How did they kept it cooled

Hi can you tell me how much cost this engender gets doler

العفو 🐸

Preciso de quatro turbo deste .

Ohenba Narkwa grugs sex

Ohenba Narkwa

gay

я унылоню

рр

please contact us directly through our web site www.hyblturbines.cz (there is also mail contact)

@@user-fb7lu9ij3q sure, message me through my facebook page. same username as used on youtube

?😍

Add more!

No, it is brushed motor with neodymium magnets.

thank you

sure!!!

Yes and when you get it its really quite a simple machine isn't it. In a way its simpler than an internal combustion engine... I guess the devil was in the detail for those first large scale engines back in the 30s and the materials they needed operating at the very edge of what was possible at the time. The German axial compressor on the front was a stroke of genius getting that working...

pake solar + oli gan, atau pake jet a1, bukan avgas 100

You can use fusion or AutoCAD.

@@gerishomwakoli4337 NO,It doesn't have the feature for this type of technical animation,i think they've used some dedicated software.

@@harrier331 which autodesk software?

@@harrier331 can you search it for me?

Use Creo Parametric

davidsirmons. Only combustion air is reverse flow through the vaporizing fuel burners, this is done to heat the vaporizers. Secondary air enters the combustor from the in/outside.

@@johno9507 Wouldn't bother explaining it. Often you find comments like this and it demonstrates their true knowledge for what they are talking about.

For most small jet engines, it makes more sense to go with a reversed flow design. From what I have read so far, engines perform best when they get the highest pressure possible before being combusted. To do this they slow down the air to convert air velocity into pressure. This means that the air isn't moving very fast after going through the compressor, so the path doesn't need to be very aerodynamic. Also, centrifugal compressors tend to have more advantages over axial (straight through) compressors because of their simple construction. I don't have actual experience with engines, but I have read many design books such as "Model Jet Engines" by Thomas Kamps.

A turboprop configuration can still be ideal with a jet engine. So props are here to stay and they're good stuff.

@@cruisemissle87 The 20th century is over. We need to get with the times.

At least £1,000

the reply above said between 2-4 k

How is price 199kg hours power engene

This is a kero start meaning it uses a ceramic burner in the combustion chamber. The older style engines, usually gas start, have external plugs.

Please can you give me this 3D animation disigne .

Look at www.hyblturbines.com, there is current price.

The cost is 2400EUR including VAT. Check our webpage for more details.

меньше грамма в минуту??? или почти полкилограмма все-таки?

@@user-to3nw3cr1q походу читать умееш писать тоже, в наличии порог непонимания?

@@user-ho8yz9be4m Видимо, да. Так в итоге сколько расход-то?) Я просто не понимаю как 28 килограмм в час выходит, поэтому и уточняю. Если расход 0.47 г/мин, то (0.47*0.001кг)/(1/60час)=0.028кг/час

@@Quanfo 28,2 кг/час это 40 литров 300 миллилитров, в минуту это 670 миллилиторов (два бокала), в секунду это 11 миллилитров (примерно десяти кубовый шприц).

@@Quanfo проверяем заявленные параметры. 28.2 кг/час это 423 кг воздуха для сжигания керосина, общая масса 451,2 кг/час, или 0,125 кг/сек 17 кг тяги это 166,77 ньютон, итого скорость потока из сопла 1334 метра в секунду.

Please learn how a turbine works before suggesting something like this

No one cares.

Dude really? How hard is it to pull up a conversion app? It's a Czech company so just be happy the words are in english...It's no wonder the rest of the world thinks we're a bunch of jackasses.