It’s a two stroke engine, yeah it’s gonna idle a little higher

4 stroke it has a cam and valves.@@elisiple8954

and it is tiny it does not have the rotating mass to hold a low rpm

​@@elisiple8954wdym it's a 4 stroke. Inlet valve/exhaust valve/camshaft. 2 stroke dose not have that

​@@letsstepaplay are you saying 2 strokes dont have intake/exhaust valves and camshafts or am I misunderstanding your comment?

They probably only make the engine block, head and related items and outsource the reast.

​@jwalster9412 for 5k it better be damn perfect. These cost more than real engines it ridiculous

@@PneumaticFrog Which is funny, because that's not 5k worth of materials or work put into those parts. For about the "same" price you get a Conley Stinger 609... which is a lot of engine, and built much, much better. This is a CNC engine, the cost is really around 1000~2000 dollars.

@@aserta I agree from a practical sense it isnt worth much, but the r&d and machining alone can ramp prices of these little parts quickly. They likely aren't producing these like ford produced the 300, en masse. Coming from an manufacturing background, I'm surprised they can churn out all these custom parts for less than $5000!

Made in China…

This is my thinking as well. Provides the basic concepts of what's required at the bare minimum. Helps ease the learning curve a bit.

I Agree but for this price you could literaly buy a whole Car to learn maintenance Work :/

@@m.d.6649 It's funny you mention that, because when I went to look at the prices, I thought the exact same thing. $6000+ You could literally just buy a used car and spend time fixing the real engine. 😄

Or buy a junk engine from a wrecker.

​@@r.b.ratieta6111 It's $1300,- according to the link in the video description. Still a lot of money for basically a gimmick imo, but not ludicrous 6k..

I would something like this puts out so miniscule a number it wouldn't be worth it. Even some of the bigger v8 motors would only push a horse or two tops.

​@@UN-intelligentit would still be interesting to see what they are actually capable of

@@UN-intelligentdepends on the CC rating. a 50CC motor can apparently push 1.6HP so if these are like 10cc its probably like .6HP but still cool to see maybe if we figure a way to scale it up to see if its close to the real life counterpart in that respect

@@UN-intelligent supposedly it makes 3 hp but idk how true that is

​@@UN-intelligentyou'd be surprised 😂

I bet you didn't wind it up to 10k tho😮

Me to . 347,000 miles

My 1980 Fairmont had one in it...between Jegs, JC Whitney and Summit, I turned that thing into a pretty fun sleeper...JC Whitney was only about a 15min drive from me, so that made things pretty easy...wasn't a terrible ride for 18 year old me in 1995...lol

Yeah its surprising how similar this thing runs to a 300 really love it

in high school I had a beater with the 300, we got in a pickle up north in des moines and wound up sending it with no coolant 250 miles south! we never thought we'd make it...

@@zethes66 my favorite was a 1966 F series with a 4 speed and limited slip rear end… sumbitch was unstoppable.

@@zethes66 Those engines were nearly bomb proof...lol

they are also more expensive than they're full size counter parts for some dumb reason

Well they are the real thing…

Mini car

Every time I watch these small engine videos, I can't help but think about dropping them into an RC auto. Then pushing it to the brink to see what they are capable of. My hobby money won't allow that to happen right now. 😢

Just buy a junk 4 banger it's cheaper and he will learn more.

@@mr.gabriel382 I dont disagree....but not everyone has space for that

it would sound better, now its sounds well ..

I also wish to see that

They sound the best and are most efficient with a 6-3-2-1 long tube setup

​@@dipstiksubaru3246equal length 6-1 headers by far sound the most exotic, but yeah 6-3-2-1 headers would make more power.

6 into 1, equal length, rotational firing order

That's a pretty good idea, I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work.

The Aergnetinian mopars are really cool looking, the Dodge cars

I follow the Argentina 6 Bangers because they are awesome

The Inline 6 is a very smooth and reliable engine. My grandfather had a slant 6 in his Dodge Dart.

@@kingwillie206 I had a slant 6 in my dodge dart as well. The Leaning Tower of Power.

I put the efi exh mnflds on my actual 300. The difference in power is stunning!

Inline sixes, back then, were carbureted and the exhaust manifolds were cast to create a hotspot underneath the intake so the air-fuel mix would be vaporized. Also, the one piece exhaust manifold was cheap to cast and quick to install on the assembly line. Performance was a very secondary consideration for those engines. Ford DID make a special high-flow exhaust manifold for its Heavy Duty versions of the 300 six but, they are hard to find. The HD 300 was often found in F-350 and larger trucks, small and mid-sized school buses, and other applications where it would be running at full power almost continuously.

@@BlackPill-pu4vi The regular has a angled dump exit, while the HD had a more straight down exhaust dump exit.

@@petersipp5247 They are severely breathing limited, you can get twice the power with a mild porting and blending, better intake and carburetor, and the EFI exhaust manifolds. You can get buy a 4BBL manifold with coolant inlet and outlets.

@@LionWithTheLamb Yes, the HD manifold had more interior volume which enabled surprising flow performance and the downward exit was sized for a 2.5" pipe instead of the usual 2" pipe. But, the engine bays of the bigger trucks could accommodate that. Putting one in a F-150 or comparable van would require a special mandrel-bent exhaust head pipe to make it fit and flow properly.

I think the rotary engine he built is the best sounding; Im waiting on a return of that engine.

turbo 2jz engine ?

@@adrianello92I want a replica I6 with DOHC like a 2j or RB26. 30cc-60cc or so

Exactly what I was thinking! Kinda annoying the correct adjustment is so close to the end stop though! 🤷

@Dave-dh7rt that would be awesome! Id love to see someone make a miniature turbo for these too. The compressor and turbine wheel would take some serious skill to make, or perhaps 3d metal printing it would work?

I was wondering what was causing that. That makes sense now.

Me to 95

I think a completely stock 70’s or 80’s ford f.150 should be the only way to go for this work of art!!

It'd work, and it would be very powerful considering a 1400w brushless motor produces about 1.69 horsepower. I have two 1400w brushless motors on my electric scooter, and I can reach 50mph in like 7 seconds. Two 1400w motors produce about 3.38 HP. That engine has to go on a bike!

@@abundantharmony brushless also makes all its torque from 0rpm. I dont see this being that efficient for multiple reasons. Mainly it wont have the torque output and it isnt physically big enough to handle the weight of pulling a human being. that crankshaft would be holding on for dear life to even get you moving lol

These engines don't produce anything close to the rated power that is written on their website. People put these in RC cars and they barely manage to move, a proper 2hp nitro engine is waaaay more powerful. No way it would move a bike.

​@@NorwayVFX2HP, torque: 0.04

I have a trike with an 80cc 2 stroke China engine. I'd love to put this monker on there. As soon as I can buy one for $150-$200. In the meantime I have to dream through the UKposts fellas who get free ones sent out by the manufacturer. So the rich guys can play with the coolest toys. Just like when I was a child. Hell I didn't get my motorized trike I've wanted my whole life till I was 49 and had gathered enough junk to build it myself. But I don't see lathes and mills in my future. Especially miniature ones. Maybe that will be one for my Son. I pray!

That's why you see the use of a torque limiting driver for a lot of them, that's the clicks you're hearing when he's tightening screws, it reaching it's torque limit. Not getting cross-threaded bolts may also be a fun task lol

There's a turbocharger keychain manufacturer out there, that actually makes a working miniature scale dual ball bearing turbocharger that would fit this application perfectly. They even make little compressor maps for them! So no engineering required.

This is why thermostats are so key. I knew people who would yank a thermostat in the summer so their 350 would run "cooler". I thought to myself, that's not how it works. Will it cool? Sure. But common hot spots in certain engines will certainly run hotter.

That's not how heat transfers works. Higher flow will increase cooling if the bottleneck is not enough thermal capacity, but if there's enough higher flow won't do anything.

@@armLocalhost You are clueless, aren’t you? It’s a proven fact that it was a how things work, you just don’t have the intellect to understand it. It used to be common in the automotive world for people to remove a thermostat thinking it would make their car run cooler, it didn’t. The operating temps look lower, but as soon as you stop the engine, temps will rise all the way to overheating. It takes time for heat to transfer, so the coolant has to move slow enough to absorb heat. Same with v8 jet boats, a restrictor is run instead of a thermostat to slow the water enough to absorb heat. Don’t run one and you will overheat and seize the engine while showing low water temp. So, try again when you have an idea what you are talking about. I’ve been an engine builder for 30 years and know what I’m talking about.

​@@adamr9215Sure you do.

@@ThatMeansHesMad Are your parents brother and sister? Because that is the only thing that explains the stupidity in your comment.

The crank is probably splash lubricated. The head and cam gear probably has to be periodically greased.

Lighter flywheel would likely do that, but may come at a cost to balancing or the smooth operation in some small ways, so short answer is definitely yes, by how much? Who knows. What else would it affect? Hard to say. The rotating mass affects more than just the ability to rev quickly, so it could be fine, or it could have drawbacks like necessity for higher idle speeds or things like that.

nope copper is best just like on a car. high hp cats use copoer gaskets steel expands at much different rates than aluminum

Dawg you look like a person to say a dog is just a cat

Nah, mommy and daddy buy everything for this man baby.