Always great content from u guys

I so want the meteorite pen but its 400 :/

Hello from Georgia, Tbilisi. Thank you for your great work.

Feeding a system that is already in rhythm with it's vibrations, can only create a new fold. The spacetime code is probably in the midst of some collision energy that is constantly feeding into this system of spacetime. Could we theoretically fuse matter so dense, that it serves to house consciousness by fissioning the the already super dense elements to survive the super long periods between universes, space time after it disintegrates.... Long enough to survive time recycling. Basic personality of success can be chosen to survive within artificial platform of super dense materials. 3 types, master warrior, master diplomat/lover and master creative/engineer only born within each timeline awaiting it to be born to master spacetime and all it's elements. Any other personality type you try to save through out time (scavenger for example for the failed/ celebrity for the success in social affairs) The more you try to save, the more likely that you change what's possible. So only basic personality of all times. Pure love which house cooperation. Quasi mortal unless the densest forms that can be forged. These three types of mindsets are so universal (fighter/lover/creative) that it has 3 parts in the mind that help us master these levels.

53:50 allowing Time to do...?😅, Space allows things to do, Space allows for All things to Be..🎉❤

Oh bro stop writing this cringe. You get to learn the most beautiful and mysterious things about the nature of our very reality, in a pretty elegant way, and you just don't care.

same, but for a diff reason. my problem is i’ll put it on when i’m going to sleep and then i’ll fall asleep during it and wake up and it’s fully played 😭 gotta find the part where u lost consciousness so u can start it back the next night

​@@SoloDolohalways 😂

Ok

If you do that, you will stop existing

Maybe we are living in some sort of simulation after all :P

The god of the time gap or the god of probability gap. After many years, probability will happen 😅

Brilliant

@cc

In an infinite universe, dont they think it kinda HAS to happen eventually?

I get bitches?

Don't feel bad Brother, the Trades are tangible and real, this stuff is theories and at this state, unprovable...you made the right choice

@@PauseQT. It's not about choices, it's about not placing limitations on yourself and expanding your own horizons.

Trades can earn you more money than any teacher earns. A plumber say can earn more money than any universty lecturer. A trade can make you self sufficient, independent and far more important.

@@Wallstrcrash2012 oh for sure brother. I’m sharp in my own realm. I’m a union ironworker. I use a lot of trigonometry (not that trig is Einstein material lol) to build stuff on a daily basis. I’m very good at my job I take home 150,000 a year. In school I had a hard time comprehending things the way the teachers taught stuff and they just kept moving on with the class instead of taking the time out to make sure I understood things. This guy in the video explains things in s way I can grasp which is cool.

I think anyone in a trade who knows what they are doing and is very good at his job should at least be bringing home 90 -100k without having to do any overtime.

Agreed same in my 52 years of existence and I studied physics at degree level.

I learnt more In the first 30 seconds than I have In my 80 years of deep study. Thank you so so much .

How could you have been interested in this topic for 61 years and not have heard all this before? I've been consuming content like this for only about 20 years (I'm 40) and nothing in this video was even close to new for me... You should go on a deep dive about what gravity actually is.... it's crazy. In short you are accelerating right now (assuming you are sitting still) and the only way on this planet to NOT accelerate is to jump off a tall building or out of an airplane because contrary to popular belief you do NOT accelerate during free-fall. When standing still on Earth the Earth itself is getting in your way of following a straight-line path through curved space-time such that the Earth is accelerating you along a perpetually curved path... again, while standing perfectly still.

​@@Chris-xo2rqAwesome comment bro. Glad to finally hear people debunking gravity "theory". I've been telling people for 40 years that they don't have a clue lol. Anyway, you seem well on your way in this journey. I hope you're finding happiness🙂

Sounds like you havent actually done all that much research in those "61 years" then...

Very well said! See it so also!

Yesss 🙌 if you like this, check out PBS Spacetime too. It’s my favourite physics channel, they have like 600 15-20 minute episodes on so many different subjects! It’s amazing

Indeed, well pit it all, bit perhaps it is good to keep in mind that big bang is one theory, pushed by most cosmologists now, while there are competin theories that sometimes even better fit the empirical observations and do not need the existence of dark matter of energy, ie stuff that we cannot empirically verify… and might indeed very well not exost at all, amd with web telescope recently seeing galaxies that cannot exist when the big bang theorists are right, there is a growing bodynif evidence that can put mich if the narrative in this docu,entary in the trash… That said, the implications étc of these now dominant theories and points of view are indeed well explained in this video, and beautiful illustrated by the images as well. Absolute eye candy! --a dutch Beta person😃

👏👏👏👏👏

Second that

We don't know that, and in fact, Penrose himself doesn't believe it. His entire Conformal cyclic cosmology (CCC) hypothesis is based on the fact there never was nothing.

the law of causality. Mass is a form of energy. Energy can't create itself. Even if cyclical, it still has to have a starting point

@Masoch1st What you're trying to refer to is the law of conservation of energy, which states energy can not be created nor destroyed, simply converted from one form to another. Which actually raises my question again; why expect "nothing" to be the default? And, no, if it's cyclical there's no need for a starting point. That's sort of the entire implication of bringing up a cyclical nature in the first place.

@@Masoch1st First off, misstating the law of causality doesn't help your argument. Second, you miss the point that anything ever created anything. It just always was. You make an assumption something has to have a starting point, yet you have no evidence of that. Lastly, if energy cannot be created, then that's a perfect argument for an eternal universe, and an argument against the idea of a nothing

An eternal universe theory does not explain potency. We clearly know that electrons and the smallest photons emerged into existence near plank epoch. Imagine an eternal pair of two atoms, that's basically it, did you imagine them moving and exchanging energy or creating new substances? No. Additionally, Asfaik, the very notions of thermodynamics, it's three laws, are axiomatic due to the philosophy of science. So appealing to them as a universal to affirm eternalism is absurd.

So well made huh....explain the water wheel at 7:35 going in the wrong direction to me. Or am I wrong.

Steve. You are wrong. If it went in reverse, how would it pick up water? Look at the shape of the buckets again.

​@@mikejohnson55281Shirley you jest?

Or the cosmological constant problem, the universe would blow up, not collapse. They got it entirely wrong, calculating the CC gives a positive result orders of magnitude larger than the measured value.

short attention span zoomers think anyone with a grating, archaic, eng ahhcent is smahht.

I want whatever it is that you have.

Recent discoveries by the James Web Telescope demonstrate that you’re incorrect in your statements, and it is more likely that you’re taking old, incorrect, scientific information and using your imagination to make up false assumptions to fill the gaps. Interesting how people take the unknown as “permission” to make up imaginative lies and then pretend that those made up explanations are absolute truth. As opposed to being content with not knowing until new observations and evidence can be collected to fill the gaps in our knowledge.

You forgot to take your antipsychotics, buddy. Stay on those, or you’ll start thinking you’re God again.

@@waido_ Think on this, there is a small chance he/she/it is for real. In truth, you never know.

@@Uthandol just trying to help, as much as I am permitted.

:D I love to hear theories

This is a wild theory that I wish I could do the math on

That is a very interesting postulation that we actually have the technology now to look for/test. Wouldn't surprise me at all to hear about such a study in a couple years.

Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be. Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . . A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support .

Exactly right! Caused by the Casimir Effect. 50 points awarded to Gryffindor!

The universe accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how it accidentally started trying to work out how… ugh, my head hurts… it accidentally started doing things in a non-accidental fashion.

No it isn't. That is just another slogan to persuade people to not believe their lying eyes. the Universe was designed, and life was created. If life was so easy to make with lightning bolts and primordial soup, then we would have been able to create life from inanimate matter 20 years ago.

When the brain die consciousness dies. You will cease to exist. You will never see anyone ever again. All your memories and everything you know will be gone. You won’t even know you are dead. It could happen in your sleep tonight and you won’t even know

@@steelearmstrong9616 You forgot to begin your statement with 'In my opinion' bc, since you have never experienced death, you cannot know, and your statement makes assertions that cannot be proven.

@@allhopeabandon7831 Lol. I don’t do opinions. Everyone loves a fairytale, particularly woman who live in a world of delusion. Most and many will do and say anything to sleep better at night. What ever warms your heart I guess. Tomorrow is not promised. Tomorrow does not exist. Now is all we have. Age is not just a number. Age has nothing to do with numbers. We use numbers as a reference point as guid to let us know where we at in life or what stage. I am extremely fit and healthy and have good genetics but I don’t delude myself like most and say that I feel 20 when I’m actually 45. People love to sugar coat everything which is all is driven by fear. The fear that someday very soon that they will cease to exist. This is no way to live and you are not living. As I mentioned above, whatever warms your heart. 😊

Well played. I needed that laugh

Really? That’s the intellectual contribution you come up with for this video? A cookie cutter copy and paste meme that even a braindead 5 year old could come up with?

Sorry to hear about that, hope you get better soon.

🫶🏻 I hope things get better for you soon.

Get well soon! 🤜

Sorry but I understand. Been dealing with cancer forever and these videos help.

"The work of mindfulness is first to recognize the suffering and second to embrace it. A mother taking care of a crying baby naturally will take the child into her arms without suppressing, judging it, or ignoring the crying. Mindfulness is like that mother, recognizing and embracing suffering without judgement. So the practice is not to fight or suppress the feeling, but rather to cradle it with a lot of tenderness. When a mother embraces her child, that energy of tenderness begins to penetrate into the body of the child. Even if the mother doesn’t understand at first why the child is suffering and she needs some time to find out what the difficulty is, just her act of taking the child into her arms with tenderness can already bring relief. If we can recognize and cradle the suffering while we breathe mindfully, there is relief already.” Thich Nhat Hanh

the reward is the journey. the reward is the interaction. it is not the praise, or the made up medals, or the compliments. do not get it twisted.

and some people use it to sleep, it blows my mind... learning NOTHING, it's like going to a concert and watching the whole show through your phone screen because of tik tok.... but hey, people are free to do what they want... i guess

Need to listen to this many more times at this moment i will like to consider this as a manual ❤

Why? The fact that we exist is proof that this video title is wrong, I'm not going to watch it based on that alone.

this channel offers some excellent content. i envy kids who can grow up with stuff like this in mind

Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. This was a long read but beautifully enunciated.

The only way these questions will be answered is with millions of years of study or if God gifts us with understanding in death.

Humans can’t see in dark and in higher dimensions so yours numbers in calculations are impossible to predict.

The chicken and the egg question of mathematics has always stuck with me. I mean, I have about as much of an understanding of mathematics as a squirrel does a pinball machine, but it really does make you think. We're inventing ways to describe the things we see, but isn't that just the pattern recognition in our monkey brains trying to rationalize our surroundings? But if mathematical principles truely do provide us the answers to the deepest mechanations of the universe, then how the fuck does the universe function on principles such as those? Hurts my brain, I love it

Nothing we know gives any indication at to why all the parameters are tuned so that the universe exists?? Have you ever heard of a book called the Bible? In the effort of truthfullnes i am not particularly a religious person although I do believe we have a God I just take issue with the willful ignorance of that particular summation. Second admission I have yet to finish your entire sonnet and apologies if you do address this possibility at some point. Perhaps it is a bounce rather than a bang and a Supreme being is waiting for our species collectively to be a moral one. Or even stranger it's all dependent on one individual such as you or even worse, me to use free will towards morality and personal responsibility to decide whether life propagates the entire universe or just our one blue dot.

KurGesagt was stealing content not to long ago idk if They are a reputable source anymore

Kurzgesagt are garbage

PBS Spacetime. Please. As for the universe, it appears astounding to us. No proof that it is objectively astounding. I mean, 93% of the OU is not even detectable to us. We're astronomically insignificant. He uses "should have" unscientifically.

I mean. PBS spacetime, it's great in terms of scientific facts and explanations. I love it aswell. I just like the type of stories and the fluent way that they were told here better. For me personally PBS is not as satisfying to watch compared to this content here, where i have not come across a single episode in which i haven't been "goosebumped" several times. Lets conclude it is one among the best channels besides and across SPACETIME.

Whoa, easy there buddy. Them are fightin' words! BTW, how long did it take you to watch all the content on YT?

​@@clancykelly5508 There's no way to use the word "should" scientifically, other than perhaps to express the expectation that a prediction about an experiment come to pass. Science is not concerned with what should be and has nothing to say about it. And if scientists find their theories in a conflict with reality so obvious that no experiment is necessary, then it's the theory that must change, being a mere work of man that has no prescriptive power.

It is awesome indeed. Congratulations.

you made up that number

@@raidermaxx2324 No, it's 52!, or 52 factorial. Perhaps do your research before falsely accusing me?

Yes...and the improbability that a fully functional 747 will be the result of a tornado ripping through an airplane junkyard would be about as close to humans existing after a lightning bolt hit a mud puddle.

i don't think the universe has been around long enough for a deck of cards, much less everything else.

Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be . Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . . A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.

Yep simply because they are sooooo well made and always highly interesting

It kind of is. Hell, there is a probably small "habitable zone" in the timeline of the universe, where just enough heavy elements were formed to make life as we know it possible, with the universe still being so warm that every rocky planet of the right composition would theoretically capable of hosting liquid water. If intelligent life developed there, it would likely wonder just how this could come to pass, how could it be fine tuned that it was so extremely friendly to life. But it is not. It's just a short moment in time just after the extreme violence of its birth and just before it expands and cools off enough so space turns cold and empty for the most part. Same goes for some theoretical guessing on the future of the universe. Neutrinos might be capable of interaction between each other, they are not massless after all. Not doing anything so far because the universe is too full and violent for them to make anything stable. But, this is just very far out there ideas but they are a good example for this thought experiment, in a very far of and to us cold and empty future universe, some exotic interactions might arise and create a second wind for the universe, a world not made from matter as we know it, but neutrinos. Theoretical life forming there, would look back at the universe (if it manages to, there is problems with this but this is just a wild thought experiment) and wonder how it came to be so perfect, so well tuned for it to exist. The "early beginnings" or our times, the age of stars and matter, being the violent birth throws of the universe inhospitable to them, but somehow turning into a vibrant cosmos just right for them to inhabit. So yeah, I fully agree on that. The universe seems fine tuned, but really, we just live in the small slice of time that is hospitable to us. The vast majority of time the universe has being either too violent or too empty to make life like us possible. We are around just at the right time, not because it was tuned this way, but because it is the only time we are possible, and probability makes the likelihood for us to exist just high enough not to be impossible. I also take exception with the "exceptionalism" principle, that states that we are not special. Well, we are not special in a deeper sense, but we should know by now that a lot of things aligned just right to make intelligent life possible on earth that it is very likely not to be common at all, even with the unimaginable amount of stars and planets out there. Even if life forms very easily under the right circumstances, it needs the right circumstances. Just the right single star, created from just the right composition of gas and dust, in just the right area of the galaxy, with just the right composition of planets, with a planet in just the right area of the solar system of just the right composition and size, being hit by another planetoid of just the right size and composition in just the right way to create a large moon of just the right size and just the right heavy iron core kickstarted by this and kept agitated in just the right way to create an electromagnetic field and the planet stressed and remolten just the right amount to make plate tectonics possible. And thats just the large events needed to create earth, excluding all the fine details. Even if in our large universe these events happen a billion, billion times, all of them together, in the right order and the right ways for them to happen are exceedingly rare. So much so that id you calculate the amount of planets kind of like earth for the Milkyway galaxy, we have good guesses on the likelihood of these events, you get a number you can count on one hand, at most low double digits. In a galaxy with somewhere around 100 billion stars. Thats mind boggling, and is also the reason why I don't see so much trouble with the Fermi paradox. Because thats just making the planet, not the complex and then intelligent life on it that would build a civilization. Because of these probability's I personally think that we are in fact sadly alone, not in the universe, but in the Milky Way. There very likely is a lot of life in some basic form out there, some complex even, but I do not have high hopes for intelligent life to be around in any reachable distance at the small slot of time we are around and capable right now. We are kind of special. A unusual blip in probability that took a whole lot of coincidence to come by, looking out at the untold billions of other chances that did not pan out. Which is another point why I do not believe in "design". If you throw one hundred dice often enough, at some point all would land with the same number up, it's just most likely going to take a looooong time. If you do hundreds of billions of these throws at the same time, it's likely going to happen a lot sooner and is a lot more likely. Sorry for the rant, it´s just a fascinating topic and something that bugs me about current main stream science. The assumption that we are not something unusual despite the facts we have indicating that, yes, we are actually unusual. Not special still, but unusual.

​@@theexchipmunk I like rants :D I think the idea "we are not special" was born after the theory of evolution got popular enough but before we had good enough telescopes to discover planets. It's just ~30 years since the discovery of the first exoplanets and the 1980ths were full of the idea that there must be countless alien civilizations. While the creation of life is not that big of a deal (also just an issue of the "slice of time"), the bigger issue is about finding an environment where the climate is stable enough for billions of years. So, I'd be extremely surprised if we find intelligent life somewhere in the Milky Way (outside of Earth). I am waiting for a clear indicator which *galaxies* would be suitable for life (just think of frequency of supernova explosions) which might reduce the number in the (known) universe a bit. But I also believe that the universe is infinite, with big bangs happening here and there.

@@lodepublishing Ah, yeah, the habitability of galaxies, not only by supernovas but also where you are (they might have some form of habitable zones too) is something i completely forgot about. That would narrow it down even further.

​@@lodepublishingIt's called the "Copernican Principle"

The fact that it is fitted for so a short time increases the tunning and not decreased, because it demonstrate that even in the big perspective everything came together at the right scarcely available time possible. And thanks God for that, for we need more faith to believe that nothing creates something than to believe in the Source of all creating everything. Jesus be praised above all

there's no one better for this longer format. its not even particularly close.

SEA makes videos of equal quality

SEA is amazing. does anyone know if any of this is ai generated or is the voice actually his

AI bot comments are getting quite common across UKposts. Sad. For now, they expose themselves by the banality of the praise without addressing the actual content of the video, while still attracting significant upvotes and at least a few organic replies.

bootlicker

Yes I indeed!

Observing it from the outside might help. How the hell you get outside I'll leave to the boffins

This.

Yeah, there is such a component of awe in the whole presentation, it at times drives shivers down my spine. For a moment I feel like I nearly can get a grasp on the truth of the universe, a short glimpse on the wondrous and terrifying truth of the underlying mechanisms of the universe. It´s in some ways nearly religious, and I think a similar feeling to what religious people feel with their faith. Really, this kind of feels like a sermon at time, not in a negative way, and not to any faith, but to existence, it´s awe inspiring facts and mysteries and an appreciation of just how weird, wild and beautiful it really is. And it really brings some revelations. Recently I when eating I was rolling around a pea on my plate and had a realization, this peas matter is made up from enough energy to destroy the majority of the city I live in. Yet it is lying there, being just a pea. I have known that for some time, but before then never "understood" it, it never clicked, if you get what I mean. And this channel manages to do that "making things click" for so many people, to be able to "get" these esoteric things. I never hat a problem with grasping these things, not always truly "understanding" them, but getting what they mean. But many people don´t have that skill, are not capable of just grasping these complex connections and understanding them. They get other things I don´t, like social interaction, but these extremely out there concepts are to them like seeing emotion and subtext in faces is for me. And this channel does the incredible service of making these things understandable, putting them in a way most people will have no trouble to understand and get them. And that is such a great thing to do, because in you normal life you will never truly come across these things, understand them without being invested and actively search out the facts.

Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be . Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . . A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.

My bad dog let me get a baconator

@@stephenbrennan4508Would you like some fries with that?

Go light on the salt that’s not supposed to exist

@@IR_Fuse_Live bitch we said fresh never frozen we ain't say shit about no salt but since you asked ok sir

how do you know it's well researched? Are there references that you checked?

@@notmyproblem88 I have watched this channel for a long time. I also have a few books that I reference. One of them is "The Elegant Universe" by Brian Greene. And "Fundamentals of Astro Physics" by Donald D Mueller, Jerry White, and Roger R. Bate. Those are just my two favorite factual books. The Elegant universe is more about string theory than astronomy. I didn't go to college, however I've studied astronomy since about 2005 when I was old enough to access the internet. Unfortunately I didn't ever go to college because it is more of a hobby to me than a career. So just because I've read a lot of books and studied in my own time by no means makes me an expert. But I certainly have a passion for astronomy and physics. Sorry for such a long reply, I just want people to know that this channel is actually factual unlike most other Ai generated junk out there on UKposts. I believe the owner of this channel actually writes these himself as well as narrates them. He most likely has a team of people that helps him. It takes them a month or more to write each episode. Some channels like voyager will put out 2 videos per day and that's my first red flag when it comes to spotting Ai generated junk. Hope this helps! Have a great weekend.

Correction, the book is called "The Elegant Universe" sorry its 5am where I'm at. I go to work early :p

bootlicker

@@fireonthegrom2728 This comment is what I was looking for. Universe themed documentary on YT is produced in a big variety - some channels are actual physicists / astronomists, explaining the actual status of their science. Others simply try to focus on New Age and Aliens and explain why god / aliens / all-mind should be real and such... I don't say that this is all rubbish, but I'm looking for proven facts after all, not speculation or misinterpretation out of bias. I'm totally new to HotU, cuz I've been watching the channels in my native language, but HotU seems to work for me also. If this is really proven and well researched content, then I have to bow in respect to the creator(s). You may not consider yourself as an expert, but I count on your opinion as you seem to know by far more of that topic than me. Simply don't want to fall for another clickbait rubbish and actually learn something serious over here. So I appreciate your opinion. :)

Thanks to Antonio Padilla❤❤

We forget that Mainstream TV is geared towards the average person. The AVERAGE person.

@@eyeq7730its geared towards programming you into an obedient slave NPC worker.

Yes, it could/has already done so countless times.

When's the last time you properly watched a BBC documentary?

The answer has always been there, to why there is a universe, and why we exist, but no one wants to believe it, tho it is the only one that makes any sense at all...

@@allhopeabandon7831 ?

You can call it NPZ if your are a thrash hardcore band from the 1980s. Like A.T.I ...any three initials

No, absolutely not. The script is obviously AI generated.

​@@Stroheim333 If it so, is the Script totaly bad? Its a serious question. Also because we can learn more about what AI is usefull for us.

@@user-li7ec3fg6h Dear, never pretend to misunderstand things when you try to "discuss" with me. If they use AI but pretend they make everything themselves, then it is pure fraud. Everyone can use AI, but nobody deserves the money or the honor they fraudulently can make from it.

​@@user-li7ec3fg6hAI stops you being human.

@@Stroheim333I am new around here, really?! Didn't have that Impression this far

That's my current theory/perception of reality

The big bang theory is not fact. It is a guess

Very good question!

Best comment I've seen xD

yeaaaaaaaaaah

I’d say that, for the Universe to exist, all we needed to do was wait. It was going to happen eventually, it just needed enough time.

You'd be gone before you knew it, so relax and don't worry.

Why would you be fearful of an end you won't even realize it happening. Because if it would happen (no reason to think it would) you would instantly be gone.

Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be . Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . . A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.

bootlicker

It surprises me that someone with a degree in science has difficulty with this. May I be so bold as to inquire what your degree was for. I have been an amateur astronomer for decades and I understand that some of the, literally, astronomical numbers are virtually beyond human comprehension (though I'd have to defer to the likes of Penrose for definite confirmation of this). The nature of physics has entered into realms of knowledge that are without doubt more philosophical, almost as though they have gone full circle from the likes of Plato and later Descartes.

@@mr4nders0n I have a MSc in Electrical Engineering so yeah I studied physics and took all the core classes (thermodynamics, Electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, etc.) I did not say I did not understand on an intellectual level, It's just that everytime I still find it hard to grasp on an intimate/gut level. I still am fascinated and find it mind boggling considering how far removed from the way we experience the world and day to day basis that's all

@@HuxleyCrimson Juxtaposing intellectual understanding alongside "gut level" and "day to day experience" is something very few people seem to do, probably because far too many people get caught up in their own little shallow-minded, partisan, egotistical, sociopolitical mind games, even with regards to scientific theory. By being honest with ourselves, we can access far deeper and richer levels of knowledge in the hope of achieving at least some smattering of wisdom and that can only be achieved by using all our faculties, not merely "dry" intellectual understanding. No doubt gut "feeling" and "day to day experience" are "wetter" means of understanding and for those that understand things superficially tend to not juxtapose the way you do. The broader range of faculties we employ, the closer we come to truth. But the more we learn, the less we know we know, because the more questions are revealed and it seems that the growth in questions tends towards exponential.

@@mr4nders0n wise words. As far as my memories go I was always fascinated by astronomy and science in general, and I found it hard to relate to common earthly matters that I could not help but find utterly futile. From kindergarten quarrels to workplace drama or even international conflicts. I just had to look up to the sky in a starry night with wonder and awe, it gives such a perspective, and makes all of our problems look so insignificant. I remember working with a former nuclear scientist/researcher turned programmer in a bank and I could not comprehend the fact that he could come to terms with living so "normally" knowing all what he knew after working on some top scientific programs at the time. I know I still can't. But as you stated it, it makes me trying to keep closer to "truth" all the time. In the end, if done right, one's ego should slowly dissolve in the face of such dizzying greatness of the universe

I just can't take cosmology seriously, I think "we" have a lot wrong.

The universe Will make due and cope until we come up with a theory .

any decision is usually based on $$

Or any other number of reasons someone might not want to do something.

@@loganh123456789with the built in ad how would it not be money.

Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be . Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . . A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.

People love fiction.

Do you sniff your own farts?

Interesting

I scrolled down to write this comment again. I don't remember watching this video or making this comment lol

@@jonasga XD I've been there. I'll admit the terms and wording of your comment went a little over my head, but still enjoyed the information and hope to learn more

Should chemistry be denied in the ready conversion of H1 to H2 merely because H2 is difficult to detect in any direct manner in space? A paper by Canadian astronomer Paul Marmet essentially collapsed the "Big Bang" back in 1990 as he theorized the existence of intergalactic and interstellar matter as the cause of redshift rather than a doppler effect -- and accounting for anomalies much more effectively, before the discovery of the abundance of H2 throughout space, though primarily ignored by the necessities of money and career support. An abundance of H2 throughout space in a gradient that will extend to meet that of our galactic neighbor, will also account for the gravitational anomaly where the outer arms of our galaxy rotate at nearly the same rate as the central region. Quantum physics is great, dare I say so before I have dived into the math. However math hasn't actually proven the existence of dark matter, no matter how sophisticated the math is or can be . Circular reasoning isn't somehow justified if you add decades of career building and funding requirements and the consensus building that takes place over time that takes on more precedence than any math in support . . A much greater quantity of H2 in the presence of H1 is the natural result if we acknowledge basic chemistry, exceeding the mass of the visible component of the universe and which must be ignored to maintain control over the narrative and our inability to think and take a risk without group oriented behavior and identification in support.

"national media" ? what country do you live in? Belarus? Russia? im just interested, i've never met anyone that lives under a regime with a "national state media" . If you dont mind...

@@raidermaxx2324 hmmm, I wonder what NBC stands for?

​@@raidermaxx2324ABC? Owned by the government

Brother if you don't think American TV is anything but totally under the control of corporate interests AND if you don't realize that American jurisprudence is the errand boy of corporate interests, I don't know what to tell you other than watch some Second Thought or 1Dime or hell even HasanAbi.

BBC in the UK?