Everything is awesome if screen has HDMI cable to play a switch (^-^)

I loved it, however, I think that at least 5 or 6 toilets would be needed. Also, I believe that there should be water in the walls all over the ship (maybe 3 or 5 centimetres are enough), during the trip, a continious protection against radiation would be needed, though you may keep the shelter for extreme situations. The rest is all awesome, I think that you found a great balance between comfort and efficiency. All those people who say that colonisation missions will not bring more than 15 or 20 astronauts actually forget that you are not going to be in a cruise ship having vacations

@@monchocastillamontes1640 that is only true for the first few hundred people maybe, but if you want to bring a million people they are going to be regular people needing a bit more space. I'm running different simulations on different numbers of people in there, it will be a VR application - hopefully done in a few months

@@monchocastillamontes1640 , putting the water everywhere would require quite a lot of added weight for the tank to be able to survive takeoff, not to mention that it may develop holes in protection if water is not recycled efficiently enough. If the sleeping bags are made to protect from radiation, that would give passengers the best protection for about a third of the time they spend on board. Then, clothes for while in 0G may also be designed to protect crew. All of this for all passengers would be quite heavy, but protecting just the crew instead of the whole interior may be the best option. And of course, the belly of the ship, which has the double layer of steel for the evaporative heat shield could be pointed toward the sun during transit to provide better protection from solar radiation, but not cosmic radiation from the other direction. Plus pointing the window at the sun may blind people in the hallway just trying to come back from the toilet

@@generalcodsworth4417 All those things are possible options, but the thing is that everyone is basing their suggestions in the iss tech, and the iss is completly inside the magnetosphere. It is true that it is a good start because the iss gets way more radiation than people on earth, but it isnt the same thing at all

I agree

Yes, where's Holden's coffee machine?

Yeah, maybe reducing the number of cabins to 30/25 you can insert a dining/recreational space. It could also be a bit less overpopulated.

hi P... ' better drink good healthly shake proteins / juices / herb teas / clean fresh waters... no no no ccooffees / no no beers - wines

@@TheSpot501st hot bunk -- have rotating shifts, more common space, and more toilets!

Indeed!

Indeed!

Indeed!

Indeed!

Indeed!

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

Miann creo que te conozco en un video

Wow Miann no creí que te gustara este tema del espacio. A mi también me gusta mucho. SpaceX :D!

Great video although I disagree with the sleeping section. The sleeping section should be an opportunity for astronauts to experience at least a little artificial gravity each 24 hour cycle. I feel that section should be spinning similar to those anti-gravity amusement park rides albeit spinning much slower. The astronauts would be lying flat against the outer hull of the spinning section (keeping their feet at essentially the same spin radius as their heads to reduce or eliminate the Coriolis Effect). It would be just for sleeping and it may not need to provide a full 1G of gravity to significantly reduce the astronauts physical deterioration due to weightlessness. Astronauts may need only spend 8 to 10 hours there out of every 24 hour cycle. Duration of daily experience to G-force as well as the amount of G-force are variables we'll need to determine but I think it can be done within the 30 foot hull diameter (as opposed to an elaborate mechanism to extend and spin living pods beyond the existing hull diameter).

@@david.e376 ya a mi tambien me encanta este tema :) creia que no era de gustarle el espacio

Точно, фантастика превращается в реальность. Уже сегодня. Замечательно. Успехов Илону Маску.

@@anatolguzenko4655 You reply to an English language comment. Why use Russian?

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

Yes

What if other beings out there are dismayed by human expansionism? What if one says "Hey, Onk, those little jerks aren't keeping to their own disgusting little planet anymore. That tears it. I say let's just wipe them all out." --- and the reply is "Hmm. On the whole I think I agree, Grok. Let's do it right after lunch!"

I agree. This place is a safe haven for me.

So true, people like Elon who only really care about a shared vision for a good future for humanity.

After seeing all the crap for the last 4 years in the US and doing some research I have come to the conclusion that political parties are for the ignorant(not trying to be mean) When one truly looks at what the majority want it is pretty simple. A good education, healthcare, and a means to make a living or feel fulfilled through your work, a roof over your head and to in most cases to have a family. Everything else is power and money related which political parties fuel in order to get your votes so they can basically rip you off from your taxes that you pay.

@@leeramer171 yup. 100%. you said it perfectly.

@@jazzylev Thx, I can't believe it took me this long to realize it.

Agreed. It's really inspiring.

Thanks for the kind words.

@@deepspacecourier i agree

@@deepspacecourier *You did great job.* ✌

But it's bad technical design. If you have only one connection tunnel, then one particle that hits through the hull is enough, and as a result you can no more get from the rooms at the top to the rooms at the bottom. A connection tunnel is also a waste of space that could be better used. In my option, every tubical section needs 3 connections to the next neighbour section. That way you can seal of individual places and you will still be able to get from the top to the bottom.

That was one of my thoughts. Solar storms can last days, and since people sleep and goof off playing video games and watching UKposts for a large portion of their day, it would make sense to have the sleep cabins also double as the radiation shelter. A short trip to the non-radiation-shielded bathroom, kitchen, or observation area wouldn't be immediately harmful. Just don't spend too much time there before you head back to the radiation shelter.

@@jebediahkerman8245 Imagine this:The starship is being bombarded by a solar storm during your 6-month trip to Mars, and then you're just hanging out watching UKposts videos sipping warm tea from a pouch, all in the comfort of your sleeping bunk, in zero gravity.

This thing is meant to land upright, so the denser parts must be placed closer to the bottom. Radiation shields add mass to a spaceship, and you must keep mass down for many reasons. The best shielded area of a spaceship/station is usually near a life-support system, usually near the center of the spaceship, because water. food Storage and batteries have more mass than the hull of the spaceship, but placed at the bottom of this one, as it lands upright, and you want life support punps close to airlocks, close to the ground. sleeping rooms have medium mass, so you put them just above. and above that you have exercise equipment, and above that you have larger emptier common rooms.

@@ollllj Think like a transatlantic passenger ship. Most of the volume is passenger cabins, not dining halls.

I doubt that this think could be used to transport 50 people to Mars. 6 months, or 180 days. That is 150 rations of food per day or 27,000 rations.You would also need roughly 100 liters of drinking water per day or 18 tons of drinking water . This is a problem since we are unable to recycle 100% of the waste products, meaning we would either have to store or drop off most of the toilet water after a certain amount of time, as it would be impossible to purify too many times. I also have to point out the excessive amount of windows on that thing. The are essentially a bunch of structual weak points added to a rocket, something that has to entire a lot of stress during take off and landing.

transparent aluminum, we actually do have it now ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fJSmg2edhbCHlas.html they are even planing to use it for space application as it's lighter and stronger than glass.

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

@@beverlywhitman303 yeah aluminium is the chemical in the transparent super hard gemstone Safire, it’s used fairly widely in modern tech. But why would you go to all that trouble when you could just go for titanium alloy and some cameras with displays?

@@MrStrez2 costs and also how would the cam survive re-entry

To be fair, it's not a torchship, it's not going at 10% of the speed of light where a particle might have the energy of a few tons of TNT.

Underrated comment

Nice reference.

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

Same thoughts😂

Also a product placement for Wellington rubber galoshes.

Those cabins are still awfully tiny. That said I've heard peole say these ships can be scaled up pretty easily. Imagine a starship half as big avaib!

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

@@iamaduckquack at first starship was going to be17m in diameter but was made 9m. Imagine how absolutely massive it would have been if the original plans were used

@@Phantom-bh5ru I fully expect there to be a bigger one eventually, just not 17m big.

@@iamaduckquack I’m thinking they might make a “mothership” that connects to many starships

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

@@elaiottoiale4216 virus link

@@elaiottoiale4216 Why ?

IT's a Virus links, be careful...

Why does a cartoon fascinate you? I'm not being vindictive! I sincerely just want to know!

I'm sure he will! if he sees it on twitter he would probably share it and comment

No he won't, you fanboys are inconsequential and annoying.

@@PlumSack79 your inconsequential and annoying

@@RandomPerson-zl6uz it's "you're"

@@PlumSack79 oh no your one of THOSE people :)

First thing I thought as well. Too much unutilized space.

Yeah, I seem to recall reading that millions of tons of supplies will be needed. I know that probably sounds crazy-high but they will be building a small city.

dixon pinfold there is a cargo bay, it's also a passenger spacecraft, not much things will be needed.

But for the first room I would've put tables and such for when they land in a celestial body like mars.

@@Zelurpio Lots of things will be needed for building a colony. Lots and lots, many tons' worth. I think it is literally millions of tons. This isn't a exploration project.

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

Starship IS quite huge compared to the ISS. It could literally double the size of the ISS with at max 3 launches.

@@jmwhiting The volume of ISS is 1000m^3. The volume of Starship that is pressurised and USABLE is about 825m^3

@@thesnitch7 a cargo starship would have an equal amount of volume as the ISS then. (since it'd just be the unpressurized cargo instead of all living space.)

@@romanplays1 Not quite - but close. I'm not sure what your point is though?

@@thesnitch7 825 meters cubed is a lot. That's over half the ISS area. So it proves my point.

dream comes true😉👍

Wait a couple years more and see it with your eyes. Elon musk is from another breed

Oh, I remember that.. Reggan and Bush was promissing it to you

you're still younger than my uncle

Nice

No, that's bad nomenclature: (a) Jefferie's Tube (three E's) is for systems-access, not routine crew movement, and (b) the inter-deck hatchways don't comprise a tube. Related: Matt Jefferie's concept for the _Enterprise_ was that all equipment would be accessible from the shirt-sleeve, pressurized interior -- so *this* rendering's idea of "batteries in the unpressurized sub-deck area" violates the "user-serviceable" goal.

No, it should be the turboshaft because it allows the crew to access all areas of the ship needed for daily operation

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

Jeff who?

@@generalcodsworth4417 turboshaft is what I call my willy

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

The radiation problem is a big one. Unfortunately, most of it is from cosmic rays which come from all directions. We will need more than a water curtain to sort that out.

Apparently, radiation is not that big a deal. If you go fast (3 months) it's a modest increase in lifetime increase. Solar flares, yes, but for that you have to have very heavy shielding so a small heavily shielded space is the only practical thing.

Me too. Lets have some teslaquila to celebrate when we get there, if we dont die on the impact lol

I'm very poor man ... But it's my dream to go. Makes me sad forever

@@cristosanto815 invest in Tesla stock!

@@TroyRubert So true... I so far have missed that opportunity haha

@@TroyRubert Making his supporters rich enough to afford the journey one stock at a time xD

The more you know

No

But ok lol 👌😂

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

There has also been a concept for a 1/3 habitable and 2/3 unpressurized storage configuration (for fuel production and prefab base building) you can have strength either by pressure or by stringers (metal bars) like whats used now in the nosecones, the fuel tanks are far more pressurized than 1atm, so that method wouldn't be too good compared to normal stringers. plus, extra air filling unused space is extra weight, and so is the weight of the walls that will have to take that increased pressure & insulate if air is there.

@@timothygooding9544 also more presurized volume means more surfce area that can leak.

@@jearlblah5169 that too

@@timothygooding9544 air is lighter than metal

@@jesusmora9379 yes but its either the entire volume of the interior or thin bars, which would also be less than the thicker walls that would be needed to contain a pressurized space

I wish the actual cockpit was up there like other spacecraft. It seems weird how its not used for that but just to look out of.

i was thinking the same thing i doubt there will be that much wasted space

Hydroponics on that small scale wouldn’t produce enough usable oxygen for anything. You’d be better off taking more oxygen tanks or fuel. The whole ship should have redundant life support systems and centralizing them is probably dangerous.

@@bigdopamine9343 I understand that part, but i meant hydroponics for freshly harvested vegetables and/or fruits. Rations are nice, but it isn't sustainable.

@@kevincote7254 Is Hydronponics on-board a spaceship of this size enough for producing food supply for around a month or two?

@@tirthachakrabarti5912 absolutely not.

@@kevincote7254 Hydroponics is for growing things. Not storing them. Hydroponics would be a waste of space.

Did you see the title of the book? "69 ways to dock your rocket" LMFAO

@@JC130676 i completely missed that, even better!

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

I feel your pain. The best we can do now is make sure our kids won't be too old to fly.

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

The thing that irritates me is that if we could have kept up the intensity of our space programs since the '60s, we would probably already have a permanent US and international presence on the moon and could be doing human exploration of Mars right now. Instead, humans decided to pour their efforts mostly into war, as usual.

@@Perforator2000 yeah, i really hope that doesn't happen again after starship reaches mars

42 the answer to all the mysteries in the Universe.

gobsmacking AWESOME

He really put some deep thoughts on it

it's there, kind dark because the main focus is the viewing gallery

You can see it better during the radiation shelter part.

The LOX header tank is in the nose cone on the prototype to balance out the load. Once the internal facilities are installed, the tank can be put elsewhere.

@@seascapewa the nose cone is the best place to put liquid because his shape

@@seascapewa I don't think they will move it after testing it in this constellation for a few years

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

Remember the vertical dimension counts as floor space too... also, you don't have to toss and turn to shift position when there is no pressure on your body from any side.

I'd want the common room to be empty, so I can have a little space to do zero gravity tricks.

Which university?

Then do better

@@stephank9066 say that to his aerospace professor

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

Come back as a ghost to see more, and haunt us a little too while your at it.

A bit of privacy please!

Are you keen to go to mars?

_"Is it because of the fact that astronaut inside will stay here for a long time so this space was needed for their mental health ?"_ I very much think so. At least I would love to have so much room to freely float about!

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aad7hWuMqXekqo0.html

In fact they are too large. They could be much lower and still serve their purpose.

@@The_O yes they could, but you still have to think about the comfort of the crew and I’m sure that the crew will want to bring things with them like pictures, and some stuff like that. The smallstars’ cabins were better because more spacious

Also consider if you are going all the way to mars you can have a smaller crew size and more room per astronaut

After landing they even have a few minutes to escape before it explodes!

@@tonywells6990 haha no

But the starship is designed for 100 people isn't it?

They say 4 people total for a mars crew. That would leave a ton of excess space for all kinds of long-duration space flight utilities and facilities.

Yes 4 people in early missions. Once these missions become a regular occurrence and there is a reasonable Sized base, and they start letting citizens go, then there will be like 50 to 100 people

Realistically it will be closer to 10 or 12.

Depends on your will to push the crew to there limits

@@AirCommandRockets that would kind of defeat the purpose of this huge ship, won't it? It is supposed to be a colonial transporter, so building such a huge space ship for only a small group of people would be pointless, so they would build it bigger. They'll likely find a way to get a decent amount worth more of people. Also, while 100 is definitely a stretch, I don't see how 50 couldn't be done.

@@jmwhiting realistically, you can't put 50 people on Starship for a full 3-month trip, with all the supplies and LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS (LSS) required to sustain them. Not even a spacecraft the size of the international Space Station has a LSS (ECLSS) capable of supporting more than 8 crewmen without external assistance such as the Space Shuttle orbiter with it's own LSS.

@@jmwhiting - If at some point they really get into the business of transporting colonists en masse, they'll do it with the 12 -18 meter, 2.0 vehicle. This is more the scaled-down, economically plausible, all-purpose workhorse. I suspect Starship 1.0 will transport _crews_ to Mars, rather than Joe-Schmoe passengers -- probably not more than 20 at a time, I wouldn't think.

@JZ's Best Friend Because if we want to build a Martian colony that eventually is just as nice as here on Earth somebody has to go and lay the groundwork for it... although its more likely robots will be sent long before humans to build the colony so its there waiting for us. Once we get the initial base set up then it can eventually grow into a city like the one's seen in Sci-Fi.

Sailors on ships have less personal space than this... they'll be fine. You only get in there when you sleep.

@@joelmann5379 Yeah, having a private cabin with a door you can lock is already a luxury. If people are serious about going to Mars, they are just gonna have to deal with 6 month of relatively cramped conditions.

@@Tralvan Yeah, after jurney they will have entire mars for themselves.

They're just going to have to pick people with a psychology that can endure this type of trip. My bigger concern is on storage space. Storing 6 months of food is going to take up a lot of space, depending on the size of the crew.

@@rreagan007 Maybe they are going to have CELSS? Might be more mass efficient in long missions.