяців тому
Yes, I did some research on it and found many differences, so my version is pretty different. One way I get around it not being deterministic is by running the simulation multiple times and taking the mean of the fitness, although this obviously takes more time.
@NikoCubeRoot 9 місяців тому
@@AstroSamDev Part 2 yes no??
@lakastusmanatus 9 місяців тому
@@AstroSamDev and for Android
@TlalocTemporal 9 місяців тому
Since Polybridge is made in unity, I wonder if some bepin tool could extract enough of the physics engine to implement this as an actual solver.
@RobertBleattler 9 місяців тому
@@TlalocTemporalsince poly bridge is written in c# you can almost certainly access the physics engine through dependency injection.
@RoboxPpls 9 місяців тому
"Im way to busy to be playing the game" 0:09 " To start off im going to need to replicate the entire game" 0:30
@justaguy311 9 місяців тому
yeah bro was so lazy to run 1km that he ran a whole Earth lap 💀
@jvsonyt 8 місяців тому
"I don't have time to play the game, so I spent time to program the game in unity and trained an ai to play it"
@masonator__ 9 місяців тому
As someone who has played a ton of Poly Bridge, this is very cool! Also, I dunno if this has been clarified yet, but there is a 1:4 ratio between polygrams and unity's mass units.
@AstroSamDev 9 місяців тому
Oh I see. Since I recorded the audio, I actually changed the weights a lot, and it seems they actually did almost reflect that. But it is good to know now 😁
@masonator__ 9 місяців тому
@@AstroSamDev Certainly lol. Also, I don't know how well this can translate into your system, but I might be able to give you the current strengths and weights of each material, along with possibly some models from the game if you plan to make any follow-up videos!
@moji3812 4 місяці тому
Ah ok
@rps4400 9 місяців тому
You are like if Real Civil Engineer and CodeBullet had a child and I love it
@StephenOwen 9 місяців тому
I’m instantly going to subscribe to both of those based on this sentence alone 😊
@realrane 9 місяців тому
your not wrong...
@tozzasque 8 місяців тому
Thought the exact same!
@darthkarl99 8 місяців тому
@@StephenOwen If you like real engineering stuff i would recommend PracticalEngineering too.
@little_lord_tam 9 місяців тому
I like how this AI shows that trial and error can result in so seemingly complex things like the swining bridge that seemed delibertly made while its just the result of failing many times prior. Just like evolution
@enderiume8282 9 місяців тому
Yeah i really found it beautiful and honestly, i tyink it can really be compared to a very young child, just trial and error the lifd
@peptobepto 10 місяців тому
HE’S BACK!!!
@Cruciblecoder 9 місяців тому
Yooooooooooo
@gecko_6103 9 місяців тому
Fnilanyyyyyy!
@meriabreadsticks 9 місяців тому
"this bridge is indestructible since it was made with engineers, so we just need need some architects" utterly comedic
@gamecoder3833 9 місяців тому
Did you get the reference bro
@yaroslavpanych2067 9 місяців тому
@@gamecoder3833probably not
@ItsVasl 9 місяців тому
when the world needed him the most, he returned
@marktyshchuk 2 місяці тому
When the AI discovers the physics of the game to cheat:
@Rodasboyy 10 місяців тому
Around 4:22 wouldn't it be better for visualization and filming purposes to do a 10x10 grid of bridges?
@AstroSamDev 10 місяців тому
It actually uses unity's 2d physics system, so having multiple rows moving back in the z axis would overlap collisions, and stacking them vertically could make the ball interfere or bridge pieces. The only way to prevent that would be to build extra barriers or delete falling things, which would reduce performance. And for visualization, it wouldn't be possible to show all of them at once on screen, and I think just showing a single one evolving gets the point across well.
@AstroSamDev 10 місяців тому
To clarify, it would be possible to show them all at once, but they would be too small. And if you were talking only about the video, I wanted to show what the simulation actually looked like.
@Rodasboyy 10 місяців тому
@@AstroSamDev I understand! Was just a friendly suggestion from someone who gets 0 out of unity Thanks for explaining 😁
@Rodasboyy 10 місяців тому
@@AstroSamDev great video btw! I'm always amazed to see NN getting to the hardest and coolest solution and thinking "Hmm , that's perfect" haha
@AstroSamDev 10 місяців тому
@@Rodasboyy Thank you!
@zetrium_ 9 місяців тому
multiple everything by deltaTime or you're comiting a crime
@AstroSamDev 9 місяців тому
no >:(
@zetrium_ 9 місяців тому
@@AstroSamDev i know lol
@MrBuyerman 9 місяців тому
Honestly, half this stuff went over my head, but i can totally get on board with the concept of spending 5x as long avoiding doing something than the original task. Fascinating stuff.
@Kurokuma10 9 місяців тому
I think if you made closeness to the flag an exponential reward, that might help incentivize reaching the goal. And if you also awarded points for bridge rigidity, that could be good for preventing dangling messes. The rigidity could be scored based on least amount of average travel for each joint node.
@an_asp 6 місяців тому
We gave something like this as an assignment to students in an evolutionary computation class a while back, and it was a lot of fun. We used a "maximum load" fitness function (keep adding weight until the bridge collapses), and also had students add a cost minimization objective at one point for NSGA-II, though that ran into some fun problems (What bridge minimizes cost? The one where you delete the whole bridge, of course!). On one test problem we were getting really weird results only to find that our scenario was missing one of the two anchor points on the sides of the bridge, so the evolutionary algorithms were desperately trying to keep a huge cantilevered pier from falling over with surprising success!
@WolfsKitten 9 місяців тому
i feel robbed, this video kinda ended abruptly, i was expecting to see more out of the evolution and it figuring out different scenarios
@ancientluck6934 9 місяців тому
The purpose was destroyed by AI holding the car hostage.
@slice6298 9 місяців тому
6:10 : connecting to all points gives a better bridge Meanwhile polybridge players: 😅
@b_read6941 9 місяців тому
Weight!!!!!!! Money!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@hayleighhill1726 9 місяців тому
Oh man, you would get along so well with RCE. "This bridge is indestructible- clearly it was made by engineers." "To fix this, we need architects." 😂
@swivvy3037 9 місяців тому
I was really hoping for more from this video. Not sure if I'm being unrealistic but it just felt like it started to gather momentum then stopped dead
@WRLDOfSad 11 днів тому
My guy really said "if you didn't like the video, dislike it" you deserve my sub
@sundown456brick 9 місяців тому
very good video, only downside I found is that it felt "incomplete" I'd absolutely LOVE to see more of this, tweaking, adding different materials, etc etc it is a pretty good concept and execution, so you definitely could invest some more resources into it. Will definitely turn out to be very good content. Keep up the good work!
@batlin 9 місяців тому
That was really well done and enjoyable to watch. I wonder if Poly Bridge 3 has an easily-understood save file format -- you might be able to use that (plus some hairy automation helpers) to test candidate solutions in the real game environment, although it would probably be a lot slower and might suffer from the nondeterministic physics update you mentioned. Unless the PB3 devs have also done work to make their custom physics model fully deterministic (maybe it works out the physics interactions before playing back the animations? Presumably they would need something like this to be able to replay solutions consistently).
@tpresto9862 8 місяців тому
As an architect who worked with engineers in an A/E firm for 20+ years, I love your dig at us starting at about the 1:55 mark. I had many engineer coworkers who I still call my friends -- a couple very good friends -- but professionally we drove each other crazy.
@DrPeeper 9 місяців тому
2:00 he CLEARLY watched RCE
@braschlosan 9 місяців тому
I hope there's a second part showing it solving various levels
@tdubmorris5757 8 місяців тому
I would love to see a part 2. Maybe try solving some actual levels with the algorithm and seeing if it would work?
@a-blivvy-yus 8 місяців тому
I like that this video demonstrated a safer example of the paperclip optimiser problem at the end. AI's goal isn't specific enough, so it does something ridiculous instead of what was intended. That could be stopping the ball from crossing the space instead of helping it to do so, or it could be consuming the entire galaxy to turn everything into paperclips...
@ickon_ 9 місяців тому
Could you maybe make a part 2? This is an awesome video, and I would love to see how you will improve this project!
@anttitykkylainen9040 8 місяців тому
Super interesting! I don't know much about programming, but you explained it in just enough detail to understand the process.
@leroy7647 9 місяців тому
Having a maximum penalty for lost balls is an effective improvement; it shouldn't be (much) worse than a ball that hasn't moved at all. As the evaluation function is already composite (anchors, ball distance...), I'd also consider a non-linear evaluation on the ball distance. Closer to the finish should be very important and perhaps the distance should be rated exponentially. Another thing that could be interesting is average velocity of the ball; lower average velocity means smoother bridge. I would love to see a followup with improvements on the evaluation (perhaps my suggestions :))
@DownhillAllTheWay 8 місяців тому
I once heard that an algorithm had been designed to assist in choosing the most efficient route for a road across London. When the program was tested, it came up with an answer in less time than expected - straight down the river.
@atom-xgaming7507 8 місяців тому
Use a checkpoint system for reward at crossing every point on the bridge, instead of end result only, maybe that will determine the AI to solve the crossing the bridge problem and build an actual bridge.
@soopFPS 9 місяців тому
I expected a super barebones explanation of how it worked, but I think I know a little bit more about machine learning now as a non-coding layman. great stuff
@davilonchi2114 9 місяців тому
You know that there is a thing in unity called FixedUpdate(){} right? so your elapse function is useless
@AstroSamDev 9 місяців тому
no
@SplitFace4393 9 місяців тому
@@AstroSamDevand you can also set after how much ms it's called, default is 33ms so every frame on 60fps
@mohamedsarfaraazosman6419 6 місяців тому
reading the comments and just reminded me of the swinging bridge and throw result. a nice simple way to overcome that would be to have 2 balls one after the other test the same bridge like traffic.
@Relkond 9 місяців тому
When creating fitness functions, I’ll often find multiple ways to score it, such as, for example: ‘distance traveled exceeds 5 units’ and ‘minimum distance to goal’ Scoring perfect gets you one point for each. 1 point for a minimum distance of 0, 1 point for traveling 5 units. I’ll then take all these disparate fitness scores and multiply them together for the final fitness score for the bridge. so if the ball never leaves the start (0 points for 0 of 5 units moved) and the ball never gets closer to the goal (0 points for goal proximity) - 0 * 0 = 0… which fair, bad example. the point is, any single fitness function doing poorly penalizes the overall score, and none of these functions need to ‘pass’ before other functions start getting considered. There’s some finagling to do (what if all functions start scoring at zero?) … but the point is, don’t limit yourself to just a linear score. Powers, logs, priorities use what works for you.
@k98killer 9 місяців тому
Interesting timing. I just made a genetic algorithm library in Go and am in te process of optimizing its performance.
@erin1569 8 місяців тому
I imagine it'd be very fun to see the algorithm that got the car to the end goal in the slowest way possible
@richardbrooksshnee 8 місяців тому
Change the reword function such that time to cross is a factor so that by failing to complete in a timely manner it greatly impedes the reward. Time to cross over cost maybe?
@flameofthephoenix8395 9 місяців тому
The genetic algorithm should be choosing which ones survive differently, each ai makes a bridge, then they have to walk across their bridge's 100 times with the simulation wearing down pieces over time, any of them that fall die, the other ones move on. If they all die repopulate it with another 100 random ais.
@danielvinokurov236 9 місяців тому
So many questions: 1. Why not specify in fitness function, that "car" should cross the bridge? 2. Where 3d red connection point come from at the bottom? 3. Why not use gravity and shape for the "car"? 4. Why not use probability function, bases on fitness to decide parents? 5. How many spicies do you create per generation?
@merion297 9 місяців тому
Cool! And it's a great foundation to build on. Would you try to improve the model with more realistic criteria? 1. Two-way crossing so that the solution can be symmetrical. 2. Vibration measurement, its minimization... 3. And anything else I didn't think of.
@AstroSamDev 8 місяців тому
I think I just may in a future video. Thanks for watching!
@invention64 9 місяців тому
There already is a fixed update function in unity for doing physics calculations
@omernomer7429 9 місяців тому
MY MAN! I saw you just a while ago making videos getting less than 1000 views WTF HAPPENED? you blew tf up congrats! I hope you have the best game dev journy ever!
@SatstackerHQ 9 місяців тому
"Clearly it was built by engineers, to break it you would need an architect" 💀💀
@aggold6757 9 місяців тому
never expected a cool poly bridge video, it's amazing
@Markfr0mCanada 9 місяців тому
It would be interesting to see what happens if you take some of the more successful bridges and recreate them in Poly Bridge.
@HappyfoxBiz 8 місяців тому
"as long as the bridge doesn't fall down and cars don't crash you will be paid" engineers: "ChatGPT, design me a 4 lane, 423 meter long bridge east to west..."
@GIRGHGH 9 місяців тому
Oh, thought you were gonna elaborate on the cheating thing and maybe do something about it but alright.
@thomasdow701 8 місяців тому
I was hoping for another step of adjustments to refine the reward system after you brought it up as an issue but was kinda left hanging like the bridge supports made of wood. 😂 I think (as someone glancing in from the outside) an issue was that your setup wasn't really rewarding the system for using supports in any constructive ways. If you come back to this at all, I personally would like to see refinement of the reward system to encourage more connectivity with supports back onto the road structure, and also to refrain from using road material outside of the direct path. Those are obviously just my thoughts, and either way, love the content.
@Peter_kys2165 10 місяців тому
damn this dude is insane😮
@anomalousanimates 9 місяців тому
bro really went 😮
@himawariyume7855 9 місяців тому
Do you only have 2 members in your population? It looked like every bridge throughout the entire training was just a slight variation on the previous one. You really need a large population to explore a large amount of different designs, and a mutation bias high enough that a clearly bad design doesn't stick around for hundreds of generations.
@AstroSamDev 9 місяців тому
The population size was 100, and I think the mutation chance was about 10-20 percent
@Noone-of-your-Business 8 місяців тому
Very good lesson for evolving genetic AI: find out what you _really _*_want_* BEFORE you put the machine on it. Or revise when it goes off the rails. This is why AI should _NOT_ be trusted with criticial decisions like steering a vehicle if it has become a completely black box to us.
@borone8573 9 місяців тому
I would love to see sequel for the vid.
@PuppetSquid 8 місяців тому
So i'm sure you already thought of this, but I think the AI would have a better chance if piece placement was changed to emulate the Arc tool. Like if the distance between two points it chooses is greater than material.maxLength, add a third point halfway between the two and offset it by a random number * the line's normal (weighted toward 0 offset) to define an arc, then create floor(arcLength/material.maxLength) connections and equally space them along the curve. It would probably still be a mess, but it would likely get it closer faster and is closer to how real players think when they plan a bridge.
@lionllew6601 8 місяців тому
hopnestly I thought we were going to see some amazing designs, but we got amazing TLDR's!
@OCTAGRAM 8 місяців тому
There is also Bridge Constructor series. I played Portal, and it was fun
@sirynka 7 місяців тому
While watching Matt(@RealCivilEngineerGaming) tweaking his bridges I thought I'd be cool to replace Matt with genetic algorithm. I don't even thing neural network is required for that. Basically we can give the bridge (with suboptimal but working design) to the computer and ask it to move joints around until it'd land on the cheapest possible bridge without structural modification. That would drastically speed up the search (compared to generating the bridge from scratch) and hopefully show what the design actually is capable of. And implementing it as a mod/plugin for the original game would be absolutely cool but i have no idea how hard would it be to integrate such thing into the game.
@olli3686 6 місяців тому
Your fitness function could have been based on three things: the changes to the road pieces (max distance change, max angle change) and the max distance change of the balls. Also you should have randomized ball size. With keeping the ball as level as possible the main goal. This will help avoid jumps, hills, swings, and dips. If you’re given a straight path of road joints and told to keep it as level as possibly by only adding bridge connections etc.
@RobertBleattler 9 місяців тому
Very cool. I’ve been thinking about doing something like this but haven’t had the time or energy to put into it
@flexjranimates 9 місяців тому
I have never seen you before but i should be taking notes You’re the only programmer on yt that i know of that Shows what they’re doing
@Onaterdem 9 місяців тому
Sebastian Lague
@teodorlb 9 місяців тому
Would be awesome if you made a follow up video improving it to set records in game
@inventor121 8 місяців тому
The AI got very close to a very real bridge design. The jumbled wood members and some of the legths were the problem but overall you can actually make a bridge with a single column and just a few supporitng struts.
@torry2 9 місяців тому
I'd be curious to see if any of the designs would work in the actual game
@rayerdyne 9 місяців тому
Ooh just tought it would be really cool if the AstroSam logo closes at the end instead of fading out It would close exactly in the same way that it opened at the beginning
@joeflemo64 9 місяців тому
This is pretty interesting and I think that if you make a few adjustments you could make a really cheap bridge for some levels in poly bridge and I would love to see that
@TREKontheTUBE 9 місяців тому
Mans like "I don't got time to play" but has time to remake the entire game
@hoi-polloi1863 4 місяці тому
I liked this video! I'm reminded of way back when, I wrote a sudoku solver program. It was a big time saver, but it kind of killed my desire to ever play sudoku by hand again...
@FoxSlyme 9 місяців тому
I was lowkey expecting you to recreate one of the result bridges in the original game
@katharinamarschall5662 8 місяців тому
How long did it take you to write the code? Could you also use an adaptive large neighborhood search?
@panagiotisapostolidis6424 6 місяців тому
a follow up video on this but it minimized stress would be really interesting
@corgano6068 9 місяців тому
What if you tweaked it to measure the total distance each part of the bridge moved during the simulation, and the less the bridge moved give it a higher score / the more the bridge moved the lower the score? Could also have it on some iterations remove a random non-road part to the bridge and if the score doesn't decrease massively, continue from there. Try to remove some of the additional clumps.
@Doctor_XI 9 місяців тому
3:37 doesn't Unity have a built in update function that *does* run at a fixed rate? Was there a specific reason that you didn't use FixedUpdate()?
@lolcat69 10 місяців тому
OH DAMM, FINALLY, A NEW ASTRO SAM VIDEO!!!
@Sven_Dongle 9 місяців тому
You have to use double precision fitness values or you get stuck in local minima.
@AstroSamDev 8 місяців тому
I thought I was, but because it is all behind the scenes in a class I don't often edit and see that. Now that I look, I see that it is a double type, but I think when I add to it and set it from the Agent's class it is as a float. So I will fix this in a future revision
@DamageMaximo 9 місяців тому
2:41 Looking up at the sun in minecraft be like:
@christianaudebert7668 8 місяців тому
one thing interesting in this video. the difficult way to produce effective reward function, because it's the key to evaluate/reward/select evolution.
@chapystick_ 9 місяців тому
Ahh yes, immediately figures out dangling roads. It’s already a true Polybridge player
@Drago_Whooves 9 місяців тому
is there a way to inject the Neural Network controls directly into the game? could even reach out to the devs and see if they can make a special build of Poly Bridge 3 that allows for injection?
@eduardokerber2931 9 місяців тому
without reverse engineering the game, the easiest way i can think off is tracking the image of the game while played for the simulation part, for the building it think his code may be able to be adapted to work, biggest problem is the amount of time it would take to train it on a single instance running at a time
@dangingerich2559 8 місяців тому
"It isn't the solution we wanted" I instantly thought "It is the solution you deserved." :)
@alexandreblais8756 8 місяців тому
"I dont have enough time to play the game so il make a new version of it from scratch"
@cherrycheshire7555 9 місяців тому
It looks more like your void Elapse() is more comparable to Unity's void LateUpdate(), which runs on fixed intervals after the physics has been calculated.
@alvesvaren 9 місяців тому
Would be really cool if someone did this but hooked into the actual game and used that to simulate everything. Seems like it may be easier than reimplementing them too
@daefin9993 9 місяців тому
that would get you banned
@pacomatic9833 9 місяців тому
@@daefin9993But they wont be used ng online anyways.
@mloxard 9 місяців тому
@daefin9993 you can literally pirate the game
@daefin9993 9 місяців тому
@@mloxard hadnt thought of that but piracy is illegal and modifying a multiplayer game is against most tos's
@JordanShackelford 7 місяців тому
Are there any games that have AI agents trained like this? I was thinking of adding predator / prey entities into my game and have the predator rewarded by enemies eaten, and the prey rewarded by time survived
@cpufreak101 9 місяців тому
I hope the poly bridge devs see this and give you a chance to actually test an AI in the real game!
@midasfury6165 9 місяців тому
You should make a video about the dynamic bridges, would like to see more
@Matthias129 Місяць тому
I love that 8 months later YT said, "Hey, here's a video you might be interested in!" Yes, thank you YT, I watched it and dropped a like on it, and multiple comments, months ago. Good thing I have the memory of a goldfish, cause here I go watching it again! Look forward to seeing this comment in 8 months when YT brings me that fresh new video I might be interested in.
@soundzythedev 9 місяців тому
2:48 "new Vector4" I didnt even know Unity had that lol
@AstroSamDev 9 місяців тому
Great for when you are making 4D games, as we all do.
@soundzythedev 9 місяців тому
@@AstroSamDev I should have been doing this from the start! I have been using 2 separate vector2s instead!!!
@isaisotarriva8162 2 місяці тому
Can I suggest a loss function for your algorithm? What I would do would be to define the loss function as the addition of 2 loss functions L1 and L2 the first one is L1=current cost and the second one is L2=min(Target position - player position) over all the simulation. That should work for a problem with only one flag. If you have multiple flags then the second loss could become more complex and involves adding all the individual losses for each flag and also locking the rewards unless the previous flag has been reached. If you have time I think a graph neural network might also be an interesting approach for solving this problem. It was a very nice video🎉😊
@tommygarson8592 4 місяці тому
watching the bridge grow and twitch as it evolved felt like something out of an Alan Resnick film
@morten.hekkvang 5 місяців тому
Nice. Would love to see a more developed version, which takes into account the bridges movements. Less movement = higher scores.
@DiabloDBS 9 місяців тому
I always find it funny how some solutions turn out when working with neural networks to solve problems ^^ It again and again shows that we need to be very sure about the ruleset we give an AI before we let it run wild as it will find loopholes in the blink of an eye.
How To Use MACHINE LEARNING In Unity MLAgents Setup & Basic Environment - Pellet Grabber Tutorial #1
Jason Builds
Переглядів 9 тис.
Real Civil Engineer
Переглядів 714 тис.
ROZETKA
Переглядів 39 тис.