PD-14 - the main engine of Russia

  Переглядів 391,903

Skyships Eng

Skyships Eng

2 роки тому

The PD-14 (Prospective Engine with 14 tf thrust) is the base engine of a family of promising Russian civilian turbojet aircraft engines, developed by the United Engine Corporation (UEC) for the MC-21 family of airliners.
The PD-14 is the most advanced engine created in Russia and claims its rightful place among the most advanced civil aviation power plants in the world. Belonging to the 5th generation, it has incorporated all the latest technologies, solutions and materials available at the moment, which already at the stage of creation gave a huge leap forward to the entire Russian engine building industry: from science and development to testing and production.
Thanks to the knowledge and technology gained in the creation of this motor, the industry has the opportunity to create other advanced engines of different classes. Several major projects are already underway, from the small PD-8 to the super-powerful PD-35, which is being developed for heavy transports and long-haul airliners.
In today's story we will take a closer look at the PD-14, learn how the creators managed to achieve the high performance of the engine, how it was developed, how it was produced and due to what advantages will it be able to successfully compete in one of the most technologically complex and competitive markets in the world.
Thank you for watching!
Subscribe to the channel, like and comment!
If you want to support Skyships and our work, welcome to our Patreon. We will create some special content for you there: / skyships
Our Facebook: / skyshipscom
Our Instagram: / skyships_world
The video was made with the assistance of the United Engine Corporation.
/ uec_rus
/ uecrus
uecrus

КОМЕНТАРІ: 994
@skhuang4971
@skhuang4971 2 роки тому
Thank you for this video. This is the best non-academic explaination about a commercial jet engine I've come across. Congratulations to Russia and to you.
@SkyshipsEng
@SkyshipsEng 2 роки тому
Today we'll meet the Russian competitor of the P&W1100G and CFM LEAP. Hope, you'll like the story)
@LemuelTaylor
@LemuelTaylor 2 роки тому
It was awesome. Well put together and I love the storytelling flair that you naturally bring to the table.
@flyerkiller5073
@flyerkiller5073 2 роки тому
Good video with enough info. Thank you for this work!
@TurboFEM
@TurboFEM 2 роки тому
Please do NK-93 at some point!
@drinksnapple8997
@drinksnapple8997 2 роки тому
Nothing special, nobody outside of Russian wants it.
@alainmare8081
@alainmare8081 2 роки тому
@@drinksnapple8997 pure speculation from you. If the engine and the plane finally are good ? Don’t forget that it is only a fraction of Boeing 737 max and A 320 Neo price. So, maybe some low cost carriers from the western world are going to be interested if at the end the real cost per pax is really good and international network for maintenance is built (not tomorrow anyway).
@yumphallangthaphal1598
@yumphallangthaphal1598 2 роки тому
For someone who has waited for so long (Russian engine), honestly and admirably thanks you.
@pauldobrovolsky7367
@pauldobrovolsky7367 2 роки тому
Я русский инженер. Не думаю, что мы сможем сделать такие хорошие лопатки из композита, как у США. Но думаю, что лопатки из титана - это совсем неплохая альтернатива. Это моё, сугубо индивидуальное мнение...
@ottopuppy
@ottopuppy 2 роки тому
The best explanation of a commercial jet engine I have seen.
@rushymoto
@rushymoto 2 роки тому
Russia has long history working with titanium, like making whole submarines out of it.
@pops91710
@pops91710 2 роки тому
This video sure did eliminate my doubts about Russian engineering. I have a USAF background and we often found Russian fighter jets crude, (nevertheless effective!) especially in the earlier combat aircraft. Clearly, Russia has made great progress in that regard. The video shows the engines are truly a piece of fine art. Please keep these great videos coming. This one was one of the best I have seen.
@Shaquiifa
@Shaquiifa 2 роки тому
One critical thing I love about this video is not shying away from the weakness of the engines.
@fredmdea785
@fredmdea785 2 роки тому
What aspects of the fighters are crude? I dont know too much abt this, The cruder parts (when compared to american jets) would be mainlt electronics, right?
@Shaquiifa
@Shaquiifa 2 роки тому
@@fredmdea785 Don't get me wrong, Russian fighters are also state of the art machines. There is a general understanding that the west build high tech fighters, while the east builds less high tech but tough and tanky fighters. For a long time, Soviet and US have been in a arms race. While US was modernizing their fighters, bombers, transports, Soviet collapsed, which halted many advancements. Even before the collapse, Soviet was in debt Nd hungry, if you look at their access to Fox 3 missiles, US have way better avionics and AMRAAMs, compared to the Russian jet at the time, mostly using R-27ER Fox 1 missiles.
@cheshireghost299
@cheshireghost299 2 роки тому
It was the soviets who were crude but not today’s Russia They want to make products that will b universally accepted on the international market unlike the soviets who made substandard products to keep up appearances of progress
@peterdurum434
@peterdurum434 2 роки тому
@@cheshireghost299 While modern Russia has managed to finally make some great achievement after awful 15 years of degradation, you can't separate Russian and Soviet sophisticated industry - it's a one country after all. Do your research and you will find a lot of Hi-Tech stuff soviets built.
@liv4combat
@liv4combat 2 роки тому
Ok, I'm sold. Definitely want to take a flight on one of these planes.
@newyork8415
@newyork8415 5 місяців тому
Wow. This a serious engine. Congratulations
@21stcenturybohemian
@21stcenturybohemian 2 роки тому
I love the charm of the Russian presentation. The grammatical and syntactic errors, and the interesting Russian colloquialism translations are often rather cute. I am wondering if the guy in the videos is the same guy doing the narration? I think not, as I suspect he would actually speak in English to the camera if he could. It is great to get a different perspective on the aircraft industry and aviation history as a whole, separate from US self-aggrandizement or UK nostalgia for better days gone by. Nobody in the US would ever talk about the Russian (Soviet) industry in a positive way, let alone with so much detail. You have opened up a whole new world for me. Keep up the good work and do not change anything!
@infarctinsult2654
@infarctinsult2654 Рік тому
Logically. Praising enemies and telling the truth is not about the USA. To lie, pervert and belittle it is always. I often watch American documentaries about production, they are interesting, but there is too much "patriotism". I am very glad that you are one of those who sees the facts and not the political subtext.
@21stcenturybohemian
@21stcenturybohemian Рік тому
@@infarctinsult2654 People are people everywhere. Political systems are temporary. Sky has, so far, not been political in any way. I do not blame him for Putin's actions, and am very happy to see him still posting.
@mrc9437
@mrc9437 Рік тому
Yes, he has a Russian channel Skyships, and translations just come out on this channel
@jamesmandahl444
@jamesmandahl444 2 роки тому
Frankly it is refreshing to hear a Russian being proud of native designs as Russians in general are very self deprecating and tend to berate themselves. That or you get the "invented in RUSSIA!" types. Hell I even like those types more than the ones who berate their own people and their abilities. One of the few good things about the interwebs is that it gives the ability to cut through propaganda and horseshit from all sides if you are willing to put a bit of effort. Good work!
@stranics27
@stranics27 2 роки тому
I'm from Russia! Nice to read an intelligent person!
@camiemengineer
@camiemengineer 2 роки тому
THIS IS A VERY GOOD DOCUMENTARY WORTH WATCHING ..As a Engineer it was fascinating to discover the work methodology of this Russian JET engine factory. For those who may not be familiar, working with titanium is extremely difficult because the metal is very hard and difficult to machine but it does have other desirable qualities: For example LIGHTNEES AND STRENGTH and it can be anodised which surely would help in its battle with corrosion ... which is, perhaps, the reason it can handle volcanic emissions! Putting politics on one side, the West should consider purchasing the MC21 with this engine. as It does look as though it's a real bargain. And if airlines do Airbus will have to reduce its prices which will mean lower prices for passenger end users. ALL GOOD! I really appreciated the honesty ... like fuel economy but I'm sure that that parameter will improve in stages and within a few years this engine will be on par with anything seen in the West. ANYWAY GOOD LUCK AND MAY GOD BLESS ALL THE HARD WORKING ENGINEERS., (AND EVERYONE ELSE), working at this factory.. GREAT TEAM!
@JDAbelRN
@JDAbelRN Рік тому
Are you JOKING? Competing with the Western manufacturers? That'll be the day!😂🇨🇳☢️🇳🇱
@camiemengineer
@camiemengineer Рік тому
@@JDAbelRN Well, ... the US have bought Russian Rocket Engines in the past recognising those Engines to be superior .... so why not Jet Engines, given a little time? I dare say you won't be convinced and to that I can only say that engineering progress is essentially a function of innovation ... and if you believe that Russian Engineers lack inventiveness then you are sadly mistaken.
@JDAbelRN
@JDAbelRN Рік тому
@@camiemengineer I am not saying at all that Russia has less talented engineers, technicians, designers or machinists. My main point is that they are so behind in the overall technology of jet engine manufacturing, that it may be decades until Russia actually catches up with and produces significant quantities to compete with General Electric, Pratt and Whitney, Rolls Royce, SCM. Why would the West or China buy Russian engines when they have so many choices readily available on the SHELF and new, more, efficient engines on the way? Actually, it would be better if Russia concentrates all their engineering and design talent to totally new aero jet design, and purchase ready made and reliable engines from the companies listed above.
@juansuponatime517
@juansuponatime517 Рік тому
@@JDAbelRN hmmmm...SELF RELIANCE?
@v1ncy_vinny406
@v1ncy_vinny406 6 місяців тому
​@@JDAbelRNthey were not allowed to purchase them due sanctions. They are behind but atleast their industry is not dead. Time will tell if they succeed.
@wassdepp1
@wassdepp1 2 роки тому
I watched the whole video. Thank you. Russian aeronautics is rising up again
@dawnsparrow4477
@dawnsparrow4477 2 роки тому
Nice video about PD-14 main engine for aviation action produced by Russia 🇷🇺 👌 👍 👏👏👏👏
@antongromek4180
@antongromek4180 2 роки тому
Once again, I'm really impressed. Russian engineering at its finest 👌
@ricardotate3392
@ricardotate3392 2 роки тому
@@flightforensics4523 what is wrong with the ssj except western propaganda which state everything from the east is bad only western aircraft is good.
@moisesruedarivero4707
@moisesruedarivero4707 2 роки тому
@@flightforensics4523 I think you wanted to say Boeing 737 Max
@kaamfinitii
@kaamfinitii 2 роки тому
West better
@jamesmandahl444
@jamesmandahl444 2 роки тому
Cam Blaxx: better be, as they have a shit ton more experience and funding.
@jamesmandahl444
@jamesmandahl444 2 роки тому
Rich Storr incorrect. The parent company that developed this engine got their know how from the ps-90 engine family
@andrewhurdle
@andrewhurdle 2 роки тому
Brilliant, I really enjoyed this, love Russian engineering and hope this engine is a great success.
@MrJoferna
@MrJoferna 2 роки тому
Too early to comment. They haven't been tested for reliability and economy in real commercial situations. Any way the Russian authoritarian administration can spend as much money on these kinds of projects while squeezing ordinary Russian citizens of their lively hood and standard of living, and no one in the Russian authoritarian regime is going to be questioned or held accountable.
@pauldobrovolsky7367
@pauldobrovolsky7367 2 роки тому
@@MrJoferna Dude, maybe you won't be doing political propaganda here, ok? No one is interested in your lies here, technical problems are being discussed here...
@AussieMaleTuber
@AussieMaleTuber 2 роки тому
@@MrJoferna Hey Joe, good to see you back in the game after what your government did to you, bravo! Watch these engines, they will really take off in Eurasia, time to move shares from the failing American manufacturers- I'm up 6% on 2020!
@legend9805
@legend9805 2 роки тому
@@MrJoferna first look at your country united snakes ordinary citizen live jn poverty while your nation spending billions in military to wage war everytime
@legend9805
@legend9805 2 роки тому
@@MrJoferna keep on sanction nation and they will develop soon no one will need your bullshit items
@zidfih1176
@zidfih1176 2 роки тому
This is becoming my new favorite channel. Can't wait for the Izdeliye 30
@markam306
@markam306 2 роки тому
Skyships, Very good presentation, thank you for your effort. As a retired engineer, I greatly appreciated the design choices made with this engine, a good balance of practicality and efficiency. It looks like Airbus and Boeing will soon have serious competition in this airliner size. The Chinese are pushing to develop competitive airliners. Let’s hope Russian industry fills this role and not China. Good luck.
@tomascernak6112
@tomascernak6112 7 місяців тому
Nah, they do not play fairly. MC-21 had denied EU certification in march 2022. So basically unsaleable outside Russia and CIS. Reason is obvious and it is not technical one. Same fate for C-919 did not get certificate in USA because "espionage" allegations. Taking into consideration, that C-919 was designed to compete for huge american domestic market (thus its relatively low flight range), it will sell only in China and some friendly countries in Asia. So do not worry, Airbus and Boeing have assured protection from any competition.
@jafarhon
@jafarhon 4 місяці тому
@@tomascernak6112 Mostly they doing this for inside flights, was listening to Putin other day saying Russia is big, from one end to another end you will fly 10 hours, and they wanna kick Airbus and Boeing out from there market first, and than possibly just like you said selling few to Asian markets.
@tomascernak6112
@tomascernak6112 4 місяці тому
@@jafarhon Yes, now they will use it that way, but this airplane was not designed yesterday, it was awaiting EU certification since 2019 so it could compete in Euroasian market. Also, airplane which can not fly over USA and their vassals (which include EU), is problematic even for internal market, because time to time you want to fly atleast over airspace of these countries. Also it is a mayor blow to Aeroflot, which was trying to restore their dominance from cold war. Russian civil aerospace industry get major blow and it will probably kill that industry altogether.
@jafarhon
@jafarhon 4 місяці тому
@@tomascernak6112 You and i know that Russians can build a plane out of a gold but west and EU will always block that, they dont want competition.
@tomascernak6112
@tomascernak6112 4 місяці тому
@@jafarhon Exactly. And it has nothing to do with current war in Ukraine. It was same with Sputnik vaccine approval. There was no war, and Russia had vaccine first, it was safer because was not mRNA and was able to produce it large quantities. Yet EU and our overlord USA did not want competition for their pharmaceutic companies.
@edwardwilcox6606
@edwardwilcox6606 2 роки тому
Great to see Russia pursuing it`s own small jet to compete with A320/B737, plus this development of a home-grown engine which looks terrific. I think they are correct not to go to technical extremes, rather concentrate on what they can do relatively easily & perhaps ease into more cutting edge techniques ( geared fans & carbon blades ) with further experience. I wish these engineers & others concerned good fortune & look forward to seeing MC-21 being exported around the globe.
@stephanbode548
@stephanbode548 2 роки тому
Ha Ha Ha, where the Russian want to go, Airbus comes from. MC-21 is in development since more than 10 years and production is still not up. I doubt that this PD-14 is outperforming the western engines.
@maximus7809
@maximus7809 2 роки тому
@@stephanbode548 you dont need to outperform, you need to outprice it to counqer the market. now sit down, the test is failed
@RandomMichiganGuy
@RandomMichiganGuy 2 роки тому
@@maximus7809 Yeah.... so Russia already tried that with the Sukhoi SSJ100. That failed miserably and the non Russian airlines who had it have already gotten rid of them and deemed the plane a failure. Russian civil aviation is dead at this point.
@maximus7809
@maximus7809 2 роки тому
@@RandomMichiganGuy and you dont know why that happened to SSJ100 of course. French part of the engine was 1000hours resource instead of declared 8000 hours. And they could not make parts in required amount to fix thos engines. So compaines were using 2-4 of 20 planes and keeping other for parts. Thats why now we make our own engines without "partners"
@ericmunene8521
@ericmunene8521 2 роки тому
@@maximus7809 good explanation .I love Russian engineers' straight forward and critical thinking.We used to compare a mig 21 and f5 and marvel at the simplicity and yet superbness of the 21 against the f5
@microRiZu
@microRiZu 2 роки тому
The most excellent aviation information channel ever! edit: the work you put into these Documentaries is jaw dropping for real, the quality is second to none even if you compare your videos with Real Engineering or Veritasium etc, this is amazing work i can't honestly think how many 10s of hours you put into a single video
@Sanginius23
@Sanginius23 2 роки тому
Great Video, superb Engine. Good luck with the MC-21, I hope to fly this bird one day
@flyerkiller5073
@flyerkiller5073 2 роки тому
Bad we’ll see this plane out of Russia not very soon
@alexandernorman5337
@alexandernorman5337 2 роки тому
Right now, only GE (and CFM) are making use of carbon fiber epoxy to make fan blades. Rolls Royce and Pratt&Whitney are still using metal alloys. The Aviadvigatel's PD-14 isn't at any particularly big disadvantage there.
@allaroundjr
@allaroundjr 2 роки тому
The geared turbo fan pratt family uses some composites
@AndreyYeltsov
@AndreyYeltsov 2 роки тому
Carbon fiber blades are a must for ridiculously high bypass ratio engines. PD-14 has a moderate flow and will not benefit from carbon blades.
@eyeofthetiger6002
@eyeofthetiger6002 2 роки тому
But RR will finally take the plunge with composite fan blades with its latest engine in development,the Ultrafan, which will be the world's largest fan blades!
@alexandernorman5337
@alexandernorman5337 2 роки тому
@@eyeofthetiger6002 Yes, Ultrafan (which also uses CMCs) should perform its first test run this year. And Aviadviagtel's PD-35 - also with composite fan blades and ceramic matrix composites - will have its first test run in 2023. Pratt&Whitney will probably choose to integrate CMCs before a composite fan. And they haven't made any schedule for introducing either technology.
@smeghed1025
@smeghed1025 2 роки тому
Ti makes sense, especially as many derivatives and variants will likely be used in industry, ships, and maybe helicopters and armored vehicles, where bypass is unimportant.
@sisyphusvasilias3943
@sisyphusvasilias3943 2 роки тому
Great documentary, I learned a lot. Looking forward to the future of Russian Jet manufacturing.
@Nachiel
@Nachiel 2 роки тому
Today, 28.12.2021 MC-21 with PW-1000 was fully certified. We are waiting its certification with PD-14!
@byloyuripka9624
@byloyuripka9624 2 роки тому
being 'merican and pedantic, i believe this is by most referred to as a turbofan. you pointed out its competitors had troubles and showed images of the cs110/a220 and its pw1500g which have not have more issues than any other evolutions and less than many others. also when talking about the size you showed a clip of an a330(?) with its large trent (7000?) which has blades grown as a single crystal but are metal and not composite and are huge! an incredible achievement from RR, i wish i could see more stuff from russia in the states! thank you sky for sharing, they can grow the bypass in the future, many others have done this through their variants/iterations
@Ticklestein
@Ticklestein 2 роки тому
Legit the first plane/engine combination from Russia I'd consider flying regularly. Looks good.
@aurelio-reymilaorcabal9669
@aurelio-reymilaorcabal9669 Рік тому
You won't be flying in any Russian jets anytime soon but Russia , Oh it will be decades before any Russian passenger jets will be certified. Even the stolen Boeing and Airbus jets will be grounded as they slowly run out of parts.Welcome to Putins Russia.
@edgarguinartlopez8341
@edgarguinartlopez8341 Рік тому
Thanks again Sky for this master piece of information; must be a very hard material to make, very complex, very complete... thanks very much! And Enzo was right (of course) the engine is the "Core part" around of which the rest of the vehicle is created... :) This is specially true on airliners. If the PD-14 program succeed, the future of the Russian aviation industry promises. Keep going please. All the best for you guys.
@adamrichardson6821
@adamrichardson6821 3 місяці тому
I've learned far more watching your videos than I have watching any others, and been thoroughly entertained as well. Truly remarkable. Thanks very much.
@breathtakingblue
@breathtakingblue 2 роки тому
Outstanding. This video is one of your finest yet. Thoroughly enjoyed this. 👏
@christiantosumbung5791
@christiantosumbung5791 2 роки тому
Do the PW geared turbofan next. I always find the engines fascinating, working on industrial turbines all my life. Great content and pretty thorough research which shows in the narrative. Keep it up.
@LemuelTaylor
@LemuelTaylor 2 роки тому
I absolutely enjoyed this video. Your content just gets better with time.
@LionPride11241968
@LionPride11241968 2 роки тому
Can anyone say Reverse Engineering of the Pratt & Whitney Engine to make Russian Version?
@ByTheKingFroModzMX4014
@ByTheKingFroModzMX4014 2 роки тому
video information of sikorsky s92 please
@Lasenggo
@Lasenggo 2 роки тому
Wow! I don't even understand half of the things discussed in the video but I'm super pumped to see this engine. More manufacturers means more progress ( including safety) in the jet engine field which would ultimately benefit airline passengers like us. Good luck to the manufacturer's and hopefully someday this would be added to Rolls Royce and Pratt and Whitney as engine options for Boeing and Airbus.
@franktyrone6789
@franktyrone6789 2 роки тому
Means low prices
@carlosgamarrath244
@carlosgamarrath244 10 місяців тому
Working as engineer in aviation industry sector if you like u can ask me if you like to 😮😮😮😮😮😮😮
@kennethlboren6729
@kennethlboren6729 2 роки тому
Well done on very informative video. I'm pleased to see Russian Civil Aviation advancing with modernize engines and aircraft.
@56Gumball
@56Gumball 2 роки тому
Being involved with the development of many R-R aero engine types for over 40 years I found your video very interesting. Thanks, and keep the good work. 👍🏼
@ghostindamachine
@ghostindamachine 2 роки тому
Fantastic documentary on this wonderful engine, and aircraft!
@EdwardTilley
@EdwardTilley 2 роки тому
Fantastic analysis... really over the top. Well done!
@hypernate1481
@hypernate1481 2 роки тому
You did a great job with researching and presenting on this video. Thank you so much for the knowledge!
@thomasbrowne6649
@thomasbrowne6649 2 роки тому
This engine makes perfect sense for a country which is self-sufficient in, indeed a major exporter of, hydrocarbons. Any slight efficiency penalty is more than offset by acquisition cost, and more importantly strategic, considerations. Well done Russia.
@justforever96
@justforever96 2 роки тому
that only makes sense as far as the engines are _used_ in Russia. And it assumes that maximum profits are not as important to Russian airline companies as any other. Even if Russian airlines can get fuel more cheaply than other airlines (and can they?), that doesn't mean they wouldn't prefer to use the lowest amount possible. But more importantly, I doubt they produced this engine only for use by Russian airlines, I am sure they hope very, very much to sell it all over the world, and you can't sell your engines to Ethiopian Airlines on the sales pitch that fuel is really cheap in Russia, so it's okay that fuel consumption is high. You _can_ probably do it by offering them for significantly lower initial cost, in spite of the added fuel costs later. and I would think that they hope to improve the fuel burn over time as well.
@Kenny-yl9pc
@Kenny-yl9pc Рік тому
@@justforever96 But from what I understand the fuel consumption is not high and very much comparable to western counterparts.
@siddiqueyd1
@siddiqueyd1 9 місяців тому
@@justforever96 This engine can be used anywhere in the world!
@pgornicki
@pgornicki 9 місяців тому
this ecnagine will be great ot carry war criminals to camps in siberia. great job russia. PS russia is not self-suficient. BY far not
@tomascernak6112
@tomascernak6112 7 місяців тому
@@justforever96 Fuel is not so expensive in aircraft TCO. For example, MC-21 has 20 tons of fuel, which is roughly 20 000 dollars on European/american market (2/3 of that in russia). This translates into 7000 km range (it is 6400 with landing reserve). This equals to 10 hours in air which correspond with average usage of airliner 11 hours per day. So per year such airplane consume fuel for 7,3 million USD in EU/USA market or 5 million USD in CIS market. So it take 10/15 years of flying to spent fuel cost equal to MC-21 purchase price not counting maintenance which would be probably more expensive, than airliner itself during that time. And now we can calculate difference between this engine and one of super-high bypass ratio from west. Cruise TSFC of PD-14 is 15g/kN/s. PW 1100 on A320Neo has allegedly 13g/kN/s. So 15% better consumption. Which means 1 million USD per year in EU/USA market. Taking into consideration, that MC-21 cost 72 million USD meanwhile A320 cost 110 million (maybe more, it is 2018 price), fuel economy would return initial cost after 38 years!!! Long after that airplane would be scrapped. Fact, that fuel economy is not so important is also supported by fact, that Airbus is offering its A320Neo also with LEAP engines, which has allegedly TSCF in cruise 14g/kN/s, 7,5% worse than PW1100 and yet, customers are buying both variant, probably based on maintenance cost in their area of operation. Much bigger problem for MC-21, PD-14 and whole Russian air industry is, that EU denied certification for MC-21 last year for political reasons. So fuel economy is totally unimportant, when politics is melded into business. Russia can develop hypersonic antigravity UFO and offer it for 1 dollar and still will be unable to sell single unit of that IF USA and its vassals (EU, NATO, Japan, Australia...) decide to not allow them fly in their airspace.
@randomdriver
@randomdriver 2 роки тому
Thanks for the video. Nice to see a little insight of what is happening in Russia. As I only have been working on western jet engines.
@samy7013
@samy7013 Місяць тому
Honestly, this video is one of the best-probably the best-short documentary about civil jet turbofan engines that I’ve ever watched. You packed so much information into it, and explained everything in a way that even a total layperson can understand. Well done!
@kevatut23
@kevatut23 2 роки тому
Appreciate as always, the depth of technical detail you go into. Hard to find anywhere. Thanks BTW. I have worked as a development design engineer all over the planet. The most underrated, at least in the US, are Russian designers and engineers. Propaganda at its best. Of all the tech pros I work with. The smoothest and most critical thinking, not to mention the humor and companionship, comes from my Russian counterparts. Kudos
@pauldobrovolsky7367
@pauldobrovolsky7367 2 роки тому
ха-ха, Чувак! Я русский инженер! Юмор, это всё, что нам осталось, после того, как мы своими руками развалили свою страну! И я молюсь, чтобы США не повторили нашу ошибку...
@pauldobrovolsky7367
@pauldobrovolsky7367 2 роки тому
ha ha, dude! I am a Russian engineer! Humor is all we have left after we destroyed our country with our own hands! And I pray that the US does not repeat our mistake...
@Ksart
@Ksart 2 роки тому
Thank you Kevin!
@jayswarrow1196
@jayswarrow1196 Рік тому
@@pauldobrovolsky7367 А им нечего повторять, мы с ними это делали синхронно: У нас была перестройка - у них "объединенция" (unionising), у нас дефолт - у них топливный кризис , у нас пропала мосавтоиндустрия - у них разорился Детроит. И кстати, свой белый дом они тоже уже "успешно" штурмовали несколько раз. Сейчас там всё тоже самое что и здесь: одноразовые вещи, с шильдой "сделано в КНДР", под знаками бывших премиум-марок. Здешние близоручки все бредят мыслями, что "могучие штаты нас завоёвывают с разных сторон", в то время, когда у них там уже давно у самих гражданская война, в локальных масштабах (осветить которую для них равносильно сдаче в плен, любому из желающих) Словом, не там мы вражину ищем, и не оттуда черпаем надежды. Нас *всех* имеет, даже не третья, а уже пятая сторона.
@barryscott6222
@barryscott6222 6 місяців тому
Anyone who has worked with Russian engineers around the world will concur. 👍
@atatexan
@atatexan 2 роки тому
Excellent,! I used to work at IAE (International Aero Engines AG), maker of the V2500 series turbofans. The engineers told me all I needed to know about how a jet engine works is “suck, squeeze, bang, blow.” Very fine video.
@alexlo7708
@alexlo7708 2 роки тому
What about IAE now? Liquidated?? There are no GE competitor for LEAP and PW gear put it up instead.
@daneagle678
@daneagle678 2 роки тому
@@alexlo7708 IAE was a partnership including, among the others, Pratt & Whitney And Rolls-Royce. Rolls-Royce sold its shares of this partnership about 10 years ago (even if they continued assembling v2500 engines in the Rolls Royce facility in Germany for several more years) and did not design either independently or in partnership new engines of this class and thrust rate, so until now for the new generation engines of this class there was only Pratt & withney and CFM (GE and Snecma partnership)
@HoLeeChit11
@HoLeeChit11 2 роки тому
@cc, if that’s the case there would be a lot females who would be experts in jet engines, I mean, take your Mrs for example.
@justforever96
@justforever96 2 роки тому
Depends on what your job is at the engine factory. But, no, it is not crucial for the guy bolting the head of a small block V8 on to understand how it actually works. Interestingly, suck-squeeze-bang-blow is more typically associated with 4-stroke piston engines, although it is is also perfectly accurate for turbine engines, with the exception that instead of describing the 4 strokes of the piston, it describes the different sections of the engine as you move aft. Although I personally never found it very difficult to understand either piston engines or turbine engines. I don't understand why people seem to consider them so mysterious.
@alainmare8081
@alainmare8081 2 роки тому
Very good and well informed video. Being blacklisted from US, Russian commercial aviation was pushed by western nations to creates it own engine and composite wings from scratch for they long awaiting MC 21. Now we have to see if their production can be equal or better than PW or CFM. A huge challenge by Russians and a potential competitor ???
@cianakril
@cianakril 2 роки тому
A very strange blacklist as PW engines are still being sold to Russia without restrictions. The Russian composite wing is indeed the result of US sanctions but the work on PD-14 engines was started long before that.
@sodinc
@sodinc 2 роки тому
@@cianakril hello, have you heard about protectionism? It isn't done blocking market for your own companies
@goodiezgrigis
@goodiezgrigis 2 роки тому
Composite wing is by design, all that sanctions did was delay in manufacturing by approximately 18 months, until Russians Kick-started their own composite production and manufacturing.
@fouadbenrezzak8398
@fouadbenrezzak8398 Рік тому
Who cares about what they say Russians are brilliant people they made legendary engineering marvelously cool stuff in the ussr era and it helped pushing the engineering work and they are coming back People say they are pushed and the nation is agressive and shit I don't care all i see is how russian make reliable and cheap and easy to maintain mechanical stuff We must admire that
@fouadbenrezzak8398
@fouadbenrezzak8398 Рік тому
@@cianakril yeah
@salipander6570
@salipander6570 2 роки тому
Top notch video! How do you get into so much detail and make it understandable as well? It's a gift...
@splifstar85
@splifstar85 2 роки тому
In Russia we say simplicity is the sister of talent.. I guess this guy is really talented 🤷‍♂️
@Xeno8086
@Xeno8086 2 роки тому
This is a really in depth video regarding a turbofan engine development, and even beyond. Engine development is the hardest thing to pull off even though it may look quite easy yo achieve. To achieve this 100% within Russia is amazing, considering that it can't be crippled by sanctions from USA which can happen anytime. The main issue Russia always had is after sales support. Hopefully that also has been overhauled like the entire manufacturing process.
@chronicawareness9986
@chronicawareness9986 2 роки тому
they used designs from major airliners and called it their own
@aatifrehman4150
@aatifrehman4150 2 роки тому
@@chronicawareness9986 where did u attain this deep knowledge?
@chronicawareness9986
@chronicawareness9986 2 роки тому
@@aatifrehman4150 from putin
@alexandernorman5337
@alexandernorman5337 2 роки тому
@@chronicawareness9986 You might have that backwards. Boeing maintains a design center in Moscow. UAC does not have a design center in the US. That shows who is drawing from who.
@LionPride11241968
@LionPride11241968 2 роки тому
@@alexandernorman5337 Yes, Part of the U.S. plan was to keep Russian Engineers employed instead of designing for Rogue Nations, after the Cold War and Russia's collapse. Now let's say, "Interlectual Property" should legally stay under wraps within Boeing regardless of were the facilities are located. However, we are talking about a 🇷🇺 Socialist Communist country like unto 🇨🇳 China. So, the Not So Free Employees will eventually render unto their government rather faithfully. Unchallenged! Nuf Said!
@mrrolandlawrence
@mrrolandlawrence 2 роки тому
we need the PD18 as well asap. Then the old PS90A series of engines can be replaced. This is needed for the il-78, il-78, tu-204, tu-214, il-96 etc etc. Great video, information not found elsewhere in the west :)
@philgarner2768
@philgarner2768 2 роки тому
Mom ok no I
@EGHG5263
@EGHG5263 2 роки тому
I read the PD-8 has completed its 1st and 2nd core testing, with bench test to follow in 2022. Certification is planned for 2023.
@xalekcey
@xalekcey 2 роки тому
PD-35
@MarketPredator78
@MarketPredator78 2 роки тому
Great explanation of all this engine building area, thanks!
@jackking5567
@jackking5567 2 роки тому
More impressive technology created by Russia. Many people say that Russia is bad at making things but the reality is that Russia is a world leader with many things - titanium being one such thing. It's good to see a country coming together to create this new engine system. It will have many bonus things such as the new gas transmission power plants as shown near the end of the video. Well done everyone!
@trololoev
@trololoev 2 роки тому
hypersonic rockets, nucklear powerplant, many space technology, icebreakers, s-400 and s500, electromagnetic and anto-drones technology - all made in russia only. "bad at making things" my ass.
@omarwilliams1145
@omarwilliams1145 7 місяців тому
Nobody says that but America and its Vassals.
@madhumitadatta6400
@madhumitadatta6400 2 роки тому
Nice video 👍,Please make a video on the MiG 21
@kevinheard8364
@kevinheard8364 2 роки тому
A great job, Mr. Skyships. I really enjoy your videos. Merry Christmas
@trololoev
@trololoev 2 роки тому
USA: we didn't allowed you sell this plane, because it have more that 10% of our parts, including engine and wings. Russia: ok! (make own engine and wings) USA: surprised pickachu face
@jayswarrow1196
@jayswarrow1196 Рік тому
Decline of sales never leads anywhere, but bankrupcy. Market control comes with contracting and a dividend rate. (i.e. let somebody build your stuff, for a "reasonable" price.) Or, to put it simply: if you don't let your girl enjoy herself from time to time - she'll find a guy, who will.
@almazblanco6676
@almazblanco6676 2 роки тому
In 2006, an agreement was signed on the creation of a new engine, which was named PD-14 (a promising engine with a thrust of 14 tons). PD-14 is a fifth generation turbofan engine developed for MC-21-300 aircraft, PD-14A for MC-21-200, PD-14M for MC-21-400. PD-8 engine will be installed on the Be-200, AN-148 and Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft. Therefore, the designers and engineers were faced with the task of creating a unified gas generator, which is the main element of the engine. 16 new technologies were developed for PD-14 by russian designers, engineers and scientists, namely - single-crystal blades for a high-pressure turbine with an advanced cooling system that allows the turbine to operate at temperatures up to 2000 ° K.; hollow wide fan blade made of titanium alloy, thanks to which it was possible to increase the efficiency of the fan stage by 5% in comparison with the fourth-generation turbofan engine PS-90 produced in the USSR in the late 1980s; low-emission combustion chamber made of intermetallic alloy; sound-absorbing structures made of composite materials; ceramic coatings on hot parts; hollow blades of a low-pressure turbine, etc. 20 new materials were created for PD-14 with indisputable advantages: a decrease in specific fuel consumption by 10-15%, a reduction in the life cycle cost by 15-20%; operation of the engine will cost 14-17% cheaper than existing analogues. All of them have been certified according to international standards. New Russian titanium and nickel alloys are used to create the engine. The engine nacelle design consists of 65% of domestic polymer composites, which achieves the required level of sound insulation and reduces engine weight. The technologies used in the production of PD-14 are state secrets and are protected. Therefore, information on PD-14 is largely classified. Example: China would gladly copy production technologies, by analogy with the Su-27. They copied the plane, but they failed to replicate AL-31F engine. The PD-14 project, in addition to creating the engine itself, includes the most important element - the provision of after-sales service. A large amount of work is planned in this area: the creation of a support center with round-the-clock work 365 days a year, the opening of a network of field offices, engine service stations, ensuring the replacement of modules in operation. It is expected that this all together should increase the foreign prospects of the new Russian engine. The state's ability to produce cooled cast blades for a modern turbine aircraft engine is an indicator of the highest level of development in mechanical engineering. There are fewer states capable of producing fifth generation aircraft turbojet engines than countries with nuclear weapons or those that launch satellites into space. Only four countries - Great Britain, Russia, USA and France - possess full-cycle technologies for creating engines.
@Kenny-yl9pc
@Kenny-yl9pc Рік тому
Japan also has the capability to produce jet engines. They did with their P1 and other military and commercial jets like business jet engines. But sure, their capacity is not the same as that of the US or Russia.
@planetaplan440
@planetaplan440 10 місяців тому
@@Kenny-yl9pc Япония закрыла свой региональный самолет. Остались бомбардьер и сухой суперджет.
@amerigo88
@amerigo88 2 роки тому
Engines are much harder to develop than aircraft. A good engine then powers many different models, typically. For historical references, look at aircraft powered by the piston Pratt and Whitney R2800 and GE J-57 turbojet. The R2800 powered the Grumman Hellcat, Republic Thunderbolt, Vought Corsair, Curtiss Commando, Northrop Black Widow, and Martin Marauder among others.
@weofnjieofing
@weofnjieofing 2 роки тому
J57 was an amazing engine! Pure small diameter turbojet...none of this fan business and with water injection.....simply stunning to see and hear!
@amerigo88
@amerigo88 2 роки тому
Oops, Pratt & Whitney, not GE, J57 powered the B-52, Boeing 707, Douglas DC-8, F-100, F-101, F-102, U-2, Martin Canberra, and other aircraft. The GE engine on my mind was the very popular J79 used in the B-58 Hustler, F-4 Phantom II, F-104. F-16, among others.
@arrant638
@arrant638 2 роки тому
There are not so many countries in the world that have competence in engine building. I can only cite as an example - the USA (GE, P&W), Great Britain (Rolls Royce), Russia (Saturn, ODK), France (Safran). China will be on this list in 10 years, but they still have a lot to learn.
@v12kid
@v12kid 2 роки тому
I'm very excited to see the potential for these to make their way onto foreign operators.
@MB-nn3jw
@MB-nn3jw 2 роки тому
It’s unlikely in any real significant numbers, since it seems pretty much all of this engine manufacture and supply is indigenous to Russia. This means issues for foreign users in supply of parts and repairs. Too limited.
@alexandernorman5337
@alexandernorman5337 2 роки тому
I doubt you'll see that until more countries begin designing and building airliners. Turf wars and all. GE, RR, and P&W will guard their market.
@Ktaurus26
@Ktaurus26 2 роки тому
@@MB-nn3jw Most likely former soviet republics maybe China or Southeast Asia
@GreenIsland38
@GreenIsland38 2 роки тому
Looks great, finest engineering. One more international quality product of Russian aero engine technology. Very impressive, in spite of sensless unjustified sanctions.
@JDAbelRN
@JDAbelRN Рік тому
Unjustified? What planet you living on? Russia will suffer and fall behind for decades due to their aggression to Ukraine.
@davem2369
@davem2369 2 роки тому
Thanks for an interesting overview that didn't rely on company advertising hype, nationalism and propaganda to show that the engine is a good product and that the engineers, universities and supply chain made great improvements in their technical capacity.
@oskarelmgren
@oskarelmgren 2 роки тому
Good to have more competition! Great video on the engine!
@studiosnch
@studiosnch 2 роки тому
Sky properly pronouncing "Eyjafjallajökull" is the icing in this двигател cake. Excited to see new engine models from other countries too, to make the market even more diverse for customers. Naturally the next challenge for OAK and ODK is long-term and after-sales support. Thankfully they could probably look at how their Chinese counterparts and fareing on this, and perhaps improve on the matter.
@carlosandleon
@carlosandleon 2 роки тому
is j pronounced like y?
@studiosnch
@studiosnch 2 роки тому
@@carlosandleon here's a pronounciation guide ukposts.info/have/v-deo/oIOgk4R7a2del5s.html
@carlosandleon
@carlosandleon 2 роки тому
@@studiosnch Oh its the ll that is weird. But it's just like an African click it's not that hard at all!
@PavlosPapageorgiou
@PavlosPapageorgiou 2 роки тому
It is wonderful to see and I hope the effort succeeds brilliantly. Already Russian aviation technology is reclaiming the position it should have had since the 90s.
@Ktaurus26
@Ktaurus26 2 роки тому
If the Soviet Union didn’t collapse Russias domestic market would be competing with the west.
@dragancrnogorac3851
@dragancrnogorac3851 2 роки тому
I just stumbled upon video and checked out channel. Looks like bright future is there
@DirkLarien
@DirkLarien 2 роки тому
I like to see this nation getting back into engine development. After all, it used to be in the forefront in this field. And given time it sure might become again. However route of lower bypass designers took is slightly disappointing. I understand the conservative approach at this time, but still hope for bit more experimental approach. And its not like this nation doesn't have some rough gems laying dormant. Best of luck i guess.
@alexlo7708
@alexlo7708 2 роки тому
LEAP is little less bypass to PW gear. But LEAP has less gear parts to PW. The PD is similar to LEAP. Just different in that it cannot reach the same compression ratio to GE LEAP. Likely cause from lower material in turbine blade.
@danielsteger8456
@danielsteger8456 2 роки тому
@Alfred Weber nobody cares.
@eyeofthetiger6002
@eyeofthetiger6002 2 роки тому
It's out of necessity not choice as Russia is under international sanctions at the moment so no more Pratt & Whitney engines for the MC-21.🤣
@alexlo7708
@alexlo7708 2 роки тому
@@eyeofthetiger6002 Russia is under Anglo sanction,not international sanction. By the way, all jet engines are monopolized by the Anglo. However Russian has historical of manufacturing on jet engines since the Soviet era.
@eyeofthetiger6002
@eyeofthetiger6002 2 роки тому
@@alexlo7708 that may be so, but the other countries involved in the aviation high tech sectors like France, Germany, Sweden, Taiwan,Japan,South Korea, etc have all voluntarily withdrawn from the Russian market for fear of US sanctions against them!🤣The engines are only part of the aircraft,as you also need the software and the other high tech bits to make it efficient,safe and reliable.
@dannya1854
@dannya1854 2 роки тому
I love how he compliments the workers and engineers of these objects. He sounds so proud no matter what country or company it is. We need more international-oriented thinking like this.
@N1originalgazza
@N1originalgazza 2 роки тому
Well done Russia! The achievements of Russian technology are positive for world progress! Thanks for the interesting video from Rome.
@user-kw4jw4jd2o
@user-kw4jw4jd2o 2 роки тому
Now a fan with woven carbon fiber is being developed for the new engine ... Since the PD-35 stand (but there is already a gas generator), large-scale models of the new fan are being tested at the PD-14 stand ... so it is likely that a carbon fiber fan will appear on the PD -14 in the near future ...
@klivekussler4496
@klivekussler4496 2 роки тому
Hope that this fantastic project wil go from strengh to strengh......great video....best wishes from UK .
@magellanmax
@magellanmax 2 роки тому
For the MC-21 to succeed, UAC has to build a robust support mechanism to prop up the launch customers. Start out regionally like in Asia, move to Africa & Latin America and the rest will follow. The developing markets need affordable aircraft and can barely afford what Boeing & Airbus offer.
@bloodswettears234
@bloodswettears234 2 роки тому
Russian kit's always impressive 👍
@nicksofialakis1448
@nicksofialakis1448 2 роки тому
Titanium blades are stronger, and Russia has the resources to use it without any dramas.
@robertansley6331
@robertansley6331 2 роки тому
Sky always produces highly professional aviation documentaries! Thank you.
@shonnyNOR
@shonnyNOR 2 роки тому
Excellent presentation, highly informative, and very interesting for a designer of model jet engines.
@Amidat
@Amidat 2 роки тому
Great video and explanation of how it all works
@MrNeptunebob
@MrNeptunebob 2 роки тому
Make a video for when the MC 21 finally gets delivered to an airline.
@JDAbelRN
@JDAbelRN Рік тому
Maybe in ten years😂🤣
@nacuchiname
@nacuchiname 2 роки тому
Impressive Russian Technology
@deusexaethera
@deusexaethera 2 роки тому
I'm guessing the Pratt & Whitney engines aren't being offered anymore. 😕
@Vadyay
@Vadyay 2 роки тому
The video is so good - watched it in English as well as in Russian
@einsesteinpiorosado8071
@einsesteinpiorosado8071 2 роки тому
¡Gracias / Spasiva!.
@paulbehan7321
@paulbehan7321 2 роки тому
Really good learning experience .Thank you
@AgentJayZ
@AgentJayZ 2 роки тому
This is a really good video! 8:39 it's better described as a turbofan. I know that's what you meant to say.
@TurboFEM
@TurboFEM 2 роки тому
This is where language nuances come to play. I am 99% certain that Russians refer to turbofans as two-stream turbojets (emphasizing the distinction between core and bypass airstreams, rather than the fact that there is a fan in front). In fact, they wouldn't even use turbojet - but turbo-reactive engine (and further describe which kind as necessary).
@munawarazad413
@munawarazad413 2 роки тому
I have been regular visitor of Dubai Air Show until 2007. Airbus 380 was displayed there for first time with Emirate painted on it. New engine seams promising, with wider and not too big first turbine blades, like Trident. Looks like it will achieve all the power at competitively lower RPM.
@chef1arjunaidi
@chef1arjunaidi Рік тому
beautifully presented, great photography and pleasant music. Russian aero technology at its best
@cccc9911
@cccc9911 2 роки тому
I don't cheer for Russia very often. But since Im addicted to commercial aviation, I would love nothing more than to see this plane succeed. (Wish it had a yolk on each side instead of sidesticks)
@eotlati1763
@eotlati1763 2 роки тому
As always nice video !!
@TJ-USMC
@TJ-USMC Рік тому
You make some Great and Enjoyable Videos - Thank-you !!!
@efeocampo
@efeocampo 2 роки тому
Brilliant russian engineers are vital, among many others, to keep their country as a leader in military technology to protect it from agressions like currently from NATO... Even if Russia's military budget is only 10% of the US' one... Amazing
@evaluateanalysis7974
@evaluateanalysis7974 2 роки тому
Lol!
@efeocampo
@efeocampo 2 роки тому
@@evaluateanalysis7974 Sure ! 🤣 It's a laughing matter that Russia, with only 10% of US military budget, is capable of producing far, far better and techological leader weapons, like hypersonic missiles, whereas US has failed its 3rd try... 😂
@evaluateanalysis7974
@evaluateanalysis7974 2 роки тому
@@efeocampo I was laughing at "agressions like currently from NATO". Countries choose to join NATO rather than any Russian bloc. A bit like when people were trying to escape the Soviet Union.
@efeocampo
@efeocampo 2 роки тому
@@evaluateanalysis7974 Let me recommend you to study at least a little bit of Russia's history, beginning with Napoleon, fast forward to Hitler and then perhaps you would be able to understand that this time, under the 'umbrella' of a so-called NATO 'organization' (justifiably created to defend western europe against monstruous USSR and its nemesis, the Warsaw Pact) western european countries, armed to the teeth (warplanes, missiles, combat helicopters, tanks, artillery and so forth, all with advanced technology) are getting very close to russian borders, and therefore, for russian citizens, well aware of Napoleon & Hitler memories of terrible suffering, with millions and millions of lives lost in combat to force them to go back, having such an army at its gates is NO LAUGHING MATTER !!! If you continue studying history, now last decades, you will learn USSR collapsed (dissolved itself into 12 republics) and a new NON COMMUNIST Russia emerged, very weak at the beginning, but now again a powerful and RESPECTFUL country which abide to ALL its signatures in Treaties like the Minsk Protocols (2014), or the ICBM with the US, which in line with its lack of moral principles, abandon signed treaties just when they do not suit them... You SHOULD know Russia is today as different as Germany is fron Hitler's era... But obviously you remain stuck with the clichés with which the CIA so successfully brainwashed you... Russian (and chinese) citizens, no longer living under a communist regime, are totally FREE to travel wherever they wish, or foreigners inside their territories... Please go un update yourself on today's geopolitical realities... You will realize, for instance, that the United States is nowadays a decadent, immoral and drug-addicted Empire...
@evaluateanalysis7974
@evaluateanalysis7974 2 роки тому
@@efeocampo "CIA so successfully brainwashed you... " Are you a conspiracy theorist? "Russia is today as different as Germany is fron Hitler's era... " Really? It's run by a fascist who attempts to kill his opponents. "western european countries...are getting very close to russian borders" In contrast to Russia which has already invaded Ukraine. Unless we stand up to this fascist bully he will invade Eastern Europe. Who does he remind you of?
@gamarrathcarlos8753
@gamarrathcarlos8753 Рік тому
Really plaisant of watching your documentery
@Luggr
@Luggr 2 роки тому
Great job Russia 🇷🇺 congratulations
@christophggcyrus6861
@christophggcyrus6861 4 місяці тому
Very well made and a lot of information - Congratulations and keep on the good work!!
@10lauset
@10lauset 2 роки тому
Wonderful presentation of a successful example of import substituation displaying necessity is the mother of invention taking advantage of modern technology. ... Cheers...
@JerjerB
@JerjerB 2 роки тому
Great video! 👍
@BossBossBoss1020
@BossBossBoss1020 2 роки тому
фантастическая по объёму работа, молодцы!
@Raowhs23
@Raowhs23 2 роки тому
cool video. more competition will lead to better more efficient engines
@ramonmedina1974
@ramonmedina1974 2 роки тому
Skyships is a very cool and personable channel! Well done!
@njm3211
@njm3211 2 роки тому
Hopefully they will be able to compete against the duopoly, certainly in the home market.
@kurtwollermann2210
@kurtwollermann2210 2 роки тому
most impressive
@BrickOil-dh8ri
@BrickOil-dh8ri 6 місяців тому
Не думал, что у иностранцев такой интерес к нашим разработкам
@karlbark
@karlbark 11 місяців тому
Amazing pronounciation of Eyjafjallajökull ! Cheers from Iceland 🇮🇸
@gusmanovr
@gusmanovr Рік тому
Great video!
@gunnarsundman6828
@gunnarsundman6828 2 роки тому
Very informative and funny, mostly because of You. 8.5 that's means PD14 is a engine of future. Thank You so much. May I ask a specialist like You? What do You think about that Finland did order 64 F35.
@Melkor54
@Melkor54 Рік тому
f35's are junk, tons of structural issues already
@BlueDinnie
@BlueDinnie 2 роки тому
Amazing thank you ❤️ 💪🏿
@fouadbenrezzak8398
@fouadbenrezzak8398 Рік тому
Good work Russia you are bringing back the engineering Marvel's of ussr its difficult to build a new engine with no year's of experience good work
@janwolski4653
@janwolski4653 2 роки тому
I'm really hoping for Russian plane industry to stand up. I love old ils and antonovs and seeing new planes in boeing-airbus duapol.
ПД-14 - главный двигатель России
29:18
SkyShips
Переглядів 3,5 млн
The Insane Engineering of the GEnX
29:28
Real Engineering
Переглядів 4,7 млн
Китайка и Хеликоптер😂😆
00:18
KITAYKA
Переглядів 1,2 млн
Não pode Comprar Tudo 5
00:29
DUDU e CAROL
Переглядів 64 млн
Irkut MC-21 - The Aircraft That Can CHANGE The Way We Travel
26:27
Science for everyone
Переглядів 282 тис.
Top 5: The World's Largest Jet Engine Manufacturers
9:35
Long Haul by Simple Flying
Переглядів 73 тис.
Comparison of Russian Irkut MC-21vs Airbus A320neo
8:34
Jetline Marvel
Переглядів 126 тис.
Russia And China’s Plan To Compete Against Airbus And Boeing
15:53
Long Haul by Simple Flying
Переглядів 346 тис.
MiG-25 - the king of interceptors
44:21
Skyships Eng
Переглядів 362 тис.
Piston and Turboprop engines | What is the difference?
21:22
Skyships Eng
Переглядів 913 тис.
WHY didn't he LISTEN?? | Korean Air Cargo 8509
27:52
Green Dot Aviation
Переглядів 127 тис.
The Pratt & Whitney J58 - The Engine of the SR-71 Blackbird
24:49
Геймер с самым быстрым интернетом
1:00
ЖЕЛЕЗНЫЙ КОРОЛЬ
Переглядів 389 тис.